EXAMINATION OF METACOGNITIVE FACTORS IN RELATION TO ANXIETY AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ADVİYE ESİN YILMAZ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2007 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences _________________________ Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ Prof. Dr. Nebi Sümer Head of the Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. A. Nuray Karancı (METU, PSY) ________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz (METU, PSY) ________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Soykan (M+ PSYCH) ________________________ Prof. Dr. İhsan Dağ (HU, PSY) ________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Belgin Ayvaışık (METU, PSY) ________________________ iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: A. Esin YILMAZ Signature : iv ABSTRACT EXAMINATION OF METACOGNITIVE FACTORS IN RELATION TO ANXIETY AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY Yılmaz, Adviye Esin Ph.D., Department of Psychology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz September 2007, 339 pages The aim of this thesis was to examine the validity of the main concepts of metacognitive theory in a Turkish sample and set the stage for metacognitive research in Turkey from the clinical psychology perspective. In addition to this, research attention was focused on two important topics remained to be empirically validated in the metacognition literature: (1) the unique contributions of “cognitive content” versus “metacognition” to the prediction of anxiety and depression symptoms, and (2) the vulnerability function of metacognitions in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms. To achieve these generic aims of the study, a two-step research plan each of which has its own specific objectives was followed. Data for cross-sectional and prospective parts of the study were collected from Turkish and British non-clinical samples. In the cross-sectional part, mainly the independent contribution of metacognitions to pathological worry, obsessive- compulsive symptomatology, and anxiety and depressive symptoms above and beyond the contribution of cognitive content was evaluated. By doing so, also the relationship patterns between metacognitions and psychological symptomatology were revealed in the Turkish sample. Consistent with the recent burgeoning of research, the association between increased levels of metacognitions and increased levels of anxiety and depression was shown in the Turkish sample, as well. Moreover, metacognitive factors were found to be associated with the symptoms of anxiety and depression independently of the relevant cognitive content. In most v analyses, metacognitions emerged as slightly stronger predictors of a given symptom dimension compared to the relevant cognitive content. In the prospective part, the causal role of metacognitions following stress in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms was examined. In the Turkish sample, higher levels of negative beliefs about worry predicted augmentation in anxiety and depression symptoms from Time 1 to Time 2. Besides, higher levels of lack of cognitive confidence interacted with higher levels of daily hassles to predict intensification of the anxiety scores. However, the British data did not support the causal role of metacognitions in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms. The statistical comparisons between Turkish and British samples indicated that the Turkish sample has a tendency to score significantly higher than the British sample on the metacognitive variables. Moreover, for all but one metacognitive factor, the interactions with cultural group (Turkish vs. British) were not significant in predicting psychopathology, indicating generalization of metacognitive theory to both the Turkish and British samples. Findings of this study were well in line with the metacognitive theory and discussed in the light of the relevant literature. Keywords: Metacognition, Anxiety, Depression, Cross-Cultural Study, Prospective Study vi ÖZ ÜSTBİLİŞSEL FAKTÖRLERİN KAYGI VE DEPRESYON SEMPTOMLARI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: KÜLTÜRLERARASI BİR ÇALIŞMA Yılmaz, Adviye Esin Ph.D., Psikoloji Bölümü Danışman: Doç. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Eylül 2007, 339 sayfa Bu tezin amacı üstbilişsel kuramın temel kavramlarının Türk örneklemindeki geçerliğini incelemek ve ülkemizde klinik psikoloji bakış açısından yürütülecek üstbilişsel araştırmalara zemin hazırlamaktır. Buna ek olarak, üstbiliş literatüründe görgül olarak geçerlenmeyi bekleyen iki önemli konu üzerine odaklanılmıştır: (1) “bilişsel içerik” ve “üstbiliş” lerin kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerinin yordanmasına birbirinden bağımsız olarak yaptığı katkı ve (2) üstbilişlerin kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerinin gelişmesine yatkınlık oluşturma işlevi. Çalışmanın bu genel amaçlarına ulaşmak için, her biri kendine özgü alt amaçlara sahip iki aşamalı bir araştırma planı izlenmiştir. Çalışmanın enlemesine kesitsel ve boylamsal kısımları için veriler, klinik olmayan Türk ve İngiliz örneklemlerinden toplanmıştır. Enlemesine kesitsel kısımda, temel olarak üstbilişlerin patolojik endişe, obsesif-kompulsif semptomatoloji ve kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerine bilişsel içeriğin yaptığı katkının üzerinde ve ötesinde olan bağımsız katkısı değerlendirilmiştir. Böylelikle, Türk örneklemindeki üstbiliş ve psikolojik semptomatoloji arasındaki ilişki örüntüleri de açığa çıkarılmıştır. Son dönemde hızla birikmekte olan araştırma sonuçlarıyla tutarlı olarak, üstbilişsel düzeylerdeki artış ile kaygı ve depresyon düzeylerindeki artış arasındaki bağlantı Türk örnekleminde de gösterilmiştir. Ayrıca, üstbilişsel faktörler ilgili bilişsel içerikten bağımsız olarak kaygı ve depresyon belirtileri ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Çoğu analizde, üstbilişler bilişsel içeriğe kıyasla ilgili semptom boyutunun biraz daha güçlü bir yordayıcısı olmuştur. Boylamsal kısımda, üstbilişin stresi takiben kaygı ve vii depresyon belirtilerinin gelişmesinde oynadığı nedensel rol incelenmiştir. Türk örneklemindeki boylamsal analizler, endişe hakkındaki olumsuz inançlardaki artışın kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerinde iki ölçüm zamanı arasında gözlenen artışı yordadığını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, bilişsel güvensizlikteki artış yüksek düzeyde gündelik sıkıntılar yaşama ile etkileşime girerek kaygı puanlarındaki artışı yordamaktadır. Buna karşılık, İngiliz örnekleminden toplanan veriler üstbilişlerin kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerinin gelişimindeki nedensel rolünü desteklememiştir. Türk ve İngiliz örneklemleri arasında yapılan istatistikî karşılaştırmalar, Türk örnekleminin üstbiliş puanlarının İngiliz örnekleminden anlamlı olarak daha yüksek olma eğiliminde olduğunu göstermiştir. Bunun yanısıra, biri hariç tüm diğer üstbilişsel faktörlerin kültür grubu (Türk ve İngiliz) ile etkileşimlerinin psikopatolojiyi yordamada anlamsız oldukları bulunmuş ve bu bulgunun üstbilişsel kuramın Türk ve İngiliz örneklemleri arasındaki genellenebilirliğine işaret ediyor olabileceği düşünülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçları üstbilişsel kuramla tutarlıdır ve ilgili literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Üstbiliş, Kaygı, Depresyon, Kültürlerarası Çalışma, Boylamsal Çalışma viii To My Parents and My Brother ix This thesis has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), in the framework of the 2214-Abroad Research Grant Program. x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Working on this thesis as well as on the doctorate as a whole, has granted me many “meta” experiences which have led to my academic and personal growth. It has been a challenging, fascinating, and illuminating adventure in new countries, with new cultures, and people. The completion of this long journey, which has taken me close to 6 years, (specifically 2190 days or 52560 hours!), was only made possible through the help of a number of people. I would particularly like to thank my supervisor, Associate Professor Dr. Tülin Gençöz for her continuous enthusiasm, common-sense, knowledge, and perceptiveness during the entire preparation period of this thesis. I could not have imagined going though the whole process without her by my side. Whenever I needed her, she was always there with her healing touch. Her instant answers to my detailed e-mails, practical and useful solutions to the problems, and enlightening feedbacks on the chapter drafts helped me more than she knows, not only during my thesis period, but also throughout my PhD years, and beyond. Dr. Tülin Gençöz is a model of professional behaviour, providing constant support, encouragement, sound advice, and good teaching. I am really delighted to have had the chance to be her student. I would like to extend my special appreciation to Professor Dr. A. Nuray Karancı for her unflinching courage and conviction throughout my graduate education. She made vital contributions to the progress of this thesis with her probing questions, constructive criticism, and sage advice. What is more, she provided me with moral support for the completion of this thesis with her “evil eye bead” which I will be proud to carry. I would also like to express my deepest respect for her. I wish to thank Associate Professor Dr. Çiğdem Soykan who was also a vital member of my supervising committee, for her fruitful ideas and clinically sound advices on the implications and discussions of the results.
Description: