Ezra Pound M i c h a e l and thE CarEEr of co y l e R o x a n a ModErn CritiCisM and PRe d a Ezra Pound and the Career of Modern Criticism CCooyyllee..iinndddd ii 88//55//22001188 11::2299::5522 PPMM Studies in American Literature and Culture: Literary Criticism in Perspective Brian Yothers, Series Editor (El Paso, Texas) About Literary Criticism in Perspective Books in the series Literary Criticism in Perspective trace liter- ary scholarship and criticism on major and neglected writers alike, or on a single major work, a group of writers, a liter- ary school or movement. In so doing the authors—authori- ties on the topic in question who are also well-versed in the principles and history of literary criticism—address a reader- ship consisting of scholars, students of literature at the gradu- ate and undergraduate level, and the general reader. One of the primary purposes of the series is to illuminate the nature of literary criticism itself, to gauge the influence of social and historic currents on aesthetic judgments once thought objec- tive and normative. CCooyyllee..iinndddd iiii 88//55//22001188 11::3311::3377 PPMM Ezra Pound and the Career of Modern Criticism Professional Attention Michael Coyle and Roxana Preda Rochester, New York CCooyyllee..iinndddd iiiiii 88//55//22001188 11::3311::3377 PPMM Copyright © 2018 Michael Coyle and Roxana Preda All Rights Reserved. Except as permitted under current legislation, no part of this work may be photocopied, stored in a retrieval system, published, performed in public, adapted, broadcast, transmitted, recorded, or reproduced in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. First published 2018 by Camden House Camden House is an imprint of Boydell & Brewer Inc. 668 Mt. Hope Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620, USA www.camden-house.com and of Boydell & Brewer Limited PO Box 9, Woodbridge, Suffolk IP12 3DF, UK www.boydellandbrewer.com ISBN-13: 978-1-57113-192-8 ISBN-10: 1-57113-192-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Coyle, Michael, 1957– author. | Preda, Roxana, 1959– author. Title: Ezra Pound and the career of modern criticism : professional attention / Michael Coyle and Roxana Preda. Description: Rochester, New York : Camden House, 2018. | Series: Stud- ies in American literature and culture: Literary criticism in perspective | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018019945| ISBN 9781571131928 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 1571131922 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Pound, Ezra, 1885–1972—Criticism and interpretation. | Criticism—United States—History—20th century. Classification: LCC PS3531.O82 Z62368 218 | DDC 811/.52—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018019945 This publication is printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. CCooyyllee..iinndddd iivv 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2266 PPMM Gone now forever that heroic age When roaring Ezra stormed our country stage! His stride was long, his shout was long and high, Flame rolled in all directions from each eye; And if his fist spun round and clapped his ear, It mattered little, since the bent was clear. He made our grandsires slubber in their seats, Time-serving editors hunt safe retreats; And when the lion turned away and slept, His enervated victims softly wept; Each fool was breathless not to make a sound, Sweating with terror lest he awaken Pound. —Yvor Winters, “The Critiad” CCooyyllee..iinndddd vv 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2266 PPMM CCooyyllee..iinndddd vvii 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2266 PPMM Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xv 1: From Wabash to Washington, 1907–1947 1 2: A Prize Fight and Institutionalization, 1948–1951 23 3: Kenner, Watts, and Professional Attention, 1951–1961 47 4: Sailing after Knowledge, 1962–1971 76 5: The Pound Era and Its Monumental Companion, 1971–1985 95 6: Pound Studies and the Postmodern Turn, 1980–1990 107 7: Reading Pound in the New Millennium, 1990–2016 133 8: The Many Lives of Ezra Pound: Biographies and Memoirs, 1960–2015 160 9: Educating the World: Periodicals on Ezra Pound, 1954–2017 181 Conclusion 207 Chronology of the Bollingen Controversy 213 Works Cited 219 Index 245 CCooyyllee..iinndddd vviiii 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2266 PPMM CCooyyllee..iinndddd vviiiiii 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2277 PPMM Preface The historical relevance of literature is not based on an organi- zation of literary works which is established post factum, but on the reader’s past experience of the “literary data.” —Hans Robert Jauss, “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory” THE RECEPTION HISTORY of Ezra Pound arguably entails the history of academic criticism itself. To make that argument is not necessarily to reaffirm Hugh Kenner’s vision of “the Pound era,” but rather to recog- nize that, after the Second World War, Pound’s work became the decisive battleground upon which the new critics initially established their domi- nance, and over which subsequently swept successive forms of feminist and poststructuralist theory.1 Pound’s work was and remains a challenge to all critical models. At once inviting and resisting exegesis, The Cantos in particular has been for three quarters of a century the ultimate prov- ing ground. By the second decade of the twenty-first century, questions of canonicity came to seem less urgent, but Pound’s work continues to attract new approaches, even if these no longer accelerate more general professional anxieties and concerns. In other words, without ever having achieved unchallenged canonical status, Pound’s work has long been cen- tral to questions of what disciplinarity in English might mean. Professional attention, in the context of Anglo-American departments of English, is shaped and regulated by the dynamic rules of disciplinar- ity. These rules have changed over time, are changing still, and doubtless should change with the evolving role of academic writing and authority in the culture at large. But at any particular moment rules and conven- tions—both explicit codes and regulations like double-blind referees—as well as implicit conventions about fairness or avoiding merely ad homi- nem attacks—govern critical behavior. Academic communities are formed with inner dissensions and agreements—the strength lies in numbers and in the endless revision of accepted and shared knowledge. Moreover, such expectations govern not just what is said, and how, but also where such work is suitably published. This much is evident in the straightforward instructions of the series in which this volume participates, “Literary Crit- icism in Perspective,” to its authors: “Literary criticism” as used here means scholarly literary analyses written by academics, professional reviewers or writers and published CCooyyllee..iinndddd iixx 88//55//22001188 11::3322::2277 PPMM