ebook img

ERIC EJ920024: Carbon Neutrality and the Use of Offsets PDF

2009·1 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC EJ920024: Carbon Neutrality and the Use of Offsets

28 | march/april 2009 | Facilities Manager Carbon + -Neu rality and the Many organizations, including colleges and universities, are moving to address the threat of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their operations. For ex- Use of ample, the rapid growth of participation in the Presidents Climate Commitment (PCC) now means that more than 600 colleges and univer- sities have pledged to develop plans to become Offsets carbon neutral. So what does this mean? Carbon neutrality is defined as achieving a state where the operation has zero-net emis- sion of greenhouse gases. The key word here is “net.” It is highly unlikely that an organi- zation will be able to achieve zero absolute emissions of greenhouse gases, since most forms of energy, many materials, and wastes all contribute to GHG emissions. This means that despite aggressive programs to switch to renewable energy, and reduce consumption and waste, credits or offsets must be purchased to counteract those emissions that the institution cannot prevent emitting. The result of the Presidents Climate Commitment is that over 600 colleges and universities are now committed to reducing their own GHG emissions. Because they cannot realistically reduce their own emissions to zero, they will be out in the marketplace looking to purchase the rights to carbon offsets. Buyer beware. By Richard A. Ney, Ph.D., LEED AP and Judith R. Purman Facilities Manager | march/april 2009 | 29 What is a Carbon carbon offset developments. Sequestration (preserving offset? carbon in storage) projects pull carbon refers to a reduction It is important to first dioxide from the atmosphere through define what a carbon in emissions of any photosynthesis (biological sequestration) offset is. Carbon is used in or by capture and underground injection this context interchange- GHG, such as of exhaust CO (terrestrial sequestration). 2 ably with greenhouse gases. Reduction projects can include energy methane, nitrous This is done because efficiency improvements, fuel switching although there are numer- oxide, or even to lighter fossil fuels or biofuels, or the ous types of GHG, the destruction of methane from animal wastes sulfur hexafluoride. differential effect of each or landfill gas – projects where the amount can be converted into a of GHG emitted can be reduced from pre- common term of carbon vious levels. Avoidance offsets could occur dioxide-equivalents (CO-eq) based upon their relative ef- if, for example, a planned coal-fired power plant was pulled from 2 fectiveness at producing heat once released to the atmosphere. future plans or was shifted to lower-emitting options. In turn, carbon dioxide can be related to the carbon portion of the compound using molecular weight ratios. not all Carbon offsets are Created equal All of this means that the term carbon offset refers to a reduc- Care must be exercised when evaluating different projects tion in emissions of any GHG, such as methane, nitrous oxide, for the quality of their claimed carbon offset. There are a se- or even sulfur hexafluoride. The offset is a quantified GHG re- ries of criteria that a potential offset must meet in order to be duction purchased and used to negate or cancel out an equiva- deemed adequate for use in the carbon neutrality calculation lent emission from the operation. of the PCC. Many of these qualities are somewhat subjective and can be quite difficult to evaluate. We describe a few of Where do Carbon offsets Come from? the criteria here that the offset must meet: In general terms, carbon offsets come from a variety of • Additional – the concept of additionality says that an projects that either pull GHG from the atmosphere, reduce emission reduction can only be considered as an offset the amount of GHG historically emitted to the atmosphere, or if the project that created the reduction would not have avoid future GHG emissions by stopping or changing future happened without the lure of the offsets themselves, or if 30 | march/april 2009 | Facilities Manager the action was otherwise required. Example 1: if an elec- evaluate whether the proposed offset has been measured, tric utility was required to install carbon dioxide capture or estimated with sufficient conservatism, to ensure that and injection equipment as a term of a permit, no offset the offset does in fact represent the intended amount of is created because the action was otherwise required by reduction. regulation. Example 2: if an op- • Permanent – a project eration has traditionally performed or change that results in an more inefficiently than its peers, There are a series emission reduction could offsets would not be created by a be deemed as an offset project that brings that poor opera- of criteria that a provided the project or tion up to the standard efficiency of change results in permanent potential offset must its peers. Only to the extent that the reduction. Imagine a facil- efficiency exceeds benchmarks would meet in order to be ity switching from coal to offsets be awarded. natural gas combustion one deemed adequate • Measureable – an offset credit must year and selling the emis- be measurable. This sounds rather for use in the carbon sion reductions as offsets, straightforward, yet the amount of only to switch back to coal neutrality calculation carbon sequestered within a forest in year two. Permanence is or agricultural field can be extremely determined by a relatively of the PCC. complex and therefore quite expen- straightforward evalua- sive to quantify; determining the ac- tion for most projects, but tual amount of energy saved through remains a challenge for implementing efficiency measures can also be a daunting biological sequestration projects. An offset buyer could task. The buyer of an offset should be in a position to purchase offsets from a forest only to see a fire burn the RETHINK LIGHT A Whole New Approach to Lighting The Lyon & Kiev Series wall mount luminaires are our latest addition to the many of Eclipse Lighting’s full-cutoff fixtures complying with DARK-SKY standards of night sky preservation. Committed to delivering compatibility and functionality for your lighting needs we have incorporated superb rite LED technology into our line of products, for its’ many “green” advantages. Our offering of LED fixtures recently expanded with UL Listed PAR38 21 Watt, Dark-Sky Friendly LYON Series direct light luminaire. BENEFITS OF USING LED: • Longer Life Span • Reduced CO² Emission • Mercury Neutral • Better Energy Efficiency • Lower Power Consumption • Durable, High Abuse Dark-Sky Friendly KIEV Series LED PAR38 • Reduced Maintenance Cost Visit: www. eclipselightinginc.com for a full line of products 9245 Ivanhoe St, Schiller Park, IL 60176 P: 847-260-0333 I F: 847-260-0344 I E: [email protected] Facilities Manager | march/april 2009 | 31 land in future years, releasing all of the carbon that was credited as offsets. A number of methods have been devel- oped to try to address permanence for these bio-processes; the use of a buffer or pool of excess credits that must be same emission offset is not double counted. When an offset maintained (i.e., the buyer may only take credit for 75 is generated and verified, it is reported and recorded in the percent of purchased offsets) and specialized insurance to registry and the disposition of the offset is tracked via the provide some protection to buyers are two examples. sales agreement. • Avoid Leakage – leakage is terminology developed to de- • Enforceable – the offset transaction must be enforceable scribe the shifting of emissions from one source to anoth- through a contract. The contract must clearly define the er. Example: a great number of offsets could be generated offset and the actions required in order for the offset to if an electric utility shut down an existing power plant; remain valid. however, if that shutdown resulted in another power plant picking up the same load, the Organizations will need to reduction would have leaked from one plant to the other and no offset would be gener- chart a course through ated. Leakage can be difficult to determine challenges of energy efficiency, and remains a subjective analysis – the key is to clearly draw boundaries for your analysis waste minimization, purchase and view impacts of the project “as the atmo- of green power, and sphere sees it.” • Verified or Verifiable – the number of development of local offsets claimed by the project or seller need renewable energy sources. to be verified by an independent third party having established credentials for determin- ing offsets. Different projects may require different levels of verification, depending on applicable Will reneWable energy Credits (reCs) protocols and standards. also funCtion as offsets? • Registered – there are a number of registries that have been A Renewable Energy Credit (REC) represents the posi- developed over the years to keep track of specific emission tive environmental attributes of “clean” electricity; that is, reductions. The purpose of a registry is to ensure that the the REC stands for the amount of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and carbon dioxide that are not emitted when this Carbon Offset Contacts clean energy source displaces a more Carbon Fund Native Energy polluting source. A REC does not www.carbonfund.org www.nativeenergy.com represent a ton of a particular pollut- ant as a carbon credit does, but rather Chicago Climate Exchange Terra Pass is the amount of various pollutants tied www.chicagoclimatex.com www.terrapass.com to a kilowatt hour (kWh) of electric- e-Blue Horizons The Carbon Neutral Company ity. RECs have existed for several years www.e-bluehorizons.net www.carbonneutral.com now, resulting from the creation of Environmental Defense Fund Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) www.edf.org for electric generation within states. Utilities could generate electricity from renewable sources to meet their targets (continued on page 37) 32 | march/april 2009 | Facilities Manager (continued from page 32) will need to chart a course through challenges of energy ef- and then sell any excess renewable power back into the mar- ficiency, waste minimization, purchase of green power, and ketplace via RECs. development of local renewable energy sources. The carbon Given their development from a variety of state regula- offset will also play a significant role in making carbon neu- tions, there is quite a variance among RECs in terms of trality a possibility. Special care must be taken to determine quality and cost. Various regulatory and voluntary REC the quality of a carbon offset to ensure that it is recognized certification groups can provide review and certification that by the PCC or by other voluntary or regulatory programs the RECs meet specified quality requirements. Although a aimed at GHG reduction. REC may be certified for regulatory use for meeting RPS There are many surprises out there. In many cases a requirements, this certification may or may not meet carbon project that would appear to offer carbon offsets may have offset requirements. Example: a 2005 cogeneration project no value, because contractual terms may take ownership of is eligible to sell RECs for 2008 into a state power market, the “environmental attributes” away from the project owner. but could not qualify as carbon credits for a program start- Due diligence, knowledge of greenhouse gas accounting ing in 2007. Additionally, the REC certification may not have rules and offset requirements, and an understanding of envi- required the leakage test that a carbon credit faces. The PCC ronmental credit markets will help the organization navigate specifically cautions colleges and universities against relying through the difficult decisions ahead on the path to carbon heavily on RECs to meet their carbon neutral pledge because neutrality. of these uncertainties. Rick Ney is senior environmental consultant and manager, Iowa strategies for managing the Carbon footprint and operations, of Sebesta Blomberg; he can be reached at rney@ Carbon neutrality sebesta.com. Judith Purman is sustainability specialist for Sebesta We are all venturing off into the great unknown as we Blomberg, she can be reached at [email protected]. This is seek to reduce GHG from our operations. Organizations their first article for Facilities Manager. Facilities Manager | march/april 2009 | 37

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.