ebook img

European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on PDF

23 Pages·2017·0.43 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on

Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 GUIDELINES European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium Ce´sar Aldecoa, Gabriella Bettelli, Federico Bilotta, Robert D. Sanders, Riccardo Audisio, Anastasia Borozdina, Antonio Cherubini1, Christina Jones, Henrik Kehlet, Alasdair MacLullich, Finn Radtke, Florian Riese, Arjen J.C. Slooter, Francis Veyckemans, Sylvia Kramer, Bruno Neuner, Bjoern Weiss and Claudia D. Spies2 The purpose of this guideline is to present evidence-based the treatment of surgical patients, a team-based approach and consensus-based recommendations for the prevention should be implemented into daily practice. This guideline is andtreatmentofpostoperativedelirium.Thecornerstonesof aimedtopromoteknowledgeandeducationinthepreopera- theguidelinearethepreoperativeidentificationandhandling tive,intraoperativeandpostoperativesettingnotonlyamong ofpatientsatrisk,adequateintraoperativecare,postoperative anaesthesiologists but also among all other healthcare pro- detection of delirium and management of delirious patients. fessionalsinvolvedinthecareofsurgicalpatients. The scope of this guideline is not to cover ICU delirium. Considering that many medical disciplines are involved in Published online 9February 2017 Introduction TheEuropeanSocietyofAnaesthesiology(ESA)iscom- CommitteechosethemembersoftheTaskForce(CDS, mitted to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines of CA, GB, FB and RDS) based on their clinical and high quality. The ESA Guidelines Committee selected methodological expertise. The Task Force elected its the ‘Reduction of Postoperative Delirium’ as a topic of chairperson,bycommonconsent,attheirfirsttelephone interest and dedicated a Task Force – established in conference on 15 March 2013, and the ESA formally March2013 – tocoverthismatter.TheESAGuidelines confirmed this election during the first constitutional meeting at the European Anaesthesiology Congress in Barcelonaon2June2013.FollowingthefirstTaskForce ThisarticleisaccompaniedbythefollowingInvited meeting,membersoftheAdvisoryBoardwerechosenby Commentary: theGuidelinesCommitteeandtheTaskForcebasedon Steiner LA. Postoperative delirium guidelines. The their clinical and methodological expertise in regard to greatertheobstacle,themoregloryinovercomingit. thekeyquestionsasagreedbytheTaskForceinBarce- Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:189–191. lonainJune2013(Table1).TheTaskForcereceivedits entire financial support from the ESA, without any FromtheDepartmentofAnesthesiologyandIntensiveCareMedicine,Charite´CampusVirchow-KlinikumandCharite´CampusMitte,Charite´ –Universita¨tsmedizinBerlin, Berlin,Germany(FR,SK,BN,BW,CDS);DepartmentofAnesthesiology,FacultaddeMedicinadeValladolid,HospitalUniversitarioRioHortega,Valladolid,Spain(CA); DepartmentofGeriatricSurgery;DepartmentofAnaesthesia,AnalgesiaandIntensiveCare,ItalianNationalResearchCentresonAging/IRCCS,Ancona(GB);Department ofAnesthesiology,CriticalCareandPainMedicine,‘Sapienza’UniversityofRome,Rome,Italy(FB);DepartmentofAnaesthesiology,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison, Wisconsin,USA(RDS);DepartmentofSurgery,St.HelensHospital,Merseyside;UniversityofLiverpool,Liverpool,UnitedKingdom(RA);PetrovskyNationalResearch CenterofSurgery,Moscow,Russia(AB);GeriatriaedAccettazioneGeriatricad’Urgenza,IRCCS-INRCA,Ancona,Italy(AC);WhistonHospital,Prescot,Merseyside, United Kingdom (CJ); Section of Surgical Pathophysiology and The Lundbeck Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen,Denmark(HK);EdinburghDeliriumResearchGroup,GeriatricMedicineUnit,UniversityofEdinburgh,Edinburgh,UnitedKingdom(AM); DepartmentofAnaesthesia,AnæstesiologiskAfdeling,Næstved,Denmark(FR);PsychiatricUniversityHospital,Zurich,Switzerland(FR);DepartmentIntensiveCare MedicineandBrainCentreRudolfMagnus,UniversityMedicalCenterUtrecht,Utrecht,TheNetherlands(AJCS);Serviced’Anesthe´siologie,CliniquesuniversitairesStLuc, Brussels,Belgium(FV) CorrespondencetoProfClaudiaD.Spies,DepartmentofAnaesthesiologyandIntensiveCareMedicine,Charite´ –Universita¨tsmedizinBerlin,Charite´CampusVirchow- KlinikumandCharite´ CampusMitte,D-10117Berlin,Germany Tel:+4930450531012/þ4930450531052;fax:+4930450531911;e-mail:[email protected] 1AntonioCherubinirepresentedtheEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety(EUGMS). 2ClaudiaD.SpieswastheelectedchairoftheTaskForce. 0265-0215Copyright(cid:2)2017EuropeanSocietyofAnaesthesiology.Allrightsreserved. DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594 Evidenceandconsensus-basedguidelinesonpostoperativedelirium 193 Table1 KeyquestionsasagreedbytheTaskForceinBarcelona, Duringitsmeetings,theTaskForceagreedonseveralkey June2013 questions (Table 1). To answer these questions and to Keyquestion Statements develop evidence-based recommendations, search strat- egies included PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, ISI Web of Whatispostoperativeandwhatispostinterventional 7/7 delirium knowledge and Embase up to March 2015. Afterwards, Whatisemergencedelirium(inadequateemergence)? 7/7 onlyselectednewpublishedarticlesinrespectofcurrent (cid:3) WhatareriskfactorsforPOD? 6/8 clinicalpracticewereconsidered.Searchtermswere(delir- * Predisposing(pre-intra-postoperative) * Precipitating(pre-intra-postoperative) iumORconfusionORconfusion(cid:2)ORdisorientationOR Whatmeasurescanbetakentodeterminetheindividual 6/8 bewilderment) AND (postoperative OR postoperative riskofpatients? period OR postoperative period(cid:2) OR post surgical OR Whenshouldariskevaluationbeperformed? 8/8 (cid:3) Preoperativephase 7/8 postsurgicalORanesthesiarecoveryperiodORanesthesia * Whichpharmacologicalinterventionscanbe recoveryperiod(cid:2)ORpostanesthesia).Thesearcheswere recommendedforwhichsubgroupofpatients? performedbetweenJanuary2014andMarch2015.These * Whichmedication/actionsshouldbeavoided? searches led to 9425 hits. After automated and manual * Whichnonpharmacologicalinterventionscan berecommended? removal of duplicates, 5779 hits were screened for & Whichsupportivestrategiesarebeneficial? relevance. Relevant articles included existing systematic & Istheuseofchecklists/algorithmsusefuland and narrative reviews, editorials, meta-analyses, random- doesitaffectincidence,severityorduration ofPOD? isedcontrolledtrials(RCTs),cohortstudies,case–control (cid:3) Intraoperativephase 8/8 studies and cross-sectional studies. Case (series) reports * Whichpharmacologicalinterventionscanbe were not included but screened for relevant references. recommendedforwhichsubgroupofpatients? * Whichmedication/actionsshouldbeavoided? We additionally used the ‘Cited by xx PubMed Central * Whichnonpharmacologicalinterventionscan articles’ function in PubMed to identify potentially berecommended? & Whichsupportivestrategiesarebeneficial? & Howshouldanaesthesiabeconductedto Fig.1 avoidPOD? (cid:3) Postoperativephase 8/8 * Whichpharmacologicalinterventionscanbe 9425 hits recommendedforwhichsubgroupofpatients? • PubMed 2547 hits & Whichmedication/actionsshouldbe • Cochrane 288 hits avoided? • Embase 4370 hits * Howshouldpainmanagementbeconductedin • Scopus 650 hits thepostoperativephasetopreventdelirium? • ISI Web of Science 1653 hits * Isthereevidenceforanalgorithm(likethePain- Agitation-DeliriumManagementonICUs)that canbeapplied? WhichtoolsshouldbeusedtomonitorforPOD? 8/8 1649 automated duplicate removal Whichtoolshouldbeusedtomonitorpostoperative 7/8 pain? 1997 manual duplicate removal WhenshouldPODbemonitored? 7/8 HowoftenshouldPODbemonitored? 8/8 WhatarereversiblecausesofPOD? 7/8 Howcansymptomsbeevaluatedobjectively? 8/8 5779 abstracts screened Whenshouldpharmacologicalinterventionsbe 8/8 conducted? Whichpharmacologicaltreatmentcanbeused? 7/7 WhereshouldPODbetreated? 7/7 5460 publications excluded Whichnonpharmacologicaltreatmentcanbe 7/7 conducted? • No surgical patients • No outcome data regarding one of our key questions & Geriatricpatients AretheredifferencesinthemanagementofPODin 8/8 • Not relevant to one of the key questions geriatricpatients? • Case report or case series report Isthereevidenceforabeneficialpre-,peri-,and 7/7 • Health economics or other nonclinical investigation postoperativetreatmentalgorithmregardingPOD? Howtomanagedeliriumsuperimposedonapreexisting 8/8 dementia/cognitivedisorder? 319 publications included by March 2015 POD,postoperativedelirium. 85 publications suggested by members of task force and involvement from the healthcare industry. Sub-commit- advisory board teeswereestablishedtoaddressthequestionsofinterest. Evidence-based and consensus-based 404 publications included by October 2015 methods The guideline was designed following the ‘Appraisal of Flowchartofthestudyselectionprocess. GuidelinesforResearchandEvaluation(AGREEII)’.1–3 Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 194 Aldecoaetal. overlooked but relevant articles. We also screened the Moreover, POD (refer to the specific definition in the referencelistsofrelevantarticlesforfurtherpublications ‘Paediatricpatients’section)isacommoncomplicationin andincludedreferencessuggestedbythemembersofthe children of pre-school age (5 to 7 years): whether this is Task Force and the advisory board. Overall, 405 articles due to age-related psychological issues or to additional wereincludedintheguideline(Fig.1).Relevantarticles inflammatory effects on the brain cannot currently be were graded according to their level of evidence (LoE) determined. There is a limited number of studies on using theCritical Appraisal Worksheets from theCentre cognitiveoutcomesinchildren.7FortheUSA,theFood for Evidence-Based Medicine of the University of andDrugAdministration (FDA)recentlyrecommended Oxford.4 The grade of recommendation (GoR) was cautious indications for anaesthesia and surgery in chil- obtained on the basis of the LoE of the literature dren aged less than 3 years.8 In Europe, the ESA (Table 2) and the consensus expert opinions by the launchedaninitiative,theEUROpeanSafeTotsAnaes- majority((cid:4)75%)oftheTaskForceandtheadvisoryboard. thesia Research (Eurostar) Initiative Task Force to Expertshadtodiscloseaconflictofinterestbeforeparti- promotetranslationalresearchonanaesthesianeurotoxi- cipatingintheconsensus-basedvotingonanyrecommen- cityandlong-termoutcomesafterpaediatricanaesthesia dation.Expertswereexcludedfromvotingifaconflictof and surgery.9 interestrelatingtoanyrecommendationwaspossible.For In addition, POD is more common in all age groups if allstatements,thestrengthoftherecommendationisprefacedby precipitating risk factors such as major surgery10–13 or theGRADEphrase‘werecommend’forstrongrecommendations emergency surgery14–19 are present. The incidence (GoRA)orbytheGRADEphrase‘wesuggest’forconditional increaseswithahighburdenofcomorbiditiespresenting recommendations(GoRB). as multiorgan dysfunction before surgery, for example Thefinaldraftoftheguidelinewaspeer-reviewedbythe low haemoglobin concentration,20–23 low ejection frac- relevantsub-committeesoftheESA’sScientificCommit- tion,16carotidarterystenosis,24orhighserum creatinine tee. The reviewed draft was made available between 8 concentration.25–28PODisassociatedwithseveralnega- October2015and7November2015ontheESAwebsite tiveclinicalconsequences,includingmajorpostoperative for critical appraisal by ESA members. The final manu- complications, cognitive decline, distress, longer hospi- script of the guideline was approved by the Guidelines talisation with increased costs and higher CommitteeandBoardoftheESAbeforepublication.The mortality.17,20,29–36Therefore,preventionofPODshould guidelinesexpireafter5yearsunlessupdatedearlier. betheaiminallpatients;ifitcannotbeprevented,itis essential to intervene immediately.29,37–39 Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is an adverse postopera- Definition tive complication that can occur in patients of any age, Delirium is defined by either the Diagnostic and Stat- from children to the elderly. Its incidence varies in the isticalManualofMentalDisorders,FifthEdition(DSM- various age groups and is substantially influenced by 5)40orbythe10threvisionoftheInternationalStatistical patient-related risk factors that are variably distributed Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems anddifferentiallyaccumulateinthedifferentagegroups. (ICD10,Table3).41Deliriumisanacuteandfluctuating Elderly patients are generally thought to be at higher alteration of mental state of reduced awareness and risk because predisposing risk factors such as cognitive disturbanceofattention.PODoftenstartsintherecovery impairment,comorbidity,sensorialdeficits,malnutrition, room and occurs up to 5 days after surgery.42–44 One polymedication,impaired functionalstatusand frailty(a investigation43 found that many patients with POD on conditionthatcanonlybeobservedamongagedpatients) the peripheral ward already had POD in the recovery accumulate and overlap with ageing. room. Table2 Fromevidencetorecommendations(modifiedfromGRADE5andTheEuropeanCouncilRecommendation6) LoE GoR Wordingofthestatements LevelofEvidence(LoE)fromtheCentreforEvidence-Based Consideredjudgement–groupdecision MedicineoftheUniversityofOxford High A–strongrecommendation Werecommend Dataderivedfrommultiplerandomisedclinicaltrialsormeta- Evidenceand/orgeneralagreementthatagiventreatmentor analyses procedureisbeneficial/useful/effective Moderate B–recommendation Wesuggest Dataderivedfromasinglerandomisedclinicaltrialorlarge Conflictingevidenceand/oradivergenceofopinionabout nonrandomisedstudies thetreatmentorprocedure,howeverevidence/opinionis infavourofusefulness/efficacy Weak Notconsidereda Consensusofopinionoftheexpertsand/orsmallstudies, retrospectivestudiesandregistries aIfevidenceorgeneralagreementthatthegiventreatmentorprocedureisnotuseful/effectiveorinsomecasesmayevenbeharmful,theinformationisincludedinthe manuscript,butnostatementsaregiven. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 Evidenceandconsensus-basedguidelinesonpostoperativedelirium 195 Table3 DefinitionofdeliriumGoldstandardaccordingtotheDiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisorders,FifthEdition,40orthe 10threvisionoftheInternationalStatisticalClassificationofDiseasesandRelatedHealthProblems41 ICD-10criteria(F05.0)Delirium,notinducedbyalcoholandother psychoactivedrugsandnotsuperimposedondementia DSM-5criteria Anaetiologicallynonspecificorganiccerebralsyndromecharacterised Adisturbanceinattention(i.e.reducedabilitytodirect,focus,sustain byconcurrentdisturbancesofconsciousnessandattention, andshiftattention)andawareness(reducedorientationtothe perception,thinking,memory,psychomotorbehaviour,emotionand environment) thesleep–wakeschedule.Thedurationisvariableandthedegreeof severityrangesfrommildtoverysevere Diagnosticcriteria: Thedisturbancedevelopsoverashortperiodoftime(usuallyhourstoa fewdays),representsachangefrombaselineattentionand awareness,andtendstofluctuateinseverityduringthecourseofa day A.Cloudingofconsciousness,thatisreducedclarityofawarenessof Anadditionaldisturbanceincognition(e.g.memorydeficit, theenvironment,withreducedabilitytofocus,sustainorshiftattention disorientation,language,visuospatialabilityorperception B.Disturbanceofcognition,manifestbyboth: Thedisturbancesincriteriaaandcarenotbetterexplainedbyanother preexisting,establishedorevolvingneurocognitivedisorderanddo notoccurinthecontextofaseverelyreducedlevelofarousal,suchas coma (1)Impairmentofimmediaterecallandrecentmemory,withrelatively Thereisevidencefromthehistory,physicalexaminationorlaboratory intactremotememory;and findingsthatthedisturbanceisadirectphysiologicalconsequenceof anothermedicalcondition,substanceintoxicationorwithdrawal(i.e. duetoadrugofabuseortoamedication),orexposuretoatoxin,oris duetomultipleaetiologies (2)Disorientationintime,placeorperson C.Atleastoneofthefollowingpsychomotordisturbances: (1)Rapid,unpredictableshiftsfromhypoactivitytohyperactivity (2)Increasedreactiontime; (3)Increasedordecreasedflowofspeech (4)Enhancedstartlereaction D.Disturbanceofsleeporthesleep–wakecycle,manifestbyatleast oneofthefollowing: (1)Insomnia,whichinseverecasesmayinvolvetotalsleeploss,with orwithoutdaytimedrowsiness,orreversalofthesleep–wakecycle (2)Nocturnalworseningofsymptoms (3)Disturbingdreamsandnightmareswhichmaycontinueas hallucinationsorillusionsafterawakening E.Rapidonsetandfluctuationsofthesymptomsoverthecourseofthe day F.Objectiveevidencefromhistory,physicalandneurological examinationorlaboratorytestsofanunderlyingcerebralorsystemic disease(otherthanpsychoactivesubstance–related)thatcanbe presumedtoberesponsiblefortheclinicalmanifestationsinAtoD DSM-5,DiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisorders,FifthEdition;ICD-10,10threvisionoftheInternationalStatisticalClassificationofDiseasesandRelated HealthProblems. VeryearlyonsetofPODintheimmediatepostanaesthe- toamaximumof60daysis3%afterelectivesurgeryand sia period before or on arrival at the recovery room is nearly 10% after emergency surgery.55 In addition to referred to as ‘emergence delirium’.45–49 In children, mortality, postoperative cognitive impairments such as paediatric emergence delirium (paedED) may present POD and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) with purposeless agitation with kicking, absence of eye impose a huge burden on individuals and society.39 contact with caregivers or parents (with eyes staring or TheincidenceofPODisdependentonperioperativeand averting),inconsolabilityandabsenceofawarenessofthe intraoperative risk factors.57 Therefore, the incidence of surroundings.50 POD varies within a broad range.58,59 For example, a Deliriumcanpresentashypoactive(decreasedalertness, meta-analysisof26studiesofPODreportedanincidence motor activity and anhedonia), as hyperactive (agitated of4.0to53.3%inhipfracturepatientsand3.6to28.3%in and combative) or as mixed forms.51,52 Increased age elective patients.60 seems to be a predisposing factor for the hypoactive POD, and delirium in general, is often regarded as a form.51,53 The prognosis may be worse with hypoactive temporaryattenuationofbrainfunction,usuallyfollowed delirium,possiblyduetorelativeunder-detectionbystaff byafullremission.However,strongevidenceexiststhat and consequently delayed treatment.51 POD is linked with longer term cognitive and noncog- nitivemorbidityaswellasreducedqualityoflife.Itisalso Relevance associatedwithincreasedmortalityintheshorttermand Morethan230millionsurgicalproceduresareperformed long term. The impact of POD on mortality has been eachyearworldwide,ofwhichmorethan80millionarein foundacrossdifferentsurgicaldisciplines,inelectiveand Europe.54–56InEurope,thein-hospitalmortalityrateup emergency surgery.17,20,23,24,29,31–33,36,61–71 Only a few Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 196 Aldecoaetal. studies, some of them after adjustment for preoperative thecomplexunderlyingpathologicalmechanismleading cognitive status, found no72–77 or only borderline78 to increased vulnerability to POD. association between POD and mortality. In addition to the above statements, emergency Thereis evidence that POD is associated with deterior- surgery14–19,155 and postoperative complications156 atingcognitioninboththeshortterm(months)andlong increase the risk of higher rates and prolonged duration term((cid:4)1year)afteritsoccurrence.39,79–81Oftenreferred of POD as well as long-term cognitive impairment.157 to as postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), Protocols are required to identify these risk factors altered cognition has been found shortly after POD in and to implement risk reduction strategies (e.g. fast the ICU setting.82–84 Some investigators have found track).105,158,159 POD to be associated with POCD up to 12 months Hypothermiaonadmissiontotherecoveryroomhasalso postsurgery30,78,85,86 and even associated with dementia been reported to be a risk factor for hypoactive emer- up to 5 years after POD.68 In addition, POD has been gence.49 In addition, preoperative fasting glucose con- associated with posttraumatic stress disorder 3 months centrations are associated with more delirium after after surgery.87 cardiac surgery.128,160 Despite existing evidence on POD increases total hospital length of stay biomarkers for the detection and monitoring of POD (LOS).13,15,20,23,31,34,84,88–96 POD on day 1 after surgery from both the ICU setting93,161,162 and the non-ICU is most predictive of hospital LOS.13 In addition, even setting,14,116,163–169 their use in clinical routine cannot POD in the recovery room has been associated with currentlyberecommended; furtherresearchisrequired. increased total hospital LOS.13 After discharge, patients with POD have an increased level of care depen- Monitoring of postoperative delirium dency20,23,30,32,34–36,61,89,92 or limitations in basic activi- EarlydiagnosisofPODiscriticaltotriggerfocussedand ties of daily living up to 12 months.31 effectivetreatment.29,37–39,79,80Patientsshouldnotleave Because patients can present with both delirium and the recovery room without being screened for POD. cognitiveimpairmentbeforesurgery,preoperativeevalu- Current reference standards for diagnosing delirium, ation ofpatientsfor thepresenceof delirium andcogni- includingPOD,aretheDSM-540ortheICD1041(Table tive impairment should be considered. Of note, studies 3). Extensive training is required to use these reference that evaluated delirium on admission, that is before standards.105 In addition, the new definition of DSM-5 surgery, reported prevalence rates between 4.4 and comparedwith DSM IV-TRdecreases the sensitivity to 35.6%.92,97–104Cognitiveimpairmentatanytimeduring diagnosedeliriumbecausethedisturbancesdonotoccur surgical stay,including preoperativedelirium, wasarisk inthecontextofaseverelyreducedlevelofarousal.170,171 factorinhipfracturepatientsforpoorfunctionaloutcome However,theDSM-5guidancenotesclarifythis,stating 12 months later.104 Any cognitive impairment before thatpatientswithaseverelyreducedlevelofarousal(of hospital admission was an independent risk factor for acute onset) above the level of coma should be con- worse longer term cognitive impairment.104,105 sideredashaving‘severeinattention’andhenceashaving delirium.40,172Asthisisrelevantinthepostoperativeand ICUsetting,itisimportantthatbothasedation/agitation Risk factors tool such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale173 A widely accepted model of delirium differentiates pre- (RASS; Table 5)and a delirium screeningtool are used. disposing factors (that are related to the patient) and A delirium screening system suitable for use in the precipitating factors (that trigger the onset of delir- recovery room should be easily applicable and fast to ium).106 The risk of developing delirium can be seen perform.44 A high sensitivity (to detect POD as early as as the product of predisposing and precipitating factors. possible)maybeachievedwithtwoscores – theNursing Risk assessment is considered as the responsibility of Delirium Screening Scale174 (Nu-DESC) and the Con- different disciplines and should be implemented in the fusion Assessment Method (CAM).44,176 However, in a perioperative clinical pathway. recentstudy,thesensitivitiesofbothofthesetestswere Theevidence-basedandconsensusstatementsandtheir lower than expected,177 and it is to be noted that the GoR for preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative CAM has a low sensitivity when not used by staff riskfactorsforPODarelistedinTable4.Asmanystudies specially trained in its use. In the latter study reporting identified advanced age asa risk factorfor POD both in lower sensitivities despite a high methodological stan- univariate and in multivariate analysis, we show the dard, the measurements were performed in a prolonged evidenceintwocolumns(alladultsvs.elderly(cid:4)65years timeframeof60min,thatistooslowtoassessthesudden of age) according to the inclusion criteria of the cited changes in the recovery room seen in this patient popu- studies. In the medical literature, elderly patients are lation.177 The study reporting a higher sensitivity was often defined as aged at least 65 years.105 However, embedded in an accreditation process in which all team chronologicalagemaybeaninsufficientproxytocapture members – nurses and physicians – were educated Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 Evidenceandconsensus-basedguidelinesonpostoperativedelirium 197 Table4 Evidence-basedandconsensus-basedstatementsregardingriskfactors Agegroup(inclusioncriteria) Statements LoE Alladults Elderly>65years GoR – WesuggestevaluatingthefollowingpreoperativeriskfactorsforPOD (cid:3) Advancedage [10],1b;[14],2b;[17],4;[18], [10,14,17,20, [18,35,76,105,111–113, B 2b;[20],2b;[34],2b;[35], 34,107,108,112, 114,117,119,119] 2b;[76],2b;[105],5 113,116,118] [107],2b;[108],2b [109],2b;[110],2b [111],2b;[112],2b [113],2b;[114],2b [115],2b;[116],2b [117],2b;[118],2b [119],2b (cid:3) Comorbidities(e.g.cerebrovascular [17],4;[20],2b;[21],2b;[71], [17,20,110,112, [21,103,123,125,126,130,132] B includingstroke,cardiovascular, 4;[103],2b 121,124,127,128] peripheralvasculardiseases,diabetes, [108],1b;[112],2b anaemia,Parkinson’sdisease, [121],2b;[122],1b depression,chronicpainandanxiety [123],2b;[124],3b disorders) [125],2b;[126],4 [127],2b;[128],2b [130],1b;[131],2b [132],2b (cid:3) Theresultsofcomorbidityscoressuch [28],2b;[34],2b;[89],2b; [28,34,135] [89,94,122,133,134] B astheAmericanSocietyof [96],4;[122],4;[133],2b; Anesthesiologists’physicalstatus [134],4;[135],4 classificationsystem(ASA-PS)orthe CharlsonComorbidityIndex(CCI)orthe ClinicalImpairmentAssessmentScore (CIAS)beforesurgery (cid:3) Preoperativefluidfastingand [13],2b;[112],2b [13] [112],Incl.(cid:4)18years,obsvd.66(cid:5)11years, B dehydration range58to72years (cid:3) Hyponatraemiaorhypernatraemia [34],2b;[110],1b [34,135,136] [110],Incl.(cid:4)60years,obsvd.75years B [135],4;[136],4 (cid:3) Drugswithanticholinergiceffects(e.g. [92],4;[109],2b [137,139,140] [92,109,113],Incl.(cid:4)50years,obsvd.67(cid:5)9 B measuredbyananticholinergicdrug years;[115,138],Incl.(cid:4)18years,obsvd. scale) 68(cid:5)8years,range46to88years [113],2b;[117],2b [137],4;[138],4 [139],4;[140],4 Werecommendevaluatingalcohol-related [20],2b;[23],2b;[34],2b; [20,34,116],Incl. [23],Incl.(cid:4)50years,obsvd.64(cid:5)9years, A disorders(ICD-10)/alcoholusedisorders [71],4;[105],5;[116],2b; none,mean63 PODþ,69(cid:5)9years,POD(cid:6),61(cid:5)6years; (DSM-5)asafurtherpreoperativerisk [138],2b;[141],2b years,range24to [71,105,138,141],Incl.(cid:4)18years,obsvd. factor 90years 68(cid:5)8years,range46to88years [142],nofulltext WesuggestconsideringthefollowingintraoperativeriskfactorsforPOD (cid:3) Siteofsurgery(abdominaland [13],2b;[23],2b;[34],2b [13,34] [23],Incl.none,obsvd.PODþ,69years, B cardiothoracic) POD(cid:6),61years (cid:3) Intraoperativebleeding [42],2b;[128],2b [128,143–145] [42],Incl.none,obsvd.PODþ71years,POD(cid:6), B 61years [143],2b;[144],2b [145],4 Werecommendconsideringdurationof [16],2b;[116],2b [16,116,136,149] [147],Incl.(cid:4)60years,obsvd.72years;[148], A surgeryasafurtherintraoperativerisk Incl.>60years,obsvd.PODþ,76.1(cid:5)6.1 factor years,POD(cid:6),69.8(cid:5)6.0years;[144],Incl. (cid:4)60years,obsvd.72years [136],4;[146],4 [147],2b;[148],2b [149],2b Werecommendevaluatingpainasa [13],2b;[49],2b;[93],2b; [13,49] [93],Incl.(cid:4)60years,obsvd.72years; A postoperativeriskfactorforPOD [103],2b;[129],2b [103,129,150],Incl.(cid:4)60years,obsvd.75 years;[152],Incl.(cid:4)50years,obsvd.66years; [153];[154] [150],4;[151],nofulltext; [152],2b;[153],1b;[154], 2b Datapresentedasreferencenumber,GoR,gradeofrecommendation(strong¼A,conditional¼B);LoE,levelofevidence;Incl.,inclusioncriterion;obsvd.,observed; POD,postoperativedelirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 198 Aldecoaetal. Table5 RichmondAgitation-SedationScaletoassesssedation whereas the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium depths169 (PAED)scale(Table7)wasusedinchildren.181 þ4 Combative Violent,immediatedangertostaff Intherecoveryroomsetting,thefollowingdeliriumscores þ3 Veryagitated Pullsorremovestube(tubes)or catheter(catheters);aggressive have undergone validation against the criteria according þ2 Agitated Frequentnon-purposefulmovement, to the DSM: fightsventilator þ1 Restless Anxious,apprehensivebutmovements notaggressiveorvigorous (1) Nu-DESC44,174,177 reported sensitivity between 32 0 Alertandcalm and 95% and reported specificity up to 87%.44 If (cid:6)1 Drowsy Notfullyalert,buthassustained sensitivityinthedifferentrecoveryroomsettingisin awakeningtovoice(eyeopening andcontactformorethanorexactly thelowerrange,itmaybeadvisabletouseathreshold 10s) of at least 1 point to increase sensitivity to 80%.177 (cid:6)2 Lightsedation Brieflyawakenstovoice(eyeopening andcontactfor<10s) (2) CAM43,44,105,176 or the CAM-ICU.178 In a post- (cid:6)3 Moderatesedation Movementoreyeopeningtovoice(but anaesthesia care unit (PACU), sensitivity has been noeyecontact) reported between 28 and 43%, with a specificity of (cid:6)4 Deepsedation Noresponsetovoicebutmovementor eyeopeningtophysicalstimulation 98%.45,177 (cid:6)5 Unrousable Noresponsetovoiceorphysical stimulation In special patient populations, other scores have been Theusualtarget/aimofalertnessiswithinthegreyrectangle. used, and diagnostic validity has been assessed. Although, these scores might be applicable and have beforeimplementingqualityindicatorsfordelirium,pain been validated regarding