DOCUMENT RESUME HE 032 467 ED 435 249 AUTHOR Howe, Richard D. Salary-Trend Study of Faculty in Physical Therapy for the TITLE Years 1995-96 and 1998-99. Appalachian State Univ., Boone, NC.; College and Univ. INSTITUTION Personnel Association, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 19p.; For other salary-trend studies for 1995-96 and NOTE 1998-99, see HE 032 427-479. Research (143) PUB TYPE Reports MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *Allied Health Occupations Education; *College Faculty; DESCRIPTORS Comparative Analysis; Higher Education; Intellectual Disciplines; Physical Therapists; *Physical Therapy; *Private Colleges; Professional Zducation; *Public Colleges; Statistical Data; *Teacher Salaries; Trend Analysis *Classification of Instructional Programs IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT This report, covering 882 physical therapy faculty, is part of an annual national survey of faculty salaries. The survey is in two parts: one covering public and one covering private four-year colleges and universities. Data for the baseline year 1995-96 and the trend year 1998-99 were collected for full-time teaching faculty in 53 selected academic disciplines from 279 public and 386 private institutions. The first section of the report defines the methodology and terms used; this is followed by a data page listing average salaries for both public and private participating institutions by faculty rank (including a new assistant professor rank), faculty mix percent, and salary factors. A concluding section compares salary trend information for both public and private institutions for the 2 study years with trend information for all fields and with the Consumer Price Index. It notes that, for both public and private institutions, average physical therapy faculty salaries in 1995-96 were about 1.0 percent below those for all ranks in all major fields; in 1998-99, salaries in public institutions were 0.02 below the average, while those in private institutions were 5.0 percent lower than the average in all fields. Appended is a list of the 53 selected academic disciplines, as well as lists of the participating public and private colleges. (CH) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. SALARY-TREND STUDY OF FACULTY IN PHYSICAL THERAPY FOR THE YEARS 1995-96 AND 1998-99 Foreword by Richard D. Howe Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608 (CUPA) in Washington, Since 1982-83 the College and University Personnel Association NC, have conducted annual na- DC, in cooperation with Appalachian State University in Boone, 1998-99. Two separate sur- tional faculty salary surveys by discipline and rank each year through for for public senior colleges and universities and the other veys are conducted each year, one private senior colleges and universities. collected and tabulated for full- Salary data from the 1995-96 and 1998-99 surveys were fields chosen from among those time teaching faculty in 53 selected academic disciplines/major defined by A Classification of Instructional Programs, 1990. of the overall aver- Each of the 53 academic disciplines/major fields presents a summary discipline/major field from the "baseline year" of 1995-96 to age salary increase in that academic private participating institutions. and including the "trend year" of 1998-99 for both public and public survey of 1995-96, 279 also Of the 329 public institutions which participated in CUPA's institutions were used in both the participated in the 1998-99 survey. Data from those same 279 which participated in CUPA's baseline year and the trend year studies. Of the 530 institutions Data from those same private survey of 1995-96, 386 also participated in the 1998-99 survey. the trend year. 386 institutions were used in both the baseline year and Therapy for both public and private In addition to listing the average salaries in Physical and listing the faculty mix participating institutions by rank, including "new assistant professor," comparisons are made between the two public percentage (FAC MIX PCT) and the salary factor, for each of the two study years (1995-96 and 1998-99) and surveys and the two private surveys with the CPI (Consumer Price index) of changes in cost-of-living. surveyed, including Physical The list of all 53 selected academic disciplines/major fields senior colleges and Therapy, is found in appendix A, and the lists of all participating this article. universities are found in appendixes B (public) and C (private) of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement BEST COPY AVAILABLE PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY filliThis document has been reproduced as 4- received from the person or organization R. Howe originating it. Minor changes have been made to 2 improve reproduction quality. 0 Points of view or opinions stated in this TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES document do not necessarily represent INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) official OERI position or policy. 