Exploring the Intersection between Cultural Competency and Managed Behavioral Health Care Policy Implications for State and County MentalHealth Agencies December, 1997 National Technical Assistance Centerfor State Mental Health Planning 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 302, Alexandria, VA 22314 Telephone: (703) 739-9333 NationalTechnical Fax: (703) 548-9517 Web site: http://www.nasmhpd.org/ntac E-mail: [email protected] AssistanceCenter forStateMentalHealthPlanning National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning Supportedunder CooperativeAgreementNo. 1 U97SMS1944 between the CenterforMentalHealth Services (CMHS), SubstanceAbuseandMentalHealth ServicesAdministration (SAMHSA) andthe National Association ofStateMentalHealth Program Directors (NASMHPD). Exploring the Intersection between Cultural Competency and Managed Behavioral Health Care Policy Implications for State and County MentalHealth Agencies December, 1997 CJ1 o cn CO? o Preparedby: o o King Davis, Ph.D. 0o0 < o Professor ofPublic Mental Health Policy Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia o P CD (J) Q. CQ oro Preparedfor: CO (D ro 00 c O National Technical Assistance Center cn ro CD CD for State Mental Health Planning (NTAC) CD Bruce D. Emery, M.S.W., Director In Collaboration with: Action Council for Mental Health and Human Services Center for Mental Health Services Coastal Carolina Hospital National Association ofState Mental Health Program Directors National Institute ofMental Health Ohio Department ofMental Health Palmer Memorial Chapel PMHC d/b/a Health Force South Carolina Department ofMental Health Cultural Action Program Table of Contents List ofAppendices / Preface and Acknowledgments ii Preamble and Vision Statement Hi Introduction and Overview 1 Conceptualizing and Defining Cultural Competency 4 Key Differences in Utilization ofMental Health Services by Race and Ethnicity 6 Characteristics ofa Culturally Competent System ofCare 9 Status ofCultural Competency in State and Local Mental Health Systems 10 Issues ofCultural Competency in the Federal and Private Sectors 12 Responding to the Technical Assistance Needs ofStates 15 Recommendations for Establishing a National Policy and Vision for Culturally Competent Mental Health Systems 18 Conclusion 21 Appendices Exploring the Intersection between Cultural CompetencyandManagedBehavioral Health Care Policy List of Appendices Appendix A: IAPSRS: Organizational Bulletin: Principles ofMulticultural Rehabilitation Services Appendix B: IAPSRS: Standards and Indicators ofMulticultural Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services TA Appendix C: Judge Baker Children's Center - Brief: Culturally Competent Evaluation ofOutcomes in Systems of Care for Children's Mental Health Appendix D: Bibliography: Cultural Competence and Mental Health Appendix E: Cultural Competence-Related Web Sites Exploring the Intersection between Cultural CompetencyandManagedBehavioralHealth Care Policy Preface and Acknowledgments This report is based on discussions that occurred during a two-day National Mental Health Policy Institute on Cultural Competency which tookplace on February 22-24, 1997 in Myrtle Beach, SC. Conference co-sponsors included the South Carolina Department of Mental Health's Cultural Affairs Program, the Ohio Department ofMental Health and the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD). The Institute was conceptualized by Dolores Macey, Ph.D., and staffofthe Cultural Affairs Program within the South Carolina Department ofMental Health. Wilma Townsend, ofthe Ohio Department ofMental Health helped craft the idea for a national focus on this topic. Dr. King Davis of Virginia Commonwealth University facilitated the Institute. These individuals sought to increase our collective understanding of the importance of cultural competency to the mission of public mental health systems and the relationship between cultural competency and managed care policy. Conferences, institutes and workshops represent a valuable tool for the rapid transmission ofnew knowledge, skills, and methods for solving a wide range ofproblems. Within the past several years, education and training events that seek to understand the potential benefits of ensuring cultural competency within managed care programs in both public and private sectors have increased. For its part, this Institute afforded participants representing both public and private mental health systems a unique opportunity to reflect and collaborate on the status ofcultural competency and its intersection with managed care policy. Participants collaborated in reaching agreement on an operational definition ofcultural competency and on the vision and steps required to ensure its increased acceptance and application at both state and local levels. It is also clear that a range of technical assistance supports will be needed to encourage and support public mental health leaders in efforts to establish cultural competency within their systems. These technical assistance needs are identified in this report. The Institute received financial support from the Center for Mental Health Services through the efforts of Paul Wohlford, Ph.D., and Harriet McCombs, Ph.D., and the National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning, an affiliate program of NASMHPD. In addition, Ronald Manderscheid, Ph.D., of the Center for Mental Health Services; Ivan Walks, M.D.. ofOptions Mental Health; and Mareasa Isaacs Shockley, Ph.D., contributed to the Institute through their presentations of new ideas, concepts and approaches. Produced under a contract between King Davis, Ph.D. and the National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning (NTAC), this report is designed to provide practical assistance in considering the issues, challenges and benefits of strengthening the cultural Exploringthe Intersection between Cultural CompetencyandManagedBehavioralHealth Care Policy