standards (not necessarily and postoperative nausea and vomiting assessment in DSM),theyhaveeitherbeenassessedinspecialpatient the recovery room.44 More research is needed regarding populations or in settings different from the postopera- the optimal tools for detection of delirium in the tive setting. Some of these scores, such as the Delirium recovery room. RatingScale-98182ortheMemorialDeliriumAssessment Scale,183 might be useful to evaluate postoperative If POD is detected, patients should not be discharged patients,buttheymighttakelongertoperforminabusy from the recovery room to the ward without having recovery room setting. Several scores can be used as started aetiology-based and symptom-based treat- alternatives: the Bedside Confusion Scale,184 Clinical ment.179 This is because the longer the duration of Assessment of Confusion,139 Confusion Rating Scale,186 deliriumandthelaterthetreatmentisstarted,themore theDelirium-O-Meter,187DeliriumObservationScreen- cognitive decline may be expected.39,79 On the post- ing,188 the delirium symptom interview (DSI),189 the operative ward, POD should be monitored at least once Neelon and Champagne Confusion Scale190 or the 4 per shift due to the fluctuating course of POD.175 The ‘A’s Test.191 evidence-basedandconsensus-basedstatementsregard- ing POD monitoring are listed in Table 6. In general, the team (including nurses and physicians) should be involved in the choice of which score to use. PODscreeningisrecommendedbyusingstandardisedrating For routine implementation, it is mandatory to train the scales validated for the postoperative setting. The scales team on the basic features of delirium as well as the usuallytakelessthan1mintocomplete.Onlythosescores features of any tools that will be used. This is not only that are validated for the recovery room or the peripheral becausescoressuchasCAMrequiretraining,whereasthe ward with an adequate sensitivity are listed below. Scores NuDesc does not, but also because the team needs to validatedonlyfortheICUorothersettingsarenotlisted. haveacommonunderstandingofdeliriumandtobeable Foremergencedeliriumimmediatelyaftersurgery,agitation to communicate consistently on the results of tools scalessuchastheRASS173wereusedinallstudies,47–49,180 used.105,192 Table6 Evidence-basedandconsensus-basedstatementsregardingmonitoringofpostoperativedelirium Agegroup(inclusioncriteria) Statements LoE Alladults >65years GoR – WerecommendscreeningforPODin [42],2b;[44],2b;[178],2b [44,178] [42] A allpatientsstartingintherecovery roomandineachshiftupto postoperativeday5 Werecommendusingavalidated [44],2b;[172],2b [44,172,178] [175] A deliriumscoreforPODscreening [175],2b;[178],2b Datapresentedasreferencenumber,GoR,gradeofrecommendation(strong¼A,conditional¼B);LoE.LoE,levelofevidence;POD,postoperativedelirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 Evidenceandconsensus-basedguidelinesonpostoperativedelirium 199 Table7 ThePediatricAnesthesiaEmergenceDeliriumscale179 Inaddition,itisimportanttonotethatnotallscoresare available in different languages. Therefore, national Item societies might consider validating the scores in the 1 Thechildmakeseyecontactwiththecaregiver language in which it is to be applied. 2 Thechild’sactionsarepurposeful 3 Thechildisawareofhis/hersurroundings 4 Thechildisrestless Prevention and treatment 5 Thechildisinconsolable Preventionandtreatmentoptionsareavailabletoreduce Items1,2and3arereversescoredasfollows:4¼notatall,3¼justalittle, the incidence and duration of POD. If POD occurs, 2¼quiteabit,1¼verymuch,0¼extremely.Items4and5arescoredasfollows: immediatetreatmentofbothcausativefactorsandsymp- 0¼notatall,1¼justalittle,2¼quiteabit,3¼verymuch,4¼extremely.The scores of each item were summed to obtain a total Pediatric Anesthesia toms has a major impact in reducing its duration29,37–39 EmergenceDeliriumscalescore.Thedegreeofemergencedeliriumincreased (Fig.2).Theevidence-basedandconsensus-basedstate- directlywiththetotalscore. ments regarding prevention and treatment are listed in Table 8. Fig.2 Pre-operative Anaesthesia Recovery room Ward Assessment A.: (low risk and high risk patients) .A: (low risk and high risk patients) Avoid benzodiazepines for Avoid benzodiazepines (except . premedication except anxiety . withdrawal) All patients: All patients: Prevention B...: (HCMAMigovainhoninii smdrtiia dusaiemnnkr t d(iaflcaaluhpdyioh-ddnla iifin-tga2ieohs rattngg irn/iohcsgny e dttitshrim uAtmsge sobligatory)) As.f .+A BAc:o Hdneitgqinhuu aroitsueks p (iaanidfnud scitoioinonnt roaofll/ os(mpetiuo Alitd iosmbolidgaalt)ory) Non-oppMparhiunoealadtvli rgmsemeponsadirataaini.cl,ogonl4o)gical Non-pprhoepMaaviourneilmadtnli gmsateposicadoiraoain.nl,lg4o)gical Low risk A A High risk A+B A+B > cut-off > cut-off > cut-off > cut-off Assess pain: Assess pain: Assess pain: Assess pain: Observer-based Start self-assessment Observer-based Start self-assessment All patients: g Start risCkh-feacckt oforsr1) Risk1) Monitoring of pos. DSI5) neg. pos. DSI5) neg. n aneasthesia ori depth: Monit High risk Aavnoaieds ttohoe sdieae4)p Differential6) Aanddm diissscihoanrge Differential6) Every shift Pre-aDsesteasislemdent6) Post-Dasestaesilsemdent6) Treat underlying cause, if possible. Treat underlying cause, if possible. py S.ymptom-orientated pharmacotherapy: .Symptom-orientated pharmacotherapy: a Titrate haloperidol (0.25 mg-wise, Titrate haloperidol (0.25 mg-wise, Ther . mUnesauexr oa3.ll5tee pmrtnigca)stively low dose atypic . mUnesauexr oa3.ll5tee pmrtnigca)stively low dose atypic Algorithmforpre-operative,intra-operativeandpost-operativemanagementofpost-operativedeliriuminadultpatients.Thealgorithmshowsthe differenttimestagesofsurgery(lefttoright)and,inadifferentaxis,preventive(top),diagnostic(middle)andtherapeutically(lower)actionsthat shouldbetaken.Thered‘startbutton’helpstheusertostartatthefirststepinthedifferenttimestages.