ebook img

ERIC EJ888074: Good Intentions Pave the Way to Hierarchy: A Retrospective Autoethnographic Approach PDF

2009·0.12 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC EJ888074: Good Intentions Pave the Way to Hierarchy: A Retrospective Autoethnographic Approach

MichiganJournalofCommunityServiceLearning Fall2009,pp.59-68 Good Intentions Pave the Way to Hierarchy: A Retrospective Autoethnographic Approach GresildaA.Tilley-Lubbs VirginiaPolytechnicInstituteandStateUniversity I explore certain complexities of partnering university students with members of the Mexican and Honduranimmigrantcommunity1throughservice-learning.Irevealhowmy“goodintentions”inadver- tentlycreatedsocialhierarchyanddeficitnotionsofthecommunity,establishingthestudentsas“haves” and community members as “have-nots.” Critically examining my practices, I reflect on the service- learning instructor’s role in fostering reciprocal relationships based on non-hierarchical constructs whenbringingseeminglydisparategroupstogetherinservice-learningpartnerships. Inthebodyofliteraturethatsituatesservice-learn- gainedinsider-outsiderstatusintheimmigrantcom- ing within social justice or critical pedagogy, munity by collaborating and serving in various researchers and practitioners have written about the capacities for more than 30 years, always secure in roleservice-learningplaysinstudents’journeysfrom the assumption I had “figured out” my role in the privileged, dominant culture backgrounds to an Spanish-speaking community, with the accompany- understandingofthelivespeopleleadinnon-domi- ing supposition that my actions were good for all nant communities (Arries, 1999; Camacho, 2004; concerned,studentsandfamiliesalike. Dunlap,Scroggin,Green,&Davi,2007;Kiely,2004, Background 2005; Mitchell, 2008; Pompa, 2002; Rockquemore &Schaffer,2000).Researchershavealsotackledthe IinitiallydesignedCTBtopartneruniversitystu- thornytopicofservice-learning’sroleinreinforcing dents with immigrant women for whom I had been students’ hierarchical perceptions and attitudes servingasinterpreteratprenatalandfamilyplanning toward non-dominant partner communities (Boyle- clinics at the Health Department for two and a half Baise & Kilbane, 2000; Eby, 1998; Morton, 1995; years. I often spent hours with the women in clinic Pompa). Furthermore, with critical service-learning waiting rooms, and we had become friends. students examine social constructs that create Consequently,theybegantorequestmyaidasacul- inequalities while encouraging them to accept turalmediatorandinterpreterinothervenues,often responsibilityforimplementingsocialjustice-orient- asking if I knew where they could obtain clothing edchange(Mitchell,2008).However,Isuggestthat and furniture for themselves and for other family similar critical examination of faculty’s own prac- members immigrating to join them. I continually tices as service-learning practitioners is equally solicited items from my university colleagues, important,soastoconstantlymonitorourownatti- church members, and various friends and acquain- tudesandbehaviors,whichstudentsandcommunity tancestohonortheirrequestsforassistance. participants may regard as models for their own Because time did not permit me to keep up with interactions. Therefore,inthispaperIdocumentmyowntrans- theirrequestsforassistance,Idecidedtoinvolvemy formativejourney,exploringmyroleastheinstructor Spanishstudentsintheendeavor,respondingtotheir ofanacademiccourseforSpanishandeducationstu- interestinmeetingandinteractingwiththefamilies dents,CrossingtheBorderthroughService-Learning aboutwhomIspokeinclass.CTBresulted,offering (CTB).Asthepersonwhodesignedandimplement- asettingforreciprocalopportunitiesforthewomen edthecoursethatbroughtstudentsincontactwitha tolearntospeakEnglishandnavigateinanewcul- hitherto unfamiliar population, I realized I was ture,andforstudentstopracticespokenSpanishand unconsciously creating social hierarchy and patron- experienceMexicanandHondurancultures. izationthroughaworkdayeachsemesterwhenuni- In addition to their academic readings, class dis- versity students delivered material goods to partner cussions, and journaling about Spanish-speaking familieswhilemeetingeachotherforthefirsttime. immigrants in the United States, the students spent My situation was particularly perilous since I had 50 hours per semester in the home of partner fami- 59 Tilley-Lubbs lies.Duringtheirtimewiththefamilies,thestudents Moll, Tenery, Rivera, Rendon, González et al., concentratedonhelpingthewomendeveloptheabil- 1995; Greenberg & Moll, 1990) also informed the ity to navigate in a new culture. They practiced studentssoastochallengedeficitnotionsregarding Englishwiththefamily,tutoredschool-agechildren, non-dominantgroups. made phone calls to obtain information or appoint- Noddings’ (1999) work on caring and compe- ments,providedtransportation,interpretedwhensuf- tenceunderlinedaclassdiscussiononthevirtuesof ficiently proficient, and generally responded to caring.Eby’s(1998)andMorton’s(1999)cautions requests made by families. In turn, the families about service-learning and Nava’s (1998) heartfelt enjoyedhelpingstudentspracticeSpanishandlearn portrayal of the pain of receiving charity also con- their customs, often over a meal or while watching tributed to the foundational understanding of ser- television.Thissimplisticviewofreciprocityinitial- vice-learning as opposed to volunteerism or com- lyguidedthecourseasIfollowedapathinspiredby munity service. In all, I mindfully chose readings my own belief in the values of community service fortheearlyweekstofacilitateanunderstandingof and cross-cultural relationships (Tilley-Lubbs, service-learninginthecommunity. 