Focus on Cancer Springer London Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Budapest Hong Kong Milan Paris Santa Clara Singapore Tokyo Jocelyn Chamberlain and Sue Moss (Eds.) Evaluation of Cancer Screening Springer Jocelyn Chamberlain Sue Moss Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology Institute of Cancer Research, Block D, Cotswold Road Sutton, Surrey SM2 SNG, UK ISBN-13: 978-3-540-19957-1 e-ISBN-13: 978-1-4471-3044-4 DOl: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3044-4 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Evaluation of Cancer Screening. -(Focus on Cancer Series) I. Chamberlain, Jocelyn II. Moss, Susan III. Series 616·994075 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Evaluation of Cancer Screening 1 Jocelyn Chamberlain and Sue Moss (eds.) p. em. --(Focus on cancer) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Cancer--Diagnosis--Evaluation. 2.. Medical screening--Evaluation I. Chamberlain, Jocelyn, 1932- . IL Moss, Sue, 1952- . III. Series [DNLM: 1. Neoplasms--prevention & control. 2.. Mass screening. 3. Program Evaluation. QZ 200 E913 19951 RA645.C3E975 1995 362..1" 96994--dc20 DNLMlDLC for Library of Congress 95-23890 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of researm or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms oflicences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. © Springer-Verlag London Linlited 1996 The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that sum names are exempt from the relevant laws and regula tions and therefore free for general use. Product liability: The publisher can give no guarantee for information about drug dosage and application thereof contained in this book. In every individual case the respective user must meek its accuracy by consulting other pharmaceutical literature. Typeset by Richard Powell Editorial and Production Services, Basingstoke, Hants RG22 4TX 28/3830-543210 Printed on acid-free paper Contents Preface. .......................................................................................................... ix The Editors and the Contributors ............................................................. xi 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CANCER SCREENING ....................... 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 Consideration of a Potential Screening Test ...................................... 1 Evaluating the Performance of a Test................................................. 3 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Screening .......................................... 5 Mathematical Models of Screening ..................................................... 9 Selection of High-Risk Groups for Screening .................................... 10 Promotion of Early Diagnosis ............................................................. 10 Ethical Issues ......................................................................................... 10 Genetic Issues ....................................................................................... 11 References ............................................................................................. 11 2. SCREENING FOR CANCER OF THE CERVIX ................................ 15 Introduction .......................................................................................... 15 Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer ........................................................ 15 The Natural History of Cervical Cancer ............................................. 16 The "Pap" Test ...................................................................................... 17 Evidence for the Effectiveness of Screening ....................................... 17 The Effectiveness of Screening in the UK ........................................... 20 The Treatment of Screen-Detected Lesions ....................................... 22 Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Screening ........................................... 23 Frequency of Cervical Screening ......................................................... 23 Quality Control Issues .......................................................................... 24 Sensitivity of Screening ........................................................................ 25 Potential for Automation ..................................................................... 26 Alternative Tests ................................................................................... 26 Screening in Developing Countries .................................................... 26 The Role of HPV in Cervical Cancer ...................................................2 8 References ............................................................................................. 28 3. SCREENING FOR CANCER OF THE BREAST ................................ 33 Epidemiology ........................................................................................ 33 vi Contents Aetiology ............................................................................................... 34 Treatment, Survival and Prognosis of Breast Cancer. ....................... 35 Predisposing Factors ............................................................................ 36 The Rationale for Screening ................................................................ 37 Screening Tests for Breast Cancer. ...................................................... 37 Effectiveness of Screening in Reducing Mortality ............................ .41 Effectiveness of Screening Younger Women .................................... .43 Effectiveness of Breast Self-Examination .......................................... .45 Disadvantages and Costs of Breast Screening. .................................. .46 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 49 References ............................................................................................ .49 4. SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER .................................... 55 Introduction .......................................................................................... 55 Time Trends-.......................................................................................... 55 Geographical Variation ........................................................................ 56 Aetiology and Primary Prevention ..................................................... 56 High-Risk Groups for Colorectal Cancer ........................................... 57 Natural History ..................................................................................... 57 Prognosis of Colorectal Carcinomas ................................................... 59 Overall Survival. .................................................................................... 59 The Rationale for Screening ................................................................ 60 Screening Methods ............................................................................... 60 The Acceptability of Screening ............................................................ 65 The Effectiveness ofScreening ............................................................ 66 Disadvantages and Costs ..................................................................... 70 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 71 References ............................................................................................. 72 5. EARLY DETECTION OF MALIGNANT MELANOMA OF THE SKIN ...................................................................................... 77 Introduction .......................................................................................... 77 Natural History ..................................................................................... 78 The Screening Test for Malignant MeIanoma .................................... 79 Options for Screening .......................................................................... 81 Health Education to Promote Self-Screening .................................... 81 Organised Professional Screening. ...................................................... 87 Other Aspects of Screening. ................................................................. 89 Conclusions ............................ :·. ............................................................. 90 References ............................................................................................. 90 6. SCREENING FOR OVARIAN CANCER ............................................ 95 Introduction .......................................................................................... 95 General Requirements. ......................................................................... 95 Candidate Tests: Evidence from Observational Studies ................... 98 Contents vii Tumour Markers ........................................................... ;.................... 98 Improving Performance. .................................................................... 102 Intervention Studies ........................................................................... 10 7 Conclusions ................•......................•••.......................•....................... 111 References ........................•.....................•....•....................................... 112 7. SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER ..........................•............. 117 Time Trends and International Differences in Incidence ..•........... 117 Aetiology ............................................................................................. 119 Staging ................................................................................................. 120 Survival ................................................................................................ 121 Natural History ................................................................................... 122 Determinants of Prognosis ................................................................ 123 Screening Tests for Prostate Cancer ................................................. 124 Prevalence of Prostate Cancer at Screening ..................................... 127 Acceptability of Screening ................................................................. 128 The Effect of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality .................... 128 The Potential Disadvantages of Screening for Prostate Cancer ..... 129 Conclusions ...................•.•........•.•.....•.•.•.............•.........•...................... 132 References ......................•.••.............•••.•.......................••...................... 132 8. SCREENING FOR CANCERS OF OTHER SITES: LUNG, STOMACH, ORAL AND NEUROBLASTOMA •..........•........... 137 Introduction ........................................................................................ 13 7 Lung Cancer ........................................................................................ 137 Stomach ............................................................................................... 142 Neuroblastoma ................................................................................... 145 Oral Cancer ......................................................................................... 149 References ........................................................................................... 153 9. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF CANCER SCREENING ............ 159 Introduction ........................................................................................ 159 Research Methodology. ...................................................................... 159 Psychological Effects ofInvitation to Screening .............................. 161 Psychological Effects of a Positive Screening Test .......................... 162 Psychological Effects in Patients with Screen-Detected Cancer ..... 164 Reducing Distress - Improving Attendance .................................... 167 Reduction in the Distress Caused by Recall ..................................... 168 Staff Stress ........................................................................................... 169 Self-Screening ..................................................................................... 170 Selective Screening ............................................................................. 170 Conclusions and Further Research Needs ....................................... 171 References ........................................................................................... 171 viii Contents 10. ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF CANCER SCREENING ....................... 175 Introduction ........................................................................................ 175 The Need for Economic Appraisal .................................................... 176 Methods for Economic Evaluation. ................................................... 176 Economic Appraisal of Cancer Screening Programmes ................. 178 Some Empirical Findings of Economic Evaluations of Cancer Screening. ........................................•............................................ 183 Conclusions ......................................................................................... 184 References ........................................................................................... 184 Index ........................................................................................................... 187 Preface In the absence of effective primary prevention of cancer, "secondary prevention" by means of screening is, on the face of it, an attractive proposition for many cancer sites. Nevertheless, only for breast and cervical cancer is the benefit of screening considered sufficiently proven in many countries for a public-health population-based screening pro gramme to be implemented. As with other public-health interventions, there is a particular ethical responsibility on those providing screening to ensure that the chance of a person benefiting from it exceeds the chance of his being harmed by it. Therefore it is necessary to establish by research the extent of benefit, e.g. the proportion of deaths avoided or life-years gained, and to balance this against the disadvantages incurred through factors such as false-positive test results, overdiagnosis of non-progressive disease and opportunity costs of using public or private resources for this purpose. The aim of this volume is to provide an up-to-date review of current evidence on the value of cancer screening. Following an initial chapter which outlines the general principles of screening and the research meth odology required, individual chapters describe research-based evidence on the pros and cons of screening for ten different cancers. For each one, the size of the problem in terms of incidence and mortality is described and its aetiology is briefly reviewed, so as to indicate not only the feas ibility of primary prevention, but also the high-risk groups at which screening might be targeted. Such evidence as there is on natural history is described, with an indication of how this could theoretically be altered by early detection. Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of potential screen ing tests are summarised, and the findings of studies aimed at measuring re ductions in mortality or incidence are reported. Evidence, which is usually sparse, on the side-effects and costs of screening is also summarised. The two fmal chapters deal with psychological and economic aspects of screening, with an emphasis on the difficult methodological problems that measurement of these aspects entails. It is hoped that this book will be of value to all health professionals with an interest in screening and cancer control, but especially to purchasers of health care, whether in the public or the private sector. Sutton, 1995 Je SM The Editors and the Contributors Dr Jackie Brown Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG Professor Jocelyn Chamberlain Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG Professor Howard Cuckle Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research Department of Clinical Medicine, The University of Leeds 34 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LN Dr Ruth Ellman Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology, D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG Dr Jane Melia Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5N.G Dr Sue Moss Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG