4456 3 02bb773 8 1s prepared as an account of >.*T~G sponsored by an aooncy of tP,c vernn!cr.! Neither theU nit& S;atecOove:nrrent nor any agency of iiieii caployees. irlakes 22:. warranty, express cr iiG-,p;i?G, i): assumes -ny legal 1iaSili:y or respons!h!!!!y for ;he accuracy. completeness or iisef-iness of ally Ififormation. apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents thai its use WCL!!~n ot infilnge pzvately owned rights qeference hzre!? to any specific cornrnc?rcial product. proacss. or serv!r,z by trade name, trademark. n~anufar.tiure!. or otherwise, dozr not n sarily constitute c: iliiply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by tho "nited S:a::xGovc any agi?;?cyt hereof 1 he view: 2nd opinions of authols expressed herein do not necessarily stats or reflect those of thcl'nrted St;rtr-,Governiiiznt or any agency thereof. - / OW N L TM 1 04 2 9 ENERGY DIVISION EXPERT SYSTEMS AND MICROWAVE COMMUNICATION PROCESSING: SYSTEMS ALARMS A FEASIBILITY STUDY Bruce Tonn Richard Goeltz Steve Purucker - Date of Issue July 1987 Research sponsored by the Bonnevi Power Adrni nis tratio n 11e OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37531 ope rated by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under Contract No. DE-ACE-840R21400 MARTtN MARlfTTA ENEHGY SYSTiMS LIBRARIES 4456 02bb771 B 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ................................................ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii ..................................................... INTRODUCTION 1 . ... 1 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. EXPERT SYSTEMS. AND POWER SYSTEMS 4 ........................................... 1.1 A I BACKGROUND .................................... 4 1.2 A I AND POWER SYSTEMS 7 . ............................................ 2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 13 .......... 2.1 THE MICROWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND A.L.A.R.M.S. ........... 13 2.2 VALUE OF EXPERT SYSTEM ALARM PROCES.S.I.N.G.. ................ 17 2.3 COMMUNICATION ALARMS PROCESS9R 18 THE . .............................................. 3 PROTOTYPE SCOPE 22 . ...................................... 4 SOFTWARE SPECIFICATIONS 24 ................... 4.1 EXPERT SYSTEM SOFTWARE SPECIFICATIONS 24 ...... 4.1.1 Selection of the Expert System Archit.e.c.t.u.r.e. ....... 24 4.1.2 The Rete Algorithm High Performa.n.c.e. .............. 28 4.1.3 Optional Software Specification 31 . 4.1.4 Expert System Softwa.re. .I.s.s.u.e.s. ...W..e.ig.h.i.n.g. .......... the Pros and Cons 33 ...... 4.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE SPECIFICATIONS 35 . .......... 5 EVALUATIONS SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE CONFIGURATIONS 38 OF . .................... 6 RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT 44 ....................................................... REFERENCES 47 . APPENDIX A PRODUCTION SYSTEM SPE.E.D. .I.M.P.R.O.V.E.M.E.N.T.S. .T.H.R.O.U.G.H. .......... ADVANCED HARDWARE 50 . APPENDIX B DATABASE MANA.G.E.M.E.N.T. .S.Y.S.T.E.M.S. .E.V.A.L.U.A.T.I.O.N. ............... CHECKLIST 52 . ................. APPENDIX C EXPERT SYSTEM SOFTWARE DESCRIPTIONS 55 .... . APPENDIX D OATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE DESCRIPTIONS 61 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page .............. Figure 2.1. BPA Microwave Communication System 14 ..................... Figure 2.2. Example of CAP Configuration 19 LIST OF TABLES Page ............................... Table 1.1. Power SystemlAI 11 Work ............... Table 1.2. Expert System Features (A Wish List) 12 .................. Table 5.1. Expert System Software Evaluation 39 .......... Tab1 e 5.2. Hardware/Software Con f ig urdt7 ’ on Eva1 utio ns 42 V SUMMARY EXECUTIVE This report presents the products of a study by Oak Ridye National Lahordtory for the Bonnevil l e Power Administration on the feasihil ity of an expert system t o process a1 arms emanating frorn Bonnevil le's fvlfcrowave Communication System Expert systems, a branch of Artificial (MCS). Intelligence (AI) , have been cited by the Electrlc Power Research Institute as an important new research and development area with-in the power systems community (EPKI 1986). Expert systems could aid i n power system pl anni ng , design, operation, rnai ntenance, education and trai nln g , a l l resulting i n potentially significant improvements i n power system management and re1 ity. Based on 1 iterature reviews , direct iabil research experience, and discussions with Bonnevi 1 l e staff, it i s concl uded that a1 aniis processing i s an appropriate domai n for expert systems technology. A prototype communications a1 ann processing (CAP) would contain a data base management system (DBMS) as well as an expert system module, The prototype would encompass an appropriately chal 1 enying subset of alarin systems, alarm networks, and alarm types. It would be capable of intelligently processing alariiis, efficiently storing alarm-based historical data, providing custom reports, and supporting statistical analysis. Such a system has the potential to improve response to criti- cal alarms, increase the information content of large volumes of coinpli- cated data, free operators from performing routine analys,is, and provide alann information t o operators, management, and field personnel through queries and automatical ly produced reports. v ii The CAP prototype i s a logical project to initiate Bonnevilles' Artificial Intelligence activities. The communication system applica- tion i s less critical than a power system application, which means that mistakes made i n the learning process w i l l not have potentially costly consequences. The volume of alarms into the prototype w i l l be neither too large nor too small. The application requires only a relaxed MCS real-time response to operators, which i s the conceptual first step toward designing subsecond response hardware/software configurations. Lastly, the A I lessons learned and experiences gained i n this project should be directly transferable to other Bonnevil l e power system appl ic ati o ns. The major expert system requirement i s speed. Alanns w i l l need to be processed i n near real time i f the expert system i s to aid human MCS operators. Forward chaining, Rete-based algorithms offer the best processing speed and should form the heart of any expert system software chosen for the prototype. The software should also offer a powerful devel opment envi ronment, and some fle xib i1 ity i n knowledge represen- tation and inferencing. The DBMS module presents no challenges that numerous cornnierci a1 ly avai 1 ab1 e packages cannot hand1 e. Therefore, DBMS selection should be driven by software availability, cost and com- patibility with the expert system software. It is recommended that the expert system module of the CAP proto- type be developed on a dedicated AI workstation using a major, commer- cial ly avail able expert system devel opirient system. The DBMS prototype can reside on any convenient computer that can be networked with the AI v i i i
Description: