E T H I CS WITH A R I S T O T LE This page intentionally left blank E T H I CS W I TH A R I S T O T LE S A R AH B R O A D IE New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 19911 Oxford University Press Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Kuala Lumpur Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland Madrid and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 1991 by Sarah Broadie Published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016-4314 First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 1993 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Broadie, Sarah Waterlow. Ethics with Aristotle / by Sarah Waterlow Broadie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-19-506601-4 ISBN 0-19-508560-4 (pbk) I.Aristotle—Ethics. 2. Ethics, Ancient. I. Title. B491.E7B7 1991 171'.3—dc20 90-33456 CIP 9876 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper This book is dedicated to Frederick Broadie who set the field This page intentionally left blank Foreword I had intended, originally, to cover in one work all the ethical topics that have come down to us from Aristotle, but was unable to make room here for some that certainly deserve a place. Hence the absence of what I would have had to say about Aristotle on the individual moral virtues, on friendship, on justice and on the foundations of politics. I have likewise had to postpone for the time being any systematic attempt to situate Aristotle's views in relation to contemporary ethics or in the history of philosophy itself. My main concern here was to make as clear as I could what has registered with me as crucial for the understanding of Aristotle's ethics. Although the Eudemian Ethics is still much less well known than it deserves, I have followed tradition in treating the Nicomachean Ethics as the principal text, including, of course, the common books V-VII (= EE IV-VI). I have, however, gone to the EE for general support throughout, as well as for the special light it sheds on the contingency of the voluntary, the structure of rational choice and the virtue of nobility. I agree with those who identify the EE as the first home of the common books, but nonetheless take it that Aristotle himself would have sanctioned placing them in the Nicomachean context. None of my arguments depends on assigning a Eudemian or a Nicomachean origin to any given passage in the common books. Nor have I had to presuppose any particular order of composition as between the two treatises. Except where it is otherwise stated, I have used the Revised Oxford Translation when quoting from Aristotle. Hamden, Connecticut S. B. August 1990 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements I thank the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation for honouring me with a fellowship taken in 1986. The fellowship period included my first semester on the faculty of Yale University, and I thank the Yale administration for permitting me leave of absence during that time. Ethics with Aristotle was completed too soon for me to take account of Richard Kraut's Aristotle on the Human Good (Princeton, 1989). But since my work was read by him for Oxford University Press and provoked pages of thoughtful comments, I have benefited from his views, if not in one way then in another, and I wish to thank him for that. I am grateful to Celene Abramson for her help with the indices; to Glena Ames for superb secretarial assistance; and to Cynthia Read and her staff at Oxford Uni- versity Press, New York, for their care and dispatch in seeing this book through the printing. And here it is appropriate for me to express deep thanks for the unfailing support of Kate Thuillier, who helped from whichever side of the Atlantic whenever she could be most effective. This page intentionally left blank
Description: