ebook img

Exact solutions of the Dirac equation and induced representations of the Poincare group on the lattice PDF

0.07 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Exact solutions of the Dirac equation and induced representations of the Poincare group on the lattice

Exact solutions of the Dirac equation and induced representations of the Poincar´e group on the lattice Miguel Lorente Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain We deduce the structure of the Dirac field on the lattice from the discrete version of differential geom- etry and from the representation of the integral Lorentz transformations. The analysis of the induced representations of the Poincar´egroup on the lattice reveals that they are reducible, a result that can be 4 considered a group theoretical approach to the problem of fermion doubling. 0 0 2 1. DISCRETE DIFFERENTIAL and the usual exterior product, from n a GEOMETRY which we construct the p-form and the dual J (n−p) -form in the n-dimensional space. 9 Given a function of one independent variable 1 v the forward and backward differences are de- σ = 1σ ∆xi1 ∧···∧∆xip 3 fined as p! i1···ip 1 1 0 (∗σ) = σi1···ipε 1 ∆f(x) = f(x+∆x)−f(x) k1···kn−p p! i1···ipk1···kp 0 4 ∇f(x) = f(x)−f(x−∆x) Fromthep-formswecanconstruct(p+1)- 0 formswith thehelp of theexterior difference, / at Similarly we define the average operators for instance, l - p 1 e ∆f(x) = {f(x+∆x)+f(x)} h 2 ∆ω ≡ ∆a∧∆x+∆b∧∆y = v: ∇ef(x) = 1 {f(x)+f(x−∆x)} ∆ ∆˜ b ∆˜ ∆ a x y x y i 2 − ∆x∧∆y X ∆x ∆y ! e r This calculus can be enlarged to functions of a The exterior calculus can be used to ex- several variables. In particular, we have for press the laws of physics in terms of differ- the total difference operator encecalculus, suchasclassical electrodynam- ics, quantum field theory [1]. In particular, ∆f(x,y)f (x+∆x,y+∆y)−f (x,y) = for the wave equation we have −∗∆∗∆φ= 0, ∆ ∆ f(x,y)+∆ ∆ f (x,y) x y x y or e e inanobviousnotation. Thefiniteincrements of the variables ∆x,∆y···, can be used to −∇˜ ∇˜ ∇˜ ∇ ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆ + x y z t x y z t introduce a discrete differential form n +∇ ∇˜ ∇˜ ∇˜ ∆ ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆˜ +··· x y z t x y z t ω = a(x,y)∆x+b(x,y)∆y . φ(xyzt) = 0 o 2. EXACT SOLUTIONS FOR THE we obtain from the Hamilton equations of DIRAC-EQUATION motion, the Dirac equation Given a scalar function Φ(n ) ≡ (n ε ) µ µ µ iγ δµ+ −m cη+ ψ(n ) =0 (3) µ 0 µ defined in the grid points of a Minkowski lat- tice with elementary lengths ε , and the dif- (cid:0) (cid:1) µ and from this we recover the Klein-Gordon ference operators equation. The transfer matrix, which carries δ+ ≡ 1 ∆ ∆˜ , δ− ≡ 1 ∇ ∇˜ the Dirac field from one time to the next can µ εµ µν 6= µ ν µ εµ µν 6= µ ν be obtained from the evolution operator [3] Y Y η+ ≡ ∆˜µ, η− ≡ ∇˜µ, µ,ν = 1,2,3,4 U = 1+ 12iε0H , ψ(n +1)= Uψ(n )U† Yµ Yµ 1− 1iε H 0 0 2 0 the Klein-Gordon equation can be read off AbasisforthesolutionstotheDiracequa- δ+δµ− −m2c2η+η− Φ(n ) = 0 (1) µ 0 µ tion can be obtained from the functions (2) (cid:16) (cid:17) and the standard four components spinors. Using the method of separation of vari- Our model for the fermion fields satisfies the ables, we obtain the exact solutions of this following conditions [2]: difference equation i) theHamiltonianistranslationalinvariant 3 1− 1iε k nµ f(nµ) = µ = 0 1+ 221iεµµkµµ! (2) ii) the Hamiltonian is hermitian Y iii) form = 0,thewaveequationisinvariant 0 with k , continuous variables satisfiying the µ under global chiral transformations dispersion relations k kµ = m2c2 µ 0 Thesolutions(2)constituteabasisforthe iv) there is no fermion doubling solutionsoftheKlein-Gordonequation. Ifwe v) the Hamiltonian is non-local impose spatial boundary conditions on the wave functions, we get Finally, coupling the vector field to the 2 πm i electro-magnetic vector potential we con- k = tan , m = 0,···,N −1 , i = 1,2,3 i i εi N struct a gauge invariant vector current lead- With the help of this basis we can derive, ing to the correct axial anomaly [2] asinthecontinuumcase,Hamiltonequations of motion, a Fourier expansion for the Klein- Gordon fields [2]. We can apply the same 3. INTEGRAL LORENTZ technique to the Dirac fields on the lattice. TRANSFORMATIONS Starting from the Hamiltonian N−1 H = ε ε ε ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆˜ ψ+(n) × A group theoretical approach to the Dirac 1 2 3 1 2 3 equation, can be given from the induced rep- n1nX2n3=0 1 1 resentations of Poincar´e group on the lattice × γ γ ∆ ∆˜ ∆˜ +γ γ ∆˜ ∆ ∆˜ + 0 1ε 1 2 3 0 2 1ε 2 3 [4]. We start with the integral transforma- (cid:26) 1 2 1 tions of the complete Lorentz group gener- + γ γ ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆ +γ ∆˜ ∆˜ ∆˜ ψ 0 3 1 2ε 3 0 1 2 3 (n) ated by the Kac generators 3 (cid:27) 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4. INDUCED REPRESENTATIONS 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 OF THE POINCARE´ GROUP S =  , S =   1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1     0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Given an integral Lorentz transformation     1 0 0 0  2 1 1 1 Λ and discrete translation characterized by 0 1 0 0 −1 0 −1 −1 a four-vector a, the induced representations S =  ,S =   3 0 0 1 0 4 −1 −1 0 −1 are given by standard methods [5]     0 0 0 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 o     i) chooseanUIR,Dk(a)ofthetranslation     Any integral matrix of the complete group (the kernel of the discrete Fourier Lorentz group can be factorized transform) (5)) L = PηPθPiS ...S PδPεPζS SαSβSγ ii) define the little group H ∈ SO(3,1) 1 2 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 perm. by the stability condition: D(ha) = n o D(a),h ∈H where P = S S S S S , P = S S S , 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 2 P3 = S3, α,β,... = 0,1 iii) constructforthegroupT4×sH theUIR o o The finite representations of the Lorentz Dk,α(a,h) = Dk(a)⊗Dα(h) group can be obtained by standard method. iv) choose coset generators c,c′ such that In particular, for the two dimensional repre- (a˜,∧˜)c = c′(a,h). For the coset repre- sentation α ∈ SL(2,C) and the parity oper- sentatives we can choose ∧ ≡ L(k) that ator I we obtain the (reducible) Dirac rep- s o resentation [5] takes k into an arbitrary integral vector of the unit hyperboloid. Finally we have o α 0 0 1 Dk,α (a˜,∧˜) = D(α,Is) =  0 α† −1 ⊗ 1 0! Dkk,′k(′a˜)Dα L−1(k′)∧˜L(k)  (cid:16) (cid:17)  (cid:0) (cid:1) InordertogetUIR,weintroducethepro- jection operator 5. IRREDUCIBILITY AND FERMION DOUBLING 1 1 Q(p) = (I +W (p)) , W (p) ≡ γµp µ 2 m c 0 The dual group of the discrete translation groupis given by allthe pointsfrom theBril- Applying this operator to a four compo- louinzone. Wecharacterize thediscreteorbit nent spinor we obtain the Dirac equation in of the point group by functions on the dual momentum space space. We formulate the following conditions (γµp −m cI)ψ(p ) = 0 (4) for these constraints: µ 0 µ i) they should vanish on and only on the We recover the Dirac equation in posi- points of the orbit tion space (3) by making the substitution ii) they should admit a periodic extension p = 2tan πk ε in (4) and then applying µ ε µ µ the discrete Fourier transform iii) they must be Lorentz invariant 1/2ε iv) the difference equations should go to F(n) = exp (−2πiknε)Fˆ(k)dk (5) the continuous wave equation when the Z−1/2ε lattice spacing goes to zero. The difference equation (3) satisfies iv) but REFERENCES leads to the constraints 4 1. M.Lorente in Symmetry Methods in (tan πk ε)(tan πkµε)−m2c2 = 0 ε2 µ 0 Physics (N. Sissakian, G.S. Pogosyan ed.) Dubna, 1996, p. 368-77. that violate conditions i) and iii), therefore 2. M. Lorente, J. Group Th. Phys. 1 (1993) the representations characterized by these 105-121. constraints are reducible. In the problem of fermion doubling one 3. M. Lorente, Lett. Math. Phys, 13 (1987) considers the inverse of the propagator, such 229-236; Phys. Lett. B 232 (1989) 345- as 350. 4 4. M. Lorente in Symmetries in Science IX (sin πk ε) (sin πk ε)−m2c2 ε2 µ µ 0 (B. Gruber,M. Ramek ed.) Plenum, N.Y. 1997, p. 211-223. is invariant under the cubic group and be- come zero on the points of the orbit under 5. M. Lorente, P. Kramer in Symmetries in this group, but is zero also in the border of Science X (B. Gruber, M. Ramek ed) the Brillouin zone −1/ε ≤ k ≤ 1/ε. There- Plenum, N.Y. 1998 p. 179-195 µ fore the representation is not irreducible and can be reduced giving rise to different ele- mentary systems with the same mass.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.