Table Of Content

INDEX to FAMILY COURT REVIEW Volume 41 Number 1 (January 2003) pp. 1-124 Number 2 (April 2003) pp. 125-280 Number 3 (July 2003) pp. 281-420 Number 4 (October 2003) pp. 421-608 Authors: AFCC TASK FORCE ON PARENTING COORDINATION, "Parenting Crxirdination: Implimentation Issues [Special Report],” 533. BAHROO, BHAGWAN A., "Pedophilia: Psychiatric Insights,” 497. BAILEY, MARTHA, “The Corptrral Punishment Debate in Canada,” 508. BARTEAU, BETTY. THOMAS A. FEE. JAY FOLBERG, LADEANA GAMBLE. ALASTAIR NICHOLSON, SUSAN SNOW, and JOHN VAN DUZER. "Tributes to Ann Milne.” 133. BATSEDIS, OLGA, "Embryo Adoption: A Science Fiction or an Alternative to Traditional Adoption?” [Student Note], 565. BLAKEY, JOAN, see Courtney, M. E. BLEDSOE. LINDA K.. see Yankeelov, P. A. BRAVER. SANFORD L., see Fabricius, W. V. BROWN. JOSEPH, see Yankeelov, P. A. BROWN, LAURA S., “ ‘Relationships More Enduring': Implications of the Tmxel Decision for Lesbian and Gay Families,” 60. BROWN, THEA, "Fathers and Child Abuse Allegations in the Context of Parental Separation and Divorce.” 367. CAMBRON. MARY LOU. see Yankeelov, P. A. CHILL. PAUL. "Burden of Prixrf Begone: The Pernicious Effect of Emergency Removal in Child Protective Pro¬ ceedings,” 457. COURTNEY, MARK E., and JOAN BLAKEY, "Examination of the impact of Increased Court Review on Perma¬ nency Outcomes for Abused and Neglected Children.” 471. DAVIS. LANAE. see Pearson, J. DENEAU, KINDRA. see Fabricius. W. V. FABRICIUS, WILLIAM V., and SANFORD L. BRAVER. “Non-Child Support Expenditures on Children by Non- residential Divorced Fathers: Results of a Study,” 321. FABRICIUS, WILLIAM V., SANFORD L. BRAVER, and KINDRA DENEAU, "Divorced Parents' Financial Sup- ptrrt of Their Children's College Expenses,” 224. FEE. THOMAS A., see Barteau. B. n.ATTERS, NANCY A., "Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court's Settlement Conference Approach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters.” 182. FOLBERG. JAY, see Barteau. B. FOLEY, THOMAS, "Extending Comity to Foreign Decrees in International Custody Disputes Between Parents in the United States and Islamic Nations” [Student Note], 257. FREEMAN, MARSHA B.. “Privati/ation of Child Protective Services: Getting the Lion Back in the Cage?" 449. FAMILY COURT REVIEW. Vol. 41 No. X, Month 2(K).1 60.V6()6 O 2(K).V Association of Family and Conciliation Courts 603 f 6()4 FAMILY COURT REVIEW GADSDEN. VIVIAN L.. STANTON E. F. WORTHAM, and HERBERT M. TURNER III. "Situated Identities of Young. African American Fathers in Low-Income Urban Settings: Perspectives on Home, Street, and the Systemm" 381. GAMBLE, LADEANA. see Barteau, B. GIANNINI. FRANCIS D.. see McMahon, T. J. GOTTLIEB, MICHAEL C., "Intrixluction to the Special Issue.” 8. HOWE, WILLIAM J. III. “Lynn Mather, Craig McEwen, and Richard J. Maiman's Divorce Lawyers at Work: Vari¬ eties of Professionalism and Practice" (The BiKikshelf). 279. HYNAN. DANIEL J., "Parent-Child Observations in CusUxiy Evaluations.” 214. INSABELLA. GLENDESSA M.. TAMRA WILLIAMS, and MARSHA KLINE PRUETT, "Individual and Coparenting Differences Between Divorcing and Unmarried Fathers: Implications for Family Court Services.” 290. LIEBMANN, THEODOR S.. “Julia Fionda's U-fta! Concepts of Childhood" [The BookshelH, 277. MARTINDALE. DAVID A.. "Troxel v. Granville: A Nonjusticiable Dispute.” 88. MEDOFF. DAVID. "The Scientific Basis of Psychological Testing: Considerations Following Daubert, Kumho, and Joiner.” 199. MENNO, JAMES V.. "View From the Bench.” .362. McMAHON, THOMAS J., and FRANCIS D. GIANNINI. “Substance-Abusing Fathers in Family Court: Moving from Popular Stereotypes to Therapeutic Jurisprudence,” 337. MILNE. ANN L.. see Salem. P. MITCHELL. DAVID B.. “Building a Multidisciplinary, Collaborative Child Protection System: The Challenge to Law Sch(H)ls.” 432. MOSKOWITZ. GAI.IT, "The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction and the Grave Risk of Harm Ex¬ ception: Recent Decisions and Their Implications on Children From Nations in Political Turmoil" [Student Note). .SSO. NICHOLSON. ALASTAIR. see Barteau. B. NOWLING. MELANIE MARGARIDA. "Protecting Children Who Witness Domestic Violence: Is Nicholson v. Williams an Adequate Response?” [Student Note[, 517. O'CONNELL. MARY E.. "The Riddle of Troxel: Is Grandma the State?” 77. OLSON, KELl.Y BROWE. “Lessons Learned From Child Protection Mediation Program: If At First You Succeed and Then You Dtin’t...” 480. PEARSON, JESSICA, and LANAE DAVIS. "Serving Fathers Who Leave Prison,” .307. PRUETT, KYLE D.. see Pruett. M. K. PRUETT, MARSHA KLINE, and KYLE D. PRUETT, "Introduction to the Special Issue." 287. PRUETT. MARSHA KLINE, see Insabella. G. M. RAMSEY, SARAH H., "Bette L. Bottoms. Margaret Bull Kovera. and Bradley D. McAuliff’s Children. Social Sci¬ ence and the Law" [The B(H)kshein. 276. RAMSEY, SARAH H.. "Guest Editorial.” 428. RIGGS. SHELLEY A., "Response to Troxel v. Granville: Implications of Attachment Theory for Judicial Decisions Regarding Custody and Third-Party Visitation,” .39. ROBERTS. KRISTINE L.. “State Supreme Court Applications of Troxel u Granville and the Courts' Reluctance to Declare Grandparent Visitation Statutes Unconstitutional,” 14. ROSATO. JENNIFER L.. “Bringing the Outside In: Recipes for Integrating Child Protection Policy and Practice Into Our Classrmtms," 439. ROWSELL. JAMIE. "Stayin’ Alive: Postmortem Reproduction and Inheritance Rights” [Student Note[, 4(K). SAINL MICHAEL A.. “A. M. Hetherington and H. Kelly’s For Better or for Worve; Divorce Reconsidered" [The Bookshein.416. SALEM. PETER, and ANN L. MILNE. "The AssiKiation of Family and Conciliation Courts: Forty Years of Lead¬ ership and lnterdi.sciplinary Collaboration." 147. SCHEPARD. ANDREW. “Editorial Notes.” 5. 129, 285, 425. SHUMAN. DANIEL W.. "Tro.xel v. Granville and the Boundaries of Therapeutic Jurisprudence,” 67. SNOW. SUSAN, see Barteau. B, STAHL. PHILIP M.. "G. Andrew Benjamin and Jackie Gollan’s Family Evaluation in Custody Litigation: Re¬ ducing Risks of Ethical Infractions and Malpractice" [The Bwtkshelf], 497. THOMPSON, ROLLIE. "The Evolution of Modern Canadian Family Law PriK'edure: The End of The Adversary System? Or Just the End of the Trial?” 155. TOWNSEND, SHARON S., “FatherhmKl: A Judicial Perspective: Unmarried Fathers and the Changing Role of the Family Court," 354. INDEX 605 TURNER. HERBERT M. Ill, Gadsden. V. L. TYE. M ARCUS C., "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Parents: Special Considerations for the Custody and Adoption Evaluator,” 92. VAN DUZER, JOHN, see Barteau, B. VASQUEZ, MELBA J. T, “Tni.xel v. Granville'. Impact on Ethnic Minority Families,” 54. WALTER, BETSY J., "Lesbian Mediation: Resolving CusUxly and Visitation Disputes When Couples End Their Relationships” [Student Note), 104. WHITE, HEIDI A., "Refusing to Blame the Victim for the Aftermath of Domestic Violence: Nicholson v. Williams Is a Step in the Right Direction” [Student Note[, 527. WILLIAMS, TAMRA, see Insabella. G. M. WORTHAM, STANTON E. E, see Gadsden, V. L. YANKEELOV, PAMELA A., LINDA K. BLEDSOE, JOSEPH BROWN, and MARY LOU CAMBRON, "Transi¬ tion or Not? A Theory-Based Quantitative Evaluation of Families in Transition,” 242. Articles: "The Assrx’iation of Family and Conciliation Courts: Forty Years of Leadership and Interdisciplinary Collabora¬ tion.” Salem and Milne, 147. "Bringing the Outside In: Recipes for Integrating Child Protection Policy and Practice Into Our Classrooms,” Rosato, 4.J9. "Building a Multidisciplinary, Collaborative Child Protection System: The Challenge to Law Schools,” Mitchell, 4.J2. "Burden of Prix)f Begone: The Pernicious Effect of Emergency Removal in Child Protective Proceedings,” Chill, 457. "The Corporal Punishment Debate in Canada,” Bailey, 508. "Divorced Parents’ Financial Support of Their Children's College Expenses,” Fabricius et al., 224. "Editorial Notes,” Schepard. 5. 129, 285,425. "The Evolution of Modern Canadian Family Law PrtKedure: The End of the Adversary System? Or Just the End of the Trial?” Thompson. 155. "Examination of the Impact of Increased Court Review on Permanency Outcomes for Abused and Neglected Children,” Courtney and Blakey, 471. "Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court’s Settlement Conference Appn)ach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters,” Flatters, 182. "Fatherhwxl: A Judicial Perspective: Unmarried Fathers and the Changing Role of the Family Court,” Townsend, 354. “Fathers and Child Abuse Allegations in the Context of Parental Separation and Divorce.” Brown. 