2003a,2007). Early in the morning on the second Saturday of Guiding Perspectives each semester, the students arrived at my garage to Feministpoststructuralismrefersto"renewedinter- sort mounds of donated clothing and furniture to est in writing a critical history that emphasizes deliver to their partner families. Each student diacronic(changingovertime)analyses;onmutation, receivedthenames,ages,andsizesofpartnerfamily transformation,anddiscontinuityofstructures"(Peters members so they could choose items they deemed & Burbules, 2004, p. 24), providing "critiques and appropriate and suitable. Once everything was methods for examining the functions and effects of bagged and ready to go, we loaded cars, vans, and any structure or grid of regularity that we put into trucksforourcross-citytrektothefamilies’homes. place"(St.Pierre&Pillow,2000,p.6).Implicitinany Becauseallthereadingsandclassdiscussionsupto structure are power issues that reach “into the very thispointfocusedonsocialjusticeissuesinservice- grainofindividuals,touchestheirbodies,andinserts learning, I felt the students were well prepared for itselfintotheiractionsandattitudes,theirdiscourses, thisexperience. learning processes and everyday lives" (Foucault, However, regardless of the thoroughness of the 1980, p. 39). To reflect on these power issues, I use foundationalreadingsandmypreparationofthestu- self-reflexivity, basing my authority on my own dents,Otheringstillseemedtooccurasaresultofthe engagementwiththeclassandthecommunity,aview workday(Fine,1998).Infall2002,thesemesterthat consistentwithLather's(1991)situatingofselfas"a serves as the context for this paper, in the class fol- first-world woman—white, middle-class, North lowing the workday, student criticism raised ques- American,heterosexual—myself-describedposition- tions regarding the appropriateness of “cramming a bunch of university students” into people’s private ality"(p.xix).Nonetheless,Irealizethatmyposition spaces.Fromthenon,mygrowinguneaseaboutthe of power and privilege in society by no means pro- eventcausedmetocriticallyexaminetheworkdayin vides answers (Kirsch, 1999) in regard to working termsofthesocialhierarchyIsuspectedIwasunin- with families from traditionally non-dominant com- tentionallycreating. munities,particularlyasIweavethefamiliesintopart- nershipswithuniversitystudents. Literature Informing the Course Criticaltheoryalsoprovidesalensforexamining the asymmetrical power structures inherent in any In CTB, service-learning defines a method/ programinvolvinguniversitystudentsinanon-dom- pedagogy that joins three concepts: community inant community (Camacho, 2004; Darder, 1991). action and academic knowledge, with deep reflec- From the perspective of critical theory, critical con- tionontheintersectionofthetwo(Eyler,Giles,& sciousness frames my examination of practice Schmeide,1996).Inplanningthecourse,Dewey’s (Freire, 1970). Furthermore, critical pedagogy work(1929/1997)echoedmybeliefinexperiential informedtheclassthatprovidedthecontextforthis learning as an integral component of education. autoethnography,recognizingtheimportanceof"the Similarly,Freire’s(1970)conceptofemancipatory social,cultural,andpoliticalinshapinghumaniden- education resonated with my desire to co-create tity"(Kincheloe,2005,p.6). educational opportunities with/for Mexican and Hondurancommunitywomenwhilefacilitatingan Analytical Process understanding of the power of praxis for students. Exploring funds of knowledge residing in the IteachataLandGrantResearchIUniversity,and homes of Spanish-speaking families (González, although the students I teach represent a variety of 60 GoodIntentionsPavetheWaytoHierarchy socioeconomic backgrounds, their university atten- ty. dance usually reflects a more privileged economic Similarly, autoethnography presents “research, situation than most partner families enjoy since the writing,story,andmethodthatconnecttheautobio- latters’socioeconomicsituationsmakethemeligible graphical and personal to the cultural, social, and for public prenatal and family planning healthcare. political” (Ellis, 2004, xix). I examine my perspec- From the outset I sought to establish a space where tives on working in non-dominant populations two seemingly disparate groups of people could throughthelensoftheworldthatshapedme,butat relate to each other through their shared humanity, the same time, I present a meta-ethnography that rather than simply as representatives of different revisits my original critical analysis of practice socioeconomic, ethnic, educational, or linguistic (Tilley-Lubbs,2003b),allowingmetoaltertheframe backgrounds. I acknowledge the perils involved in in which I wrote the original story, ask questions I sucha“colorblind”approach,butatthetimeitmade didn’t ask then, consider others’ responses to the sensetome,andmyinitialqualitativeresearchpro- originalstory,andincludevignettesofrelatedexpe- vided evidence that students and families do come riencesthathappenedsinceIwrotethestoryandnow togetheranddeveloprelationshipsofvaryingdepths affectthewayIlookbackatthestory(Ellis,2009,p. thatcross,oratleaststraddle,thesebarriers(Tilley- 13).Ifirstaddressedtheissueoftheworkdayinmy Lubbs,2003a,2003b,2007). dissertation(Tilley-Lubbs,2003b),butinthispaperI Nonetheless, the initial data analysis suggested a reconsidertheeventsixyearslater,viewingtheexpe- needforre-examiningthepracticesoftheworkday.I rience through the lens of my current perspectives reread student journals, and I reanalyzed countless aboutpowerandprivilege. hours of informal time spent in the company of the EarlyTimes students and families as recorded in my field notes. Actualwordsarequotedfromthejournalsoftwostu- dentswhoquestionedtheworkdayandfrommyper- Wheretopark?AsIfollowedmyhusbandwho sonal journals2 regarding the workday and student was maneuvering the Ryder moving van, I reactionstotheevent.Thatsemesterconscientização clutchedthesteeringwheelandhopedforthe best.All the cars following behind cautiously [conscientization] (Freire, 1970) began, causing me edged their way past the numerous cars and toquestionmyestablishedpractice. trucksintheparkinglot.Thereweresome20 The self-reflexivity that guided this paper allows ofus,somanyofthestudentshadtoparkout