1 SALARY -TREND STUDY OF FACULTY IN PHYSICAL THERAPY FOR THE YEARS 1995-96 AND 1998-99 by Richard D. Howe Since 1982-83 the College and University Personnel Association (CUPA) in Washington, has conducted D.C., in cooperation with Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina, 1998-99: one for public two annual national faculty salary studies by discipline and rank through universities. senior colleges and universities, and the other for private senior colleges and Salary data for each study were collected and tabulated for full-time teaching faculty in 53 Classification selected academic disciplines/major fields chosen from among those defined by A defines the of Instructional Programs *(CIP), 1990, including Physical Therapy. The CIP discipline/major field of Physical Therapy as, A group of instructional programs that prepares individuals, upon referral by a physician, to evaluate patients and plan and execute treatment programs to prevent or remediate physical dysfunction, relieve pain, and prevent further disability. Includes instruction in equipment design and kinesiology, therapeutic patho- and maintenance, treatment regimes, and the evaluation of skeletal, neurological, and cardiovasculardisorders. Also includes instruction in patient counseling, personnel supervision, and record keeping.* [*A Classification of Instructional Programs (Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, [1990]. P. 185 -- 51.2308).] of This article summarizes the overall average salary increases in the discipline/major field and Physical Therapy for both public and private institutions from the "baseline year" of 1995-96 to including the "trend year" of 1998-99. Of the 329 institutions which participated in CUPA's institutions PUBLIC study of 1995-96, 279 also participated in 1998-99. Data from those same 279 1 3 in were used in both the baseline year and the trend year. Of the 530 institutions which participated CUPA's PRIVATE study of 1995-96, 386 also participated in 1998-99. Data from those same 386 institutions were used in both the baseline year and the trend year. This article lists the average salaries for the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy for both public and private participating institutions by rank, including NEW ASST PROF (new assistant professor), the FAC MIX PCT (faculty mix percentage), and the SALARY FACTOR. Comparisons are also made using the CPI's (Consumer Price Index) changes in cost-of-living between the two studies for each of the two study years (1995-96 and 1998-99). The CPI uses a base period of 1982-84 and measures/tabulates prices of food, clothing, shelter and fuels, transportation, medical care, entertainment and other goods and services people buy for day-to-day living. When examining trends in faculty salary, it is important to consider any changes in the purchasing power of salaries due to inflation. Comparing changes in the faculty salaries with the CPI gives one a more precise view of what "real" salary increases are, that is, buying power. The salary is based on a nine- or 10-month academic year salary of full-time faculty, and does not include any faculty teaching less than 51 percent. Salary for summer academic work, fringe benefits, and perquisites are also poi included in the salary data. The average salary is based on the study information with the assumption that all employees are full-time. The average salary displayed is an average of all faculty salaries reported for a given rank and discipline. "NUM" refers to the number of faculty members whose salaries were included to compute the average salary. "N/IN" refers to the number of institutions that reported salary data for a given academic rank and discipline/major field. 2 The FAC MIX PCT represents the percentage of faculty in a given discipline/majorfield who hold a given academic rank. For example, a FAC MIX PCT factor of 37.8 for associate professors of Physical Therapy in the 1995-96 public study means that 37.8 percent of the faculty in that discipline/major field held the rank of associate professor. The SALARY FACTOR for a given rank in a given discipline/majorfield represents the ratio of the average salary to the total average salary of all institutions in each of the four studies: PUBLIC 1995-96, PUBLIC 1998-99, PRIVATE 1995-96 and PRIVATE 1998-99. For example, a SALARY FACTOR of 1.08 for associate professors in the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy in the 1995-96 public study means that their average salary is eight percent higher than the average salary for all associate professors in all institutions in that study. NEW ASST PROF refers to the grouping of assistant professors hired for the first time in the fall of the study year (1995-96 or 1998-99). All information for this group was included in the ASST PROF group for reporting purposes. ALL MAJOR FIELDS refers to the entire data base for all 53 disciplines/majorfields in each of the four studies. Among other things, it is used to compare the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy with the entire data base for each study. The reader will find the size of the sample on which each percentage or dollar value is based to be of particular importance. The smaller the number in the group, the greater the effect of extreme scores on a descriptive statistic such as the average. It should also be noted that any large disparity in the sample sizes between the "baseline year" of 1995-96 and the "trend year" of 1998-99 will lessen the reliability and validity of any conclusions that one might make based on a simple comparison of averages. 