Directorate-General For internal Policies POLICY DEPARTMENTB STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES Directorate-General For internal Policies POLICY DEPARTMENTB AgricultureA agnricdu lRtuurer aanld D Rueravle Dleoveplompmeenntt STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CCuullttuurreeC aaulnntuddre EE anddduu Eccdaaucttaiitooionnn Role The Policy Departments are research units that provide specialised advice FishFisehreireiess to committees, inter-parliamentary delegations and other parliamentary bodies. RegionaRle gDioenvale Dleoveplompmeenntt Policy Areas TranspoTrratn aspnordt aTnod uToruirsismm Agriculture and Rural Development Culture and Education Fisheries Regional Development Transport and Tourism Documents Visit the European Parliament website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies PHOTO CREDIT: iStock International Inc., Photodisk, Phovoir DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES EUROPEAN AQUACULTURE COMPETITIVENESS: LIMITATIONS AND POSSIBLE STRATEGIES STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHOR(S) John Bostock, University of Stirling Institute of Aquaculture (UoS). Francis Murray, University of Stirling Institute of Aquaculture (UoS) James Muir, University of Stirling Institute of Aquaculture (UoS) Trevor Telfer, University of Stirling, Institute of Aquaculture (UoS) Alistair Lane, European Aquaculture Society (EAS) Nikos Papanikos, APC Advanced Planning – Consulting SA (APC S.A) Philippos Papegeorgiou, APC Advanced Planning – Consulting SA (APC S.A) Victoria Alday-Sanz RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Jesús Iborra Martín Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: DE, ES, FR, IT. ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in September 2009. Brussels, © European Parliament, 2009. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/expert/eStudies.do?language=N DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES EUROPEAN AQUACULTURE COMPETITIVENESS: LIMITATIONS AND POSSIBLE STRATEGIES STUDY Abstract This study examines the competitiveness of the EU aquaculture sector, as a contribution to the wider review of EU aquaculture policy being carried out by the European Community institutions. EU aquaculture competes with its international equivalents, with outputs from capture fisheries, and more fundamentally within global food markets. With small exceptions, the sector invests in production within the EU, and as little of its product is exported, competition is so far primarily defined within EU markets. Whilst EU aquatic food consumption has risen over the past 10 years, with stable or declining capture fisheries supply, most of this increase has come from imports rather than growth of EU aquaculture. To substantially increase aquaculture production at competitive prices for mainstream EU markets will require larger entities capable of scale economies, although small and micro-enterprises can also provide niche products and help sustain rural and coastal livelihoods. As spatial expansion is highly constrained by environmental regulation and conflicts with other resource users, productivity gains will be important in increasing output. Technological solutions are emerging, but are costly, so under current conditions, investments are more likely to be made in lower-cost production systems in third countries that export to the EU. IP/B/PECH/IC/2008_177 December 2009 PE 431.569 EN European Aquaculture Competitiveness: Limitations and Possible Strategies CONTENTS GLOSSARY 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 7 LIST OF FIGURES 9 LIST OF TABLES 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. INTRODUCTION 15 1.1. Background 15 1.2. Aims 15 1.3. Research approach 16 1.4. Competitiveness concepts 17 2. EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL SEAFOOD TRENDS 19 2.1. EU and global seafood production and demand 19 2.2. EU supply characteristics: regions and sub-sectors 20 2.3. Company characteristics and consolidation trends 27 2.4. Product differentiation, standards and certification 31 2.5. International trade rules and market volatility 36 3. INDICATORS OF COMPETITIVENESS 41 3.1. Availability of indicators 41 3.2. Comparative economic performance 44 3.3. National and Regional Comparisons 46 3.4. Aid to the sector 51 3.5. External factors 52 4. IDENTIFYING LIMITATIONS: SWOT ANALYSIS BY SECTOR AND THEME 53 4.1. Legal and administrative constraints 54 4.2. Environmental aspects 57 4.3. Availability of production sites 59 4.4. Food safety and other aspects related to consumption 62 4.5. Animal health and welfare 64 4.6. Third countries competition and market issues 68 4.7. Fish oil and fishmeal availability 76 4.8. Technological issues 79 4.9. Production costs 85 5. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 89 5.1. Introduction 89 5.2. General SWOT analysis for European aquaculture 90 5.3. Market orientation 92 5.4. Sustainability and access to resources 94 5.5. Industry structure 95 5.6. Innovation and industry support 96 5.7. Industry image 98 3 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies REFERENCES 99 ANNEX 1: INDUSTRY STRUCTURE STATISTICS 105 ANNEX 2: SWOT ANALYSIS FOR MAIN INDUSTRIES 111 A2.1 Salmon SWOT 111 A2.2 Trout SWOT 113 A2.3 Sea bass and sea bream SWOT 115 A2.4 Carp SWOT 117 A2.5 Shellfish SWOT 119 A2.6 Other species SWOT 120 ANNEX 3: POTENTIAL STRATEGIES: SCENARIO ANALYSIS 123 A3.1 Approaches 123 A3.2 Developing the market and stewardship scenarios 124 A3.3 Supply chain scenarios 127 A3.4 Implications for policy 128 4 European Aquaculture Competitiveness: Limitations and Possible Strategies GLOSSARY Competition Institutions, policies, and factors determining national productivity, which, in turn sets rates of returns to companies, growth rates and ultimately sustainable economic prosperity Cost leadership Efficiency driven competition strategy usually associated with economies of scale and low unit costs for commoditised products Economies of scale Reductions in unit-cost as the size of an enterprise increases Future contract A contract to buy or sell a specified commodity of standardized quality at a future date at an agreed (market-determined) price Genetic Movement of gene(s) from a hybrid or selectively-bred (farmed) Introgression species back into the parental (wild) gene pool by (escape and) backcrossing Horizontal Acquisition or merger between firms in the same industry and Integration stage of production Recirculating Tank-based aquaculture system where the water flow is treated Aquaculture System and re-used (as opposed to flow-through water supply which only passes through the farm once before discharge) Product Competition strategy based on development of distinctive product differentiation qualities, tangible and intangible often targeting narrower ‘niche’ premium markets Vertical integration Hierarchy of different market-specific production or service entities under common ownership combining to satisfy a common need 5 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies 6
Description: