ebook img

ERIC ED456773: Salary-Trend Study of Faculty in Sociology for the Years 1997-98 and 2000-01. PDF

22 Pages·2001·0.44 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED456773: Salary-Trend Study of Faculty in Sociology for the Years 1997-98 and 2000-01.

DOCUMENT RESUME HE 034 333 ED 456 773 Howe, Richard D. AUTHOR Salary-Trend Study of Faculty in Sociology for the Years TITLE 1997-98 and 2000-01. Appalachian State Univ., Boone, NC.; College and Univ. INSTITUTION Professional Association for Human Resources, Washington, DC PUB DATE 2001-00-00 21p.; For the salary-trend study of sociology faculty for NOTE 1996-97 and 1999-2000, see ED 442 411. For other salary-trend studies for 1997-98 and 2000-01, see HE 034 283-336. PUB TYPE Research (143) Reports MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *College Faculty; Comparative Analysis; Higher Education; DESCRIPTORS Intellectual Disciplines; *Private Colleges; *Public Colleges; *Sociology; Statistical Data; Tables (Data); *Teacher Salaries; Trend Analysis Classification of Instructional Programs; Consumer Price IDENTIFIERS Index ABSTRACT This report is part of an annual national survey that examines salaries of full-time teaching faculty in 54 selected disciplines. Data for the study as a whole were collected from 305 public and 403 private institutions for the baseline year of 1997-1998 and the trend year of 1999-2000. This portion of the study covers salary data for Sociology faculty at 253 public and 279 private institutions for 2000-2001, with comparable numbers for 1997-1998. Data are presented for average salaries by faculty rank, "faculty mix percent" (percentage of faculty at each rank), and "salary factors" (ratio of the average salary in the discipline to the total Salary trend information is compared for public and institution average) . private institutions for each of the two study periods with trend information for all fields and with the Consumer Price Index. The study found that for the 2000-2001 period the average salary of $54,812 for 2,130 of faculty in public institutions was approximately 3.5% lower than the average salary for all faculty in all major fields, and the average salary for faculty in private institutions was 4.8% lower than that for all faculty. The average salary increase was 0.6% per year above the cost-of-living for public institutions and 0.7% per year above the cost-of-living for private institutions as measured by the Consumer Price Index. Appendixes contain a list of the selected academic disciplines and lists of public and private institutions participating in both studies. (SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. SALARY-TREND STUDY OF FACULTY IN SOCIOLOGY FOR THE YEARS 1997-98 AND 2000-01 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Foreword Office of Educational Research and Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDUC TIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization by originating it. 13 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Richard D. Howe Points of view or opinions stated in this TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES Appalachian State University document do not necessarily represent INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) official OERI position or policy. Boone, NC 28608 Since 1982-83 the College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (CUPA-HR) in Washington, D.C., in cooperation with Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, have conducted annual national faculty salary surveys by discipline and rank each year through 2000- 01. Two separate surveys are conducted each year, one for public senior colleges and universities and the other for private senior colleges and universities. Salary data from the 1997-98 and 2000-01 surveys were collected and tabulated for full-time teaching faculty in 54 selected academic disciplines/major fields chosen from among those defined by A Classification of Instructional Programs. 1990. Each of the 54 academic disciplines/major fields presents a summary of the overall average salary increase in that academic discipline/major field from the "baseline year" of 1997-98 to, and including, the "trend year" of 2000-01 for both public and private participating institutions. Of the 371 public institutions which participated in CUPA-HR's public survey of 1997-98, 305 also participated in the 2000-01 survey. Data from those same 305 institutions were used in both the baseline year and the trend year studies. Of the 543 institutions which participated in CUPA-HR's private survey of 1997-98, 403 also participated in the 2000-01 survey. Data from those same 403 institutions were used in both the baseline year and the trend year studies. In addition to listing the average salaries in Sociology for both public and private participating institutions by rank, including "new assistant professor," and listing the faculty mix percentage (FAC MIX PCT) and the salary factor, comparisons are made between the two public surveys and the two private surveys for each of the two study years (1997-98 and 2000-01) and with the CPI (Consumer Price Index) of changes in the cost-of-living. The list of all 54 selected