Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity The Sector-wide Approach in Bangladesh Primary Education: A Critical View Manzoor Ahmed CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 57 January 2011 Institute of Education and Development, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme ConsortiumsupportedbytheUKDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment(DFID).Itspurposeistoundertake researchdesignedtoimprove accesstobasiceducationindevelopingcountries.Itseekstoachievethisthrough generatingnew knowledge and encouragingitsapplicationthrougheffective communicationand dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals,non-governmentorganisationsandotherinterestedstakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledgeandskill,isbothapartofthedefinitionofpoverty,andameansforitsdiminution.Sustainedaccess to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter-generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women,andreductionsininequality. TheCREATEpartners CREATEisdevelopingitsresearchcollaborativelywithpartnersinSub-SaharanAfricaandSouthAsia.The leadpartnerofCREATEistheCentreforInternationalEducationattheUniversityofSussex.Thepartnersare: TheCentreforInternationalEducation,UniversityofSussex:ProfessorKeithMLewin(Director) TheInstituteofEducationandDevelopment,BRACUniversity,Dhaka,Bangladesh:DrManzoorAhmed TheNationalUniversityofEducationalPlanningandAdministration,Delhi,India:ProfessorRGovinda TheEducationPolicyUnit,UniversityoftheWitwatersrand,SouthAfrica:DrShireenMotala TheUniversitiesofEducationatWinnebaandCapeCoast,Ghana:ProfessorJeromeDjangmah, ProfessorJosephGharteyAmpiah TheInstituteofEducation,UniversityofLondon:ProfessorAngelaWLittle Disclaimer The research on which this paper is based was commissioned by the Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE http://www.create-rpc.org). CREATE is funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries and is coordinated from the Centre for International Education, University of Sussex. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of DFID, the University of Sussex, or the CREATE Team. Authors are responsibleforensuringthatanycontentcitedisappropriatelyreferencedandacknowledged,andthatcopyright laws are respected. CREATE papers are peer reviewed and approved according to academic conventions. Permission willbe grantedto reproduceresearchmonographsonrequesttotheDirector ofCREATEproviding there is no commercial benefit. Responsibility for the content of the final publication remains with authors and therelevantPartnerInstitutions. Copyright©CREATE2011 ISBN:0-901881-64-3 Addressforcorrespondence: CREATE, CentreforInternationalEducation,DepartmentofEducation SchoolofEducation&SocialWork EssexHouse,UniversityofSussex,FalmerBN19QQ UnitedKingdom Tel: +44(0)1273877984 Fax: +44(0)1273877534 Authoremail: [email protected] Website: http://www.create-rpc.org Email [email protected] PleasecontactCREATEusingthedetailsaboveifyourequireahardcopyofthispublication. The Sector-wide Approach in Bangladesh Primary Education: A Critical View Manzoor Ahmed CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 57 January 2011 ii Contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................vi Summary..................................................................................................................................vii 1.TheSearchfor anEffectiveCooperationModality...............................................................1 2.EmergenceoftheSector-WideApproach(SWAp)...............................................................3 3.SecondPrimaryEducationDevelopment Programme(PEDP II) as aSWAp......................5 3.1Goals andFocus................................................................................................................5 3.2ThePrimaryEducationSystem........................................................................................6 3.3Progress in Access and LearningOutcomes.....................................................................7 3.4DPEAssessment...............................................................................................................8 4.SWAp,MultipleProvisions andAssistanceModality........................................................12 4.1Premises, Assumptions andAmbivalence......................................................................12 4.2Contradictions inPEDP IISWAp..................................................................................13 4.3Civil SocietyStakeholder’s Perspective.........................................................................16 4.4AGovernment Perspective.............................................................................................20 4.4.1DPEConcept Paper(Prog3).....................................................................................20 4.4.2Government PolicyFramework –TheNew EducationPolicy................................22 4.4.3DPE’s PreliminaryProgrammeDocument..............................................................24 5.Elements ofaPragmaticProgrammeApproach forPrimaryEducationinBangladesh.....26 5.1Consensus BuildingonProcess andContent.................................................................26 5.2Roles andContributionofNGOs...................................................................................27 5.3BroadPolicyIssues andPolitical Decisions...................................................................28 5.4ASchematicForaPragmaticProgrammeApproach.....................................................29 6.Conclusions andRecommendations....................................................................................33 6.1Conclusions: ModalityofCooperationandProgrammeManagement..........................33 6.2Recommendations..........................................................................................................34 References................................................................................................................................37 Appendix 1...............................................................................................................................39 List of Tables Table1: CompletionRates inDifferent Types of PrimarySchools, 2008(percentages based onreconstructedcohort analysis)...............................................................................................8 Table2: MeanNumbers ofCompetencies AchievedbyGrade5Students, 2008(out of27 