ebook img

ERIC EJ840112: Integrating Science into the Agricultural Education Curriculum: Do Science and Agriculture Teachers Agree? PDF

2007·0.17 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC EJ840112: Integrating Science into the Agricultural Education Curriculum: Do Science and Agriculture Teachers Agree?

INTEGRATING SCIENCE INTO THE AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM: DO SCIENCE AND AGRICULTURE TEACHERS AGREE? Gregory W. Thompson, Professor Oregon State University Brian K. Warnick, Assistant Professor Utah State University Abstract Agriculture teachers and science teachers who taught in a high school with an agricultural education program were targeted for this study to determine and compare their perceptions of integrating science into agricultural education programs. The data indicate that while both groups have responded positively to the call to integrate science into the agricultural education curriculum, some differences in attitudes do exist. A majority of the teachers indicated that teacher preparation programs should provide instruction on how to integrate science both at the preservice and inservice levels. More agriculture teachers were in agreement than science teachers that integrating science would help agriculture programs meet state standards and help students meet requirements for state standards. Although a majority of science teachers agreed, a significantly greater number of agriculture teachers agreed that students will be better prepared for standardized testing if they learn science through an agriculture context. Introduction prepare students for advanced study and employment in the changing food and fiber The integration of agricultural education industry. Additionally, The Carl D. Perkins with academic subjects has been the topic of Vocational and Applied Technology Act of much discussion and interest over the past 1990 encouraged academic and vocational several years. Roberson, Flowers, and teacher collaboration for pedagogy Moore (2001) defined integration between revision, multidisciplinary integration, and vocational education and academic subjects implementation of real-life learning as “a marriage of both types of curricula in experiences (Lankard, 1992). order to teach the many skills necessary Research findings support the claim that for students' future successes” (p. 31). the integration of science into the agriculture Furthermore, Farley and Taylor (2004) curricula is a more effective way to teach posited, “If we continue to teach all skills in science. Students taught by integrating isolation, we can only reinforce the idea that agriculture and scientific principles we acquire different skills for use in demonstrated higher achievement than did different subject areas” (p. 8). students taught by traditional approaches Both academic and vocational groups (Chiasson & Burnett, 2001; Enderlin & have made calls for the integration of Osborne, 1992; Enderlin, Petrea, & science and agriculture. The American Osborne, 1993; Roegge & Russell, 1990; Association for the Advancement of Science Whent & Leising, 1988). has recommended connecting what students The theoretical model for this study learn in school through interdisciplinary consists of factors influencing the amount of links, real-world connections, and collaboration and integration between connections to the world of work (American agriculture teachers and science teachers. Association for the Advancement of Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975) planned Science, 1993). In 1988, the National behavior theory suggested that demographic Research Council recommended that variables, knowledge and observations agriculture courses be expanded to increase influence beliefs, which influence attitudes, scientific and technical content to better intentions, and finally behaviors. In Journal of Agricultural Education 1 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… attempting to increase the level of that nearly one-half of the science teachers collaboration and integration, the reported some collaboration with agriculture perceptions of agricultural science teachers. They recommended further studies instruction by all stakeholders, including of science teacher teachers’ perceptions agriculture instructors, students, parents, toward agriculture program quality. administrators, guidance counselors, and Major questions of concern include the science teachers, must be considered. need for integration of science and Over the past decade, several studies agriculture as well as the ability and have provided insight into the perceptions of preparation of the agriculture teacher to different groups of stakeholders. Attitudinal integrate science into the agriculture surveys of agriculture teachers in Oregon curriculum. (Thompson & Balschweid, 1999), Mississippi (Newman & Johnson, 1993), Objectives Texas (Norris & Briers, 1989), South Carolina (Layfield, Minor, & Waldvogel, The purpose of this study was to 2001), and Indiana (Balschweid & determine the perceptions and attitudes of Thompson, 2002), as well as winners of the high school science teachers and agriculture National FFA’s Agriscience Teacher of the teachers toward integrating science into the Year Award (Thompson & Schumacher, agricultural education curriculum. The 1998b) have all provided information