Human–Computer Interaction Series William Sims Bainbridge Family History Digital Libraries – Human Computer Interaction Series Editors-in-chief Desney Tan Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA Jean Vanderdonckt Louvain School of Management, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium The Human-Computer Interaction Series, launched in 2004, publishes books that advancethescienceandtechnologyofdevelopingsystemswhichareeffectiveand satisfying for people in a wide variety of contexts. Titles focus on theoretical perspectives (such as formal approaches drawn from a variety of behavioural sciences), practical approaches (such as techniques for effectively integrating user needsinsystemdevelopment),andsocialissues(suchasthedeterminantsofutility, usability and acceptability). HCI is a multidisciplinary field and focuses on the human aspects in the development of computer technology. As technology becomes increasingly more pervasivetheneedtotakeahuman-centredapproachinthedesignanddevelopment of computer-based systems becomes ever more important. Titles published within the Human–Computer Interaction Series are included in ThomsonReuters’BookCitationIndex,TheDBLPComputerScienceBibliography and The HCI Bibliography. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6033 William Sims Bainbridge Family History Digital Libraries 123 William Sims Bainbridge Independent historian Chantilly, VA, USA ISSN 1571-5035 ISSN 2524-4477 (electronic) Human–Computer Interaction Series ISBN978-3-030-01062-1 ISBN978-3-030-01063-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01063-8 LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2018956268 ©SpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG2018 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission orinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilar methodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinor for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Contents 1 Connections Between Family Data and Wider Meanings . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 The Digital Library Initiative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2 An Historical Trapper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3 Connections to Nature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.4 A Professional Genealogist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 1.5 Applying Technology to Human History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2 Documenting and Digitally Presenting Family Photographs . . . . . . 31 2.1 Accuracy and Completeness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 2.2 Identifying the Subject . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.3 The HTML Approach to Documentation and Connection . . . . . 42 2.4 Adapting Conventional Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2.5 The Death of Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3 Evolution from Home Movies to Videos in Social Media . . . . . . . . 67 3.1 Documenting Old Home Movie Travelogues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.2 Understanding Home Movies that Did Not Involve Oneself . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 3.3 Contemporary Videos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 3.4 Innovative Video Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 3.5 The Game of Life. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 3.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 v vi Contents 4 Producing Coherent Narratives from Family Diaries and Memoirs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 4.1 Expansion of Narratives from Diaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 4.2 Controversy About an Explorer’s Diary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 4.3 The Mysterious Plane Crash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.4 Correspondence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 4.5 Episodic Memories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 4.6 A Family Narrative Example. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 4.7 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5 Exploratory Oral History Interviews of Family Members. . . . . . . . 135 5.1 The History of Interviewing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 5.2 Finding the Appropriate Conceptual Framework. . . . . . . . . . . . 141 5.3 Open-Ended Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 5.4 The Process of Interviewing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 5.5 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 6 Information Technologies for Cultivating Domestic Artifacts . . . . . 165 6.1 Documenting Artifacts In Situ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 6.2 A Brief In Situ Example of Preservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 6.3 Toys, Play, and Reality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 6.4 Scanning and Searching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 6.5 Scanning Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 6.6 Free Camera Functional Preservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 6.7 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 7 Virtual World Representation of Family Homes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 7.1 Gramercy Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 7.2 Bailiwick in 3-D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 7.3 Historic Virtual Reality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 7.4 Historical Virtual Worlds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 7.5 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 8 Applications of Online Censuses and Other Official Records . . . . . 233 8.1 Human Factors in Family History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 8.2 Sociology of the Census . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 8.3 Personal Reflections on Legal Records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 8.4 Medical Records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 8.5 Church Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 8.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 Contents vii 9 Recording Contemporary Family History Through Social Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 9.1 Creating a Family Archive in Facebook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 9.2 The Content of a Family History Archive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 9.3 Seeking Green Hollow Farm in Facebook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 9.4 A Family of Homes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 9.5 Wikis of Fictional Families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 9.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 10 Integration of Family Records into Community History. . . . . . . . . 301 10.1 The Valley of the Shadow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 10.2 The Greenwich History Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309 10.3 Durability of Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320 10.4 Teaching a Profession. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 10.5 Conclusion: A Research Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 Chapter 1 Connections Between Family Data and Wider Meanings Abstract Popularcomputertechnologiesmaybeusedeffectivelytodaytoassem- blehistoricaldataaboutfamiliesintoaccurateandmeaningfulnarratives,whether by family members themselves or by professional historians. A major technology developmenteffortwastheDigitalLibraryInitiativeofthe1990s,ledbytheNational Science Foundation, that set the stage for several aspects of current family his- tory archiving. To provide contrast with this vast collective effort, and prepare for consideration of family data challenges, the distinctive life of trapper and utopian Sewell Newhouse (1806–1888) is summarized, highlighting the fact that human fameiscapriciousandcandistorthistoricalrecords.Thenextexample ofconnec- tionsbetweenkindsofdataandhumanmeanings,oneactivityofaruralfamilyin theearly1940s,linkstogeneralprinciplesoftherelationshipbetweenhumansand nature, and between individuals and world events. Consideration of the career of genealogistLouisEffinghamdeForest(1891–1952)suggestshowtheprofessionof familyhistorianmayevolve,whileraisingquestionsabouthowfamiliesmayhandle uncomfortablefactsthatmaybediscovered.Theconclusioncombinesphotographs andcensusdatatoshowhowthestructureofanuclearfamilymaybedelineatedfor theperiod1900–1940. Thegreatpopularityofonlinegenealogicalservices,despitetheirseverelimitations, suggeststhatfamilyhistoryworkhasgreatpotentialforthefuture,butonlyifeffi- cientandeffectivemethodscanbedevelopedtocollectinformationaboutourpast and assemble the fragments into accurate and meaningful narratives. Professional genealogistshaveexistedforoveracentury,andrecentlyanewprofessionofdigital curator has emerged (Botticelli et al. 2011). Defined by Wikipedia, “Digital cura- tion is the selection, preservation, maintenance, collection and archiving of digital assets…Successfuldigitalcurationwillmitigatedigitalobsolescence,keepingthe informationaccessibletousersindefinitely.”1 Yetinmostcasesmuchofthehistor- icalworkmustbedonebyfamilymembersthemselves,whichmeansthattheywill needinstructiononhowtofindrelevantantiqueinformation,howtoassembleand preserve the information describing their own lives, and how to handle the neces- 1en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_curation. ©SpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG2018 1 W.S.Bainbridge,FamilyHistoryDigitalLibraries,Human–Computer InteractionSeries,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01063-8_1 2 1 ConnectionsBetweenFamilyDataandWiderMeanings sary information technology tools. At the same time, history teachers will need to addcoursesaboutfamilyhistorytotheircurricula,recognizingthattheirscholarly discipline long ago abandoned its obsession with “kings and battles,” and the full diversityofhumanitydeservestoberemembered. Thisbookprovidesacomprehensivebackground,forthefullrangeofinformation typesandinformationtechnologies,inthecontextnotonlyoftraditionalhistorical scholarship but also of computer science and social science. Family histories are bothintimateandcosmopolitan,connectingoneselftothewiderworld,linkingfrom todaytobothyesterdayandtomorrow.Iwouldnothavebeenabletowritethisbook, hadInotbelongedtoafamilythatcaredverymuchaboutitsownhistory,orhadI notinheritedtwocenturiesoffamilydocuments,photographscovering17decades, and home movies and videos covering 9 decades. While trained in sociology, my dissertationandseverallaterworkswerehistoricalstudies,andforaquartercentury I have worked at the intersection of social and computer sciences at the National ScienceFoundation. 1.1 TheDigital LibraryInitiative In 1994, the National Science Foundation made six major investments in devel- oping new technologies, which could today contribute to family history systems, here listed in Table 1.1. Called the Digital Library Initiative (DLI), this ambitious activitycontinuedaboutadecade,goingthroughtwoadditionalstages,thesecond focusedonsmallerbutmorediversegrants,thenthethirdstageaimedtopartnerwith othernations,recognizingthatbydefinitiontheWorldWideWebwasinternational (Griffiths2004;Lesk2012).Ihadhopedtherewouldbeafourthstage,developing digitallibrarytechnologiessuitableforusebyfamiliesandsmallorganizations,but thatneverhappened.AmemberoftheDLIteam,Irepresentedthesocialsciences, and the six grants in Table 1.1 were managed by my computer science colleague, StephenGriffin. These grants were made in September 1994, for a total of $26,842,849, which wasabout$44,000,000in2017dollars,accordingtotheinflationcalculatorplaced online by the US government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.2 Today, anyone who wants to can go to the online NSF grants abstract search system to read the orig- inal abstracts describing the grants, and take a few simple steps to find additional information.3 Forexample,theone-paragraphabstractoftheMichigangrantsays: “Thisprojectconductsresearchthatwillleadtotheimplementationanddeployment of a digital library testbed and environment of textual, video, still image, and data sets,frombothprimaryandsecondaryinformationsuppliers.Theprojectwillmake availablecapabilitiesandservicestoalargenumberofusersatmultiplelocations. Thebasicapproachisoneofself-assemblingagentbasedfederationofdistributed 2data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl,accessedOctober2017. 3www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/advancedSearch.jsp.