academic disciplines/major fields surveyed, including Sociology, is found in Appendix A, and the list of all participating senior colleges and universities are found in Appendix B (public) and C (private) of this article. AVAILABLE 3EST COPY 2 SALARY-TREND STUDY OF FACULTY IN SOCIOLOGY FOR THE YEARS 1997-98 AND 2000-01 by Richard D. Howe Since 1982-83 the College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (CUPA-HR) in Washington, D.C., in cooperation with Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina, has conducted two annual national faculty salary studies by discipline and rank through 2000-01: one for public senior colleges and universities, and the other for private senior colleges and universities. Salary data for each study were collected and tabulated for full-time teaching faculty in 54 selected academic disciplines/major fields chosen from among those defined by A Classification of Instructional Programs * CIP), 1990, including Sociology. The CIP defines the discipline/major field of Sociology as, A group of instructional programs that describes the systematic study of human social institutions and social relationships. Includes instruction in social theory, sociological research methods, social organization and structure, social stratification and hierarchies, dynamics of social change, family structures, social deviance and control, and applications to the study of specific social groups, social institutions, and social problems.* [*A Classification of Instructional Programs (Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, [1990]. P. 148-- 45.1100).] This article summarizes the overall average salary increases in the discipline/major field of Sociology for both public and private institutions from the "baseline year" of 1997-98 to and including the "trend year" of 2000-01. Of the 371 institutions which participated in CUPA-HR's 1 3 PUBLIC study of 1997-98, 305 also participated in 2000-01. Data from those same 305 institutions and the trend year. Of the 543 institutions which participated in were used in both the baseline year those same CUPA-HR's PRIVATE study of 1997-98, 403 also participated in 2000-01. Data from 403 institutions were used in both the baseline year and the trend year. This article lists the average salaries for the discipline/major field of Sociology for both public and private participating institutions by rank, including NEW ASST PROF (new assistant professor), the FAC MIX PCT (faculty mix percentage), and the SALARY FACTOR. Comparisons are also made using the CPI's (Consumer Price Index) changes in cost-of-living between the two studies for each of the two study years (1997-98 and 2000-01). The CPI uses a base period of 1982-84 and measures/tabulates prices of food, clothing, shelter and fuels, transportation, medical care, entertainment and other goods and services people buy for day-to-day living. When examining trends in faculty salary, it is important to consider any changes in the purchasing power of salaries due to inflation. Comparing changes in the faculty salaries with the CPI gives one a more precise view of what "real" salary increases are, that is, buying power. The salary is based on a nine- or 10-month academic year salary of full-time faculty, and does not include any faculty teaching less than 51 percent. Salary for summer academic work, fringe benefits, and perquisites are also not included in the salary data. The average salary is based on the study information with the assumption that all employees are full-time. The average salary displayed is an average of all faculty salaries reported for a given rank and discipline. "NUM" refers to the number of faculty members whose salaries were included to compute the average salary. "N/IN" refers to the number of institutions that reported salary data for a given academic rank and discipline/major field. 2 4 The FAC MIX PCT represents the percentage of faculty in a given discipline/major field who hold a given academic rank. For example, a FAC MIX PCT factor of 27.5 for associate professors of Sociology in the 1997-98 public study means that 27.5 percent of the faculty in that discipline/major field held the rank of associate professor. The SALARY FACTOR for a given rank in a given discipline/major field represents the ratio of the average salary to the total average salary of all institutions in each of the four studies: PUBLIC 1997-98, PUBLIC 2000-01, PRIVATE 1997-98 and PRIVATE 2000-01. For example, a SALARY FACTOR of 0.94 for associate professors in the discipline/major field of Sociology in the 1997-98 public study means that their average salary is six percent lower than the average salary for all associate professors in all institutions in that study. NEW ASST PROF refers to the grouping of assistant professors hired for the first time in the fall of the study year (1997-98 or 2000-01). All information for this group was included in the ASST PROF group for reporting purposes. ALL MAJOR FIELDS refers to the entire data base for all 54 disciplines/major fields in each of the four studies. Among other things, it is used to compare the discipline/major field of Sociology with the entire data base for each study. The reader will find the size of the sample on which each percentage or dollar value is based effect of extreme to be ofparticular importance. The smaller the number in the group, the greater the be noted that any large disparity scores on a descriptive statistic such as the average. It should also in the sample sizes between the "baseline year" of 1997-98 and the "trend year" of 2000-01 will lessen the reliability and validity of any conclusions that one might make based on a simple comparison of averages. 