3 NEW ASST ASST ASSOC ALL RANKS INSTRUCTOR PROF PROF PROF PROF N/IN SALARY NUM SALARY NUM NAN SALARY NUM N/IN SALARY NUM N/IN SALARY NUM N/IN SALARY NUM N/IN DISCIPLINE: HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND RELATED SCIENCES MAJOR FIELD: Physical Therapy PUBLIC, 1995-96: AVERAGE 36 47999 185 37619 10 19 40171 6 5 26 42952 68 27 51206 70 28 59282 19 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 10.3% 3.2% 36.8% 37.8% 15.1% PCT: SALARY 0.99 1.29 1.09 1.10 1.08 0.98 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 279 90660 48543 5946 251 4205 272 29192 36754 25458 279 27143 279 39120 47365 279 321 13 60591 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 6.6% 4.6% 28.1% 29.9% 35.4% PCT: DISCIPLINE: HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND RELATED SCIENCES MAJOR FIELD: Physical Therapy PUBLIC, 1998-99: AVERAGE 37 232 53360 24 43551 14 48818 10 14 34 49047 29 103 56954 74 22 66704 SALARY: 31 FAC MIX 100.0% 10.3% 6.0% 44.4% 31.9% 13.4% PCT: SALARY 1.00 1.35 1.19 1.15 1.09 0.99 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 279 89174 53370 6254 239 4386 260 32241 40911 24888 279 26937 279 42557 52140 279 31095 67342 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 7.0% 4.9% 27.9% 30.2% 34.9% PCT: DISCIPLINE: HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND RELATED SCIENCES MAJOR FIELD: Physical Therapy PRIVATE, 1995-96: AVERAGE lI 38 47988 187 40710 19 44597 14 33 19 44933 105 22 52 53945 61553 10 SALARY: 11 FAC MIX 100.0% 10.2% 10.2% 56.1% 27.8% 5.9% PCT: SALARY 0.99 1.32 1.24 1.18 1.17 FACTOR: 1.00 ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 386 43114 48264 1983 292 30749 13141 386 350 35928 2041 38154 385 46184 13559 382 61833 14431 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 4.6% 4.7% 30.5% 31.4% 33.5% PCT: DISCIPLINE: HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND RELATED SCIENCES MAJOR FIELD: Physical Therapy PRIVATE, 1998-99: AVERAGE 48 278 51731 41396 27 44546 18 22 46 15 48785 164 34 58460 71 69519 16 SALARY: 11 FAC MIX 100.0% 9.7% 7.9% 59.0% 25.5% 5.8% PCT: SALARY 0.95 1.20 1.12 1.16 1.14 0.99 FACTOR: ALL MAJOR FIELDS AVERAGE 386 44803 54316 1974 294 34625 339 2178 39867 13 I 39 386 41924 386 14285 5 I 127 383 70365 15405 SALARY: FAC MIX 100.0% 4.4% 4.9% 29.3% 31.9% 34.4% PCT: 4 6 BEST COPY AVAILABLE RESULTS OF THE TWO PUBLIC STUDIES: 1995-96 AND 1998-99 In the PUBLIC 1995-96 study in the above table, the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy was reported in 36 of the 279 public institutions. The average salary of the 185 faculty was $47,999. This average salary was approximately1.1 percent lower than the average salary of $48,543 for all 90,660 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the same 1995-96 public study. For the PUBLIC 1998-99 salary study in the above table, Physical Therapy was reported in 37 of the same 279 public institutions. The average salary of the 232 faculty was $53,360. This salary of $53,370 for all average salary was approximately 0.02 percent lower than the average 89,174 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 1998-99 public study. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy in the public institutions studied was 11.7 percent ($53,360 minus $47,999 equals $5,361). The CPI of increase cost-of-living between October 1995 and October 1998 was 6.7 percent. In comparison, with the CPI, there was a relative increase in Physical Therapy average faculty salaries over the three-year period by 4.5 percent or an average of 1.5 percent each year above the cost-of-living. The increase in average salaries for all faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS over three years in the public institutions studied was 9.9 percent ($53,370 minus $48,543 equals $4,827). In comparison to the discipline/majorfield of Physical Therapy (11.7%), the faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS received a relative increase in their salaries of 1.8 percent less than the faculty in the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy. In the 1995-96 study the faculty mix percentage in Physical Therapy is lower at the professor rank than at the assistant professor rank: 15.1 percent vs. 36.8 percent; in the 1998-99 study it is 13.4 percent vs. 44.4 percent. The differences in faculty mix percentage at the ranks of professor and as- 5 sistant professors in ALL MAJOR FIELDS for both public studies are 35.4 percent vs. 28.1 percent (1995-96) and 34.9 percent vs. 27.9 percent (1998-99). Finally, the hiring rate of new assistant professors in Physical Therapy in the public studies 3.2 percent (6/185) vs 4.6 was lower than the hiring rate of ALL MAJOR FIELDS in 1995-96, percent (4,205/90,660) and higher in 1998-99, 6.0 percent (14/232) vs. 4.9 percent (4,386/89,174). RESULTS OF THE TWO PRIVATE STUDIES: 1995-96 AND 1998-99 The PRIVATE 1995-96 salary study in the above table indicates that the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy was reported in 38 of the 386 private institutions. The average salary of the 187 faculty was $47,988, an average salary 0.6 percent lower than the average salary of $48,264 for all 43,114 faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 1995-96 private study. In the PRIVATE 1998-99 salary study in the above table, 48 of the same 386 private institutions reported Physical Therapy. The average salary of the 278 faculty was $51,731, an for all 44,803 faculty in ALL average salary 5.0 percent lower than the average salary of $54,316 MAJOR FIELDS in the 1998-99 private study. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in Physical Therapy in the private institutions studied was 7.8 percent ($51,731 minus $47,988 equals $3,743). The CPI increased cost-of-livingbetween October 1995 and October 1998 was 6.7 percent. A more realistic increase, therefore, in the average faculty salaries of Physical Therapy over the three-year time period, is 1.1 percent or 0.4 percent each year above the cost-of-living. The three-year increase in average salaries for all faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the private institutions studied was 12.5 percent ($54,316 minus $48,264 equals $6,052). In comparison to Physical Therapy (7.8%), the faculty in ALL MAJOR FIELDS increased their salaries 4.7 percent 6 less than faculty in Physical Therapy. For both studies in the discipline/majorfield of Physical Therapy, the faculty mix percentage is lower at the professor rank in comparison to the assistant professor rank: 5.9 percent vs. 56.1 percent (1995-96); and 5.8 percent vs 59.0 percent, (1998-99). The differences in the ranks of professor and assistant professor in ALL MAJOR FIELDS for both private studies are 33.5 percent vs. 30.5 percent (1995-96) and 34.4 percent vs. 29.3 percent (1998-99). Finally, the hiring rate for new assistant professors in Physical Therapy was higher than the hiring rate in ALL MAJOR FIELDS in the 1995-96 private study: 10.2 percent (19/187) vs. 4.7 percent (2,041/43,114) and higher in the 1998-99 private study: 7.9 percent (22/278) vs. 4.9 percent (2,178/44,803). CONCLUSION This article presents salary-trend information on the academic discipline/major field of Physical Therapy and compares that information with both ALL MAJOR FIELDS and the CPI over the "trend year" of 1998-99. a period of three years, from the "baseline year" of 1995-96 through Two studies--one for public institutions, and the other for private institutions- -were conducted for the baseline year and for the trend year--a total of four studies. A total of 882 (.3%) faculty in the discipline/major field of Physical Therapy participated and were included in the 53 disciplines/major fields in each of the four studies and in the overall total of 267,751 participating faculty. The same 279 public institutions and the same 386 private institutions in the United States participated in the baseline year and in the trend year. Although the public and private studies data may be interpreted in a variety of ways, several significant points are as follows. First, the average faculty salary factors in the discipline/majorfield 7 of Physical Therapy for the 1995-96 public study was one percent below that of all ranks in ALL MAJOR FIELDS (1.00); and for the 1995-96 private study it was one percent below the average faculty salary factors for all ranks in ALL MAJOR FIELDS (1.00) as well. In both the public and private studies the average faculty salary factors for all ranks in Physical Therapy in 1998-99 were exactly the same and five percent below the average salary factors for all ranks in ALL MAJOR FIELDS (1.00), respectively. Second, the October 1998 CPI reflects an 6.7 percent increase over the October 1995 CPI and indicates that the faculty in Physical Therapy in the public institutions received an average annual salary increase of 1.5 percent above the cost-of-living. In the private institutions the annual average salary increase was 0.4 percent above the cost-of-living. Third, in both the 1995-96 and 1998-99 public studies and in the 1995-96 and 1998-99 private studies in Physical Therapy, the professor rank FAC MIX PCTs are lower than those for the assistant professor rank. Finally, the hiring rate of new assistant professors in Physical Therapy in the 1995-96 public study was lower than the hiring rate of ALL MAJOR FIELDS. However, in the hiring rate for new assistant professors in the 1995-96 and 1998-99 private studies and in the 1998-99 public study were higher than the hiring rate for ALL MAJOR FIELDS. Because a significant data base of average faculty salaries in the academic discipline/major field of Physical Therapy has now been developed, it is anticipated that this information will serve professors. as a valuable reference and evaluation tool for interested administrators and 8 10