ebook img

ERIC EJ1146412: An Exploration of "Scaffolded" and "Experiential" Learning Environment's Impact upon Students' Experiences of a Challenging Level 6 Topic in Forensic Psychology: MAPPA PDF

2017·0.08 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC EJ1146412: An Exploration of "Scaffolded" and "Experiential" Learning Environment's Impact upon Students' Experiences of a Challenging Level 6 Topic in Forensic Psychology: MAPPA

An exploration of ‘scaffolded’ and ‘experiential’ learning environment’s impact upon students’ experiences of a challenging level 6 topic in forensic psychology: MAPPA Dean J. Wilkinson & Tim Jones Higher education institutions want to develop rounded, independent learners equipped with the required skills to embrace the challenges of post-graduation (European Commission, 2013). Vygotsky suggests learners are interdependent, born as social beings with emotional intelligence. Experiential learning is created by direct participation in life events (Houle, 1980). Learning which incorporates reflection upon everyday experience creates deeper learning, therefore this study aimed to explore the use of a ‘scaffolded’ learning environment combined with ‘experiential’ learning environment on students’ experiences of engaging with a challenging level 6 topic in forensic psychology: MAPPA. The session consisted of 80 level 6 students. The session was constructed around one basic scenario about a boy called Harvey. This scenario provided the basic foundation for students to begin to explore, reflect and problem solve. The basic scenario was accompanied by a number of work based scenarios, which contained specific information. Key themes emerged around Actual Learning Outcomes; Barriers; Solutions; Experience. These themes are discussed in the context of students learning and theories surrounding learning. Keywords: Scaffolded learning; experiential learning; learning environments; interactive learning. Introduction PSYCHOLOGY, as a subject, has become sity students studying psychology per year very popular due to the practical appli- at undergraduate level, full and part-time cation and impact that it has on all areas (HESA, 2010). More women than men study of life such as education; health; economy psychology at university and more than half and crime (British Psychological Society, of these students are mature. A large amount 2013). The Telegraph newspaper (2013), of undergraduates and graduates also now reports Psychology among the top 10 most work part-time to fund their degree course. popular degree choices at undergraduate This rapid growth of a more heterogeneous level in England. Forensic psychology, or at student body, that has different expecta- least psychology applied to the legal setting, tions, is reflective of both the major changes as a sub-section and specific applied domain and debate in teaching psychology (Hartley, of Psychology has existed as a unique area 2012; Upton & Jones, 2012). of study for around 40 years (Shapiro & The desire of every higher education Walker, 2013). Consequently, there has institution is to develop rounded, inde- been an increase in the number of students pendent learners equipped with the skills to who have studied Forensic Psychology at negotiate the challenges of employment or undergraduate and postgraduate level of postgraduate education (European Commis- study, with the desire to pursue a career sion, 2013). Consequently, it is impor- in the field. There are over 60,500 univer- tant to consider student’s developmental Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 41 Dean J. Wilkinson & Tim Jones opportunities and in particular the role and educators to use ‘cooperative learning’ and contribution that educational experi- tasks whereby less competent learners can ences play. Piagetian (1954, Constructivist) develop their skills with help from more and Vygotskain (1978, Social-constructivist) skilful peers. Wood et al. (1976) referred to perspectives provide differing, but estab- this process as scaffolding learning: ‘Those lished accounts, of development applicable elements of the task that are initially beyond to learning environments (Miell & Ding, the learner’s capacity, thus permitting him 2005). Both accounts are underpinned by to concentrate upon and complete only the constructivist framework which main- those elements that are within his range of tains that new knowledge is understood competence’ (p.90). and explored through the application of Vygotskyan theory was first applied to prior knowledge and experience. These primary school students, whereby each and two accounts differ, however, when the every child should be viewed as an individual role of the ‘learner’ is considered. Piaget with a distinct learning style. Consequently, (1954) describes the learner as powerful, the knowledge and skills that are worthwhile active, lone explorers who become social- learning varies for every student. From this ised in later developmental stages. Vygotsky perspective, the purpose of education and promotes the learner to be interdependent, schooling is to create and guide develop- born as a social being with emotional intelli- ment which is a byproduct of social learning gences. A Vygotskyan perspective, therefore, through internalisation of culture and social opens up the debate around what it is to relationships. Past experiences and prior be ‘individual’, and whether there is such knowledge are valuable when making sense a concept as ‘individuality’. Additionally, of new situations or present experiences a debate surrounds whether the learner is (Vygotsky, 1978). The same principles can, determined by other individuals or whether and have been, related to the higher educa- the learner themselves determines who they tion setting. For example, a task that is set for are. Some (Miell & Ding, 2005) would argue the student, irrelevant of their age, should that a key component of identity formation be pitched at the right level. Following the involves the learner drawing distinctions standard undergraduate degree structure, between themselves and others. the tasks should be compliant with level 4, Vygotsky maintained that learning 5 or 6 criteria. If the task is too difficult, occurred when the environment, including then it could be argued that this is outside the input from the ‘teacher’, and the of the student’s zone of proximal develop- students potential were balanced. He called ment and regardless of the amount of help this balance the Zone of Proximal Develop- in the form of scaffolding, the gap cannot ment (ZPD), centred at the core of his devel- be bridged. If a task is pitched too easy then opmental theory. Vygotsky (1978) stated that the student will lose motivation. However, the zone of proximal achievement is ‘the for a task to be successful it should allow distance between the actual developmental an individual to acquire knowledge and level as determined by independent problem develop the skills specific to that individual’s solving and the level of potential develop- progress; stretching individuals that are high ment as determined through problem performing and supporting individuals that solving under adult guidance, or in collabo- find certain tasks challenging. ration with more capable peers’ (p.86). Murtagh and Webster (2010) report Alongside the interaction between the initial findings of a small scale initiative learner and teacher, Vygotsky maintained undertaken in a modern university. This that the interaction with other peers is an study investigated the use of a scaffolded effective way of developing skills and strate- approach to teaching, learning and assess- gies. Therefore, it is beneficial for teachers ment. A specific module was designed and 42 Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 An exploration of ‘scaffolded’ and ‘experiential’ learning environment’s impact upon students’ experiences structured so that the mode of assessment (a or only considering the possibility of doing presentation) was the focus of every taught something about it’ (Borzak, 1981, cited in session. Each session was strategically scaf- Brookfield, 1983). This sort of learning is folded to increase individual student engage- sponsored by an institution and might be ment. They report that such an approach used on training programmes for profes- impacted on students’ ability to engage sions such as social work and teaching or in self-regulated learning and impacted in field study programmes such as those for positively on their academic achievement. social administration or geography courses. Zimmerman (2002) defines self regulated The second type of experiential learning learning in terms of the learners approach is ‘education that occurs as a direct partici- to a task. An individual who self regulates pation in the events of life’ (Houle 1980, their learning approaches a task, according p.221). Here learning is not sponsored by to Zimmerman (2002), with confidence, dili- some formal educational institution but gence, and is resourceful. They are aware of by people themselves. It is learning that is the boundaries of their skills and knowledge. achieved through reflection upon everyday Consequently, they proactively seek infor- experience and is the way that most of us do mation, they overcome obstacles and they our learning. take responsibility for their achievement This study aims to explore how a ‘scaf- outcomes (Borkowki et al., 1990). folded’ learning environment combined Student’s education and understanding with ‘experiential’ learning environ- can be vastly improved by using experien- ment impacts upon student’s experiences tial learning methods and opportunities of a challenging level 6 topic in Forensic (Hawtrey, 2007; Watts & Becker, 2008). Psychology: MAPPA. MAPPA is an acronym In addition, there is evidence that univer- for Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrange- sity students have a strong preference for ments to ensure management of violent experiential learning techniques (Hawtrey, and sexual offenders. Guidelines of these 2007; Kolb, 1984). Experiential learning arrangements can be found at the Ministry has the advantage of creating higher levels of Justice National Offender Management of motivation towards learning from the Service website. students as well as better retention of knowl- edge compared to traditional style lectures. Method Hawtrey (2007) presents a number of experi- Participants ential learning methods specifically designed The participants of this study consisted of for teaching economics through classroom 80 level 6 students enrolled on the Forensic experiments. Classroom experiments are an Psychology module. These students were accepted method of teaching economics at undertaking a range of degree courses which the university level (Holt, 2007; O’Sullivan & included: BSc Psychology; BSc Forensic Sheffrin, 2006, cited in Hawtrey, 2010). Psychology; BSc Counseling Psychology; Top Brookfield (1983, p.16) notes that writers up degree students from various partner in the field of experiential learning use the colleges. The participant’s age ranged from term in two contrasting ways. Experien- 22–46 with a mean age of 24. No further tial learning could be viewed as the sort demographic information was recorded. of learning undertaken by students who are given a chance to acquire and apply Materials knowledge, skills and feelings in an imme- Scenarios diate and relevant setting. Experiential The session was constructed around one learning thus involves a ‘direct encounter basic scenario about a boy called Harvey. with the phenomena being studied rather This scenario provided the basic founda- than merely thinking about the encounter, tion for students to begin to explore and Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 43 Dean J. Wilkinson & Tim Jones problem solve. In addition to the basic based on the evidence or information that scenario (appendix i) there were a number they had been provided with. of work based scenarios based around the At the end of the session students were following organisations: Social services; then required to reflect upon the following Health-General Practitioner; Health – Acci- three points: dent and emergency; Police – Special crimes 1. Learning; unit; Police – Undercover; HMP – Rye Hill; 2. Experience; Probation; Local Housing Authority. Each 3. Conclusions. of these scenarios contains specific infor- mation gathered by the given unit along Qualitative analysis with instructions about the policies and The participant’s responses produced quali- procedures which govern the sharing of tative data which ultimately needed to be information. analysed. Thematic analysis was deemed the most appropriate method of analysis Procedure given the type and amount of qualitative Students were informed about the planned data collected. This method of analysis is session several weeks prior to schedule. appropriate when the researcher is inter- They were informed that they could attend ested in analysing the words of the partici- the session and were under no obligation pants as opposed to how the words have to provided data/feedback for this study. been presented/said. Thematic analysis, However, all data would be anonymised therefore, allowed participant’s responses as feedback would be written on a post-it to be themed highlighting the common note. Commencing the session, students and contradictory descriptions made by the were reminded of the study and they were participants. asked to write their own learning objectives/ There are a number of different types of outcomes for the session on a post-it note thematic analysis, however, they all follow and to stick it onto the relevant flip chart similar basic steps and principles. The paper. Given that this lecture was towards general view is that thematic analysis high- the end of a level 6 module, students had lights key themes that flow throughout the established a firm idea based on previous interview diary scripts. However, Braun and lectures of the standard that level 6 requires. Clarke (2006), Howitt and Cramer (2008), Students were then given a 20 minute over- and Howitt (2010) have formulated more view of MAPPA in a traditional lecture style systematic and transparent approaches to this presentation. Following this session, students method. Thematic analysis, due to its broad were presented with the basic scenario about nature and reduced theoretical ‘baggage’ Harvey (see appendix i). Students were (Howitt, 2010) occupies the middle ground then assigned to one of the groups (i.e. between quantitative and qualitative analysis. Social services; Health-General Practitioner; Howitt (2010) maintains that thematic Health – Accident and emergency; Police analysis broadly consists of three main steps: – Special crimes unit; Police – Undercover; transcription; analytic effort; identifying HMP – Rye Hill; Probation; Local Housing themes; and sub-themes. Each stage has a Authority) and given a full brief relating to degree of flexibility in terms of the researcher that particular organisation. Students were going back – and – forward between stages. given five minutes to go through the brief Braun and Clarke (2006) have provided the in their group and try to put together the most systematic account of doing thematic evidence that they had so far about Harvey’s analysis to date. The Braun-Clarke model case. Students were then able to circulate consists of six steps to analysis. These steps around the other groups (visit other organi- are displayed in Figure 1. sations) with specific questions or enquires 44 Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 An exploration of ‘scaffolded’ and ‘experiential’ learning environment’s impact upon students’ experiences Step 1: Data familiarisation Step 2: Initial coding generation Step 3: Search for themes based on initial coding Step 4: Review of themes Step 5: Theme definition and labelling Step 6: Report writing Figure 1: Braun and Clarke’s model of Thematic Analysis (Howitt, 2010). Ethics responses (see analysis section). The themes There were no problematic ethical issues will be presented below with accompanying associated with this study, however, it was supporting evidence. ensured that students were informed about the session in advanced and that their partic- 1. Learning Objectives ipation was voluntary. Therefore, students When analysing the student’s responses with were able to attend the session without regards to learning objectives at the start of having to provide recorded information the session, 52 students suggested learning for the purpose of this study. Participant’s objectives around the following themes: responses were anonymised in order to • To gain an ‘understanding’ of MAPPA. protect their identity. Full details of the study • To be able to ‘critically appraise’ MAPPA. were provided along with written consent • To gain relevant information towards the for participation prior to the session taking ‘assessment’. place. To some extent these contributions map Results onto elements of the level 6 grading criteria The results were analysed using thematic and therefore might suggest that students analysis. The method of analysis was most have an understanding of what level 6 means. appropriate to highlight the common However, there suggestions were particu- themes that emerged from the participants larly practical with regards to applying and Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 45 Dean J. Wilkinson & Tim Jones utilising the content of the session towards ‘my experience was that no one could tell vital the final assessment. bits of information to the people that really There were four further themes needed to know to do something about it. that emerged from the reflection items Whilst policies are there to protect information presented to students at the end of the they can inhibit protection too.’ session (Learning, Experience and Conclu- sions). These themes will be presented and The third theme that emerged was around discussed below with supporting evidence. Solution. Students appeared to have wanted The first theme that will be discussed is to provide a solution to the problem. This around Actual Learning Outcomes. This theme is evident by students making comments includes student’s reports and reflections about how MAPPA should be improved of what they actually learnt and therefore or reworked and general comments about ‘gained’ from the session. Students reported overcoming the barriers that they them- gaining a better understanding of the struc- selves highlighted. These comments were ture of MAPPA (what it is), the workings of around improving the communication links MAPPA (what it does), as well as the limi- with specific facilitators, rethinking policies, tations and issues (critical appraisal). For utilising information technologies to try to example: alleviate some of these issues. For example: ‘I got a great deal of information from this ‘they need to generally Improve the communica- session. I felt more engaged and it helped that tion between the groups to make better use of the information was accessible and related to the information gained at different levels.’ real-life, this enabled a greater understanding than normally achieved.’ ‘I’m shocked at how policy’s prevent protec- tion, I have never thought about it in this way ‘Learnt that… what MAPPA is used for. before.’ Authorities that are important for MAPPA to succeed do not cooperate which prevents its ‘they need to get one set database that contains effectiveness.’ the information shared across sectors, or one place or person who can access information ‘Brilliant! I now understand what MAPPA across sectors.’ is, how it works and its limitations and flaws. I will be able to use this in my IS and will ‘what about annual meetings where infor- remember it for future reference as the “learning mation can be shared given the right style” was perfect.’ circumstances.’ The second theme to emerge from students ‘MAPPA becomes a set agency with the sole reflections was Barriers. Students were able purpose to communicate and collect relevant to highlight through self discovery that one information.’ of the fundamental issues with MAPPA is the barriers between organisations. Students The final theme to emerge from students reported that they discovered that commu- responses was Experience. Students commented nication and legislations were the main upon the value of experiencing how MAPPA barriers which prevent MAPPA from being a functions in a practical session and the feel- successful construct. For example: ings that they expect practitioners to experi- ence when trying to deal with a case. ‘We couldn’t tell anyone anything, not even the police – completely bound by our own legis- ‘I felt restricted; frustrated; infuriated and power- lation and policies.’ less so I can imagine workers to feel the same.’ 46 Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 An exploration of ‘scaffolded’ and ‘experiential’ learning environment’s impact upon students’ experiences ‘Although it was role play, I feared for my job which aided their understanding, through if I said something wrong.’ experience, of the problems with the organi- sation. Interestingly, students resulted in ‘I feel that we have learnt a valuable lesson reflecting on ‘solutions’, their ‘experiences’, from this session, in many respects, but most of and the ‘barriers’ of MAPPA. Vygotsky might all about real life scenarios whereby we have to suggest that the learner is interdependent make a change.’ but supported through the environment, allowing the student to make such discov- Discussion eries. In addition, these discoveries were Students were successfully able to set realistic made by interacting with other students learning objectives that were representative as opposed to interacting or listening to a of the level of study (level 6). To some extent ‘teacher’. This is in line with Vygotsky (1979) this is indicative of the student’s ability to self who stresses the dynamic role of role of regulate their own learning by recognising the peer interactions and the value of a diverse level at which they should be studying, along approach to learning. From this perspec- with the relevant content that surrounds the tive, the students will have achieved if they given topic of study. However, the self regu- reached the zone of proximal achievement lation that Zimmerman (2002) discusses is (Vygotsky, 1978). Also, the analytical skills suppressed by the system of education and that are involved in suggesting solutions ties the natural default of lectures and seminars. into the application of theoretical knowledge This format reduces the capacity by which a to the workplace which Crowe (2012, p.62, learner can regulate their learning approach cited in Knott et al., 2013) are paramount to a task and demonstrate confidence, dili- for employability and relevant to global citi- gence and resourcefulness. Murtagh and zenship. Experiential learning tasks, like the Webster (2010) study reports how ‘scaffolded task in this study, enables students to develop learning’ environments allow students to the required skills that psychology graduates self-regulate their learning which ultimately are expected to acquire (Knott et al., 2013). increases engagement with the subject. By The session detailed in this study was an moving away from a traditional lecture style, attempt to combine a scaffolded approach this session allowed students to engage at to learning with experiential learning in a deeper level and begin to demonstrate order for level 6 students to experience, self regulated learning through discovery, discover and learn about some difficult real this was evidenced by student detailing their life concepts relating to MAPPA and forensic expectations and actual outcomes. psychology. It would have been useful to Students were able to highlight clear have conducted follow up interviews to outcomes of the session, these were: gaining gain students viewpoints about the session an understanding of what MAPPA is; how compared to other taught sessions. It would it functions and the associated issues with be interesting to find out, for example, MAPPA as an organisation. These outcomes whether students consciously adapted their link closely to student’s experiential learning learning approach given the practical nature during the session. The session was specifi- of the session and whether they felt as if cally designed to provide students with an they moved from a passive learner to an opportunity to learn through discovery in a interactive engage learner. supported environment which reflects the It is difficult to assess from the data constructivist approach. Consequently, this captured, whether all students engaged allowed students to be faced with an example with the session at the same level – this is scenario which was reflective of real-life and a difficult phenomena to assess even with therefore students appeared to engage with traditional teaching methods particularly real life issues in a controlled environment in large group sessions i.e. lectures of 100 Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017 47 Dean J. Wilkinson & Tim Jones or more. However, it could be beneficial to Dr Dean J. Wilkinson, Senior Lecturer in design a session which included a measure Forensic Psychology, University of Worcester, of engagement whether that being self Worcester. disclosed or accounted for through forma- tive assessment throughout the session. This Dr Tim Jones, Head of School, Psycholog- could include an exploration of ‘coopera- ical, Social and Behavioural Sciences. tive learning’ as coined by Vygotsky (1979). References Blackmore, J. (2009) Academic pedagogies, quality Murtagh, L. & Webster, M. (2010). Scaffolding logics and performative universities:evaluating teaching, learning and assessment in Higher teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education. Tean Journal 1(2) December [Online]. Education, 34(8), 857–872. Available at: http://bit.ly/tyfJ5M (Accessed 28 Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E. & Pressley, October 2011). M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interde- Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in pendence of metacognition, attributions, and children: Piaget development and learning. self-esteem. Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176–186. Instruction, 1, 53–92. Piaget, J. (1972). Development and learning. Reading British Psychological Society (2013) Retrieved 9 in Child Behavior and Development. New York: Hart- September 2013 from www.bps.org.uk/careers- court Brace Janovich. in-psychology Shapiro, D.L. & Walker, L.E.A. (2013). New direc- Brookfield, S. (1984). Self-directed adult learning: tions in teaching forensic psychology. In The A critical paradigm. Adult Education Quarterly, Telegraph (2013) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ 35(2), 59–71. education/universityeducation/8695883/ Brookfield, S. (1993). Self-directed learning, political The-top-10-most-popular-degree-courses. clarity, and the critical practice of adult educa- html?image=4 09/09/2013 tion. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(4), 227–242. Upton, P. & Jones, T. (2012). Through the looking glass: European Commission (2013). High level group on Supporting student transitions in the 21st century. In the modernization of Higher Education. Report to Division of Academics, Researchers and Teachers the European Commission on improving the quality of in Psychology Inaugral Conference, 18–20 teaching and learning in Europe’s Higher Education April 2012, Grand Connaught Rooms, London Institutions. Accessed 2/4/14. (Unpublished). Hartley, J. (2012). Reflections on 50 years of teaching Upton, P. & Jones, T. (2012). The Value Parodox psychology. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(1), 3–9. – inducting psychology undergraduates in a time of Hawtrey, K. (2007). Using experiential learning tech- austerity. In Division of Academics, Researchers niques. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), and Teachers in Psychology Inaugural Confer- 143–152. ence, 18–20 April 2012, Grand Connaught Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) (2010). Rooms, London. (Unpublished). www.hesa.ac.uk cited in Hartley, J. (2012). Vygotsky, L.S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem Reflections on 50 years of teaching psychology. in the psychology of behavior. Soviet Psychology, Psychology Teaching Review, 18(1), 3–9. 17, 3–35. Houle, C.O. (1980). Continuing learning in the Winne, P.H. (2005). Key issues in modeling and professions. London, Jossey-Bass.  applying research on self-regulated learning. Knott, V.E., Mak, A.S. & Neill, J.T. (2013). Teaching Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, intercultural competencies in introductory 232–238. psychology via application of the Excellence in Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role Culture Expriential Learning and Leadership of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 46–53. Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89–100. Miell, D. & Ding, S. (2005). The early development Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated of identity. Cited in S. Ding and K. Littleton, learner: An overview.Theory into Practice, 41(2), (Eds.), Children’s Personal and Social Development. 64–70. Milton Keynes: The Open University. 48 Psychology Teaching Review Vol. 23 No. 1, 2017

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.