The Unequal Race for Good Jobs How Whites Made Outsized Gains in Education and Good Jobs Compared to Blacks and Latinos Anthony P. Carnevale Jeff Strohl Artem Gulish Martin Van Der Werf Kathryn Peltier Campbell 2019 REPRINT PERMISSION The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce carries a Creative Commons license, which permits noncommercial reuse of any of our content when proper attribution is provided. You are free to copy, display, and distribute our work, or include our content in derivative works, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must clearly attribute the work to the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce and provide a print or digital copy of the work to [email protected]. Our preference is to cite figures and tables as follows: Source: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, The Unequal Race for Good Jobs: How Whites Made Outsized Gains in Education and Good Jobs Compared to Blacks and Latinos, 2019. Noncommercial Use: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Written permission must be obtained from the owners of the copy/literary rights and from Georgetown University for any publication or commercial use of reproductions. Approval: If you are using one or more of our available data representations (figures, charts, tables, etc.), please visit our website at cew.georgetown.edu/publications/reprint-permission for more information. For the full legal code of this Creative Commons license, please visit creativecommons.org. Email [email protected] with any questions. Unequal The Race for Good Jobs How Whites Made Outsized Gains in Education and Good Jobs Compared to Blacks and Latinos 2019 Anthony P. Carnevale Jeff Strohl Artem Gulish Martin Van Der Werf Kathryn Peltier Campbell ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to express our gratitude to JPMorgan Chase & Co. for the generous support that made this report possible, particularly to Sarah Steinberg for her encouragement and guidance. The staff of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce was instrumental in the production of this report from conception to publication. In particular, we would like to thank r Andrea Porter for strategic guidance; r Ban Cheah for project conceptualization, data programming, and analysis; r Nicole Smith for economic methodology; r Neil Ridley and Tanya I. Garcia for editorial and qualitative feedback; r Hilary Strahota, Emma Wenzinger, Frank Zhang, and Caitlin Panarella for communications efforts, including design development and public relations; and r Andrew Debraggio and Coral Castro for assistance with logistics and operations. Many others contributed their thoughts and feedback throughout the production of this report. We especially are grateful to our talented designers, editorial advisors, and printers, whose efforts were vital to its successful completion. We would also like to thank Elizabeth González of the College Futures Foundation, Harry Holzer of Georgetown University, CJ Powell of the Leadership Conference Education Fund, and Valerie Wilson of the Economic Policy Institute, who provided feedback on an earlier version of this report. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of JPMorgan Chase & Co. or any of its officers or employees. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. CONTENTS Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1 Inequity in the Post–World War II Economy .......................................................................................4 Upskilling as the Driver of Change in the US Economy ....................................................................8 Trends in Good Jobs by Educational Pathway for White, Black, and Latino Workers ..............12 — White workers moved to jobs on the bachelor’s degree pathway, leaving jobs on the high school pathway behind ..................................................................................................13 — Black workers gained good jobs on the middle-skills and bachelor’s degree pathways...........................................................................................................................................................16 — Latino workers gained good jobs on all three educational pathways, but gained their largest share of jobs overall on the high school pathway ....................................................................................19 Persistent Equity Gaps between White, Black, and Latino Workers .............................................22 — Not all good jobs pay equally: racial differences in earnings remain. ...............................................................27 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................................30 — Policy Implications ......................................................................................................................................................30 References ...............................................................................................................................................33 Figures Figure 1. Skilled-services industries provided all of the net growth in employment and good jobs between 1991 and 2016, while blue-collar industries shed employment and good jobs..................... 9 Figure 2. Good jobs have almost doubled for workers with bachelor’s degrees and above in skilled-services industries, and middle-skills good jobs have experienced strong growth in both skilled-services and blue-collar industries ....................................................................................... 10 Figure 3. Good jobs held by White workers are increasingly concentrated among those with at least a bachelor’s degree .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 4. Nearly all the net new good job gains by Whites were by workers with bachelor’s degrees or higher in skilled-services industries, while all the net losses were by workers with a high school diploma or less ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Figure 5. Good jobs held by Black workers are increasingly on the bachelor’s degree pathway ........................ 17 Figure 6. Black workers with bachelor’s and graduate degrees made strong gains in good jobs within skilled-services industries, and also made significant gains on the middle-skills pathway in both skilled-services and blue-collar industries ....................................................................... 18 Figure 7. Among Latino workers, those with no more than a high school diploma have the largest share of good jobs, but those with a bachelor’s degree or higher are quickly catching up ............... 20 Figure 8. Latino workers obtained good jobs across both blue-collar and skilled-services industries with bachelor’s and graduate degrees, with middle skills, and even with a high school diploma or less ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 9. White, Black, and Latino workers all increased their likelihood of having a good job between 1991 and 2016, but equity gaps remain ......................................................................................... 23 Figure 10. White workers are more likely than Black or Latino workers to have a good job at every level of educational attainment ........................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 11. White workers continue to be overrepresented in good jobs, while Black and Latino workers are underrepresented. ........................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 12. White workers gained more good jobs than their growth in overall employment, while Black and Latino workers gained fewer good jobs ...................................................................................... 26 Figure 13. The inequitable distribution of good jobs and corresponding earnings shifted $554 billion to White workers from Black and Latino workers in 2016 ......................................................................... 29 Tables Table 1. Overview of White Workers by Educational Pathway ................................................................................... 13 Table 2. Overview of Black Workers by Educational Pathway .................................................................................... 16 Table 3. Overview of Latino Workers by Educational Pathway...................................................................................19 Table 4. In 2016, more than half of good jobs among Whites and Blacks were held by workers with bachelor’s and graduate degrees, compared to just over a third among Latinos ........................ 22 Introduction The American job machine has performed well over the past 25 years. Between 1991 and 2016, employment among White, Black, and Latino workers grew by 20 percent, while employment in good jobs soared by 35 percent.1 Yet the opportunities and benefits of the modern economy have not accrued evenly across the three groups.2 Discrimination and a history of racial injustice in this country have led to Whites gaining a disproportionate edge in educational opportunity and good jobs. During this period, Whites started out with more good jobs than Blacks and Latinos, and they gained an outsized share of the new good jobs compared to Blacks and Latinos.3 Today, White workers are the only major racial or ethnic group for whom the majority of their jobs are good jobs.4 Overall, Whites have a disproportionate share of good jobs relative to their share of employment, and Blacks and Latinos are disproportionately underrepresented in good jobs relative to their share of employment. In 2016, White workers held 77 percent of the good jobs in the United States even though Whites collectively held 69 percent of all jobs. Black workers held 10 percent of good jobs even as Blacks held 13 percent of all jobs. Latino workers held 13 percent of good jobs, while Latinos held 18 percent of all jobs.5 1 Our main data source is the Current Population Survey (CPS), 1992–2017. The CPS, sponsored jointly by the US Census Bureau and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, began using data on degree attainment in 1992. Previously, this survey had included data only on years of education. 2 We cover the three largest racial and ethnic groups in the workforce: Whites, Blacks, and Latinos. All the analysis includes only these three groups. The aggregate numbers in the report are totals for these groups only and discussion of shares are out of the totals for these three groups only. While Asians now represent a significant share of the workforce, the Current Population Survey did not separately report data for Asians until 2003. 3 We use the term Black to refer to people who identify as Black or African American and the term Latino to refer to people who identify as Hispanic or Latino, including people who identify racially as Black and ethnically as Latino. We use single terms for different racial and ethnic groups—White, Black, and Latino—to alleviate ambiguity and enhance clarity. In charts and tables, we use the terms White, Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latino. 4 Our analysis encompasses workers ages 25 to 64 covered in the CPS, 1992–2017, but gaps by race or ethnicity in the number of annual work hours could contribute to gaps in good jobs. For more on racial gaps in annual work hours, see Wilson and Jones, Working Harder or Finding It Harder to Work, 2018. 5 The discussion of jobs and earnings is based on workers’ employment and total wages and salaries for 25-to-64-year-old workers. We compare aggregate levels of employment and earnings in the economy at different points of time and do not account for multiple jobs held by a single worker or movement of workers between jobs in a given year. 1 THE UNEQUAL RACE FOR GOOD JOBS The good news is that for workers in all three groups, the likelihood of being employed in a good job—or the percentage of all jobs that are good jobs—is now higher than it was a quarter century ago: in 2016, 58 percent of Whites (compared to 50% in 1991), 41 percent of Blacks (compared to 33%), and 37 percent of Latinos (compared to 30%) held good jobs. As shown below, this is in part because all three groups have responded to the growing demand for more educated workers by substantially increasing their educational attainment. As the complexity of occupations and work tasks has grown, the number of workers with postsecondary education has increased substantially, and workers are therefore receiving higher earnings than in the past.6 At the same time, racial gaps in economic opportunity persist, even among workers who have the same education level. White workers not only are more likely than Black and Latino workers to have a good job, but also have higher earnings in good jobs. Moreover, Blacks and Latinos are less likely than Whites to have any job, much less one that is good. Overall, for the past 25 years, Black unemployment rates have been approximately double those of Whites, and Latino unemployment rates have been roughly 1.5 times those of Whites. What Is a Good Job? We define a good job as one that pays family-sustaining earnings. Good jobs pay a minimum of $35,000 ($17 per hour for full-time jobs) for workers between the ages of 25 and 44 and at least $45,000 ($22 per hour) for workers between the ages of 45 and 64. In 2016, these good jobs paid median earnings of $56,000 for workers without a bachelor’s degree and $75,000 for workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher. Overall median earnings for all good jobs were $65,000. The persistent racial divide in good jobs reflects a variety of factors, including differential access to high- quality, well-resourced K–12 schools and selective colleges and universities;7 employment discrimination; segregated social and professional networks; and other forms of systemic privilege and discrimination based on race and ethnicity.8 In addition, the divide in educational attainment that contributes to the good jobs gap also reflects different barriers on the postsecondary pathway. For example, Black and Latino students are more likely to enroll in colleges with lower graduation rates.9 And when they do enroll in college, they are disproportionately more likely than White students to be the first in their family to go to college;10 to come 6 See Carnevale and Rose, The Undereducated American, 2011, and Goldin and Katz, The Race between Education and Technology, 2008. 