367. "Guest Editorial Notes,” Ramsey, 428. “Individual and Coparenting Differences Between Divorcing and Unmarried Fathers: Implications for Family Court Services,” Insabella et al.. 290. “Intrcxluction to the Special Is.sue,” Gottlieb, 8. "Introduction to the Special Issue.” Pruett and Pruett. 287. "Lesbian. Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Parents: Special Considerations for the Custody and Adoption Evalua¬ tor,” Tye, 92. "Lessons Learned From a Child Protection Mediation Program: If At First You Succeed and Then You Don’t...,” Olson. 480. "Non-Child Supptrrt Expenditures on Children by Nonresidential Divorced Fathers: Results of a Study,” Fabricius and Braver, 321. "Parent-Child Observations in Cu.sUxly Evaluations,” Hynan, 214. "Pedophilia: Psychiatric Insights.” Bahrix), 497. "Privatization of Child Protective Services: Getting the Lion Back in the Cage?" Freeman, 449. “ ’Relationships More Enduring’: Implications of the Tm.xel Decision for Lesbian and Gay Families,” Brown, 60. "Resprinse to Tro.xel r. Granville: Implications of Attachment Theory for Judicial Decisions Regarding CusUxly and Third-Party Visitation.” Riggs, 39. "The Riddle of Tm.xel: Is Grandma the State?” O’Connell, 77. "The Scientific Basis of Psychological Testing: Considerations Following Daubert. Kumho, and Joiner,” Medoff, 199. "Serving Fathers Who Leave Prison,” Pearson and Davis, 307. 1 6()6 FAMI1,Y COURT REVIEW "Situated Identities of Young, African American Fathers in Low-Income Urban Settings: Perspectives on Home. Street, and the Systemm" Gadsden et al.. .^81, “State Supreme Court Applications of Tmxel v. Granville and the Courts' Reluctance to Declare Grandparent Visita¬ tion Statutes Unconstitutional," Roberts, 14. “Substance-Abusing Fathers in Family Court: Moving from Popular Stereotypes to Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” McMahon and Giannini, 337. “Transition or Not? A Theory-Based Quantitative Evaluation of Families in Transition," Yankeelov et al., 242. “Tributes to Ann Milne,” Barteau et al.. 133. “Traxel v. Granville and the Boundaries of Therapeutic Jurisprudence," Shuman, 67. “Tmxel v. Granville: A Nonjusticiable Dispute." Martindale. 88. “Tmxel v. Granville: Impact on Ethnic Minority Families.” Vasqueit. 54. "View from the Bench," Menno. 362. The Bmfkshelf: “A. M. Hetherington and H. Kelly’s For Better or for Worse: Divoree Reconsidered,” Saini, 416. “Bette L. Bottoms. Margaret Bull Kovera. and Bradley D. McAuliffs Children. Social Science and the Law,” Ramsey, 276. “G. Andrew Benjamin and Jackie Gollan's Family Evaluation in Custody Litigation: Reducing Risks of Ethical In¬ fractions and Malpractice.” Stahl. 497. “Julia Eionda's Le^al Concepts of Childhood'.' Liebmann. 277. “Lynn Mather, Craig McEwen. and Richard J. Maiman's Divone Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Pmfessionalism and Practice,” Howe. 279. Special Report: “Parenting Ctxtrdination: Implementation Issues," AFCC Task Force on Parenting Cixirdination. 533. Student Notes: “Embryo Adoption: A .Science Fiction or an Alternative to Traditional Adoption?" Batsedis, 565. “Extending Comity to Foreign Decrees in International Custody Disputes Between Parents in the United States and Islamic Nations." Foley, 257. “The Hague Convention on International Child Ahduction and the Grave Risk of Harm Exception: Recent Deci¬ sions and Their Implications on Children from Nations in Political Turmoil,” Moskowit/, 580. “l-esbian Mediation: Resolving CusUxly and Visitation Disputes When Couples End Their Relationships," Walter, KM. “Protecting Children Who Witness Domestic Violence: Is Nicholson v. Williams an Adequate Response'.^’ Nowling, 517. “Refusing to Blame the Victim for Aftermath of Domestic Violence: Nicholson v. Williams Is a Step in the Right Di¬ rection." White. 527. “.Stayin' Alive: Postmortem Reproduction and Inheritance Rights,” Rowsell. 4(K).