Table Of Content

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 253 HE 035 386 Fact Book, Fiscal Year 2002. TITLE South Dakota Board of Regents, Pierre. INSTITUTION PUB DATE 2002-00-00 41p.; Cover page title varies. NOTE For full text: http://www.ris.sdbor.edu/publication/ AVAILABLE FROM 2002Factbook/factbook02.pdf. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Descriptive Reports (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. *Enrollment; College Administration; College Admission; DESCRIPTORS. Educational Facilities; *Educational Finance; *Higher Education; *State Universities; *Student Costs; *Student Financial Aid IDENTIFIERS *South Dakota ABSTRACT This annual report provides a variety of information about the state of higher education in South Dakota. The "Fact Book" is organized around the nine state policy goals adopted by the South Dakota Boatd of Regents in 1997. Data, including tables and graphs, are grouped in these & 3Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality"; sections: (1) "Goals 1, 2, (2)"Goals 4 & 5Faculty: Attraction, Retention, Development"; "Goals 6 & (3) 7Universities: Collaboration, Technology"; (4) "Goal 8Facilities and Equipment"; "Financial Resources"; and (6) "Regional Universities and (5) Special Schools Admissions Requirements." (Contains 7 figures and 37 tables.) (.SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Fact Book, Fiscal Year 2002 South Dakota Board of Regents U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND Office of Educational Research and Improvement DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization R. Perry originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES reproduction quality INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Points of view or opinions stated in this 13 document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 Fiscal Year 2002 A Message from the Executive Director Robert T. Tad Perry Publications such as annual reports, fact books, and accountability reports are typically a compilation of data. For education institutions these data relate to enrollments, scores, buildings, and budgets. Most ofus flip through the pages, searching for answers to specific questions. By seeking single bits ofd Oa, we miss the message ofthe whole document, however. The Fact Book for Fiscal Year 2002 is arranged around the Nine State Policy Goals, adopted by the Board of Regents in 1997. By presenting the data ofthe past year, the Regents are accounting to citizens, policy makers, and stakeholders for the management of their resources. The Fact Book, however, is more than that. It is a statement of the direction in which the Regents are moving the state universities and special schools. Its message is a vision for thepublic educational institutions of this state. For South Dakota, the Regents hope to achieve: Access for all qualified South Dakotans; Enrollment in economic growthprograms; Improvement in academic performance; Attraction and retention ofqualified professionals; Development offaculty professionals; Collaboration among the universities; Enhancement of current technology infrastnicture; Maintenance of current facilities and equipment and Generation of external funds. At the foundation of these goals is the belief that these public institutions serve the needs of South Dakota and its people through teaching, research, and service. More than that, however, the people have a voice in the future ofthe public educational institutions. I trust this Fact Book will enhance discussions about the opportunities and challenges facing the Regental system. Abbreviations Used in the