3 NEW ASST ASST ASSOC ALL RANKS INSTRUCTOR PROF PROF PROF PROF SALARY NUM MN SALARY NUM MN SALARY NUM NAN SALARY NUM N/IN SALARY NUM MN SALARY NUM N/IN DISCIPLINE: SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY MAJOR FIELD: Sociology PUBLIC. 1997-98: AVERAGE 49993 250 2131 29736 76 53 36531 38334 81 578 111 202 587 47652 199 217 890 60838 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 3.6% 5.2% 27.1% 27.5% 41.8% PCT: SALARY 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.93 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 94917 305 6033 273 4477 292 51971 31233 26557 305 28739 305 39457 41389 33588 305 50601 65235 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 6.4% 4.7% 28.0% 30.3% 35.4% PCT: DISCIPLINE: SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY MAJOR FIELD: Sociology PUBLIC. 2000-01: AVERAGE 2130 54812 253 65 31955 41844 106 122 89 617 42819 208 582 205 52466 68374 214 825 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 5.0% 5.7% 29.0% 27.3% 38.7% PCT: SALARY 0.97 0.92 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 6740 260 86307 305 4595 286 56712 25251 305 34612 25102 305 44131 45702 29214 305 55877 72044 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 7.8% 5.3% 29.3% 29.1% 33.8% PCT: DISCIPLINE: SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY MAJOR FIELD: Sociology PRIVATE. 1997-98: AVERAGE 297 49016 1018 29 32579 32 37 36480 44 279 38172 329 46296 182 162 60778 378 203 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 3.1% 4.3% 27.4% 32.3% 37.1% PCT: SALARY 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.96 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 2168 320 2246 351 43743 403 50060 32640 13418 401 39908 40160 14126 400 48638 401 14031 63549 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 5.0% 5.1% 30.7% 32.1% 32.3% PCT: DISCIPLINE: SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY MAJOR FIELD: Sociology PRIVATE, 2000-01: AVERAGE 279 999 53825 27 34983 39578 52 45 31 306 42066 310 50308 169 169 352 68805 187 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 3.1% 5.2% 30.6% 31.0% 35.2% PCT: SALARY 0.95 0.96 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.95 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 42767 403 2130 313 2348 355 56401 13367 400 36483 13492 400 43076 13778 399 45141 54109 72649 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 5.0% 5.5% 31.3% 31.5% 32.2% PCT: 4 RESULTS OF THE TWO PUBLIC STUDIES: 1997-98 AND 2000-01 In the PUBLIC 1997-98 study in the above table, the discipline/major field of Sociology was reported in 250 of the 305 public institutions. The average salary of the 2,131 faculty was $49,993. This average salary was approximately 4.0 percent lower than the average salary of $51,971 for all 94,917 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the same 1997-98 public study. For the PUBLIC 2000-01 salary study in the above table, Sociology was reported in 253 of the same 305 public institutions. The average salary of the 2,130 faculty was $54,812. This average salary was approximately 3.5 percent lower than the average salary of 56,712 for all 86,307 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 2000-01 public study. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in the discipline/major field of Sociology in the public institutions studied was 9.6 percent ($54,812 minus $49,993 equals $4,819). The CPI of increase cost-of-living between October 1997 and October 2000 was 7.7 percent. In comparison, with the CPI, there was a relative increase in Sociology average faculty salaries over the three-year period by 1.9 percent or an average of 0.6 percent each year above the cost-of-living. The increase in average salaries for all faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS over three years in the public institutions studied was 9.1 percent ($56,712 minus $51,971 equals $4,741). In comparison to the discipline/major field of Sociology (9.6%), the faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS received a relative increase in their salaries of 0.5 percent more than the faculty in the discipline/major field of Sociology. In the 1997-98 study the faculty mix percentage in Sociology is higher at the professor rank than at the assistant professor rank: 41.8 percent vs. 27.1 percent; in the 2000-01 study it is 38.7 percent vs. 29.0 percent. The differences in faculty mix percentage at the ranks of professor and assistant professors in ALL MAJOR FIELDS for both public studies are 35.4 percent vs. 28.0 per- 5 cent (1997-98) and 33.8 percent vs. 29.3 percent (2000-01). studies was Finally, the hiring rate of new assistant professors in Sociology in the public (111/2,131) vs 4.7 higher than the hiring