(1)Riskestimation(clinicalassessment takingintoconsiderationpredisposingandprecipitatingriskfactors);riskfactorscanbefoundindetailintheguidelinerecommendation, determinationofriskintoahighandalow-riskgroupcanbemadeasaclinicaldecision(2)Neuromonitoring(EEG/EMG-based)recommendedif available;(3)DSI,DeliriumScreeningInstrument(shouldbevalidatedintheappliedlanguage);(4)nonpharmacologicalmeasurestoreduce postoperativedeliriumshouldincludeorientation(clock,communication,etc.);visual/hearingaids;noisereductionandfacilitationofsleep; avoidanceofuselessindwellingcatheters;earlymobilisation;earlynutrition;pharmacologicaltreatmentshouldbeinstitutedtoimprovepatientsafety ifnonpharmacologicalmeasuresfail;(5)differentialincludestheassessmentandpossiblemodificationofunderlyingcausesfordelirium:use,for example,the‘IWATCHDEATH’-acronym:Infectious(e.g.UTIandpneumonia);Withdrawal(e.g.alcohol,opioidsandbenzodiazepines);Acute metabolicdisorder(electrolyteimbalanceandrenaldysfunction);trauma(operativetrauma);CNSpathology(e.g.strokeandperfusion);hypoxia(e.g. anaemia,cardiacfailureandpulmonaryfailure);deficiencies(e.g.vitaminB12,folicacidandthiamine);endocrinepathologies(e.g.T3/T4and glucose);acutevascular(e.g.hyper-/hypotension);toxins(e.g.anaesthetics,drugswithanticholinergicside-effects);heavymetals(rarecause);(6) detailedpre/post-surgicalassessmentofcognitivefunctionwithvalidatedtools.EEG,Electroencephalograph;EMG,Electromyography;UTI,urinary tractinfection;CNS,centralnervoussystem. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 200 Aldecoaetal. Table8 Evidence-basedandconsensus-basedstatementsregardingpreventionandtreatment Agegroup(inclusioncriteria) Statement LoE Alladults >65years GoR – Wesuggestimplementingfast- [158],1b;[159],2b;[193],2b; [159,193] [158,194] B tracksurgerytopreventPOD [193],2b Wesuggestavoidingroutine [10],2b;[105],5;[195],2b; [10],Incl.none,PODþ, B premedicationwith [196],3b;[197],NR;[198], 67.7years,POD(cid:6),50 benzodiazepinesexceptfor 2b;[204],2b years;[105,195,196], patientswithsevereanxiety >60%were(cid:4)65years; [197];[199]meanage 66.8yearsandrange 43–87years Werecommendmonitoring [105],5;[199],1b;[200],1b; [199–201] [105,202] A depthofanaesthesia [201],1b;[202],1b Werecommendadequatepain [103],2b;[153],1b;[197], [202] [103,153,197,199,205] A assessmentandtreatment NR;[203],4;[205],2b; [206],(SR) Wesuggestusingacontinuous [13],2b;[207],2b [13,207] B intraoperativeanalgesia regimen(e.g.with remifentanil) Werecommendpromptly [37],2b;[38],2b;[179],2b; [37] [38,179,208] A diagnosingPOD, [208],Consensusreview establishingadifferential diagnosis,andinstituting treatment Wesuggestusinglow-dose [208],5;[209],SR;[210],2b; [208,209] [211,212] B haloperidolaorlow-dose [211],2b atypicalneurolepticstotreat POD Datapresentedasreferencenumber,LoE.Incl.inclusioncriteria;obsvd.,observed;LoE,levelofevidence;GoR,gradeofrecommendation(strong¼A,conditional¼B); POD,postoperativedelirium.aLow-dosehaloperidolmeans0.25mgstepwisetitrateduptomaximumof3.5mg.213Anexcessivedoseofhaloperidolofmorethan6mga dayshouldnotbeused.214Long-termuseindementiapatientsmayincreaseharm.215 Pharmacological premedication (in particular benzo- neuroleptics122,233,234reducetheincidenceofPOD231or diazepines) is not always needed, and its routine use reduceitsseverityandduration,229thesefindingsremain has been questioned.208 However, for highly anxious uncertain due to inconsistent results of aggregated evi- patients or patients with alcohol or benzodiazepine use dence.232,235 Therefore, their routine use is currently disorders, careful use of premedication for prevention not advisable. and treatment can be considered.107,216,217 It remains unclear whether different regimens of anaes- PreventionofPODinpatientswithalcoholusedisorders thesia influence the development of POD. Cohort (e.g. measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identifi- studies, retrospective or secondary analyses185,236,237 cation Test (cid:4)8 points) may include long-acting benzo- and RCTs88,126,238–242 have shown mixed results and diazepines, neuroleptics, a -agonists and alcohol.218 In do not imply a role in adults. However, an important 2 the subset of patients with alcohol withdrawal-induced factorinmanagingPODisadequatestressreductionwith delirium,benzodiazepinesshouldbeoneofthefirst-line sufficient analgesia, an appropriate choice of analgesia medications.105Assecond-linemedication,a -agonistsor and the use of intraoperative opioids.13,180 Currently, it 2 neuroleptics can be used. For emergence delirium, remainsunclearifintraoperativeadministrationofshort- benzodiazepinesmightbea precipitatingfactor,48,107,219 acting analgesia impacts on POD. Some observational although this remains controversial.180 dataareavailablesuggestingthatanalgesiaprovidedwith continuous administration of remifentanil might reduce Dataonmelatoninforpremedicationontheeveningbe- the incidence of POD compared with a bolus-driven foresurgeryareinsufficienttodrawfinalconclusions,and regimen with fentanyl,207 but to draw convincing con- currently no clear recommendation can be given.220–223 clusions, evidence from RCTs is required. Perioperativea -agonists,forexampledexmedetomidine 2 To standardise the assessment and treatment of post- orclonidine,mightbeconsideredtodecreasetheincidence ofPODaftercardiacorvascularsurgery.224–228 operative pain, we refer to the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ guideline on acute pain management Thereareconflictingresultsregardingtheincidenceand in the perioperative setting.243 Although high preopera- severity of POD through prophylactic administration of tive129 and postoperative pain244 are risk factors for haloperidol35,229–231 or atypical neuroleptics.122,232–234 delirium, opioid analgesics may also be a risk factor Although there is some evidence that preventive low- in respect of side effects and organ dysfunc- dosehaloperidol35,229–231orpreventivelow-doseatypical