Fact Book National Association of College and University Business Officers NACUBO Agricultural Experiment Station AES Northern State University NSU Animal Disease Research & Diagnostic Laboratory ADRDL Rural Development Telecommunications Network RDTN Black Hills State University B HSU Regents Information Systems Cooperative Extension Service RIS CES South Dakota Library Network SDLN Capital University Center CUC South Dakota School for the Deaf SDSD Digital Dakota Network DDN South Dakota School of Mines and Technology SDSMT Dakota State University DSU South Dakota School for the Blind and Visually Impaired SDSBVI Ellsworth Air Force Base EAFB South Dakota State University Enrollment Services Center SDSU ESC School and Public Lands S&PL Full-time Equivalent FTE University of South Dakota USD General Activity Fee GAF University of South Dakota School of Medicine Higher Education Facilities Fund USDSM HEFF University Support Fee USF Higher Education Price Index HEPI Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education WICHE Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System IPEDS 2 3 BESTCOPYAVAILABLE: Fiscal Year 2002 Table of Contents Goals 1, 2 & 3 - Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality 4 Introduction to Goals 1, 2 and 3 / Historical Fall Headcount Enrollment 5 Historical Fall FTE Enrollment / Graduation Rate 6 Transfer Enrollments /New Registrants Student Profile by University 8 Geographic Distribution and State Support by County 9 Proficiency Exams / Advanced Placement® Exams 10 ACT - American College Testing / Composite Scores / Mean by Completion of Core 11 Enrollment in Economic Growth Programs 12 Historical Tuition and Fee Charges / Regional Total Cost Comparison 13 FY02 Tuition and Fees Schedule 15 Student Financial Aid by Program / Average Student Loan Debt / % of Total Financial Aid from Loans 16 Average Financial Aid Award / % of Students Receiving Financial Aid / Student-Faculty Ratio / 10 Most Popular Degrees 17 Degree Trends FY96-01 18 Degrees and Baccalaureate Majors Awarded FY01 21 Teacher Education Majors 22 South Dakota School for the Blind and Visually Impaired / South Dakota School for the Deaf Goals 4 & 5 - Faculty: Attraction, Retention, Development 23 Introduction to Goals 4 and 5 / Average Salary by Professorial Rank / Explanation of Salary Competitiveness Plan 24 Faculty Profile by University 25 Grants and Contracts Goals 6 & 7 - Universities: Collaboration, Technology 26 Introduction to Goals 6 and 7 / High School Students Enrolled in College Level Courses 27 Technology Fellows / Electronic University Consortium 28 Governor's Teaching with Technology Awards Goal 8 Facilities and Equipment 30 Introduction to Goal 8 / Buildings, Cost vs. Replacement / Dormitory Utilization 31 Historic M&R Allocation / Size of Physical Plant 32 Selected Building Construction or Improvements 33 Self-Liquidating Projects Financial Resources 34 Introduction to Goal 9 / Base Budgets and Incentive Funding 35 All Funds Operating Budget 36 Operating Budgets by NACUBO Programs 37 Budgeted Salaries by Category 38 Actual Expenditure Per Student FTE / Tuition Factor / BOR Employee Utilization 39 Regental Universities and Special Schools 40 Admissions Requirements 4 3 Fiscal Year 2002 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Goals 1, 2, and 3 Goal I-Access for All Qualified South Dakotans: All qualified residents will have convenient and afford- able access to higher education. Goal 2-Enrollment in Economic Growth Programs: The universities will increase enrollments in selected programs within their respective missions that are of particular importance to the