meto“beknownandseenbyothers,...toopenup in the street. It was a warm September thepossibilityoflearningmoreabout[my]topic,and Saturdayafternoon,sotherewerepeopleout- [myself],andingreaterdepth”(Etherington,2004,p. sidemillingaround,creatingavibrantatmos- 25). Through self-reflexivity, I can reflect on and phere.Wefinallymanagedtoparkandgetout becomemorefullyconsciousofmyown“ideology, ofallthevehiclestomakeourwaytothefam- culture,andpolitics,”goingbeyondself-awarenessto ilieswehadcometovisitfortheworkday. createa“dynamicprocessofinteractionwithinand WhenwearrivedatIsabel’s3wehadtowait between…[myself]…andthedatathatinformdeci- outsidewhileshefinishednegotiatingwiththe vendor parked outside her apartment. He had sions, actions and interpretations,” addressing “ethi- backed his truck up to the sidewalk, and the cal issues and power relations” (p. 36) between pop-top was open, showing neatly arranged myselfandtheparticipantsintheclassandthecom- shelvesfilledwithbrightlycoloredvegetables munity. I could step away and “reflect on [my] and boxes of Mexican food.Yaneth was hop- actions through the eyes of the ‘other’s” actions ping around licking a sucker, stopping only (Rhoads, 2003, p. 239), acknowledging “response longenoughtorunupandhugme. data” from participants who forced me to “signifi- After a brief wait, we went inside, some cantlyreconstruct[my]interpretation”ofmyactions twenty students crowding into the one-bed- asIengagedintheprocess(St.Pierre,1997,p.184). roomapartment.TheminuteIsatdownonthe In a text informed by “deconstructive reflexivity,” I couch, Isabel said, “Permiso,” [Excuse me.] am able to be confessional and critical of my own and disappeared into the bedroom. She returned with a bag of papers, and within ten actions in interacting with a university class and an minutes, as the students stood observing, we immigrant community (Denzin, 2003, p. 236). My had glanced at all the school papers and the commitment to using a critical lens to examine my doctorbills....Iwasfinallyabletobreakinto practiceintersectswithmycommitmenttodevelopa thelitanyofrequestsforhelpinterpretingthe theoryofpraxis“guidedbycriticalrefectionand... stacks of papers to introduce Isabel to Kathy, revolutionary praxis” (McClaren, 1997, p. 170), the student who would be her partner for the informedbymy“positionalityasboth[subject]and semester. Each nervously uttered greetings, [object]ofthegaze”(p.149)ofcriticalself-reflexivi- andasImovedaway,theybegantheirnegoti- 61 Tilley-Lubbs ations for their weekly meetings. By the time empathy, but in rereading the words through the we left, they were excitedly making plans for deconstructive lens of conscientização (Freire, Kathy’s twice-a-week trip to Roanoke. 1970), her word choices epitomized Eby’s (1998) (Journal,fall2002) cautions about service-learning.A young university student placed herself as a role model providing Ipresentthisexcerptfrommyjournalaboutatyp- “guidance”toadultparentsresponsiblefortheirfam- icalworkdaytoaidinunderstandingthesituationand ilies’ livelihood, demonstrating her deficit notion mind-setthatguidedmyworkatthetime,toprovide regardingnon-dominantgroups. a baseline for the rest of the story. Looking back at This journal, which I posted to the class listserv, thisvignette,Iamawareoftheimplicitsocialhierar- representsmythinkingatthetime: chybeingestablished,butatthetimeIwrotethis,my only concerns focused on responding to perceived Asseveralofyoupointedout,weareverydif- community needs and providing an opportunity for ferentfromtheLionsClubdescribedbyMichael everyone to meet. I enacted historianWise’s (1980) Nava(1998)inCharity4.Themostimportantdif- words:“[A]nironicsituationoccurswhentheconse- ference in my opinion is that I know and love quences of an act are diametrically opposed to the eachandeveryoneofthefolksweworkwith, originalintention,"and"whenthefundamentalcause andtheyknowthat.Theyknowalsothatthestu- dentswhoworkwiththemcometohaveasimi- ofthedisparityliesintheactorhimself,andhisorig- larfeelingaboutthem,andtheyrespondinkind. inalpurpose"(p.300). Wearenotsimplybuyinganonymousgiftsfor How ItAll Started anonymouspeople;wearesharingthebountyof our world with those whose material blessings From the inception of the workday to the student arefewerthanours.Everyitemofclothingthat interrogationofthepractice,itneveroccurredtome was selected yesterday had a face or name that I was creating a hierarchical situation between behind it. Our gifts were for persons, for indi- viduals.(Journal,fall2002) two groups of people whose life circumstances and socioeconomicstatusdifferedsignificantly.Iwasjust doing what I had always done, trying to respond to Mydiscomfortliesnotonlyinmypatronizingatti- peoplewhoaskedforhelpofanykind.Theonlydif- tudes, but also in the knowledge that my attitudes ferencewasmyinclusionofstudentsandfamiliesin shapedthethinkingofgroupsofstudentsandcom- theprocess. munity members, my tone of beneficent charity Uptothattimeinmylife,mywayofbeinginand attemptingtojustifybehavioraboutwhichIalready serving the world included beneficent acts in felt uneasy. I include this embarrassing passage response to requests from the community. because I suspect I am not alone in having reacted Inadvertently, through my sense of empathy, I con- thiswayasaservice-learninginstructorshapedbya verted my sense of caring into perceiving need lifeofserviceinthecommunity. among the families, subconsciously developing a deficitnotionaboutthefamilies.Insodoing,Ifailed Student Uprising toappreciatetheirdemonstrationsofstrengthasevi- I was not prepared for the class discussion that dencedbytheirabilitytocopeadequatelyandinde- ensued following the actual workday as students pendentlyinanewandoftenaliensociety(Nieto& questionedtheirownfeelingsandthoseofthefami- Bode, 2008). In other words, I was practicingkind- lieswevisited,tosaynothingofmyroleinfacilitat- ness propelled by emotions and a sense of service ingtheevent.Someexpresseddiscomfortatourmid- (Morton, 1999), completely oblivious to the ramifi- dle class co-opting of another’s space and privacy. cationsofmyactionsinregardtostudents’interpre- Lizreferredto“draggingahugegroupofuniversity tationsoftheevent: students to people’s apartments,” which Bill called The service-learning workday has already “tourismofthemarginalized.”Lizsaid,“Howwould helpedmeonmyjourneytounderstandingthe youfeelifabigoleRydermovingvanpulledupto impactofthelittlethingsthatpeoplecandoto your apartment and then a bunch of students helpothers.Bysimplydonatingclothes,shoes, swarmed out and crowded into your apartment to andhouseholditems,wewereabletobrighten stareatyoulikeanimalsinthezoo?”Shealsostated several families’lives. From house to house I thatshefeltquiteuncomfortablewithmypicturetak- learned the real need for our services. Each ing as if the families were exhibits. I never had householdhaddifferentneedsandwantsfrom thoughtalongthoselines;Isimplywantedtocreate thestudents,buttheyallneededourguidance. archivesfortheclass. (Tina,September2002) Theentirethree-hourclasswasfueledbyconver- AtthetimeIreadthisreflection,Ifocusedonher sationabouttheworkday,charity,andthetruemean- 62 GoodIntentionsPavetheWaytoHierarchy ingofservice-learning.Ifeltdefensiveandirritated, dentsandthefamiliestomeeteachother,but defendingmyactionsbystatingthatthefamiliesstill at the same time, it is a day fraught with the neededhelpgettingestablishedandtheworkdaypro- danger of embedding Otherness in the stu- vided the opportunity to deliver clothing and furni- dents’ and the families’ consciousness/sub- consciousness.(fall2002) turepeoplecontinuedtogiveme.However,thetwo most vocal objectors did not buy my explanations. I was accustomed to reading journals submitted by Truthbetold,atthetime,Iwasnotacknowledging, studentswho,chargedwithexplainingtheirreasons even to myself, that it also provided an opportunity for taking the class, wrote about wanting to “help for me to empty my garage of the mountains of people out” or to “help the less fortunate,” familiar goodspeopleconstantlydonated,probablyalsotak- phrases that frame the altruism of the middle class. ing advantage of the opportunity to clean out their However,thatclassshookmybeliefsabouttheright- ownclosets,drawers,houses. ness of the workday as students critically evaluated For the first time class members critically ques- thepractice.Idescribetheexperienceasthecritical tionedmypractices,andtheensuingdiscussionwas point of conscientização (Freire, 1970) that first heatedandcontroversial.Astheconversationswirled causedmetofeelself-doubtaboutthepractice. aroundme,Iobservedtheclass,watchingthevaried Uptothatpoint,myvisionincludedfacilitatinga emotionsandopinions.ThinkingIhaditfiguredout, classtofosterchangewithinstudents,causingthem IexplainedtothemthatalthoughIamanonlychild, tobecomeagentsofchangeinsociety.Ineveronce Igrewupinalargeextendedfamilythatconstantly consideredtheycouldserveasagentsofchangefor passed clothes around depending on each person’s methroughwhatIperceivedatthetimetobeprob- currentsizeorneeds.Ifeltsoclosetothelocalfam- ing, hurtful criticisms and accusations directed iliesthatsharingwiththemwassimplyanextension towardme.Myidealisticnotionsawthestudentsas: of what I have always done. Whoever had more sharedwiththeonewhoneededhelp,butIfailedto [L]eavenintheevolutionofacriticalmassof seethatmyfamilydidnotincludeagreatvariationin thosewho,whatevertheirprofessionorstatus social or economic status, and that our clothing in society, will have the compassion, con- exchanges tended to be reciprocal, vastly different science, and competence to act in solidarity fromthedynamicsofalargegroupofstudentstak- withthepoorandmostneglectedmembersof societyascriticallythinkingagentsofchange ingclothesandfurnituretonewlyimmigratedfami- committedtothefashioningofamorehumane lieswhomtheyweremeetingforthefirsttime,cre- andjustworld.(Wood,1998,p.192) ating structures of power and privilege that would extendthroughoutthesemester.IfeltasifIhadbeen Nonetheless,whenthestudentsactedinunconscious pushedintoa“disturbinglyvulnerableplacewhereI solidarity with the community by questioning my wasforcedtoconfrontmyineptitude”(Vacarr,2001, practices, my knee-jerk reaction was irritation and p. 286). Unlike Vacarr, however, I was unable to defensiveness. The journal entries for the week moveawayfrommydisequilibriumtocreateateach- reflected student protests, but because I read them ingmoment.Iallowedmyannoyancetopreventmy wearing blinders of caring (Noddings, 1999) revealing my humanity that framed an error in my about/for the community, I did not hear the student judgment.Ioptedinsteadtomaintainthe“all-power- voicesuntilIreanalyzedthejournals. fulSuperTeacher”(p.290)stance.Uptothistime,I The following spring, I defended my dissertation hadresidedcomfortablyinmypositionofpowerand basedonresearchconductedinfall2002.Twocom- privilege,believingthatifIchosetoignoretheirexis- mittee members knew reaction papers I wrote for tence, I could create an environment in which the theircoursesindicatingthatthroughCTBIsoughtto societalconstructsofrace,class,andotherhierarchi- provideanenvironmentthatwouldfosterreciprocal calconceptscouldbeblurredbymy“goodness.”At relationships between university students and com- that point, I subconsciously began to confront my munity members. When one committee member motives,butIchosetoremaincloakedindenialand asked,“Kris,doyourealizethatyouaresettingupa irritation,unabletoacknowledgethesituationIhad situation in which all the participants involved will created.Fortunately,Ihadcreatedaclassthatencour- perceivethestudentsasthe‘haves’andthecommu- agedquestioning,evenifIhadnotintendedtobethe nity members as the ‘have-nots’of society?”, I was objectofthequestions. soshockedthatIcouldnotreply.Iknewshewascor- Myjournalfromthefollowingweekdemonstrates rect;sheconfirmedwhatthestudentshadsaidandI changetakingplaceinmythinking: hadignored. AlthoughIpassedthedefense,Ispentweeksread- In a way, the workday is a powerful agent in providing a means of taking the first steps ing social justice literature and critically examining towarderasingOthernessbyallowingthestu- bothmypracticeandtheoreticalframeworkpriorto 63 Tilley-Lubbs publishingtheresearchontheuniversity’selectronic grantstoliveinmarginalizedcircumstances,Iinter- dissertation library (http://www.lib.vt.edu/find/ posed my own previous acts of random kindness, etds.php).Afterthatsemester,Icontinuedthework- described by some of my colleagues in my depart- daysfortwomoresemesters,beforefinallyconced- mentasmy“missionaryzeal,”asamodelfortherela- ing that the practice reflected theory inconsistent tionships which would frame the CTB experience. with my beliefs about hierarchy (Boyle-Baise & Ratherthanfosteringreciprocitythroughsharedlan- Kilbane,2000;Camacho,2004;Eby,1998;Morton, guageandculture,Icreatedadeficitnotionregarding 1995;Pompa,2002;Ransford,2000). thecommunity. The patriarchal society in which I grew up pro- Gaining an Understanding motescharitableactsasbeneficentandvirtuous.Iam a member of a church that considers service to As my academic life continued, I became con- humankind to be of the highest calling, whether in sumedwithotherconcerns,buttheissueofthework- manual labor to build a house through Habitat for daystayedinmymindasabothersometopicIneed- Humanity or in donations to Heifer Project ed to address honestly and openly at some point, if International.Mycodeformoralbehaviorissimilar fornootherreasonthanmycertaintythatIwasnot toKant’smoralphilosophythatextolledalifeseek- the only service-learning practitioner whose prac- inghowtocomplywithmyethicalobligations,pre- ticeswereinconsistentwithherbeliefs.AsIreflect- cipitated by the question: “What ought I to do?” edontheworldIgrewupin,IrealizedIamtheprod- (Johnson, 2004, p. 1). Perhaps Lamott (2005) best uctofapaternalistic,hierarchicalsocietythatsocial- sumsuptheguidingprinciplethathasframedmylife izedmetobelieveinaltruisticbehavior(Wildman& foraslongasIcanremember:“Youdowhatyoucan, Davis,2000).Asamemberofthedominantculture, what good people have always done: you bring Iamoftenunabletorecognizemyprivilege.Byunin- thirstypeoplewater,youshareyourfood,youtryto tentional actions with good intentions, I have the help the homeless find shelter, you stand up for the ability to perform hurtful acts, and I questioned underdog” (pp. 307-308). However, CTB indicated whetherthatwasthecasewiththeworkdays. thefirsttimeIincludedstudentsandfamiliesinmy Eby(1998)positsthatalthoughservice-learningis effortsandbeliefs. atransformativepedagogythathelpsstudentsdevel- Igrewupinanenvironmentprobablytypicalofa opsocialresponsibilitytowardthecommunity,alack generation of baby-boomers who were affected by ofunderstandingaboutunderlyingsocietalsituations Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech in may leave students with the impression that need 1963.Wejoinedhandsinsisterhoodandsolidarity.I existsinamarginalizedcommunity,andthattheycan wasappalledtorecognizethatmyentireperspective “fix”theneedbytheirpresenceor“help.”According abouttheworldandtheworkdayscontributedtothe toEby,suchsimplisticviewsofsocialproblemslead oppressivebehaviorIabhor.Iwasblatantlyexercis- to an emphasis on deficiencies in the community, ing my White privilege to create invisible racism ratherthanfosteringappreciationfortheirstrengths. (Tatum,2000)andclassism(Ransford,2000).Atthis AlthoughIagreedwithEby’sarguments,onlyafterI timeofself-searching,Behar’s(1996)voicealsores- began to question my practices did I completely onated with my discomfort as she talked about the understandhisconcernsregardinginvolvingstudents vulnerability of the researcher placing herself in the inanon-dominantcommunity. research.IfeltIcouldnotleaveoutthisrevelationof Theironyofthisnarrativeisthatthecontinuum myowntransformationandremaintruetothebeliefs ofmytransformationaljourneywasprecipitatedby thatshapewhoIam,notonlyasaresearcher,butalso student questioning, a journey that changed me asaperson. from enacting a deficit notion of the community, whichIinturnimplicitlyhadbeencommunicating The Conundrum tothestudents. Similarly,indesigningacourseinwhichmembers Nonetheless,justasIwascontemplatinglettingmy ofanon-dominantcommunityserveastext,teachers, friends and church family know that I could not students, and collaborators for a course whose mis- accept any more items for the families, I received a sion espouses a social justice precept, my responsi- callfromAracely,whohadbeenintheprogramfor bility lay in facilitating relationships that would not the first three semesters, letting me know she had reinforce existing societal constructs based on returned from Mexico after a year and a half back inequity and Othering. However, “random, individ- homewithherfamily,andshehadnoclothesorfur- ual acts of kindness” underscored my practice as I niture. Could I help her? Once again, the van and worked from “emotional response and not [my] pickup truck made their way across town to deliver head” (Morton, 1999). While pushing students to the clothes and furniture stored in my garage, this deeplyexaminesocietalpracticesthatcausedimmi- timewiththeassistanceofmyfamilyandonestudent 64 GoodIntentionsPavetheWaytoHierarchy whom I called to ask if he could bring his pickup thataretop-down,helper-helpee,butnonhierarchical trucktohelpwiththedelivery.Thatoccasionrepre- relationshipsinthesensethateachpartnerhassome- sented the final large delivery we made, either thing to gain and each has something to give” throughtheclassorpersonally. (Jackson&Smothers,1998,p.113).Additionally,I Eventodaytheneedstillexistsforsharingorchari- acknowledge that the “served [should] control the tyorservingorwhateverelsewewanttocallthiscom- service[s] provided,” thus making them “better able plexconcept,althoughithasadifferentshapethanit to serve and be served by their own actions” had when