tion.115,180,197,245,246 Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214 Evidenceandconsensus-basedguidelinesonpostoperativedelirium 201 could be one option if the patient is able to titrate the increases. Data provided by the WHO for Western medicationandfindtherightbalancebetweenanalgesia Europe report a prevalence of 1.6% in patients aged andtheminimumdoseofopioids.247PODdoesnotlimit 60 to 64 years and up to 43.1% in patients older than PCAuse.247Regionalanaesthesiaandregionalanalgesia 90 years.259 Previous dementia,23,67,146 cognitive impair- have not shown any benefit in respect of POD.248 ment11,12,15,18,34,71,90,93,108–110,113,115,116,125,169,260,261 and depression20,22,71,91,110,112,123,143 are associated with A healing environment should be considered for the development of POD. prevention of POD. Apart from the consensual state- ments on nonpharmacological treatment, this should Other chronic diseases are often reported to be be embedded in an environment for cognitive,249 func- present in more than 50% of patients aged 65 to tional, social and emotional enhancement.250 Further 70 years. In 30% of these patients, more than research is required to optimise the use of self-healing one single chronic disease is present. Cardiovascu- competencies of patients. lar14,16,17,24,28,77,95,103,125,127,148,260,262 and meta- bolic15,34,131,135,136 risk factors/diseases were found to Special patient groups be most frequently associated with POD. Geriatric patients Multimorbidity consists of a situation in which clinical A ‘threshold theory of cognitive decline’ was postulated patterns, evolution and treatment become more compli- toexplainasituationofdiminishedbrainreservecapacity cated than the simple sum of the different illnesses. occurring in older age, the genesis of which coincides Multimorbidityreducesthecapabilitytocopewithstress with the degenerative phenomena occurring with age- andincreasesglobalvulnerability – includingtheriskfor ing.251Duetothisreducedbraincapacity,olderpatients POD.257,263 Functional status, also called the sixth vital are on a ‘functional cliff’ for developing POD when sign,isdefinedasthesumofbehavioursthatareneeded undergoing a major physiological stress. tomaintaindailyactivities,includingsocialandcognitive InEurope,thepercentageofpeopleagedatleast65years functions.264 Impaired functional status (i.e. reduced currently ranges from 12% in ‘young’ countries such as levels of independence, abilities and socialisation) is Ireland to 21% in ‘old’ countries such as Germany and common among the elderly as a result of gait alteration, Italy.252Withthepassageoftime,thiswillhaveamajor lossofcoordination,reducedorabolishedsphinctercon- impactonthedemandforhealthcareservices,especially trol, malnutrition, associated illnesses and/or cognitive surgery. There are higher rates per population of both deterioration. Impaired functional status is associated inpatient and outpatient surgical and nonsurgical pro- withsurgicalsiteinfection,increasedmortalityandcom- cedures among the elderly compared with other age plication rate. In the preoperative setting, performance groups.253 Patients older than 80 years are the most measuressuchasthetimed‘Up&Go’Test265andother rapidly increasing group among surgical admissions.254 forms of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment266 have InItaly,38%ofpatientswhoundergosurgeryareatleast often been used. Impaired functional status has been 65 years old.255 In the USA, approximately half of oper- reportedasapredisposingfactorforPOD.23,34,89,169,267–271 ations are performed in patients aged at least 65 The term ‘frailty’ indicates a situation of critically years.254,256 Thus, the demand for surgery by older and reduced functional reserves, involving multiple organ sickerpatientsisincreasing,257andPODisregardedasa systems. It manifests with impaired capability to cope major problem. with intrinsic and environmental stressors and limited capability to maintain physiological and psychosocial Risk factors and preoperative evaluation homeostasis. Currently, 5.8 to 27.3% of the elderly Ageinginvolvesacontinuumofchangesinbiologicaland ((cid:4)65 years of age) in the general European population functional parameters that increase vulnerability and are reported to be frail.272 However, studies examining reduce functional reserve.258 Ageing is often accom- olderpatientsundergoingelectivecardiacandnoncardiac panied by chronic multiple diseases, disability and surgery quote prevalences of frailty between 41.8 and frailty. 50.3%273,274;thishighlightsthegreatvulnerabilityofthis Althoughchronologicalageplaysaroleinpredisposingto patient age group. Hypoalbuminaemia, hypocholestero- POD, it probably acts as a surrogate variable for the laemia and high levels of inflammation together with accumulation of age-related risk factors that are differ- muscular atrophy are specific markers. Frailty has been entially expressed among individuals; it is almost cer- foundtobeapredisposingfactorforPODamongelderly tainlythesumoftheseriskfactorsthatismostimportant surgical patients.75,123,133,275 in determining the probability of POD. Hearing loss was found to be a predisposing factor for Dementia is a main predisposing factor for POD. POD in three studies276–278 and mentioned in three Thisconditionisveryrareamongpatientsunder60years reviews58,270,279; the last two of these reviews and one of age and becomes increasingly frequent as age additional study on internal medicine patients120 Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:192–214

Description:
The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) is com- the 'Reduction of Postoperative Delirium' as a topic of United Kingdom (CJ); Section of Surgical Pathophysiology and The Lundbeck After automated and manual metabolic disorder (electrolyte imbalance and renal dysfunction); trauma
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.