state's economy in order to graduate students who can contribute to the development and expansion of the state's economy. Goal 3-Academic Improvement: The academic programs offered by universities will be of high quality and the universities will regularly provide evidence of quality based on measures of their students and graduates. Progress toward the attainment of Goals 1, 2, and 3 can be measured by the changes in ease of accessibility, the relevance of courses offered in today's high-tech economy, and the level of academic standards imposed. Some actions to achieve the goals since their adoption include: enrolling 2,747 students in distance delivery courses in Fall 2000 and 3,918 students in Spring 2001; of these 1,421 in Fall 2000 and 1,807 in Spring 2001 were enrolled in Internet courses through the Electronic University Consortium. enrolling 3,599 students in Fall 2000 in economic growth programs, an increase of31.5 percent over the previous year. enrolling over 700 high school students in college-level courses. sponsored seven College Board Advance Placement (AP) and two AP Vertical Teams training institutes for high school teachers on Regental university campuses in Summer 2001. Historical Fall Headcount Enrollment Census Date Percent Fall Total USD NSU SDSU DSU BHSU Year SDSMT Change 4.60% 28,828 2,424 9,350 8,161 3,038 3,836 2,019 2001 27,560 3.55% 7,349 2000 8,719 4,068 3,315 2,308 1,801 0.21% 26,616 6,887 8,540 3,164 2,275 2,003 3,747 1999 26,560 7,317 3.27% 2,265 8,635 2,873 3,639 1,831 1998 25,719 -2.98% 2,260 7,164 8,818 3,445 2,623 1,409 1997 26,508 -3.36% 9,067 7,541 2,245 2,832 3,549 1996 1,274 27,429 8,027 -5.00% 2,724 2,372 9,323 3,623 1,360 1995 28,872 -0.08% 8,319 2,472 9,650 3,077 3,915 1994 1,439 28,894 8,289 2,497 9,535 0.87% 3,952 3,036 1,585 1993 28,644 8,220 2,905 2,459 9,554 4,002 1,504 1992 Under the funding framework, adapted in FY98, revenues are distributed to the universities as base funding accompanied by targeted investments and incentives for demonstrated improvement As a result of this change, separating students enrolled in state-supported courses from those who enroll in self-support courses is no longer necessary. Since fall of 1998, the Regents have reported all enrollment as of the census date which is the seventh class day in the semester (previous to 2000, census day was the tenth class day in the semester). In order to provide a historical perspective on total enrollment, historical fall headcount enrollment and historical fall FTE enrollment tables have been recalculated to reflect total enrollment on census date in past years. 4 5 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Fiscal Year 2002 Historical Fall Full-time Equivalent Enrollment Census Date NSU Year DSU BHSU SDSMT SDSU USD Fall Total Percent Change 2,918 2,202 2,041 2001 3.25% 7,664 1,568 22,442 6,050 2,946 2000 1,444 2,207 1,947 0.60% 21,735 7,313 5,878 2,920 1999 2,299 7,339 5,840 1,335 -1.42% 21,606 1,873 2,898 2,287 7,530 1,916 1998 21,917 1,142 6,144 0.93% 2,761 2,221 1,037 21,714 1,872 1997 7,687 6,137 -2.83% 2,814 944 2,365 1,870 6,457 1996 7,898 22,347 -3.36% 2,840 2,335 1,955 8,049 6,917 1,026 1995 23,123 -3.74% 2,524 2,033 3,063 7,170 8,215 24,021 1994 1,016 0.81% 3,037 2,070 2,487 1,057 8,095 7,083 23,828 2.86% 1993 2,972 2,037 2,381 1992 7,760 1,042 23,165 6,974 In past years, the Board of Regents has reported both fall headcount and fall .th enrollments as state-support only. Prior to fall 1992, not all campuses reported self-support course enrollment. Consequently, self-support enrollment information is not uniformly available for those years. Beginning in fall 1992, all campuses were brought into compliance with Board policy on reporting. The historical fall headcount enrollment and the historical fall FTE enrollment tables contained in this edition of the Fact Book reflect the total enrollment on census date for years in which the data are available. All FTEs are based on 15 credit hours for undergraduates, 12 credit hours for master's and doctor's degrees, 15 credit hours for Law and 19 credit hours for Medicine. FTE totals may not be exact due to rounding. Completion of Baccalaureate Degrees First-time, Full-time, Baccalaureate Degree- Seeking Undergraduates 1995 Fall Cohort NSU SDSMT BHSU DSU SDSU USD System Baccalaureate degree completed in: 2 1996-1997 3 1 2 9 1997-1998 12 1 312 1998-1999 20 57 26 28 198 641 1999-2000 57 272 47 113 431 88 1008 24 42 22 2000-2001 90 210 19 13 Baccalaureate Degree Subtotal 515 842 105 80 135 197 1,874 Not Enrolled in Fall 2001 Completed associate Degree 42 2 22 5 5 8 No degree completed 298 287 594 763 201 2,271 128 Enrolled in Fall 2001 As an undergraduate student 27 45 23 5 17 21 138 As a graduate/professional student 2 2 7 3 Total 355 4,332 428 510 1,640 1,178 221 Source: University data provided to Regents Information Systems *This group is the subset of the fall 1995 federal Right to Know cohort that enrolled in a Regental university to seek a bachelor's degree. Students who were enrolled in associate degree programs and those who were "special" students (not degree seeking) are not included. Those shown as completing a baccalaureate degree did so at the same university where they enrolled as freshmen. Those shown as not having completed a degree may have done so at another college or university. Students who completed an associate degree changed from bachelor's program to an associate program. Those enrolled in graduate or professional programs in fall 2001 may have completed a bachelor's degree at another university. 5 6 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Fiscal Year 2002 Transfer Enrollments All Undergraduate Transfers - Fall 2001 Transfer front: Transfer to: BHSU NSU USD Total SDSU SDSMT DSU S.D. State Universities 38 4 30 25 104 BHSU 7 26 4 4 56 DSU 17 5 20 7 59 NSU 11 18 3 27 100 31 2 37 SDSMT 3 49 4 37 30 SDSU 131 11 55 4 USD 13 81 8 1 42 133 166 531 29 Total 59 102 S.D. Private & Tribal Institutions 30 Augustan College 14 11 2 1 1 1 2 5 Dakota Wesleyan University 16 8 1 4 2 4 Huron University 13 3 7 3 Kilian Community College 2 14 1 1 4 15 45 19 Mount Marty College 3 3 1 2 2 29 5 National American University 19 1 2 7 2 Presentation College 3 15 1 2 9 5 Sinte Gleska University 1 1 14 2 35 University of Sioux Falls 13 5 1 206 65 64 32 20 9 Total 16 S.D. Technical Institutes 27 22 Lake Area Technical Institute 4 61 3 5 5 2 10 Mitchell Technical Institute 1 1 1 4 32 24 Southeast Technical Institute 63 3 6 38 2 Western Dakota Technical Inst. 27 3 6 59 172 34 55 9 Total 9 314 257 Other Institutions 72 1,055 268 63 81 4 4 In Process* 23 3 8 3 1 Total Transfers 517 608 439 1,987 133 148 142 *In Process refers to transfers whose records have not been processed fully by date of publication Source: Regents Information Systems New Undergraduate Registrants Total- Fall 2001 Headcount, Excluding Special Students NSU SDSU USD DSU BHSU SDSMT System 422 1,046 4,466 439 1,575 636 First Time Freshmen 348 599 First Time Transfer 1,970 142 429 518 133 149 46 664 166 Readmit After Absence 201 107 131 13 2,340 601 7,100 1,196 Total New Undergraduate 510 688 1,765 Source: Regents Information Systems 6 7 Fiscal Year 2002 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Student Profile by University Fall 2001 Headcount