Social Norms of Alcohol Use at a Historically Black University Teresa Laird Regent University Andrea Shelton Joseph Jefferson Texas Southern University Abstract misperception (Prentice & Miller, 1993). Compared to pressure by their peer groups, The authors surveyed 239 volunteer response to a social norm voluntary and participants at one southern historically Black individual-based. If students perceive that university using the Core Alcohol and Drug most students are engaging in a particular survey. The purpose was to document the activity, the response is to conform to that overestimation (or misperception) of alcohol social norm. Providing students with and drug usage rates at the selected institution accurate and campus-specific information and to compare reported rates to those noted on the rates of drinking among their peers at a predominately White university within may affect the perceived norm. As a result, close proximity. Analysis of the data overestimations of alcohol use among indicated that participants’ actual responses peers decreases and actual consumption differed significantly from what they declines as a response to new social norms perceived to be the campus norm. (DeJong, et al., 1998; Haines & Spear, 1996). Introduction Although studies investigating social Excessive drinking by college students has norms have been conducted for persisted over the last 200 years (Gehrig & approximately 10 years at Predominantly Geraci, 1989; Straus & Bacon, 1953; U. S. White Universities (PWUs), there is a Department of Education, 2003). Drinking paucity of literature on this phenomenon at patterns are noted to vary by demographics of Historically Black Colleges and the students and characteristics of the Universities (HBCUs). The purpose of this institutional environment. Research investigation was to examine social conducted in the last decade has drinking norms and students’ perceptions demonstrated that college students frequently regarding campus alcohol consumption at overestimate the amount of alcohol used by a HBCU. their peers (Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991; Haines & Spear, 1996; Hingson, Heeren, Ethnic Comparison of Drinking Patterns Zakocs, Kopstein, & Wechsler, 2002; Perkins & Wechsler, 1996). Students may justify their Presley, Meilman, and Lyeria (1995) patterns of consumption, citing the perceived examined students’ ethnic backgrounds drinking behaviors of their peers as higher and identified social drinking patterns than their own. unique to each. A national study of 40,000 college students reported that the highest Research suggests that students may use risk factors for alcohol drinking in college alcohol and other drugs as a response to a perceived social norm or environmental The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 Social Norm 20 Social Norms include being White, single, male, and consumption differs by ethnicity on having a parent who drank (Lightenfeld & college campuses, a similar pattern of Kayson, 1994). The same study, African overestimation or misperception of American students reported low alcohol drinking by peers is demonstrated in the consumption regardless of the institution current study. they attended. White students attending PWUs consistently reported drinking Method significantly more than White students did at HBCUs. As part of an annual assessment of alcohol and other drug use at a selected HBCU, the Mielman, Presley, and Cashin (1995) Core Drug, and Alcohol Survey (Presley, surveyed over 12,000 students at HBCUs and Harrold, Scouten, Lyerla, & Meilman, found that students on average report 1.8 1994) was administered to 239 students. drinks per week compared to a reported Volunteer participants were recruited average of 4.6 drinks per week at PWUs. through a convenience cluster sampling of Historically Black institutions also reported the largest classes in the Education low rates of binge drinking, defined as five or department. This strategy ensured a high more alcoholic beverage in one sitting during return rate and a sample representative of two weeks prior to completing the survey the student body. Participants received (Meilman et al., 1995) and low frequency of information regarding the purpose of the use compared to predominantly White study and consent forms were distributed. academic institutions (Debro, 1991; Ford & Data were collected during the 2004-2005 Carr, 1990; Ford & Goode, 1994). In the academic year, with Institutional Review Mielman et al. (1995) study, 22 % of students Board approval. engaged in binge drinking at the HBCUs compared to 38 % of White students at the Core Alcohol and Drug Instrument PWUs. The Core instrument was developed and Social Drinking Norms funded by the U. S. Department of Education. Survey items are designed to The concept of social drinking norms may identify and measure students’ attitudes, be defined as a person’s attitudes, beliefs, social perceptions of use, consequences, and feelings regarding his/her behaviors on background characteristics, and what he/she perceives as normal, perceptions of the campus environment. agreeable, or even expected within a particular social context (Berkowitz & Using a Likert format, the questions Perkins, 1986). In many situations, ascertained self-reported alcohol use. The people’s perception of these norms will Core survey is also used to assess influence their behavior (Center on perceptions of alcohol use among students Alcohol Marketing and Youth, (CAMY) on campus by asking subjects how much 2006). When individuals misperceive the they think other students are drinking. norms of their group or think an attitude or Responses are recorded on an behavior is more (or less) widespread than individualized scanned form, which is is actually the case, individuals may decide to engage in behaviors that are consistent with those false norms. Although alcohol The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 21 SSoocciaial lN Noorrmms The majority was single (68.8%) and analyzed by the Core Institute (1999 located female (59.7%). These demographics are at Southern Illinois University (Presley et al., consistent with data provided by the 1994). Only data on self-reported alcohol use University’s Enrollment Management and participant's perception of overall campus office, suggesting that the sample was alcohol use are presented in this paper. This representative of the approximately 10,000 data were compared and contrasted with in the student body. national findings between PWUs and HBCUs. Drinking Patterns and Perceptions Self-reported measures assessed by the Core The analysis of self-reported drinking Alcohol and Drug Survey indicated that the patterns revealed that the average number survey has construct validity. Test-retest of drinks consumed per week was 1.4 per reliability was estimated using Pearson sitting within a two-week span The . product-moment correlation coefficient. For percentage of respondents who reported items on alcohol use, the test-retest reliability binge drinking was 22.4%. The response was high with item correlations above .80 to the question about alcohol consumption (Presley, Harrold, Scouten, Lyerla, & within the last year (last 12 months) Meilman, 1993). indicated that 98 (40.8%) did not drink or consume alcohol. In contrast, 59 (25.5%) Statistical Analysis of the respondents perceived that student’s peers drank everyday. Frequency distributions were calculated, cross-tabbed, and used for comparisons. The Discussion Kruskal-Wallis (H) test was utilized as a one- way analysis between subjects, designed to The results of this study support previous test mean differences with ordinal ranked findings by Meilman, Presley, and Cashin data. The value of H was tested at the (1995) that alcohol use at HBCUs is lower probability levels of .05 or higher by the chi- than at Predominately White Universities. The square ((cid:548)2) distribution table. present study also demonstrates a notable Results disparity between actual alcohol consumption and the perceptions students’ hold of their peers' usage. The authors found no comparable Participants studies documenting this disparity at HBCUs. The findings are consistent with the numerous A total of 239 participants were enrolled in studies of PWUs (Presley, Leichliter, & Meilman, 1999; Presley, Meilman, & the study. Although other ethnic groups were Leichliter, 2002). A study completed at a represented, including Hispanic, Native PWU in the same state as the present study American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Other, noted that student norms and activities only data collected from Black and White influenced the perception, frequency and students are reported here (n = 219). amount of alcohol consumed by peers Participants’ ages ranged from eighteen (18) resulting in a higher consumption “to keep years to fifty-three (53) years. Nearly half pace with their friends” (Wheeler, Wright, (46%) were in the age range 18-20 years. & Frost, 2006). Eighty-one percent of the students were Black, and were 9.5% White (non-Hispanic). ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 Social Norm 22 Social Norms The Education Development Center (EDC) built on misperceptions, combined with reported in 2002 that 89.2 % of students the often desperate need to “fit in” perceived a higher level of alcohol use among experienced by many late adolescents and peers than actual drinking levels when young adults, frequently has a negative students socialize with each other. In the affect on alcohol consumption (Johnston, same study, students perceived their peers to O’Malley, & Bachman, 2002). Students be drinking an average of nine drinks a week believe that if they drank, as they perceive when the actual reported amount was 4.7 other students do (following the norm); drinks. Results indicated that most students they will fit in and be accepted. The perceived peers “party” drinking with an decision to drink while in college may be average of 6.5 drinks, when actually the more challenging to students as HBCUs number was 3.4 drinks. Perkins and who are the first in their families to attend Berkowitz (1986) found the same disparity college and who have no point of between actual drinking norms and perceived reference. Counselors may emphasize the drinking norms on campuses nationwide. negative consequences of drinking that Studies evaluated by the CORE Institute may adversely affect a student’s academic (Meilman, Presley, & Lyerla, 1994; Presley, progress, graduation, and career prospects, Meilman, & Lyerla, 1995) have also reported the very goals that the family is supporting this finding and evaluated possible causes them to achieve. for these lower alcohol rates on HBCU’s since Problematic drinking is a behavior with the 1990’s, these results suggest a known genetic links and environmentally more recent and prevailing trend. reinforced habits (Lightenfeld & Kayson, 1994). For this reason, it is suggested that Research at other HBCUs on social norms counselors invest in resources necessary to associated with alcohol consumption is identify and refer students needing clearly needed. Use rates by students at these assistance with alcohol related problems. institutions remain below national averages. Opportunities to provide information about Advertising initiatives by brewers, local alcohol and other drug counseling and marketing, and distributors targeting African education available to students include Americans may affect future drinking orientation programs for incoming patterns and usage, however. freshmen and transfer students, welcome back to campus weeks, alcohol awareness Implication for Counselors month, alcohol-screening programs, and other outreach programs sponsored by College students may benefit from counseling university counseling and health education to reduce or eliminate risky alcohol offices. School representatives may also consumption. Students may establish a share the campus policy on alcohol use on skewed schema or perception of college life campus in their recruitment efforts. and college drinking, believing that drinking is an integral part of the college experience, Culturally sensitive media presentations, more so than reality. This skewed or guest lectures, and classroom instruction inaccurate perspective is often times based on and activities at HBCUs may prompt friends’ exaggerated stories and/or the students to identify problematic family portrayal of college life in the media (Strote, drinking and allow a forum to discuss Lee, & Wechsler, 2002). This perspective, physical, legal, and environmental The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 23S Soocciaial Nl Noromrms challenges. Information about drinking and Conclusion perceived norms should be shared with targeted groups such as student athletes, College counselors are in an ideal position members and pledges of sororities and to help educate students about actual fraternities, and other student alcohol related behaviors on campus and organizations. Such sessions can be prevent student alcohol misuse. The facilitated by former athletes or personnel at college or university distinguished members, respectively, who counseling and health centers should may also relay personal stories. Programs provide accurate information to students may need to be targeted for part-time and regarding actual student behaviors in a commuting students who do not avail number of subject areas to avoid themselves of resources on campus due to misperceptions. These topics could include work conflicts or family obligations. Such alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, and programs may be created with students sexual activity rates and practices. Newly individually or at different venues and released findings by the Center on Alcohol times which are more convenient to their Marketing and Youth (CAMY) reported schedules. All students regardless of that although African American students traditional or non-traditional status should drink less, they suffer higher rates of be informed of the campus health services alcohol related problems and behaviors or community resources available to them (2006, July). CAMY’s 2006 report also for alcohol and other drug problems. These found that the misuse of alcohol, other strategies are currently being implemented drugs, and related behaviors decrease once or developed for use at the HBCU where students had accurate information and the present study was conducted. developed a more realistic perception of use. In addition to identifying problem drinking, it is helpful to consider High school and college preparatory psychosocial factors that lead students to counselors could also play a role in problematic alcohol consumption. Issues correcting student’s misperceptions of such as the transition from high school, campus behaviors. Frequently, students (or living away from parents, and wanting to their alumni parents) choose a particular fit in are all major concerns of nearly school due to its social outlets or "party" every new college student (Astin, 1993). reputation (Astin, 1993; Colthurst, 1998). Although alcohol may appear to be an easy Sharing accurate information on actual way to contend with these adjustments, alcohol use and misuse rates, as well as safe alternatives to drinking (i.e. intercept- campus specific alcohol policies could group interviews, focus groups, and media assist in minimizing alcohol consumption influences along with exercise, reading, and associated risky behaviors before hobbies, volunteer activities, and students enter college.(cid:139)(cid:3) socializing with peers in non-alcoholic (cid:3) environments) should be provided to students in both formal and informal college settings (Krueger & Morgan, 2005). ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 Social Norm 24 Social Norms AUTHOR NOTE Core Institute. (1999). 1999 Statistics on Teresa Laird is an Associate Professor at alcohol and other drug use on American Regent University. Andrea Shelton and campuses. Carbondale, IL: Southern Joseph Jefferson are faculty at Texas Illinois University. Southern University. Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be Debro, J. (1991). Drug Use and Abuse at directed to: Andrea Shelton, Texas Historical Black Colleges. In: L. Harris Southern University, 3100 Cleburne, (Ed.) Problems of Drug Dependence 1990: Houston, Texas 77004. Email: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Scientific [email protected] Meeting of the Committee on Problems of (cid:3) Drug Dependence, Inc. NIDA Research REFERENCES Monograph 105. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, pp. 460-461. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San DeJong, W., Vince-Whitman, C., Francisco, CA: Joseph Bass. Colthurst, T., Crettella, M., Gilbreath, M. Rosati, M., & Zwieg, K. (1998). Baer, J. S., Stacy, A. & Larimer, M. Environmental management: A (1991). Biases in the perception of comprehensive strategy for reducing drinking norms among college students. alcohol and other drug use on college Journal of Alcohol Studies, 52, 580-586. campuses. Newton, MA: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Berkowitz, A. D., & Perkins, H. W. Prevention. (1986). Problem drinking among college students: A review of recent research. Education Development Center (2002). Journal of American College Health, 35, http://main.edc.org/PDF/annualreport2005. 1-28. pdf Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth Ford, D. S., & Carr P. (1990). (CAMY). (2006, July). Exposure of Psychosocial correlates of alcohol African-American youth to alcohol consumption among black college health advertising, 2003-2004. Report presented students. Journal of Alcohol and Drug at the 8th Annual Dr. Lonnie E. Mitchell Education, 36 (1), 45-51. HBCU Substance Abuse & Mental Health Conference, Baltimore, MD. Ford, D. S., & Goode, C. R. (1994). African American college students’ health Colthurst, T. (1998). Proceedings report. behaviors and perceptions of related health Symposium on alcohol and other drug issues. Journal of American College problem prevention at historically black Health, 42 (5), 206-210. colleges and universities. Report of proceedings at symposium organized by Gehrig, D. D., & Geraci, C. P. (1989). the Higher Education Center for Alcohol Alcohol on Campus: A Compendium of the and other Drug Prevention with support Law and a Guide to Campus Policy. USA: from the Robert Wood Johnson Campus Administration Publications. Foundation, Baltimore, MD, 25-27. The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 25 SSoocciiaall NNoorrmms Haines, M., & Spear, S.F. (1996). Changing the perception of the norm: A Perkins, H. W., & Wechsler, H. (1996). strategy to decrease binge drinking among Variation in perceived college drinking college students. Journal of American norms and its impact on alcohol abuse: A College Health, 45, 134 nationwide study. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 961-974. Hingson, R. Heeren, T., Zakocs, R. Kopstein, A., & Wechsler H. (2002). Prentice, D.A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Magnitude of alcohol-related morality and Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on morbidity among U. S. college students campus: some consequences of ages 18-24. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, misperceiving the social norm. Journal of 63 (2), 136-144. Personal and Social Psychology, 64, 243- 256. Johnston, L., O’Malley, P., & Bachman, J. (2002). Monitoring the future: National Presley, C. A., Harrold, R., Scouten, E., survey results on drug use 1975-2001. Lyerla R., & Meilman, P. W. (1993). Vol. II, College Students and Young Adults CORE Alcohol and Drug Survey: User’s Ages 19-40. (NIH publication No. 02- manual. (4th ed.) Carbondale, IL: Southern 5107) Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Illinois University, Core Institute. Drug Abuse. Krueger R. & Morgan, D. (2005). Focus Presley, C. A., Harrold, R., Scouten, E., GroupKit.http://www.virginia.edu/student Lyerla, R., & Meilman, P. W. (1994). health/hp/norms/marketresearch.html. Core alcohol and drug Survey. Carbondale, IL; Southern Illinois University. Lightenfeld, M., & Kayson, W. A. (1994). Factors in college students’ drinking. Presley, C.A., Leichliter, J. S., & Meilman, Psychological Reports, 74, 927-930. P. W. (1999). Alcohol and drugs on American college campuses: Report to Meilman, P. W., Presley, C. A., & Cashin, college presidents. Third in a series. 1995, J. R. (1995). The sober life at the 1996, and 1997. Carbondale, IL: Core historically Black colleges. Journal of Institute, Southern Illinois University. Blacks in Higher Education, 9, 98-100. Presley, C. A., Meilman P. W., Leichliter, Meilman, P. W., Presley, C. A., & Lyerla, R. J. S. (2002). College factors that influence (1994). Black college students and binge drinking, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, drinking. Journal of Blacks in Higher 14, 83-90. Education, 8, 70-71. Presley, C. A., Meilman, P. W., & Lyerla, Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). R. (1995). Alcohol on American college Perceiving the community norms of alcohol campuses: Use, consequences, and use among students: such as implications perceptions of the campus environment, for campus alcohol education Vol. 2, 1990-1992. Carbondale: Southern programming. International Journal of the Illinois University. Addictions, 21, 961-97. ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007 Social Norm 26 Straus, R., & Bacon, S. D. (1953). Drinking in college. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Strote, J., Lee, H., & Wechsler, H. (2002). Increasing MDMA use among college students: Results of a national Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 64-72. U. S. Department of Education. The Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention/Historical Black College and University Data. Retrieved July, 2003 from: http://www.higheredcenter.org/hbcu/html. Wheeler, R. W., Wright, L., & Frost, C. (2006). Social influence and alcohol abuse in a sample of college students. National Social Science Association, 27(1), 106- 111. The Alabama Counseling Association Journal, Volume 33, Number 2, Fall, 2007