following research objectives were regarding the perceived needs and barriers addressed: of integrating science. Other studies have provided insight into the perceptions of 1. Describe the demographic guidance counselors, administrators, parents, characteristics of science teachers and students toward integrating science into and agriculture teachers in Oregon the agricultural education curriculum who taught in schools with (Balschweid, 2002; Dyer & Osborne, 1999; agricultural education programs; Johnson & Newman, 1993; Osborne & 2. Describe and compare perceptions of Dyer, 2000; Thompson, 2001). selected science teachers and The perceptions of science teachers, in agriculture teachers concerning the particular, are extremely important to the integration of science and successful integration of science and agriculture; agriculture (Johnson and Newman, 1993). 3. Describe and compare selected Collaboration and resource sharing between science teachers’ and agriculture the science teacher and agriculture teacher teachers’ perceptions regarding the are often required, and it is often science role of teacher preparation programs teacher groups within a state, district, or in agriculture; and, school that influence whether or not students 4. Describe and compare selected enrolled in agriscience courses receive science teachers’ and agriculture science credit toward graduation. Greater teachers’ perceptions toward meeting understanding of the perceptions and state standards through increased attitudes of science teachers toward integration in agricultural education integrating science and agriculture should programs. assist in implementing changes and programs that will increase the level of Methods/Procedures integration and collaboration. In a study of attitudes of Illinois high school science The target population for this study teachers toward education programs in consisted of science teachers (N = 360) in agriculture, Osborne and Dyer (1998) found schools that had secondary agriculture that science teachers agreed that stronger programs during the 2001-2002 school year connections should be made between and agriculture teachers (N = 121) during science and the agriculture curricula and that the 2001-2002 school year. The Oregon agriculture programs should become more department of education provided the science based. Osborne and Dyer also found researchers with a current database Journal of Agricultural Education 2 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… containing the name and school address of a t-test was used to compare early and late each science teacher. This database was respondents on the summated scale matched with the database of all perception responses (Linder, Murphy, & agriculture teachers during the 2001-2002 Briers, 2001). The t-values obtained school year. Science teachers employed at verified that the difference between early schools with no agricultural education and late respondents was not statistically program were not included in the final significant. population. Caution should be exercised Each form of the instrument consisted of when generalizing the results of the study two parts. Part one included 62 five-point beyond the population. scale questions designed to obtain The instrument used in this study to information about the perceptions of describe the perceptions of science integrating science and agriculture. Subjects instructors was adapted from the Integrating were asked to respond to statements using a Science Survey Instrument developed by 5 for strongly agree, a 4 for agree, 3 for Thompson and Schumacher (1998a). Face neutral, 2 for disagree, and 1 for strongly and content validity for the version of the disagree. Part two requested that the subjects instrument used in this study was established report demographic information about by a group of university teacher educators in themselves. agricultural education and science Data received from part one of the education, and by state supervisors of survey were analyzed and frequencies agricultural education. Two forms of the reported as the percent of respondents that questionnaire were created by the chose each of the five response levels. To researchers: one for agriculture teachers, and simplify reporting, following data analysis, one for science teachers. The primary strongly agree and agree were combined into difference between the two forms was the one category named “Agree” and disagree wording of the questions. The two forms and strongly disagree were combined into were pilot tested by science teachers (n = 9) one category named “Disagree.” Responses and agriculture teachers (n = 10) in Utah to by construct from science teachers and further establish face and content validity as agriculture teachers were then compared well as initial reliability (α = 0.87). As a using the Mann-Whitney U Test. This test measure of the reliability of the attitudinal was chosen due to the ordinal nature of the scale, internal consistency for the science data (scaled responses) and the teacher form was measured at α = 0.90 using independence of the sample groups Cronbach’s alpha with construct reliability (Mertens, 1997). ranging from α = 0.71 to α = 0.85. Internal consistency for the agricultural science Results/Findings teacher form was measured at α = 0.86 with construct reliability ranging from α = 0.71 to Research question one sought to α = 0.83. determine demographic information for the The survey instrument was mailed to all respondents. A summary of the demographic subjects along with a cover letter and return characteristics of science and agriculture envelope. Two weeks after the initial teachers is presented in Table 1. The mean mailing, a follow-up postcard was mailed to age of science teachers teaching in a school all non-respondents. After another two week with an agricultural education program was waiting period, a second survey instrument 42 years old (SD = 10.1). Respondents had and return envelope were mailed to non- taught an average of 14.6 years (SD = 9.27) respondents. Usable responses were with 9.7 years of teaching experience received from 222 science teachers for an at their current school (SD = 8.158). overall response of 61.7% and from 106 The majority were male (68.2%) and lived agriculture teachers for an overall response in a town/city (59.5%) at the time of the of 87.6%. To examine for non-response bias survey. Journal of Agricultural Education 3 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… Table 1 Demographic Profile of Science and Agriculture Teachers Demographic Variable Science Teachers Agriculture Teachers Years of teaching experience M = 14.59 M = 13.51 (SD = 9.27) (SD = 10.49) Years taught at current school M = 9.71 M = 9.82 (SD = 8.15) (SD = 8.81) Age M = 42.33 M = 39.55 (SD = 10.11) (SD = 11.44) School Size M = 465 M = 365 (SD = 247.1) (SD = 260.7) Gender Female 39.3% 17.1% Male 60.7% 82.9% Participation in 4-H or agricultural education as 28.0% 87.6% a youth Type of area raised in Farm/Rural 46.3% 84.6% Town/City 53.7% 15.4% Type of area lived in at the time of survey Farm/Rural 40.5% 74.0% Town/City 59.5% 26.0% Participated in inservice/workshop courses on integration Yes 24.7% 79.2% No 75.3% 20.0% Current school awards Science credit toward high school graduation for agricultural education courses Yes 46.9% 45.2% No 53.1% 54.8% Approximately one in four science for successful completion of agricultural teachers (24.7%) reported they had education courses. Slightly over one fourth participated in an inservice workshop or of the science teachers (28.0%) reported course that demonstrated how to integrate they had taken agricultural education science and agriculture and slightly fewer courses in high school and/or been involved than half of the teachers (46.9%) reported in 4-H. that students attending their school received The mean age of agriculture teachers science credit toward high school graduation was 39.6 years (SD = 11.4) with 13.5 years Journal of Agricultural Education 4 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… of teaching experience (SD = 10.5) and 9.8 science to teach integrated science concepts. years teaching experience at their current The majority of agriculture teachers also school (SD = 8.8). The majority were male agreed or strongly agreed with all the (82.9%) and lived on a farm or in a rural statements related to integrating science into area (74.0%) at the time of the survey. Over the agriculture curriculum. Percentages of three in four agriculture teachers (79.2%) agriculture teachers that agreed or strongly reported they had participated in an agreed with the statements ranged from 58% inservice workshop or course that to 100%. The highest level of agreement demonstrated how to integrate science and was found for the statement that “agriculture agriculture. Slightly fewer than half of the is an applied science.” Ninety-seven percent teachers (45.2%) reported that students of the science teachers and 100% of the attending their school received science agriculture teachers agreed or strongly credit toward high school graduation for agreed that agriculture is an applied science successful completion of agricultural and those involved in agriculture must have education courses. A large majority of the a greater understanding of science than ten respondents (87.6%) reported they had taken years ago. A majority of the teachers (90% agricultural education courses in high school science; 88% agriculture) also agreed or and/or been involved in 4-H. strongly agreed that applied science Research question two sought to principles should be infused into the determine and compare science teachers’ agriculture curriculum, and that students are and agriculture teachers’ perceptions more aware of the connections and learn concerning integrating science and more about agriculture when science agriculture. The results from the 12 concepts and principles are integrated into statements indicated that a majority of the the curriculum. Additionally, a majority science teachers either agreed or strongly (81.13%) of the agriculture teachers agreed agreed with all the statements. Percentages or strongly agreed that they are competent of science teachers who agreed or strongly enough in science to teach integrated science agreed with the statements ranged from concepts. 38.31% to 96.85%. The highest level of Although a majority of the teachers agreement was found in the statement that agreed with all but one statement in the “agriculture is an applied science,” where construct concerning perceptions of science 97% of the science teachers agreed or and agriculture, eight of 13 statements were strongly agreed and 100% of the agriculture found to be statistically significant between teachers agreed or strongly agreed with the the science teacher and the agriculture statement. More than half of the teachers teacher. Science and agriculture teachers indicated a neutral response (54%) toward differed in the level to which they agreed the statement that “integrating science into with integrating science and agriculture. agriculture classes has increased ability to Agriculture teachers agreed more strongly teach problem solving.” Approximately 50 than science teachers (Mann-Whitney U = percent of the science teachers agreed or 7883.5, p = .004). A summary of the strongly agreed that the agriculture teacher perceptions of science teachers and in their school was competent enough in agriculture teachers is presented in Table 2. Journal of Agricultural Education 5 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… Table 2 Percentage of Agreement Between Science and Agriculture Teachers on Their Perceptions of the Integration of Science and Agriculture Science Agriculture Mann-Whitney U, Question A / DA A / DA p-value Agriculture is an applied science. 97% / <1% 100% / 0% U = 7286.0, p < .001 People in agriculture must have a greater 96% / <1% 96% / 0% U = 8977.5, p = .137 understanding of science than 10 years ago. Students are more aware of connection 93% / 1% 93% / 0% U = 9594.0, p < .670 between scientific principles and agriculture when integrated. Students learn more about agriculture when 92% / <1% 89% / 1% U = 7998.5, p = .003 science concepts are integrated. Applied science principles should be infused 90% / 1% 88% / 0% U = 8967.0, p = .157 into the agriculture curriculum. Ongoing efforts should be expanded to 85% / <1% 82% / 2% U = 8813.0, p = .098 upgrade scientific content. Science teachers should examine curricula 73% / 7% 86 % / 3% U = 8151.0, p < .007 used for integration opportunities. Agriculture students learn scientific concepts 70% / 4% 86% / 0% U = 7318.5, p < .001 when integrated into agriculture curriculum. Agriculture students are better prepared in 70% / 10% 86% / 0% U = 7741.5, p = .001 science if integration takes place. I feel comfortable working with the 68% / 11% 64% / 17% U = 9032.5, p = .209 Ag./Science Department to develop a team teaching approach in integration. Students understand science concepts easier 65% / 8% 68% / 1% U = 6544.5, p < .001 when agriculture is integrated. The agriculture teacher is competent enough 50% / 17% 81% / 6% U = 7077.5, p < .001 in science to teach integrated science concepts. Integrating science into agriculture classes has 38% / 7% 58% / 6% U = 7970.0, p = .003 increased ability to teach problem solving. Note: A = agree, DA = disagree. Following data analysis, strongly agree and agree were collapsed into the agree (A) column and strongly disagree and disagree were collapsed into the disagree (DA) column. Journal of Agricultural Education 6 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… Research question number three education programs should provide contained six statements designed to address instruction for undergraduates and the science and agriculture teachers’ teachers in the field on how to integrate perceptions regarding the role of teacher science into the agriculture curriculum. preparation programs in assisting teachers to There was only one statement in integrate science (Table 3). The results of the teacher preparation construct the six statements ranged from 47% to 90% with which a majority of the teachers did not of the science teachers in agreement and agree. Forty-seven percent of the science 31% to 92% of the agriculture teaches in teachers and 31% of the agriculture teachers agreement with the statements. Four agreed with the statement that science statements in the teacher preparation teachers should mentor beginning construct exhibited statistically significant agriculture teachers in their school district. differences concerning the degree of Almost half (49%) of the agriculture agreement, including providing instruction teachers and 40% of the science for pre-service teachers, providing teachers indicated a neutral response instruction for inservice teachers, and that concerning science teacher mentoring. teacher educators should teach a course Table 3 provides a summary of science modeling team teaching and collaboration. teachers’ and agriculture teachers’ Over 87% of the science teachers and perceptions of the role of teacher preparation 90% of the agriculture teachers p r o g r a ms in integrating science and strongly agreed or agreed that teacher agriculture. Table 3 Perceptions of the Role of Teacher Preparation Programs in Agriculture Science Agriculture Mann-Whitney U, Question A / DA A / DA p-value Provide instruction for undergraduates 90% / 2% 92% / 0% U = 10577.5, p = .663 on how to integrate science Provide inservice for teachers in the 87% / <1% 90% / 0% U = 10176.5, p = .295 field on how to integrate science Should place student teachers with a 80% / 1% 54% / 11% U = 7027.0, p < .001 cooperating teacher who integrates science Teach a course that allows future 75% / 4% 65% / 5% U = 8793.5, p = .003 teachers to learn to team teach and model collaboratively Increase basic science course 67% / 2% 54% / 20% U = 8114.5, p < .001 requirements for undergraduates Science teachers should mentor 47% / 12% 31% / 30% U = 7939.5, p < .001 beginning agriculture teachers to help them integrate Note: A = agree, DA = disagree. Following data analysis, strongly agree and agree were collapsed into the agree (A) column and strongly disagree and disagree were collapsed into the disagree (DA) column. Journal of Agricultural Education 7 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… Research question four contained eight p < .001). Additionally, five statements in statements that addressed state standards. the state standards construct were found to Overall, science teachers and agriculture be statistically significant between the teachers differed in the level to which they science and agriculture teachers’ level of agreed with questions about how increased agreement. A summary of responses science integration affects the ability to meet related to state standards is provided in state standards (Mann-Whitney U = 6025.0, Table 4. Table 4 Perceptions of the Ability to Meet State Standards with Increased Science Integration Science Agriculture Mann-Whitney U, Question A / DA A / DA p-value Integration will help Agriculture 80% / 2% 85% / 0% U = 9503.0, p = .057 Programs align with educational standards. Integrating will help students meet 77% / 5% 89% / 0% U = 8970.0, p = .007 requirements for State Initial Mastery. Integrating will help students meet 73% / 4% 84% / 3% U = 8821.0, p = .005 requirements for State Advanced Mastery. High School graduation credit should 59% / 24% 90% / 2% U = 4868.5, p < .001 be offered for agriculture classes that integrate science. Our school is actively engaged in 57% / 21% 60% / 20% U = 10309.5, p = .529 meeting state standards. Students will be better prepared for 55% / 14% 78% / 5% U = 7272.5, p < .001 standardized testing if they learn the application of science. Agriculture courses that integrate 51% / 24% 92% / 2% U = 4893.0, p < .001 science should be credited toward college admission science requirements. State standards will impact the way 43% / 21% 40 % / 12% U = 7939.5, p = .383 science content is delivered. Note: A = agree, DA = disagree. Following data analysis, strongly agree and agree were collapsed into the agree (A) column and strongly disagree and disagree were collapsed into the disagree (DA) column. Journal of Agricultural Education 8 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… Both science and agriculture teachers science into the agricultural education agreed (80% and 85%, respectively) that curriculum. integration will help agriculture programs Although the science teachers and the align with educational standards. Five out of agriculture teachers in this study held eight of the statements were statistically positive attitudes toward the integration of significant. Although not statistically science in the agricultural education significant, 90% of the agriculture teachers curriculum, they differed in the levels to agreed or strongly agreed and 59% of the which they agreed with integrating science science teachers agreed or strongly agreed and agriculture. It is recommended that that high school graduation credit a g r i c u l ture teachers, teacher educators, should be offered for agriculture classes that school administrators, and state officials be integrate science. Further, 92% of the made aware that science teachers in this agriculture teachers and 51% of the s t u d y generally hold positive attitudes science teachers agreed that these courses toward integrating science and agriculture should be credited toward college admission and may be interested in working with the science requirements, and 78% of the agriculture program in their school. agriculture teachers and 55% of the Teachers agreed agriculture is an applied science teachers agreed that students s c i e n ce and people involved in agriculture will be better prepared for standardized must have a greater understanding of science testing if they learn the application of than 10 years ago. These findings science. correspond with a previous study of Illinois science teachers (Osborne & Dyer, 1998). Conclusions/Implications/ Science and agriculture teachers responded Recommendations positively toward student benefits when science is integrated into the agricultural The purpose of this study was to education curriculum. Integration of science determine attitudes and perceptions of into the curriculum should produce more science and agriculture teachers toward science literate students that have a deeper integrating science into the agricultural understanding of agriculture and how the education curriculum. Although there was connection and application of science and variation in the level to which agriculture agriculture are integral. teachers and science teachers agreed with Teacher education programs can have a the individual statements in the survey dynamic impact on helping teachers develop instrument, both groups of teachers the pedagogical and technical skills to generally expressed positive attitudes toward increase the science content in the the integration of science into the agricultural education curriculum. A agricultural education curriculum. Fishbein majority of the teachers indicated that and Ajzen’s planned behavior theory (1975) teacher preparation programs should provide provides a framework for explaining the instruction on how to integrate science both potential for integrating