USD SDSU SYSTEM SDSMT NSU DSU BHSU Classification 1,484 15.9% 13.7% 3,947 11.1% 907 15.3% 374 372 489 12.3% 12.7% 15.9% Freshman-2001 HS Grad 321 133% 4,300 390 14.9% 888 10.9% 332 13.7% '1,261 12.8% 378 Freshman-Other HS Grad 27.4% 18.7% 1,051 143% 4,134 13.2% 1,080 414 16.6% 15.8% 1,478 402 13.6% 482 278 13.8% 12.6% Sophomore 3,752 11.2% 1,337 14.3% 13.0% 389 13.5% 528 911 328 12.8% 12.8% Junior 13.8% 259 17.4% 15.2% 12.1% 17.8% 1,626 989 4,378 404 432 13.3% 647 280 13.9% 16.9% Senior 607 6.5% 2,570 550 6.7% 8.9% 209 277 8.6% 19.5% 591 336 16.6% 7.2% Special/Terminal 83% 17.8% 29.9% 1342 2,442 14.4% 5,138 476 14.4% 362 15.7% 349 9.4% 167 Graduate 609 2.1% 2.3% 4.8% 215 394 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 First Professional Residency 78.9% 7,020 75.1% 80.4% 6,564 22,733 70.0% 84.9% 3,156 2,579 1,698 85.0% 82.3% 1,716 Resident 24.9% 6,095 21.1% 19.6% 2,330 30.0% 1,597 459 726 15.1% 680 303 15.0% 17.7% Non-Resident Gender 4,322 46.2% 43.8% 37.4% 69.3% 3,054 38.8% 12,615 1,180 51.0% 1,681 1,349 35.2% 1029 Men 56.2% 62.6% 53.8% 5,028 5,107 16,213 30.7% 61.2% 2,487 49.0% 1,858 743 990 64.8% Women Age Undergraduate/Spedal 0.0% 0.1% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 8 0.0% 0 0 8 Birth date missing 42 2.8% 0.5% 639 3.0% 20 1.0% 352 46 13.7% 158 1.1% 1.3% 17 or younger 21 75.6% 3,966 74.5% 6,573 83.1% 17,538 75.5% 67.4% 2,227 1,567 79.9% 1,726 64.1% 1,479 18-23 2,550 662 660 8.4% 103% 11.0% 12.4% 8.7% 222 255 12.3% 16.1% 190 561 24-29 4.4% 352 5.9% 325 4.9% 6.8% 6.1% 1,375 5.3% 126 333 98 141 9.6% 30-39 3.7% 2.9% 233 3.2% 860 3.4% 172 4.1% 70 2.8% 229 104 52 6.6% 40-49 44 42 230 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 32 0.6% 1.2% 22 1.1% 78 2.2% 50 or older 12 100.0% 7,912 23,200 5,325 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2,562 100.0% 2,075 100.0% 3,474 100.0% 1,852 Total Undergraduate Graduate/First Professional 4 0.1% 0 4 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 Birth date missing 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 0 17 or younger 653 11.6% 347 12.2% 189 13.1% 2.3% 26.1% 5.4% 6 91 9 1.7% 11 18-23 28.6% 476 28.2% 33.1% 41.0% 1,609 94 47 801 19.7% 143 28.7% 48 13.0% 24-29 26.0% 374 25.2% 1,463 26.0% 714 21.5% 27.7% 75 40.7% 27.6% 132 68 100 30-39 21.9% 290 20.2% 20.8% 1,231 589 30.5% 30 8.6% 145 19.8% 33 144 39.8% 40-49 7.3% 668 11.9% 385 13.6% 2.9% 105 94 5.4% 19.7% 65 10 9 18.0% 50 or older 100.0% 5,628 2,836 100.0% 100.0% 1,438 476 362 100.0% 349 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 167 Total Grad./First Pro£ Ethnic Origin 873% 903% 85.1% 25,220 6,942 82.4% 8,439 2,615 86.1% 86.0% 91.0% 3,490 1,998 1,736 White/Caucasian 2.0% 1.6% 2.3% 185 583 55 54 2.2% 149 1.8% 0.8% 3.2% American Indian 17 123 39 210 87 0.7% 22 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% 1.1% 0.9% 26 0.7% Black/Non-Hispanic 17 19 2.2% 218 2.3% 644 2.0% 164 24 1.4% 6.0% 43 2.5% 145 50 Asian/Pacific 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 36 57 196 24 1.0% 30 1.0% 38 0.5% 1.0% Hispanic 11 6.9% 469 5.0% 726 8.9% 9.0% 1,975 273 7.7% 3.5% 9.2% 186 186 Unlmown/Missing/Refusecl 135 28,828 9,350 3,836 2,424 3,038 8,161 2,019 Total Enrollment Source: Regents Information Systems 8 7 Fiscal Year 2002 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Geographic Distribution and General Fund Support by County Fall 2001 Headcount Enrollment County Enrollment State Support by County State Support by County Enrollment County $217,506 Hyde 59 $305,983 Aurora 83 $165,894 Jackson 45 464 $1,710,555 Beadle 79 Jerauld $291,237 $180,640 49 Bennett $106,910 29 Jones $785,233 213 Bon Homme $833,158 226 Kingsbury $2,536,340 Brookings 688 429 $1,581,526 Lake $3,218,349 Brown 873 556 $2,049,716 Lawrence $626,712 Brule 170 346 $1,275,543 Lincoln $0 Buffalo 0 $272,804 74 Lyman $862,650 234 Butte $390,773 Marshall 106 $158,521 43 Campbell $722,562 McCook 196 $689,383 Charles Mix 187 $313,356 McPherson 85 $453,444 Clark 123 425 Meade $1,566,780 $1,275,543 346 Clay $117,969 32 Mellette $1,994,418 Codington 541 Miner 95 $350,221 $180,640 49 Corson $10,056,881 2728 Minnehaha $350,221 95 Custer $534,548 Moody 145 Davison 349 $1,286,602 $7,708,555 2091 Pennington Day 175 $645,145 $342,848 Perkins 93 $320,729 Deuel 87 Potter $471,877 128 $302,296 Dewey 82 188 Roberts $693,070 $328,102 89 Douglas $324,416 88 Sanborn $442,385 Edmunds 120 $140,089 Shannon 38 $320,729 Fall River 87 $858,964 Spink 233 $309,669 Faulk 84 $269,117 Stanley 73 $589,846 Grant 160 $294,923 Sully $615,652 Gregory 80 167 $195,387 Todd 53 Haakon 98 $361,281 $564,041 Tripp $704,129 Hamlin 153 191 $840,531 Turner 228 Hand $453,444 123 350 $1,290,289 Union Hanson 70 $258,058 $549,294 $165,894 Walworth 149 Harding 45 Yankton $2,009,164 545 $1,824,837 Hughes 495 $84,790 Ziebach 23 Hutchinson 268 $987,993 Source: Regents Information Systems and Board of Regents Residents from throughout South Dakota attend regental universities. This table displays the total number of high school graduates from each county who are enrolled in the universities of South Dakota public higher education. State support represents general funds appropriated per headcount enrollment for the six universities and the medical school. It does not include appropriations for AES, CES, ADRDL and system operations. General funds per headcount appropriated for FY02 equal $3,686.54. 8 9 Students: Access, Economic Growth, Quality Fiscal Year 2002 Proficiency Exams Beginning with Spring 1998 all rising juniors have been required to take the Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP). Student improvement can be gauged by comparing performance on the ACT against Assessment perfomaanceonthe CAAP. Gains in Achievement between ACT and CAAP The chart to the left % of Students Making Expected or Higher than Expected Gains compares percentage gains 100% - Fall 2000 & Spring 2001 Combined in achievement by South 98% 98% Dakota students against a 96% 96% 96% 96% national reference group of 94% students who have similar 92% ACT scores Exam results 90% - were compared to national norms. In all four testing 88% (writing, areas 86% mathematics, reading and 84% science reasoning), South Science Reading Mathematics Writing Skills Dakota students tested Reasoning SD Students 0 National Reference higher than the national nomas. Source: Board of Regents & American College Testing Inc. Advanced Placement The Advanced Placement (AP) program administered by the College Board offers high school students a chance to study courses that are equivalent to first-year college courses. Following instruction in special AP classes, in honors classes, or through independent study, the students can take examinations that demonstrate that they have ob- tained the knowledge and skills Annual AP Program Participation for South Dakota of comparable college courses. 2500 2 ,102 When those students later enroll 1,949 in a college or university that ac- cepts AP credit, they can present 1500 their AP scores. Currently all South Dakota public universities 1000 award credit for acceptable exam scores. 500 The chart to the left shows the number ofhigh school 0 students taking AP exams and the 2000 1999 1996 1997 1998 2001 number of exams taken in 1996 # ofA.P. Exams Taken through 2001. # of Candidates Source: The College Board 9 I0