rate of ALL MAJOR FIELDS in 1997-98, 5.2 percent 5.3 percent (122/2,130) vs. percent (4,477/94,917) and higher in 2000-01, 5.7 percent (4,595/86,307). RESULTS OF THE TWO PRIVATE STUDIES: 1997-98 AND 2000-01 field The PRIVATE 1997-98 salary study in the above table indicates that the discipline/major 1018 of Sociology was reported in 297 of the 403 private institutions. The average salary of the all faculty was $49,016, an average salary 2.1 percent lower than the average salary of $50,060 for 43,743 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 1997-98 private study. In the PRIVATE 2000-01 salary study in the above table, 279 of the same 403 private institutions reported Sociology. The average salary ofthe 999 faculty was $53,825, an average salary 4.8 percent lower than the average salary of $56,401 for all 42,767 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 2000-01 private study. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in Sociology in the private institutions studied was 9.8 percent ($53,825 minus $49,016 equals $4,809). The CPI increased cost-of-living between October 1997 and October 2000 was 7.7 percent. A more realistic increase, therefore, in the average faculty salaries of Sociology over the three-year time period, is 2.1 percent or,0.7 percent each year above the cost-of-living. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the private institutions studied was 9.1 percent ($56,401 minus $50,060 equals $6,341). In comparison to Sociology (9.8%), the faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS increased their salaries 2.9 percent more 6 than faculty in Sociology. For both studies in the discipline/major field of Socio logy, the faculty mix percentage is higher 37.1 percent vs. 27.4 percent at the professor rank in comparison to the assistant professor rank: (1997-98); and 35.2 percent vs 30.6 percent, (2000-01). The differences in the ranks ofprofessor and assistant professor in ALL MAJOR FIELDS for both private studies are 32.3 percent vs. 30.7 percent (1997-98) and 32.2 percent vs. 31.3 percent (2000-01). Finally, the hiring rate for new assistant professors in Sociology was lower than the hiring rate in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 1997-98 private study: 4.3 percent (44/1,018) vs. 5.1 percent (2,246/43,743) and lower in the 2000-01 private study: 5.2 percent (52/999) vs. 5.5 percent (2,348/42,676). CONCLUSION This article presents salary-trend information on the academic discipline/major field of Sociology and compares that information with both ALL MAJOR FIELDS and the CPI over a period of three years, from the "baseline year" of 1997-98 through the "trend year" of 2000-01. Two studies--one for public institutions, and the other for private institutionswere conducted for the baseline year and for the trend year--a total of four studies. A total of 6,278 (2.3%) faculty in the discipline/major field of Sociology participated and were included in the 54 disciplines/major fields in each of the four studies and in the overall total of 267,734 participating faculty. The same 305 public institutions and the same 403 private institutions in the United States participated in the baseline year and in the trend year. Although the public and private studies data may be interpreted in a variety of ways, several significant points are as follows. First, the average faculty salary factors in the discipline/major field 7 that of all ranks in ALL of Sociology for the 1997-98 public study was four percent less than less than the average MAJOR FIELDS (1.00); and for the 1997-98 private study it was 2.1 percent both the public and private faculty salary factors for all ranks in ALL MAJOR FIELDS (1.00). In 2000-01 were 3.5 percent lower studies the average faculty salary factors for all ranks in Sociology in MAJOR FIELDS (1.00), and 4.8 percent lower than the average salary factors for all ranks in ALL respectively. 1997 CPI Second, the October 2000 CPI reflects an 7.7 percent increase over the October annual salary and indicates that the faculty in Sociology in the public institutions received an average salary increase of 0.5 percent above the cost-of-living. In the private institutions the annual average increase was 0.7 percent above the cost-of-living, as well. professor rank FAC Third, in both the 1997-98 and 2000-01 public studies in Sociology, the 1997-98 and 2000-01 MIX PCTs are higher than those for the assistant professor rank; and, in the assistant professor private studies the FAC MIX PCTS were higher at the professor rank than at the rank, as well. 2000-01 Finally, the hiring rate of new assistant professors in Sociology in the 1997-98 and in the hiring rate public studies were higher than the hiring rate of ALL MAJOR FIELDS. However, than the hiring for new assistant professors in the 1997-98 and 2000-01 private studies were lower rate for ALL MAJOR FIELDS. discipline/major Because a significant data base of average faculty salaries in the academic is anticipated that this information will serve as field of Sociology has now been developed, it administrators and professors. a valuable reference and evaluation tool for interested 8

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.