ERIC ED544824: The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Michigan. Grade 4, Public Schools

2013·0.44 MB·English

by  ERIC

Michigan
Mathematics
Grade 4
2013 State Snapshot Report Public Schools
Overall Results Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score Results
(cid:132) In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Michigan
was 237. This was lower than the average score of 241 for public
school students in the nation.
(cid:132) The average score for students in Michigan in 2013 (237) was not
significantly different from their average score in 2011 (236) and
was higher than their average score in 1992 (220).
(cid:132) The score gap between higher performing students in Michigan
(those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those
at the 25th percentile) was 43 points in 2013. This performance
gap was not significantly different from that in 1992 (43 points).
(cid:132) The percentage of students in Michigan who performed at or
above the NAEP Proficient level was 37 percent in 2013. This
percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (35
percent) and was greater than that in 1992 (18 percent).
(cid:132) The percentage of students in Michigan who performed at or
above the NAEP Basic level was 77 percent in 2013. This
percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (78 * Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2013. Significance
tests were performed using unrounded numbers.
percent) and was greater than that in 1992 (61 percent). a Accommodations not permitted. For information about NAEP
accommodations, see
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx.
NOTE:Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.
Compare the Average Score in 2013 to Other States/Jurisdictions Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation (public)
¹Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools).
In 2013, the average score in Michigan (237) was
(cid:132) lower than those in 35 states/jurisdictions
(cid:132) higher than those in 5 states/jurisdictions * Speigrnfoifrimcaendt lyu sdiniffge ruennrto (upn d<e .d0 5n)u fmrobme r2s0.13. Significance tests were
(cid:132) not significantly different from those in 11 states/jurisdictions
NOTE: For information about NAEP accommodations, see
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx.
Results for Student Groups in 2013 Score Gaps for Student Groups
Percentages (cid:132) In 2013, Black students had an average score that was 32
Percent of Avg. at or above Percent at points lower than White students. This performance gap
Reporting Groups students scoreBasic Proficient Advanced was narrower than that in 1992 (42 points).
Race/Ethnicity (cid:132) In 2013, Hispanic students had an average score that was
White 66 244 86 45 7 18 points lower than White students. Data are not reported
Black 19 212 47 10 1 for Hispanic students in 1992, because reporting standards
Hispanic 9 226 64 22 4 were not met.
Asian 3 262 91 65 31 (cid:132) In 2013, male students in Michigan had an average score
American Indian/Alaska Native # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ that was not significantly different from female students.
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (cid:132) In 2013, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price
Two or more races 2 241 84 34 10 school lunch, an indicator of low family income, had an
Gender average score that was 28 points lower than students who
Male 52 237 76 38 7 were not eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch. This
Female 48 236 77 36 6 performance gap was not significantly different from that in
National School Lunch Program 1996 (24 points).
Eligible 54 224 65 20 2
Not eligible 46 252 91 57 12
# Rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met.
NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the
"Information not available" category for the National School Lunch Program,
which provides free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes
African American and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude
Hispanic origin.
NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1992–2013 Mathematics Assessments.