E I W UROPE AND THE SLAMIC ORLD EUROPE ISLAMIC AND THE WORLD A HISTORY J T , G V , H L OHN OLAN ILLES EINSTEIN AND ENRY AURENS Translated by Jane Marie Todd With a Foreword by John L. Esposito Copyright © 2013 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tolan, John Victor, 1959– [Europe et l’islam. English] Europe and the Islamic world : a history / John Tolan, Gilles Veinstein, and Henry Laurens ; translated by Jane Marie Todd With a Foreword by John L. Esposito. p. cm. Henry Laurens’s name appears first on the original French ed. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-14705-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Europe—Relations—Middle East. 2. Middle East— Relations—Europe. 3. Europe—Relations—Islamic countries. 4. Islamic countries—Relations—Europe. 5. Europe—Civilization—Islamic influences. 6. Islamic civilization—Western influences. I. Veinstein, Gilles. II. Laurens, Henry, 1954– III. Todd, Jane Marie, 1957– IV. Title. DS63.2.E8L3813 2013 303.48'2401767—dc23 2012016021 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Cet ouvrage publié dans le cadre du programme d’aide à la publication bénéficie du soutien du Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et du Service Culturel de l’Ambassade de France représenté aux Etats-Unis. This work received support from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Cultural Services of the French Embassy in the United States through their publishing assistance program. This book has been composed in Minion Pro Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ Printed in the United States of America 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 CONTENTS Foreword by John L. Esposito General Introduction PART I: Saracens and Ifranj: Rivalries, Emulation, and Convergences By John Tolan 1. The Geographers’ World: From Arabia Felix to the Balad al-Ifranj (Land of the Franks) 2. Conquest and Its Justifications: Jihad, Crusade, Reconquista 3. The Social Inferiority of Religious Minorities: Dhimmis and Mudejars 4. In Search of Egyptian Gold: Traders in the Mediterranean 5. On the Shoulders of Giants: Transmission and Exchange of Knowledge PART II: The Great Turk and Europe By Gilles Veinstein Introduction to Part II: Continuity and Change in Geopolitics 6. The Ottoman Conquest in Europe 7. Ottoman Europe: An Ancient Fracture 8. Antagonistic Figures 9. The Islamic-Christian Border in Europe 10. Breaches in the Conflict PART III: Europe and the Muslim World in the Contemporary Period By Henry Laurens Introduction to Part III 11. The Eighteenth Century as Turning Point 12. Civilization or Conquest? 13. The Age of Reform 14. The Age of Empire 15. The First Blows to European Domination 16. The Great War and the Beginning of Emancipation 17. Contemporary Issues Notes Selected Bibliography Index FOREWORD by John L. Esposito CONTEMPORARY POLITICS and the media have too often produced a narrative of conflicting paradigms that sees the world and the history of relations between the West and Islam in terms of a clash of civilizations, Orientalism versus Occidentalism, fourteen centuries of jihad versus Crusades and colonialism, Islamophobia and anti-Westernism. Lost in the cultural crossfire are the religious, historical, political, and cultural diversity rather than monolithic nature of the West and the Muslim world and positive interactions and exchanges and cross-fertilization. Despite common historical and theological roots and beliefs, Muslim-Christian relations have often been overshadowed by political and economic as well as religious conflict as the armies and missionaries of Islam and of Christendom have been locked in a struggle for power and for souls: from the fall of the Byzantine (eastern Roman) Empire before Muslim armies in the seventh century to the Crusades during the eleventh and twelfth centuries; the expulsion of the “Moors” from Spain and the Inquisition; the Ottoman threat to overrun Europe; European (Christian) colonial expansion and domination from the eighteenth to early twentieth centuries; the political and cultural challenge of the superpowers in the new colonialism or American “neocolonialism” since the latter half of the twentieth century; the creation of the state of Israel by Western “Christian” countries and Palestinian exile; the competition of Christian and Muslim missionaries today from Africa to Southeast Asia; and the contemporary reassertion of Islam in Muslim politics around the world. Theologically, the very similarities of Christianity and Islam put the two on an early collision course. Islam belongs to the Abrahamic family of great monotheistic faiths. Muslims, like Jews and Christians, view themselves as the children of Abraham, as proclaimed in each of their sacred scriptures: the Old and New Testaments and the Qur’an. Despite specific and significant differences, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam share a belief in one God, the creator, sustainer, and ruler of the universe who is beyond ordinary experience. And all believe in angels, Satan, prophets, revelation, moral responsibility and accountability, divine judgment, and reward or punishment. Yet while Jews and Christians claim descent from Abraham and his wife, Sarah, through their son Isaac, Muslims trace their religious roots back to Abraham (Ibrahim) through Ismail, his firstborn son by Hagar, Sarah’s Egyptian servant. Both religions had a universal message