CTB began. Many of the families with (Sigmon, 1979, p. 3). Keeping in mind these two whomwecollaboratehavebecomefairlywellestab- basic precepts of service-learning, I seek creative lishedanddonotsufferfromthedesperateneedthat waystoinvolvestudentswithfamiliesinempathetic shapedtheirliveswhentheyfirstimmigrated.Needs relationships that foster attitudes of concern for continuetoexistwithincreasingfrequency,mirroring social justice and equity not based on deficient theeconomicdownturntheworldisexperiencing.The notions but rather on a realization of their responsi- conundrum is how to address appeals from people bility to help people meet their basic needs (Eby, who have fewer financial resources and subsequent 1998).Iintendtoplacemoreemphasisonthelitera- needs.Arecentphonecallmademerealizeanewthe tureandclassactivitiesthatdeconstructsocietalcon- imponderabilityofthesituation,causingtheendofthe texts that affect immigrants to promote an under- storytotouchthebeginning. standingoftheeconomichardshipinvolvedinimmi- Marta called to check on me, beginning with her grationbothinleavingthehomecountryandinliv- usual, “Quería escuchar su voz.” [I wanted to hear inginthehostcountryaswellasthediscriminatory yourvoice.]Herhusbandquithisjobatalocaldairy, practices that restrain many immigrant lives, affect- tired of constant abuse from the owner, but he con- ingtheiropportunitiesforearningalivingwage. tinues to face great difficulty finding constant, con- When I receive random calls from people asking sistentworkinconstruction,areflectionofthegen- for help, I will devise ways to involve students per- eraleconomy.Iknewtheyhadmovedinthespring sonally in the process of reaching out to people in from the trailer provided by the dairy into a small their moments of authentic need. If a time comes house in a nearby town, and I had accepted her when economic necessity determines a need for excuse of the move for terminating her relationship reestablishingthewidescaledistributionoffoodand with the CTB students who visited her weekly. Not clothes,Iwillabandontheroleoftryingto“fix”the untilwetalkedlastweekdidshesharethattherea- situation single-handedly. I will invite students and sonshecouldnolongerhostthestudentswasdueto womentocometogetheranddiscussthepossibilities the fact that she had no food in the house to offer for identifying and addressing community needs. I whentheyvisited,afactthatembarrassedhergreat- play with the idea of returning to the Nava (1998) ly.Nowtheyarefeelingmoresecure,buttheirbud- piece,havingthestudentsandwomenworktogether get is still tight and she tentatively inquired if we insmallgroupstoreadthestoryanddeconstructthe could loan them some money. Her call was one of impersonal charity that framed the event. I would several, reflecting the recent lack of work many suspect that by brainstorming together they might immigrantsface. comeupwithsolutionsthatwouldbefarbetterthan anyIcoulddevise.Icanenvisionresultingreciproc- If I Had KnownThen . . . ity, which would then form the basis for critically thinkingaboutwaysforthefamiliestoaddresstheir Reflectingontheseconversations,Iamconfronted needs.Throughdialogue,thestudentsshouldbeable anewbythepropositionofhowtoprovideassistance torecognizeconnectionsbetweenthefamilies’situa- withoutdeepeningthedivideofthe“haves”andthe tionsandthesocialcontextsinwhichtheyarerooted “have-nots”ofsociety.Onapersonallevel,Icontin- as they move through the “cycle of theory, applica- ue to operate from the point of view Behar (1993) tion,evaluation,reflection,andthenbacktotheory” described in talking about her dealings with (Freire, 1998, p. 75) and thus into conscientização. Esperanza, a Mexican peasant whom Behar inter- The bottom line is the imperativeness of involving viewed over a period of years: I remain honored to thewomenintheprocessofpraxistotransformchar- serveastheircomadre[friendwhohasmoreandthus ityintocollaboration. canshare]. Bystartingtheplacementswithaworkday,Iwas TheAftermath overtly, albeit unconsciously, establishing the stu- dents and myself as dominant members of society After I discontinued the workday, some changes and the families as the marginalized. At the same occurred. The students and families still needed an time,Irecognizethat“[s]ervice-learningisawayof opportunity to meet prior to beginning their partner- building relationships; not hierarchical relationships ships, so we began having a Meet and Greet as the 65 Tilley-Lubbs third class meeting. These potluck social times took cepts of service-learning (Jackson & Smothers, placeinmychurchfellowshiphall,providingneutral 1998). The necessity of constantly including the groundfortwoseeminglydisparategroupsofpeople community members in decisions and policy-shap- to meet without automatic assumptions regarding ingisimperative,whichIdobymeetingperiodical- power and privilege. Also, because the students no ly with the women to seek their input about their longer spend 8-10 hours on the workday, I cut the goals regarding the program and how the students required hours back to 40. As more of the children andIcanbesthelpthemachievethosegoals.Asser- beganattendingelementaryschool,theneedfortutor- vice-learning instructors practice critical examina- ingandhomeworkhelphasincreased,sothestudents tionfromavarietyofdisciplines,pedagogicalprac- tend to spend more time working with the children tices,methods,andtheoreticalframeworks,thechal- than with their former service-learning activities that lenge is to begin/continue to examine our efforts focusedonthewomen’sneedsforinterpretationand through the crucible of self-reflexivity. This critical social navigation. I now incorporate more literature examinationofmypracticesseekstoengageindia- aboutmulticulturaleducation,suchasNietoandBode logue with other service-learning researchers and (2008),aswechallengethedeficitnotionsthatframe practitioners as we consistently interrogate our own publicschoolingforimmigrants. practices. Inrecentyears,thewomensteppedintoleadership Notes roles with the students, constantly making sugges- tions about the partnerships, whether regarding scheduling, course content, or expectations for stu- Iwouldliketothanktheeditor,JeffreyHoward,andthe dents.Thewomennowleadbusierlivesthatinclude threeanonymousrefereesfortheirmosthelpfulcomments aswellasJenniferMcCloud,whonowservesasthegrad- jobs,church,children’sschoolactivities,andfriends, uateresearchassistantfortheservice-learningexperience so they determine their availability based on their andwhotirelesslyreadsmyworkandprovidesvaluable convenience,ratherthanacceptingwhatevertimethe insightsasIcriticallyexaminemypractice. students suggest, as was the case in the beginning. Initially,thestudentsandwomendidafinalcollabo- 1 AlthoughIrefertotheMexicanandHondurancom- rativemediaprojecttalkingaboutthewomen’slives munity,inactualityinthelocalewheremyworkissituat- ed, the two groups do not often intersect. Nonetheless intheirhomecountries,theirimmigration,andtheir withintheconfinesofCTB,thecontextofthispaper,the lives in the United States. The women expressed two groups do intersect and interact frequently. I avoid boredomwithrepeatingthestoryeverysemester,and using“Latino”inanattempttocircumventgeneralization they now determine a new topic each semester, andstereotypingofSpanishspeakerswhoimmigratefrom choosingtopicssuchasthedifficultyoflivinginthe southofourborder.Inaddition,thewomenwhomIinter- United States and not speaking English. They also view as part of my research self-identify as Mexican or takeresponsibilityforholdingthestudentsaccount- Honduran. In certain places, I do use the term “Latino” able for their commitments, informing me of any whenquotingorreferringtostatementsmadebystudents. infractionstheyareunabletoresolve.Fromtheway 2 In this paper, journal and field notes will be used thewomenspeakandbehave,Ibelievetheyperceive interchangeablytorefertomypersonalwritings. themselvestobestakeholderswitha“votingvoice” intheprogram.Theirenactedfreedomtodirecttheir 3 Allnamesusedinthispaperarepseudonymstopro- tecttheparticipants’privacy. experiencesreinforcesmybeliefinthepowerofcrit- ical pedagogy to effect emancipatory attitudes and 4 In preparation for the workday, the students read a roles(Freire,1997/2005;Kincheloe,2008). memoir about being the recipient of the generic benefi- Would these changes have happened if the work- cenceoftheLionsClubatChristmastimewhenhewasa dayshadcontinuedtoplacethemintheroleofrecip- young child whose family had recently emigrated from Cuba. ientsofcharity?Idon’tknow. AWord of Optimistic Caution References In my exploration of the implications of placing Arries,J.(1999).Criticalpedagogyandservice-learningin university students in a traditionally non-dominant Spanish:CrossingbordersintheFreshmanSeminar.In immigrant community, I reinforced my belief that J. Hellebrandt & L T. Varona (Eds.), Construyendo such partnerships are rich and meaningful for most puentes (Building bridges): Concepts and models for participants, but the instructor who chooses to service-learning in Spanish (pp. 33-48). Washington, engage an immigrant community in such a partner- D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, ship needs to exercise extreme caution in regard to 1999. fostering Othering and reinforcing social hierarchy, Behar,R.(1993).Translatedwoman:Crossingtheborder concepts that are diametrically opposed to the pre- withEsperanza’sstory.Boston:Beacon. 66 GoodIntentionsPavetheWaytoHierarchy Behar,R.(1996).Thevulnerableobserver:Anthropology González,N.,Moll,L.,Tenery,M.F.,Rivera,A.,Rendon, thatbreaksyourheart.Boston:Beacon. P., González, R.,Amanti, C. (1995). Funds of knowl- edge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Boyle-Baise,M.,&Kilbane,J.(2000).Whatreallyhap- Education,29(4),443-470. pens?A look inside service-learning for multicultural teacher education. Michigan Journal of Community Greenberg,J.,&Moll,L.C.(1990).Creatingzonesofpos- ServiceLearning,7,54-64. sibilities: Combiningsocialcontextsforinstruction. InL. C. Moll, (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional Camacho, M. M. (2004). Power and privilege: implicationsandapplicationsofsociohistoricalpsychol- Community service-learning in Tijuana. Michigan ogy(pp.319-348).Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity. JournalofCommunityServiceLearning,10(3),31-42. Jackson, S.A. & Smothers, T. L. (1998). The Southern Darder,A.(1991).Cultureandpowerintheclassroom:A Volunteer Corps at West Virginia Wesleyan. In J. L. criticalfoundationforbiculturaleducation.NewYork: DeVitis,R.W.Johns,&D.L.Simpson(Eds.),Thespir- Greenwood. itofcommunityinliberaleducation(pp.102-120).New York:PeterLang. Denzin, N. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture.Thousand Oaks, Johnson,R.N.(2004).Kant’smoralphilosophy.Stanford CA:Sage. encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved November 7, 2007fromhttp://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/ Dewey, J. (1929/1997). My pedagogic creed. In D. J. Kiely,R.(2004).Achameleonwithacomplex:Searching Flinders&S.J.Thornton(Eds.),Thecurriculumstud- for transformation in international service-learning. ies reader (pp. 17-23). New York: Routledge. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (Reprinted from Journal of National Education 10(2),5-20. Association,18,291-295,1929.) Kiely,R.(2005).Atransformativelearningmodelforser- Dunlap, M.; Scroggin, J.; Green, P.; & Davi,A. (2007). vice-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, JournalofCommunityServiceLearning,12(1),5-22. 13(2),19-30. Kincheloe, J. (2005). Foreword. In L. D. Soto & B. B. Eby,J.W.(1998).Whyservice-learningisbad.Retrieved Swadener(Eds.),Powerandvoiceinresearchwithchil- May 10, 2006 from http://www.messiah.edu/external_ dren(pp.1-6).NewYork:PeterLang. programs/agape/service_learningarticles/wrongsvc.pdf. Kincheloe,J.(2008).Criticalpedagogy,2nded.NY:Peter Etherington,K.(2004).Becomingareflexiveresearcher: Lang. Using our selves in research. Philadelphia: Jessica Kirsch, G. E. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist Kingsley. research: The politics of location, interpretation, and Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological publication.Albany,NY:StateUniversityofNewYork. novel about teaching and doing autoethnography. Lamott,A.(2005).PlanB:Furtherthoughtsonfaith.New WalnutCreek,CA:AltaMira. York,NY:Riverhead. Ellis, C. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and onlifeandwork.WalnutCreek,CA:LeftCoast. pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge. Eyler,J.,Giles,D.,&Schmeide,A.(1996).Apractition- er’s guide to reflection in service learning: Students’ McLaren, P. (1997). Revolutionary multiculturalism: voices and reflection. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Pedagogiesofdissentforthenewmillennium.Boulder, University. CO:Westview. Fine,M.(1998).Workingthehyphens:ReinventingSelf Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service- and Other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative models. Michigan Journal of Community Service research:Theoriesandissues(pp.130-155).Thousand Learning,14(2),50-65. Oaks,CA:Sage. Morton,K.(1995).Theironyofservice:Charity,project and social change in service-learning. Michigan Foucault, J. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected inter- JournalofCommunityServiceLearning,2,19-32. viewsandotherwritings.Brighton,UK:Harvester. Morton,K.(1999).Starfishhurlingandcommunityservice. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bergman Retrieved July 5, 2008 from http://www.mncampus Ramos,M.(Trans).NewYork:Continuum. compact.org/ Freire, P. (1997/2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Nava, M. (1998). Charity. In E. Santiago & J. Davidow Letters to those who dare to teach. Cambridge, MA: (Eds.),LasChristmas(pp.51-58).NewYork:Vintage. Westview. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of hope. New York: sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Continuum. Boston:Pearson,Allyn,andBacon. 67 Tilley-Lubbs Noddings, N. (1999). Caring and competence. In G. A. Vacarr, B. (2001). Moving beyond polite correctness: Griffith (Ed.), The education of teachers: Ninety-eighth Practicing mindfulness in the diverse classroom. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of HarvardEducationalReview,71(2),285-295. Education(PartI)(pp.205-220).Chicago:Universityof Wildman, S. M. & Davis, A. D. (2000). Language and Chicago. silence: Making systems of privilege visible. In M. Peters,M.A.,&Burbules,N.C.(2004).Poststructuralism Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. and educational research. New York: Roman and Hackman,M.L.Peters,&X.Zúñiga(Eds.),Readings Littlefield. forsocialdiversityandsocialjustice:Ananthologyon racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, Pompa, L. (2002). Service-learning as crucible: andclassism(pp.50-60).NY:Routledge. Reflectionsonimmersion,context,power,andtransfor- Wise,Gene.(1980).Americanhistoricalexplanations:A mation. Michigan Journal of Community Service strategyforgroundedinquiry.2nded,rev.Minneapolis, Learning,9(1),67-76. MN:UniversityofMinnesota. Ransford,M.E.(2000).Twohierarchies.InM.Adams,W. Wood, William J. (1998). Santa Clara University’s J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Eastsideproject:Apilgrimagetowardourownhuman- Peters,&X.Zúñiga(Eds.),Readingsforsocialdiversi- ity.InE.Zlotkowski(Ed.),Successfulservice-learning ty and social justice: An anthology on racism, anti- programs:Newmodelsofexcellenceinhighereduca- Semitism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, and classism tion(pp.189-209).Bolton,MA:Anker. (pp.412-418).NY:Routledge. Author Rhoads, R. (2003), Traversing the great divide: Writing theselfintoqualitativeresearchandnarrative.InN.K. GresildaA.Tilley-Lubbs([email protected])isassis- Denzin(Ed.),Studiesinsymbolicinteractionism(235- tantprofessorofSecondLanguageEducation/ESLat 259).Boston:Elsevier. VirginiaPolytechnicInstituteandStateUniversityin Blacksburg, Virginia. She teaches and writes about Rockquemore,K.A.,&Schaffer,R.H.(2000).Towarda critical pedagogy and theory, service-learning in theoryofengagement:Acognitivemappingofservice- teacher education and multicultural education, learningexperiences.MichiganJournalofCommunity transnationalissuesthatimpacteducationforimmi- ServiceLearning,7,14-25. grantchildren,qualitativeresearch,ethnographyand Sigmon,R.L.(1979).Service-learning:Threeprinciples. autoethnography. Her most recent scholarship criti- Synergist,9-10. callyexaminesherteachingpractice. St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education.NewYork:Routledge. St.Pierre,E.A.(1997).Methodologyinthefoldandthe irruptionoftransgressivedata.InternationalJournalof QualitativeStudiesinEducation,10(2),175-189. Tatum,B.D.(2000).Definingracism:“Canwetalk?”In M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. Hackman,M.L.Peters,&X.Zúñiga(Eds.),Readings forsocialdiversityandsocialjustice:Ananthologyon racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, andclassism(pp.79-82).NY:Routledge. Tilley-Lubbs,G.A.(2003a).Crossingtheborderthrough service-learning:The power of cross-cultural relation- ships. In J. A. Hellebrandt, J. Arries, & L T. Varona (Eds.), JUNTOS: Community partnerships in Spanish andPortuguese.Boston:Heinle. Tilley-Lubbs,G.A.(2003b).Crossingtheborderthroughser- vice-learning: The power of cross-cultural relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic InstituteandStateUniversity,Blacksburg,VA. Tilley-Lubbs,G.A.(2007).Theintersectionoftheacade- my and the community: Researching relationships through community-based education. InA.Wurr & J. Hellebrandt(Eds.),Learningthelanguageofglobalcit- izenship: Service-learning in applied linguistics. Bolton,MA:Anker. 68

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.