ebook img

Expanding Rural Land Tenures to Alleviate Poverty PDF

300 Pages·2005·1.94 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Expanding Rural Land Tenures to Alleviate Poverty

E R L T XPANDING URAL AND ENURES A P TO LLEVIATE OVERTY by Kate Dalrymple August 2005 A thesis submitted to The University of Melbourne in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructure and Land Administration Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia i ii D ECLARATION This is to certify that the thesis has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institution. The text does not exceed 100,000 words. Parts of this work were published in refereed conference proceedings and journals as listed in Appendix 1. ________________ Kate Dalrymple iii iv A BSTRACT This thesis investigates the land administration framework guiding development of the rural poor to assess whether it meets sustainable development and poverty alleviation objectives set by current land policies. This research was conducted in two main phases. The first phase explored the role of evolving land policy, land administration and tenure theories in the context of delivering sustainable development and poverty alleviation. Investigations were focused towards the design of land administration systems as a means of assisting national development in developing countries. Essential linkages between each of the components were reviewed to determine how they relate to poverty alleviation among the rural poor. This required a multidisciplinary literature search and analysis of materials from Geomatics, development and environmental studies, sociology and public policy. However analysis of land policy and land administration at a theoretical level is not definitive. Empirical research was necessary to understand people to land relationships of the rural poor. Case studies in rural Cambodian villages were conducted as the second phase of research. The objective of these case studies was to dispel the popular land administration principle that assumes project designs can continue to rely predominantly on technical tools to provide tenure security for individuals. Field studies illustrated complexities surrounding socially-derived tenure arrangements of the rural poor within various social and environmental contexts. Informal, communal and customary people to land relationships underpin traditional natural resource management, use and access patterns. These localised relationships deliver vital security and organisational functions among rural poor societies. A redefined land administration framework for addressing poverty alleviation within a sustainable approach was derived from these case study findings. The framework theory was then discussed and refined among world expert land administration researchers and consultants from economic, legal and agricultural fields. v The research shows that private titling alone will not deliver poverty alleviation and sustainable development to rural poor societies. These societies depend on socially-derived practices and have limited resources. They are usually unable to take advantage of formal administration services. However land policy goals can be achieved if a flexible land administration framework is created. This framework must be characterised by secure land and resource access and tools that appropriately incorporate local conditions, capacity and practices. vi A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I wish to acknowledge and thank my supervisors Professor Ian Williamson and Jude Wallace for their enduring support. Ian and Jude, your expert advice, enthusiasm, encouragement and sustained commitment to the ideas of my PhD are greatly appreciated. Along with your moral and financial support, I particularly wish to thank Ian for giving me the opportunity to get my “feet wet” by gaining valuable research experience overseas. Jude, your timing to join our research group was impeccable and I am so fortunate you were a part of my PhD journey. Staff and students from the Department of Geomatics, and particularly the Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructure and Land Administration, provided a helpful and friendly environment during my candidature. Special mention for their individual support goes to Lillian Cheung and Nghiem Tran for their ever efficient administrative support, Abbas Rajabifard and Gary Hunter for their willingness to help and offer valuable research advice, Andrew Binns and Rohan Bennett for their support, critiques and comments on drafts, as well as notable contributions made by past and present researchers of the Centre and ‘rooftop’: Matthew Warnest, Daniel Steudler, Richelle Pearson, Lisa Ting, Daniel Paez, Lisa Strain, Kevin McDougal, Saeid Moshen Kalantari Soltanieh, and Michael Black. Special thanks to Mr Bruce Thompson and the Spatial Information Infrastructure Group at the Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria, for funding and support of my PhD. This study was conducted primarily with the co-operation of “everyday” people of Cambodia, especially those in rural settlements. Without their acceptance, hospitality and eagerness to share their time, data collection would not have been possible. I thank them whole heartedly for freely providing information and truthfully answering my questions. My gratitude extends to those village and commune chiefs who were most helpful and obliging. I hope that vii interpretations of my experience with these people serve to help and not hinder progress and improvement for the lives of the rural poor. Contacts at both National and Provincial levels provided the missing middle level information critical to the study these included staff from: the Ministry Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction Offices and the Provincial General Department of Cadastre and Geography in Kampong Thom and Pursat, the National Council of Land Policy, Participatory Land Use Planning team, the Integrated Rural Development Project and technical advisors and experts facilitating a range of project areas. I am most appreciative of the Ministry of Land Management and Urban Planning and Construction, Central Project Office and GTZ for their in-kind and financial support while researching in Cambodia. The facilities provided during my time in Phnom Penh were invaluable in helping collate, exchange information and hold meetings. Mr Willi Zimmerman, (project Technical-Advisor until 2004) was an inspirational leader and source of wisdom and knowledge. His directional advice and sense of confidence in me gave me the strength to pursue studies on my own. I admire whole heartedly Willi’s untiring positivism and rational perspective on his work and attitude to all staff. I would like to thank Professor Don Grant, Professor Stig Enemark and Mr Tony Burns for their words of wisdom and encouragement throughout my candidature and Professor Halger Magel for comments early in my PhD confirmation. Thank you also to my family and friends. Family first, your offers to help were always greatly appreciated. One day I’ll be able take you to these special places, to meet these special people and you’ll discover why it is so easy to become passionate about the issues my research attempts to address. I want to thank my dear friends, Meg Fricke, Kate Evans, Kirsten Fairfax, Adrian Sim and Lachlan Beveridge whose support, encouragement, and enjoyable distractions kept me sane and provided a balanced life while writing. Friends who don’t lose faith are the best ones to have. Family and friends - thanks for having faith. To everyone mentioned here, my sincere thanks. viii T C ABLE OF ONTENTS DECLARATION............................................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................................vii TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................ix LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................xi LIST OF FIGURES.........................................................................................................................xii LIST OF ACRONYMS...................................................................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................- 1 - 1.1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................- 1 - 1.2 BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................- 2 - 1.3 RESEARCH OUTLINE............................................................................................................- 7 - 1.4 OUTLINE OF THESIS...........................................................................................................- 12 - CHAPTER 2 – LAND POLICY FOR DEVELOPMENT....................................................- 15 - 2.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................- 15 - 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY THEORY.....................................................................- 15 - 2.3 ENVIRONMENT, RURAL POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS.........................................- 22 - 2.4 THE LAND DEVELOPMENT SCENE.....................................................................................- 25 - 2.5 LAND POLICY DEVELOPMENT...........................................................................................- 30 - 2.6 POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT ISSUES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA.................................................- 40 - 2.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY.........................................................................................................- 42 - CHAPTER 3 – LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT..- 45 - 3.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................- 45 - 3.2 LAND ADMINISTRATION PROGRESS...................................................................................- 45 - 3.3 LAND ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES.................................................................................- 57 - 3.4 LAND ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS...................................................................................- 77 - 3.5 CHAPTER SUMMARY.........................................................................................................- 84 - CHAPTER 4 – LAND TENURE............................................................................................- 87 - 4.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................- 87 - 4.2 LAND TENURE OVERVIEW.................................................................................................- 88 - 4.3 IMPORTANCE OF TENURE SECURITY................................................................................- 102 - 4.4 TENURE ISSUES OF THE POOR..........................................................................................- 105 - 4.5 TENURE FORMALISATION STRATEGIES............................................................................- 116 - 4.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY.......................................................................................................- 122 - ix CHAPTER 5 – RESEARCH DESIGN.................................................................................- 125 - 5.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................- 125 - 5.2 RESEARCH MODEL DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................- 125 - 5.3 SELECTION OF RESEARCH APPROACH............................................................................- 129 - 5.4 RESEARCH DESIGN.........................................................................................................- 136 - 5.5 CHAPTER SUMMARY.......................................................................................................- 140 - CHAPTER 6 – CAMBODIAN CASE STUDY....................................................................- 143 - 6.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................- 143 - 6.2 CAMBODIAN HISTORICAL CONTEXT...............................................................................- 144 - 6.3 NATIONAL LAND MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION PROJECT.................................- 160 - 6.4 VILLAGE CASE STUDIES OUTLINE..................................................................................- 168 - 6.5 CASE STUDY SITE 1 – CHE MEAKH................................................................................- 171 - 6.6 CASE STUDY SITE 2 – SRAE SRAMA...............................................................................- 185 - 6.7 CASE STUDY SITE 3 – OU TA PROK................................................................................- 201 - 6.8 SUMMARY OF CAMBODIAN RURAL TENURES.................................................................- 217 - 6.9 CHAPTER SUMMARY.......................................................................................................- 222 - CHAPTER 7 – RURAL TENURE DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS...................................- 223 - 7.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................- 223 - 7.2 LESSONS LEARNT...........................................................................................................- 224 - 7.3 RURAL TENURE EXTERNALITIES....................................................................................- 235 - 7.4 TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE.........................................................................................- 242 - 7.5 FORMALISATION.............................................................................................................- 245 - 7.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY.......................................................................................................- 253 - CHAPTER 8 – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................- 255 - 8.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................- 255 - 8.2 RESEARCH SCOPE...........................................................................................................- 256 - 8.3 OBJECTIVE 1: INVESTIGATING LAND POLICY FOR SUSTAINABILITY...............................- 257 - 8.4 OBJECTIVE 2: INVESTIGATING LAND ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT..............................................................................................- 258 - 8.5 OBJECTIVES 3 AND 4: EXPLORING THE TENURE COMPONENT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION.......................................................................................................- 259 - 8.6 OBJECTIVE 5: IDENTIFYING LIMITATIONS OF SOCIALLY DERIVED TENURE ARRANGEMENTS.....................................................................................................- 260 - 8.7 OBJECTIVE 6: INTEGRATING RURAL LAND TENURE FOR THE POOR................................- 262 - 8.8 RESEARCH CONCLUSION................................................................................................- 265 - REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................- 267 - APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF CORRESPONDENCES ……………….….……………………….……… - I - APPENDIX 2 – CAMBODIAN PLAIN LANGUAGE STATEMENT OF RESEARCH …………………. - IV- APPENDIX 3 – CAMBODIAN VILLAGE QUESTIONNAIRE …………………….……………..... - VI - APPENDIX 4 – QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW RESULTS ……………….………………….…….. - IX - APPENDIX 5 – PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO RESEARCH ……………………........................ - XIII - x

Description:
2.3 ENVIRONMENT, RURAL POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS. impersonality of our attitude toward the land …There are some who can
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.