science into the at the preservice and inservice levels, and agricultural education curriculum based that student teachers should be placed with a upon the positive perceptions of both cooperating teacher that makes concerted science and agriculture teachers in this efforts to integrate science into study. They indicate that the positive the curriculum. Moreover, science and perceptions held by science and agriculture agriculture teachers felt teacher education teachers toward integrating science into the programs in science and agriculture should agricultural education curriculum will model collaboration by teaching a course influence their intentions and behaviors. In that helps future teachers in science and understanding stakeholder perceptions (in agriculture learn how to collaboratively this study, science teachers), it can be teach. concluded that since science teachers hold Although the teachers differed in their positive perceptions toward similar concepts level of agreement, the majority of science concerning integrating science as agriculture teachers and agriculture teachers agreed that teachers, there is potential to integrate more preservice agriculture teachers should take Journal of Agricultural Education 9 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007 Thompson & Warnick Integrating Science Into The… more basic science courses at the was offering science graduation credit and undergraduate level. When both agriculture college admissions’ science requirements for teachers and science teachers recommend agriculture courses that integrate science. more basic science skills, it may be time to With additional research, this may explain re-evaluate the science requirements of why science teachers sometimes oppose the agricultural education programs. Teacher integration of science and agriculture subject educators should design the preservice matter. Although a majority of teachers curriculum incorporating basic science agreed, a significant number of agriculture classes that will help future agriculture teachers were more in agreement that teachers develop necessary science skills. students will be better prepared for Adding more science courses alone may not standardized testing if they learn science necessarily increase integration of more through an agriculture context. science into the agriculture curriculum, but The data presented serves as a agriculture teachers may feel more confident benchmark for identifying and comparing in their science skill level to teach to some science and agriculture teachers’ perceptions level of depth. Further, teacher educators of integrating science and agriculture. should work with science teacher educators Further areas of research include: (a) to not only model teaming, but to also help examining exemplary programs that preservice teachers learn the pedagogy of integrate science and agriculture may yield a teaching science. The generally positive model for integrating science; (b) assessing findings of this study toward integrating the influence of integrating science in the science and agriculture support prior agricultural education curriculum on student research (Conroy & Walker, 2000; Layfield achievement in science would add to the et al., 2001, Thompson & Balschweid, 1999; knowledge base on contextual learning; (c) Thompson & Schumacher, 1998b). It is determining other stakeholder perceptions of recommended that teacher preparation integrating science into the agricultural programs in agriculture review the amount education curriculum; (d) assessing of science offerings at the undergraduate agriculture teachers’ knowledge of basic level to determine if there are appropriate science concepts would provide a more science classes that can be added to the independent measure of teacher science undergraduate program. competence; and (e) identifying effective Do science teachers know and collaboration approaches for academic and understand the science content in the agriculture teachers. agricultural education curriculum? Teachers should be encouraged to crosswalk their References curriculum with science teachers and show where science standards are incorporated American Association for the into the curriculum. Agriculture teachers Advancement of Science (1993). Project and science teachers should work together to 2061 – Science for all Americans. develop strategies that best integrate science Washington, DC: Author. into the curriculum. Administrators can assist with the process by providing time for Balschweid, M. A. (2002). Teaching teachers to collaborate as suggested by biology using agriculture as the context: several science teachers in this study. perceptions of high school students. Journal More agriculture teachers were in of Agricultural Education, 43(2), 56-67. agreement than science teachers that integrating science would help agriculture Balschweid, M. A., & Thompson, G. W. programs meet state standards and help (2002). Integrating science in agricultural students meet requirements for state education: attitudes of Indiana agricultural standards. The biggest area of disagreement science and business teachers. Journal of between the science and agriculture teachers Agricultural Education, 43(2), 1-10. Journal of Agricultural Education 10 Volume 48, Number 3, 2007

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.