Table Of Content

Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Ahfachkee Indian School (K-12) South and Eastern School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 # # Yes and Special Education students who graduated. 33.33% 100% 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% Yes Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 75.00% No Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 7.14% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 7.69% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% 0.00% Yes High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% NA NA Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 30% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Alamo Navajo Community School (K-12) New Mexico Navajo South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 # # Yes and Special Education students who graduated. 31.82% 50% 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% Yes Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 13.33% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 26.67% Yes students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% 2.70% Yes High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% NA NA Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 94.59% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 42% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance American Horse School (K-8) Pine Ridge School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 5.00% Yes reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 0.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 93.10% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 3.45% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 3.45% No settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 42% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Aneth Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 14.81% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 11.11% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 59.26% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 46% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Atsa' Biya'a'zh Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 92.86% No Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 7.69% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 0.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 83.33% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 4.17% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education Not 8 49.95% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a returned means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Baca/Dlo'ay Azhi Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 8.00% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 16.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 53.66% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 17.07% No C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 7% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Beatrice Rafferty School (K-8) South and Eastern School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 33.33% Yes reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 20.00% Yes students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 41.18% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 50% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Beclabito Day School (K-4) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education *** NA reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% *** NA students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 7.69% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 38.46% No C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 80% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Black Mesa Community School (K-8) Arizona Navajo Central School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education *** NA reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% *** NA students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education Not 8 49.95% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a returned means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Blackwater Community School (K-2) Arizona South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 50% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates

ebook img

ERIC ED554002: Bureau of Indian Education 2010-2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance PDF

2.4 MB·English
by  ERIC
#additional_collections #ericarchive
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Upgrade Premium
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED554002: Bureau of Indian Education 2010-2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance

Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Ahfachkee Indian School (K-12) South and Eastern School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 # # Yes and Special Education students who graduated. 33.33% 100% 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% Yes Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 75.00% No Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 7.14% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 7.69% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% 0.00% Yes High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% NA NA Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 30% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Alamo Navajo Community School (K-12) New Mexico Navajo South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 # # Yes and Special Education students who graduated. 31.82% 50% 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% Yes Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 13.33% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 26.67% Yes students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% 2.70% Yes High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% NA NA Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 94.59% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 42% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance American Horse School (K-8) Pine Ridge School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 5.00% Yes reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 0.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 93.10% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 3.45% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 3.45% No settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 42% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Aneth Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 14.81% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 11.11% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 59.26% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 46% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Atsa' Biya'a'zh Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 92.86% No Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 7.69% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 0.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 83.33% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 4.17% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education Not 8 49.95% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a returned means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Baca/Dlo'ay Azhi Community School (K-6) New Mexico Navajo South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 8.00% No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 16.00% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 53.66% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 17.07% No C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 7% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Beatrice Rafferty School (K-8) South and Eastern School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% 100.00% Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 33.33% Yes reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% 20.00% Yes students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 41.18% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 50% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Beclabito Day School (K-4) New Mexico Navajo North School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education *** NA reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% *** NA students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 7.69% No 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 38.46% No C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 80% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Black Mesa Community School (K-8) Arizona Navajo Central School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education *** NA reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% *** NA students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education Not 8 49.95% No services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a returned means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates Bureau of Indian Education 2010 – 2011 (Based on SY 2009-2010 Data) Special Education Indicator Performance Blackwater Community School (K-2) Arizona South School Year School Met Indicator Description 2009-2010 Target Results Target? Graduation Rate Reduce by .5%* between All SpEd the percentage of all students who graduated Students 1 NA NA NA and Special Education students who graduated. NA NA 2 Dropouts A dropout rate less than 8.12% 8.12% 0.00% NA Assessment Targets 3 B 96% *** Yes Participation Rate Assessment Targets – Reading 3.4% 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education No reduction students and all students Assessment Targets - Mathematics 3 C Reduce the gap in the proficiency rate between Special Education 3.31% No students and all students reduction Suspensions and Expulsions 4 13.42% NA NA High School rate ^ Suspensions and Expulsions 4 3.28% 0.00% Yes Elementary rate ^ 5A LRE Placement A ≥ 80% with non-disabled peers 70.17% 100.00% Yes 5B B ≤ 40% with non-disabled peers 7.37% 0.00% Yes C. Number of students with disabilities receiving services in separate 5C schools, residential placements, in hospital settings or in homebound .45% 0.00% Yes settings. Parental Involvement Percent of parents with a student receiving special education 8 49.95% 50% Yes services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities Child Find 11 100% 100.00% Yes Eligibility Determined within 60 days of referral * For the high school graduation rate, each school’s target is based on the previous years’ gap percentage. # Due to the special education graduation percentage exceeding the all student graduation percentage for the 2009- 2010 school year, there was no gap to reduce, and thus the school made the target. @ In the 2008-2009 school year, the special education graduation percentage exceeded the all student graduation percentage and therefore there was no gap to reduce. The school thus made the target for the 2009-2010 school year. *** If the number of assessments (indicator 3 - participation rate, reading and math) is for 10 students or less, then no results are published. ^ Indicator 4 – for K-12 schools, high school target rates will apply. ~ A negative school result value indicates the school increased the percentage gap, rather than reducing it. NR Indicates the school did not report their data for graduation rates

See more

The list of books you might like

Upgrade Premium
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.
DMCA & Copyright: Dear all, most of the website is community built, users are uploading hundred of books everyday, which makes really hard for us to identify copyrighted material, please contact us if you want any material removed.
Copyright @ PDFdrive.to, 2022 | We love our users