and mission. Both possessed a supersessionist theology—that is, each community believed that its covenant with God was the fulfillment of God’s earlier revelation to a previous community that had gone astray. While Christians had little problem with their supersessionist views toward Judaism, a similar claim by Muslims to have the final revelation was unacceptable and, more than that, a threat to the uniqueness and divinely mandated role of Christianity to be the only means to salvation. Christendom experienced the early conquests and expansion of Islam not only as a theological but also as a political and civilizational challenge to its religious and political hegemony. Muslim rule quickly spread from the Byzantine and Persian empires to Syria, Iraq, and Egypt, and swept across North Africa and into Europe, where Muslims ruled Spain and the Mediterranean from Sicily to Anatolia. For non-Muslim populations in Byzantium and Persia, who had been subjugated by foreign rulers, Islamic rule meant an exchange of rulers rather than a loss of independence. Many in Byzantium willingly exchanged Greco- Roman rule for that of new Arab masters, fellow Semites, with whom they had closer linguistic and cultural affinities and to whom they paid lower taxes. Upon declaration of their allegiance to the Islamic state and payment of a poll (head) tax, these “protected” (dhimmi) peoples could practice their faith and be governed by their religious leaders and law in matters of faith and private life. Islam often proved more tolerant than imperial Christianity, providing greater religious freedom for Jews and indigenous Christians; most local Christian churches had been persecuted as schismatics and heretics by a “foreign” Christian orthodoxy. As Francis Peters has observed: The conquests destroyed little: what they did suppress were imperial rivalries and sectarian bloodletting among the newly subjected population. The Muslims tolerated Christianity but they disestablished it; henceforth Christian life and liturgy, its endowments, politics, and theology, would be a private not a public affair. By an exquisite irony, Islam reduced the status of Christians to that which the Christians had earlier thrust upon the Jews, with one difference. The reduction in Christian status was merely judicial; it was unaccompanied by either systematic persecution or blood lust, and generally, though not everywhere and at all times, unmarred by vexatious behavior.1 The rapid spread and development of imperial Islam produced a rich Islamic civilization that flourished from the ninth to the twelfth centuries. Urban cultural centers emerged in Cairo, Baghdad, Cordova, Palermo, and Nishapur. With significant assistance from Christian and Jewish subjects, Muslims collected the great books of science, medicine, and philosophy from the West and the East and translated them into Arabic from Greek, Latin, Persian, Coptic, Syriac, and Sanskrit. The age of translation was followed by a period of great creativity as a new generation of educated Muslim thinkers and scientists made their own contributions to learning in philosophy, medicine, chemistry, astronomy, algebra, optics, art, and architecture. Towering intellectual giants dominated this period: al-Farabi (d. 950), Ibn Sina (known as Avicenna, 980–1037), Ibn Rushd (known as Averroes, d. 1198), al-Biruni (973–1048), and al-Ghazali (d. 1111). The cultural traffic pattern was again reversed when Europeans, emerging from the Middle Ages, turned to Muslim centers of learning to regain their lost heritage and to learn from Muslim advances in philosophy, mathematics, medicine, and science. They retranslated the Greek philosophers and the writings of their great Muslim disciples: men like al-Farabi, who had come to be known as “the second teacher or master” (the first being Aristotle) and Ibn Rushd (Averroes), remembered as “the great commentator on Aristotle.” Many of the great medieval Christian philosophers and theologians (Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas, Abelard, Roger Bacon, Duns Scotus) acknowledged their intellectual debt to their Muslim predecessors. F C E C ROM THE RUSADES TO UROPEAN OLONIALISM Few events have had a more shattering and long-lasting effect on Muslim- Christian relations than the Crusades. For many in the West, the specific facts regarding the Crusades are but a dim memory. Few remember that it was the pope who called for the Crusades and that on balance the Crusaders lost. For Muslims, the memory of the Crusades lives on as the clearest example of militant Christianity, an early harbinger of the aggression and imperialism of the Christian West. If many in the West have regarded Islam as a religion of the sword, Muslims down through the ages speak of the Christian West’s Crusader mentality and hegemonic ambitions. For Muslim-West relations, it is less a case of what actually happened in the Crusades than how they are remembered. Political and economic motives and incentives are often forgotten or overlooked as each community looks back with memories of its commitment to defend its faith and with heroic stories of valor and chivalry against “the infidel.” Both Muslims and Christians saw the other as militant, somewhat barbaric and fanatic in religious zeal, determined to conquer, convert, or eradicate the other, and thus an enemy of God. A second far-reaching and influential event affecting the relationship of Islam
Description: