S U D A N A C A D E M Y O F S C I E N C E S ESTIMATION OF BREAST DOSE AND CANCER RISK IN CHEST AND ABDOMEN CT PROCEDURES b y : S u h a A b u b a k e r A li E lt a h ir U n ite d A r a b E m ira te s U n iv e rs ity 2008 A t h e s is s u b m it t e d in p a r t ia l f u lf illm e n t f o r t h e r e q u ir e m e n t s o f M a s t e r D e g r e e in M e d ic a l P h y s ic s S u p e rv is o r: D r.A b d e lm o n e im A d a m M o h a m e d S u lie m a n M a y 2013 ESTIMATION OF BREAST DOSE AND CANCER RISK IN CHEST AND ABDOMEN CT PROCEDURES b y : S u h a A b u b a k e r A li E lt a h ir A t o m ic E n e r g y C o u n c il E x a m in a t io n c o m m it t e e N a m e T itle S ig n a t u r e Prof. Faroug Id res Habbani External Examiner C g Y T ~ . Dr. Abdelmoneim Adam Mohamed Sulieman Supervisor 4 / '> j / ; JYH£ * J " Mr. Ammar Mohamed Alamin Academic Representatives Affairs ✓ 2 3 /J u n e /2 0 1 3 D e d ic a tio n This thesis is dedicated to my father, w ho taught me that the best kind o f know ledge to have is that w hich is learned for its own sake. It is also dedicated to my mother, w ho taught m e that even the largest task can be accomplished i f it is done one step at a time. I A c k n o w le d g e m e n ts It is a great pleasure to acknow ledge all those people w ho have given me tremendous help and support in com pleting this study especially to my supervisor, Dr. Abdelmoneim Adam Mohamed Sulieman for his guidance and assistance throughout the whole period o f this study. I also would like to thank all Heads and sta ff o f Departments o f D iagnostic Imaging in hospitals that w ere involved in this study for their perm issions and assistance during the sam pling o f the data. Lastly, I w ould like to thank my fam ily for their consistent support. ii C o n te n ts 1 No. Item Page No. Dedication 1 A ft A cknow ledgem ents 11 ft 0 ft Contents 111 List o f tables VI 0 0 List o f figures Vll Abbreviations ix Abstract X Abstract [Arabic] xi C h a p t e r O n e : I n t r o d u c t io n LI Introduction to computed tomography (CT) Imaging i \ 2 Radiation dose in CT examination 2 Radiation Risk during CT Chest and Abdomen 3 1 3 1.3.1 CT Chest 3 1.3.2 CT Abdomen 4 \ A Problem o f study 4 O bjective 5 1 .5 T hesis outline 5 1 .6 III I I C h a p t e r T w o : T h e o r e t ic a l B a c k g r o u n d 1 CT machine (com ponents) 6 I2 '1 2.1.1 CT Gantry 6 2.1.2 X-ray Tube, Collim ation, Filtration 7 9 2.1.3 | Detectors 2.1.4 1 Data A cquisition System (D A S) 10 2.1.5 CT Patient Table or Couch 11 2.1.6 Power Distribution Unit 11 2.2 CT Imaging Technique 11 2.2.1 Chest CT scan 13 2.2.2 Abdomen CT scan 14 2.3 1 Radiation Quantities and Units 15 2.3.1 Radiation Quantities 15 2.3.2 Radiation Units 16 16 2.3.3 1 Exposure 2.3.4 Absorbed D ose 17 2.3.5 1 D o se Equivalent 17 2.3.6 E ffective D ose 18 2.3.7 Computed Tomography D o se Index 19 2.3.8 Computed Tomography D o se Length Product 20 2.3.9 Computed Tomography D ose Index Volum e 20 2.4 [ Breast Radio-sensitivity 21 2.5 Previous studies 26 IV C h a p t e r T h r e e : M a t e r ia ls a n d M e t h o d s 3.1 32 In tro d u ctio n 32 3 2 P a tie n t d a ta 33 3 3 C T m a c h in e s 14 33 D a ta c o lle c t io n 15 34 C T d o s e m e a s u r e m e n ts 16 34 O rg a n d o s e d e te r m in a tio n s 17 34 C a lc u la tio n o f e f f e c t iv e d o s e 18 36 C a n c e r r isk e stim a tio n 36 1 9 A n a ly s is o f d ata C h a p t e r F o u r : R e s u lt s a n d D is c u s s io n 4.1 37 R e s u lts 43 4 2 D is c u s s io n C h a p t e r F iv e : C o n c lu s io n a n d R e c o m m e n d a t io n s 5.1 48 C o n c lu s io n 48 5 2 R e c o m m e n d a tio n s 49 R E F E R E N C E S 53 A P P E N D IX A A P P E N D IX B 54 L ist o f ta b les 1 Table Item P ag e No. The evolution o f typical values for high-performance CT 13 machines. 1 1 W eighting Factors as defined in ICRP 2 6 ,6 0 and 103. 25 2 .2 Patient population o f the study classified per hospital and type o f 32 3 .1 examination. 1 3.2 1 CT machines. 33 | ^ 1 Current Conversion Factors for Obtaining E ffective D o se From 3 35 the D ose-Length Product. I Patient demographic data and exposure parameters during CT 4.1 exam used by each hospital: Mean ± sd deviation and the range in 38 the parenthesis at constant kVp =120. I DLP and CTDIvoi for patient during CT exam used by each 4.2 hospital: M ea n isd deviation and the range in the parenthesis at 39 constant kVp =120. 1 DLP and E ffective dose for patient during CT exam used by each hospital: M ean±sd deviation and the range in the parenthesis at 39 constant kVp =120. I 1 E ffective dose and breast dose for patient during CT exam used , by each hospital: M ean±sd deviation and the range in the 4 4 I 40 parenthesis at constant kVp =120. Mean organ radiation equivalent dose (m Sv), risk coefficients and radiation risk per procedure. 45 4.6 I Comparison o f patient dose during CT with previous studies. 46 VI L is t o f fig u res Figure Item 1 P age N o. 2.1 6 CT scanner. 2.2 CT Gantry. 7 2.3 Image acquisitions in CT. 8 Scintillation detector im age acquisition in CT. 2.4 9 2.5 1° X enon Gas detectors. The scanning techniques used in the first four generations o f CT 2.7 scanners. 1 2 2.8 Radiation quantities. 1 6 2.9 Absorbed dose. 1 7 2.10 Computed Tomography D ose Index. 1 9 2.11 D o se Length Product. 20 Breast shielding during CT procedures for adults (A ) And 2.12 1 22 pediatric ( B ) . Distribution o f the scanner technology and CT manufacturers o f 3.1 33 the im aging departments participating in this study. Screensaver show s exam ple o f radiation report generated by 3.2 m odem M DCT and sent to PACS as separate series. Total dose- 3 5 length product is displayed in mGy.cm. ( a r r o w ) 4.1 CTDIV0] in the hospitals during the chest and abdomen scans. 4 1 4.2 DLP in the hospitals during the chest and abdomen scans. 4 1 Correlation between DLP (m Gy.cm ) and E ffective dose (m Sv) to 4.3 fem ale patient undergoing CT chest exam in the three hospitals. 4 1 VII
Description: