SMall NUMBERS aND BIG SPaCES Call FOR a Team Approach in North Dakota Pam Smith, MEd, is the coordinator of Adult Outreach Services at the North Dakota School for By Pam Smith and Bambi Lambert the Deaf/Resource Center for Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and she chairs pepnet 2’s “Team North Dakota.” Preparing deaf and hard of hearing students for transition is a unique challenge With more than 20 years in education, she has in North Dakota, a rural state in which the North Dakota Department of taught high school Public Instruction has identified only 32 transition-age students as “deaf” or psychology in New “hearing impaired.” Additional students who are deaf or hard of hearing may be Mexico, worked with being served via 504 plans in the schools, but there is no data available which students who were deaf in rural communities, indicates this. Collaboration among schools, the school system, and various state and taught high school agencies is mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Services social studies for 10 years for deaf and hard of hearing students may be limited, or unavailable, as at the North Dakota indicated by parents and educators across North Dakota. School for the Deaf. Smith earned her In the face of these challenges—low numbers, limited services, and a rural bachelor’s degrees in deaf environment—North Dakota educators and the pepnet 2 team were determined to find education and secondary ways to ensure and assist with the successful transitions of students who are deaf or hard education and her of hearing. The team began by developing a survey. The survey was disseminated to master’s degrees in more than 500 agencies and providers across the state and garnered a 23 percent educational leadership/ response rate; it gauged the needs that service agencies experience and asked administration and respondents to identify problems in helping deaf and hard of hearing individuals gerontology. transition from school to postsecondary education or the workplace. Respondents indicated that providers’ experience with individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing was infrequent, and that they felt somewhat ill-prepared to provide services due to the fact that they were unable to communicate fully and effectively. The greatest need for deaf and hard of hearing students, as stated by providers, was the lack of or inability to schedule certified interpreters. More than 80 percent of respondents reported lack of interpreter services as their number one concern. At present, only 17 interpreters are certified by the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf in our entire state, and 12 of those interpreters work in classrooms. Photos courtesy of Pam Smith and Bambi Lambert 28 ODYSSEY 2016 Left: A father and Bdaamughbteir Linavomlvebd einrt, MtEhed ,D iesa af Rtoelaec Mheord eolf the deParfo agrnadm hleaarrdn ohfo whe taoring Clockwise from fosri gtnh Ie l oFvaer gyoou (.North above left: Dakota) Public Schools, Lambert in the anFdar s lhefet :pAro mviodthees racademic classroom; the sulepapronsr tt haen sdig inn fsatmruilyction in pepnet 2 North trfarnosmit aio dne asfk riollles mfoordel. Dakota team; secondary deaf and hard of entertainer Keith hearing students. She Wann with students maintains her certification at the transition as an American Sign Summit. Language interpreter through the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf and has worked in new The second biggest problem, as indicated by Program (IEP), employment, teacher and interpreter our survey results, was lack of information agency/community supports, legal training/mentorship, about the needs of those who are deaf or hard of rights/responsibilities, and audiological trends. educational interpreting, hearing. Participants left with a portfolio of helpful and at an independent After an analysis of this survey, our North transition resources to take back to their homes living center. On the Dakota team developed a plan to address the and schools. North Dakota pepnet 2 needs of providers across the state while We were fortunate that our team members team since 2013, Lambert maintaining a focus and emphasis on the worked so well together. Each of us was earned her master’s degree transition of youth who are deaf or hard of determined to create the best experience in deaf/hard of hearing hearing. possible, and all of us had the support of our education from the home agencies and schools. We figured out University of Minnesota. Planning for a Summit who would organize which events and which Key state and national agencies were identified organizations would foot the bills. We The authors welcome and invited to participate in planning and collaborated to provide food, transportation, questions and comments presentation at a two-day transition Summit. and lodging for student workshop attendees about this article at Invitations were extended to the members of and their families in addition to the speaker [email protected] the state Transition Communities of Practice, fees. Even though we were spread across the [email protected]. to supporting agencies and programs, and to state, our team met weekly at times to ensure the president of the North Dakota Association planning and implementation continued of the Deaf and others active in the Deaf smoothly. We set goals and did whatever we community. The Summit was an event with needed to do to achieve those goals. Working keynote speakers and breakout sessions hard and consistently was key to our success. designed for students, parents, professionals, The transition-aged students who attended and interpreters. Topics addressed included the Summit were given a pre-test at the start of advocacy, the Individualized Education the Summit and a post-test three months later. 2016 ODYSSEY 29 Results indicated that the attending well as to other case managers who were an assessment of needs and resources in students initially had limited knowledge referred to our team as serving our state, to collaborating as we planned of the components of the IEP itself as individuals who are deaf or hard of and structured a statewide conference well as limited understanding of the IEP hearing. The portfolio included all and subsequent presentations, joining process. Following the Summit, their aspects of transition, from information forces through pepnet 2 has been knowledge had increased: students were about postsecondary programs, to critical. Through working together as a able to identify their disability and training programs, to employment, to team, and with individuals throughout needed accommodations, and they independent living options, to social the state, we are more effectively demonstrated greater knowledge of the security and vocational rehabilitation meeting the needs of individuals who are IEP and confidence in the transition services; it was intended to inform and deaf or hard of hearing throughout process. educate not only the case managers but North Dakota as they transition to The Summit was not all work. With students and their parents as well. postsecondary programs or the the support of pepnet 2 and our From working as a team as we workplace. sponsoring agencies and in support of developed, disseminated, and evaluated Deaf Awareness Week, Keith Wann, a hearing son of deaf parents and a comedian who entertains internationally in American Sign Language, performed Collaboration Calculations: for more than 200 enthusiastic community members. Wann’s Lessons from North Dakota performance created a rare opportunity for adults who are deaf to get together with each other and deaf and hard of By Pam Smith and Bambi Lambert hearing students and their families for an evening of fun, camaraderie, and The following strategies proved helpful in enabling deaf and hard of hearing outstanding entertainment—and for us students to use the resources available to effectively transition from school to to attract more individuals to our event. postsecondary study or the workplace. Following the Summit, the North Dakota team developed a presentation •Identifythe roles and responsibilities of each team member involved in the focusing on the transition needs of student’s transition—whether educational, training, or workplace—as well students who are deaf or hard of hearing as independent living. in North Dakota. The presentation included audiological considerations, •Empowerstudents to take ownership of their goals: educational considerations and o Always involve students in the IEP process. assessments, vocational rehabilitation o Gradually release responsibility to the student through activities that information, pertinent assistive require self-disclosure and self-advocacy. technology considerations, o Regularly share the student’s progress with the rest of the team. communication access, and relevant services available statewide. This •Engagelocal, regional, and state agencies: presentation has been shared virtually o Educate agencies and providers of the service needs of individuals who via videoconferencing to statewide are deaf or hard of hearing. agencies and in person at statewide o Provide professional resources. conferences. Responding to the feedback from the •Encouragestudents to self-advocate and communicate with their support survey and Summit, the team compiled network throughout the transition process and into postsecondary, a portfolio of informational resources to employment, and independent living options. address the transition needs of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The •Establishand maintain meaningful connections on the national, state, and portfolios were then hand-delivered local levels with agencies, providers, parents, schools, and other entities. across the state to case managers of each This enables enhanced postsecondary outcomes for all students in North student identified as having a primary or Dakota who are deaf or hard of hearing. secondary disability of hearing loss as 30 ODYSSEY 2016