testedcompetencies)..................................................................................................................8 Table3: PEDP IIProgress onSelected Indicators.....................................................................9 List of Figures Figure1: PercentageDistributionofPrimarySchool Students bySchool Type,2008 (includingnon-formal primaryeducationprogrammes)............................................................7 iii Listof Acronyms ADB AsianDevelopment Bank BANBEIS Bangladesh BureauofEducational InformationandStatistics BIDS Bangladesh Instituteof Development Studies CAMPE CampaignforPopularEducation CIDA Canadianinternational Development Agency CREATE Consortium forResearch onEducational Access Transitions andEquity DP Development Partner DPE DirectorateofPrimaryEducation EFA EducationforAll EMIS EducationMonitoringInformationSystem GNP Gross National Product GOB Government of Bangladesh GPS Government PrimarySchool ICT InformationandCommunicationTechnology LENPA LearningNetworkonProgrammeBasedApproaches MDG Millennium Development Goal MoPME MinistryofPrimaryand Mass Education NAPE National AcademyforPrimaryEducation NCTB National Curriculum and TextbookBoard NFPE NonFormal PrimaryEducation NGO NonGovernmental Organisation NPED National PrimaryEducationDevelopment OECD OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment PBA ProgrammeBasedApproach PEDP PrimaryEducationDevelopment Plan PIU Project ImplementationUnit PLU Project Liaison Unit PMU ProgrammeManagement Unit UNESCO UnitedNations Educational ScientificandCultural Organisation UPE Universal PrimaryEducation UPEP UpazilaPrimaryEducationPlan URC UpazilaResourceCentre RNGPS RegisteredNonGovernment PrimarySchool SAPE SectorassistanceProgrammeEvaluation SIP Sector Investment Programme SLIP School level Improvement Plan SMC School Management Committee SWAp SectorWideApproach iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Keith Lewin for his comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this monograph. I also thank Dr. Benjamin Zeitlyn for going over the text meticulouslyandmakingvaluablesuggestions inrespect ofbothsubstance andstyle. I have benefited greatly from formal and informal discussion with my CAMPE colleagues and the members of the Education Watch Group who had helped formulate the CAMPE position paper on the next phase of primary education development in Bangladesh, upon which I have drawn extensively. I have also benefited from conversation and meetings with officials at the Directorate of Primary Education and those responsible for implementing PEDPII. However, I remain responsible for the content and the conclusions and recommendations presentedinthemonograph. I wish to acknowledge the assistance of Justine Charles in preparing this monograph for publication. v Preface Sector Wide Approaches have been the favoured modality or channelling external assistance to education for over a decade. Where development partners provide substantial flows of finance it has proved attractive to try and integrate sources of funding into common basket arrangements. In principle these kinds of arrangements should reduce transaction costs and harmonise inputs into a single national programme that can be managed efficiently. It should also enhance sustainabilitysince SWAps do not have end dates in the same sense that project aid generally does. This approach is consistent with the Paris accords injunction to avoid duplication across development partners and ease the burden on recipient governments of dealingseparatelywith large numbers of donors. PEDPII, the support programme for primary schoolinginBangladesh, has aspiredtoSWAparrangements. Access to education in Bangladesh has improved considerably over the last decade but remains far from universal. Fewer than half of all children access and complete lower secondary school after the short primary school system finishes at Grade 5. National assessments indicate considerable cause for concern about achievement levels and the wide variation in quality between schools and districts. PEDP II has fallen short of its aspirations. The development of its sequel provides a unique opportunity to learn from the successes and failures of PEDP II and establish new modalities that may have more effect on sustained levels of educational access to basic education. Amongst the opportunities that need exploringin depth are needs to adopt a less rigid and more flexible approach to planningover the lifetime of the next assistance programme, expand the opportunities for stakeholder participation in the SWAp and its implementation, work to ensure that committed resources are actually disbursed on time, decentralise – or at least pilot on scale schemes - down to Upazilla level to plan and manage the mobilisation of resources to enhance access, support multiple providers in delivering educational services within an appropriate regulatory framework. The risk is that development partners and government remain within their existing comfort zones and fail to grasp the opportunity to adopt new and more effective practices. Keith Lewin DirectorofCREATE Centrefor International Education UniversityofSussex vi Summary This monograph, in the CREATE Pathways to Access series, is about the modality of cooperation and programme management in primary education in Bangladesh, based specifically on the experience of the Second Primary Education Development Programme (PEDP II). It is not intended to be an assessment of PEDP II accomplishments, but key information and a brief discussion about progress in the substantive programme objectives in primary education development in Bangladesh have been presented in order to understand howthemodalityof cooperationandmanagement has worked. Having examined the characteristics of the Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) as it has been applied in PEDP II and how it has helped or hindered achievement of the programme goals, the on-going discourse on the appropriate scope and features of the next phase of primary education development is reviewed. This is particularly relevant as PEDP II winds up and a new programme for primary education development from mid-2011 begins to be designed. Conclusions are drawn on the basis of CREATE research activities which have illuminated the issues and concerns that have surfaced in implementing PEDP II. Recommendations are made about the modality of cooperation and management that would be congruent with and supportive of future strategies and key actions to advance universal primary education with equityandquality. vii viii