Affirming the Goal: Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard? Advance Brief for State Policymakers According to MetLife’s March 2011 Survey of the American Teacher: Preparing Students for College and Careers, approximately 93% of secondary school parents, 85% of secondary teachers, and 80% of business executives believe college and career readiness should be a priority in our nation’s classrooms. This college and career readiness priority is shared by many of our nation’s governors and chief state school officers. Forty-four states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have adopted the Common Core State Standards, a state-led initiative that identifies what knowledge and skills in English language arts and mathematics our students need to be successful in life after high school. ACT helped write those standards, and our definition of college and career readiness is the one on which the Common Core State Standards are based. But do we know if ACT’s—and thus every state that has adopted Common Core State Standards—definition of college and career readiness is not only the right goal, but also internationally competitive? Our newest policy research report, Affirming the Goal: Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard?, attempts to answer this question. Below are key takeaways from the report What does college and career readiness really mean? ACT defines college and career readiness as the acquisition of the knowledge and skills a student needs to enroll and succeed in credit-bearing, first year courses at a postsecondary institution (i.e., two- or four- year colleges, trade or technical schools) without the need for remediation. The level of knowledge and skills needed for college readiness is comparable to that needed for workforce training programs for those jobs that offer salaries above the poverty line, are projected to grow in the future, and offer opportunities for advancement. How do we know if our college and career readiness definition is internationally competitive? ACT conducted a comprehensive analysis of the assessment results of 2,248 US tenth-grade students from 77 high schools across the U.S. who took a special administration of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which is an international assessment for 15-year olds, and PLAN®, ACT's tenth-grade college and career readiness assessment. The analysis identified the PISA score equivalents to PLAN’s college and career readiness benchmark scores in reading and math. From this, we determined if U.S. college and career readiness performance standards are internationally competitive by comparing them with the performance of the highest performing nations. 1 FIGURE 1 Tenth-Grade College and Career Readiness Performance Benchmark in Reading Compared to the Performance of Countries on PISA 2009 Reading Shanghai-China 556 Significantly above the Korea 539 College & Career Readiness Finland 536 Benchmark Hong Kong-China 533 Singapore 526 Canada 524 New Zealand 521 Japan 520 519 US College & Career Readiness Benchmark Australia 515 Netherlands 508 Belgium 506 Significantly below the Norway 503 College & Career Readiness Estonia 501 Benchmark Switzerland 501 Poland 500 Iceland 500 United States 500 Liechtenstein 499 Sweden 497 Germany 497 Ireland 496 Not significantly different France 496 from the OECD average Chinese Taipei 495 Denmark 495 United Kingdom 494 Hungary 494 OECD average 493 Portugal 489 Macao-China 487 Significantly above or Italy 486 below the OECD average Latvia 484 Slovenia 483 Greece 483 Spain 481 Czech Republic 478 Slovak Republic 477 Croatia 476 Israel 474 Luxembourg 472 Austria 470 Lithuania 468 Turkey 464 Dubai (UAE) 459 Russian Federation 459 Chile 449 Serbia 442 Bulgaria 429 Uruguay 426 Mexico 425 Romania 424 Thailand 421 Trinidad and Tobago 416 Colombia 413 Brazil 412 Montenegro 408 Jordan 405 Tunisia 404 Indonesia 402 Note: The data in this figure are adapted from OECD, Argentina 398 PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary (Paris: Kazakhstan 390 Author, 2010). The US college and career readiness benchmark value is based on ACT analysis. Albania 385 Qatar 372 Panama 371 Peru 370 Azerbaijan 362 Kyrgyzstan 314 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Average PISA 2009 Reading Score 2 FIGURE 2 Tenth-Grade College and Career Readiness Performance Benchmark in Mathematics Compared to the Performance of Countries on PISA 2009 Mathematics Shanghai-China 600 Significantly above the Singapore 562 College & Career Readiness Hong Kong-China 555 Benchmark Korea 546 Chinese Taipei 543 Finland 541 Liechtenstein 536 Switzerland 534 530 US College & Career Readiness Benchmark Japan 529 Canada 527 Netherlands 526 Macao-China 525 New Zealand 519 Belgium 515 Australia 514 Significantly below the Germany 513 College & Career Readiness Estonia 512 Benchmark Iceland 507 Denmark 503 Slovenia 501 Norway 498 France 497 Slovak Republic 497 Austria 496 OECD average 496 Not significantly different Poland 495 from the OECD average Sweden 494 Czech Republic 493 United Kingdom 492 Hungary 490 Luxembourg 489 Significantly above or United States 487 below the OECD average Ireland 487 Portugal 487 Spain 483 Italy 483 Latvia 482 Lithuania 477 Russian 468 Greece 466 Croatia 460 Dubai (UAE) 453 Israel 447 Turkey 445 Serbia 442 Azerbaijan 431 Bulgaria 428 Romania 427 Uruguay 427 Chile 421 Thailand 419 Mexico 419 Trinidad and 414 Kazakhstan 405 Montenegro 403 Argentina 388 Jordan 387 Brazil 386 Note: The data in this figure are adapted from OECD, Colombia 381 PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary (Paris: Albania 377 Author, 2010). The US college and career readiness Tunisia 371 benchmark value is based on ACT analysis. Indonesia 371 Qatar 368 Peru 365 Panama 360 Kyrgyzstan 331 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Average PISA 2009 Mathematics Score 3 They are indeed internationally competitive. In fact, our analysis affirmed: (1) the average scores of only four countries were significantly higher than our projected benchmark scores in reading and in mathematics; (2) that the performance standards of college and career readiness—and therefore the new Common Core State Standards—are competitive with the highest performing nations in the world; and (3) because our projected benchmark scores fell well within the average scores of the highest performing countries, college and career readiness is the right goal for US education. (See Figures 1 and 2) How would the U.S. fare if college and career readiness standards were fully adopted and successfully implemented? According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the intergovernmental organization that sponsors the PISA assessment, average U.S. performance on PISA in 2009—as U.S. states implement their own disparate state education standards—was about the same as the OECD average in reading , but lagged behind the OECD average in math. Out of the 65 countries who participated in PISA 2009, average US performance fell below 14 countries in reading and 30 countries in math. But if all states were to implement college and career readiness, using ACT’s—and the Common Core State Standards Initiative’s—definition, ACT estimates U.S. performance would then be among the top ten countries in the world in reading and in math. While this may not put the U.S. at the very top of the OECD list, it would be a substantial improvement and a critical step in the U.S. regaining lost ground in the globally competitive economy. For more information please contact: Jon Erickson Interim President, Education Division ACT, Inc. [email protected] 4