7 For a data-based exploration of inequities in the education system that contribute to disparate academic and labor market outcomes for Black and Latino students compared to White students, see Carnevale and Strohl, Separate and Unequal, 2013; Carnevale et al., Our Separate & Unequal Public Colleges, 2018; and Carnevale et al., Born to Win, Schooled to Lose, 2019. 8 See Pager and Shepherd, “The Sociology of Discrimination,” 2008, for a more comprehensive exploration of racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. 9 Young Invincibles, Race & Ethnicity as a Barrier to Opportunity, 2017. 10 Redford and Hoyer, “First-Generation and Continuing-Generation College Students,” 2017. 2 THE UNEQUAL RACE FOR GOOD JOBS from lower-income families; and to receive less financial support from Racial and ethnic family and friends,11 all of which contribute to lower graduation rates. discrimination in its many Significant equity gaps remain among White, Black, and Latino workers forms is deeply even as all three groups have achieved higher levels of education and greater access to good jobs. We focus on the relationship between intertwined human capital and economic opportunity, but it must be acknowledged with economic that racial and ethnic discrimination in its many forms is deeply inequalities. intertwined with economic inequalities. Discrimination is a complex issue with economic, social, and political dimensions that manifest through institutional, organizational, and interpersonal dynamics.12 We do not purport to address all aspects of discrimination or the causes and dynamics that underpin racial and ethnic inequality in the United States. Instead, we focus on how historic differences in access to postsecondary education differentially affected the likelihood of securing a good job for White, Black, and Latino workers. Our key findings include: Between 1991 and 2016, the share of workers employed in good jobs has increased by 7 to 8 percentage points for White, Black, and Latino workers. The distribution of good jobs among the three major racial and ethnic groups remains inequitable, even though all groups made gains. Black and Latino workers’ earnings in good jobs are lower than those of White workers at all levels of education. Among workers with good jobs, Whites are paid $554 billion more annually than they would be if good jobs and good jobs earnings were equitably distributed in the workforce, while Blacks are paid $202 billion less and Latinos $352 billion less annually because of these inequalities. White, Black, and Latino workers are all earning a growing share of their good jobs with a bachelor’s degree or higher. For all three groups, economic opportunity shifted from the high school pathway to the middle- skills pathway. 11 This is largely because Black and Latino families have less wealth than White families. Black families with more limited financial resources actually show a greater inclination to provide financial support for their children than similarly situated White families, but they are unable to provide the support they would like to give. Nam et al., Bootstraps Are for Black Kids, 2015. 12 For a more comprehensive examination of discrimination see Pager and Shepherd, “The Sociology of Discrimination,” 2008. 3 THE UNEQUAL RACE FOR GOOD JOBS Inequity in the Post–World War II Economy In the post–World War II period, White, Black, and Latino workers experienced key shifts in employment opportunities at different historical moments. For White workers, the critical juncture came during the postwar industrial boom, when returning veterans gained disproportionate access to well-paid blue- collar jobs and GI benefits that helped them secure educational opportunity and housing for their families. For Black workers, the critical juncture came during the civil rights movement of the 1960s, when they gained legal access to many educational and economic opportunities previously denied to them. For Latino workers, the critical juncture came in the 1990s, when demographic changes largely propelled by immigration resulted in Latinos gaining a larger presence in the US workforce than in past generations.13 The experiences of Whites, Blacks, and Latinos in the United States underpin the dynamic of how access to good jobs for each group has changed. These experiences were similar insofar as Whites, Blacks, and Latinos all increased their levels of educational attainment over time. But White workers have consistently had disproportionate advantages in educational attainment. Meanwhile, educational disadvantages faced by Blacks and Latinos have been compounded by employment discrimination, which persists even among college graduates14 despite broad social changes and regulatory efforts to thwart it, such as those of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Where White workers are in today’s economy has much Educational to do with where they were in the early and mid-20th disadvantages faced century. Following World War II, White veterans had greater by Blacks and Latinos access than other racial and ethnic groups to the GI Bill’s educational benefits and preferred access to low-interest have been compounded mortgages.15 The educational benefits facilitated White by employment workers’ disproportionate access to high-paying jobs, while discrimination. homeownership allowed them to build wealth, which they 13 Tienda and Sánchez, “Latin American Immigration to the United States,” 2013. Our analysis does not disaggregate the Latino workforce by nativity, although we recognize that there are significant educational differences between US-born and foreign- born Latinos. 14 For an example of how White and Black college graduates are treated differently in job recruitment and hiring, see Gaddis, “Discrimination in the Credential Society,” 2015. 15 Turner and Bound, “Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide,” 2003; Brown, Divergent Fates, 2013. 4 THE UNEQUAL RACE FOR GOOD JOBS