DOCUMENT RESUME SP 038 765 ED 434 082 Quality Teachers for the 21st Century. TITLE Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. INSTITUTION 1999-00-00 PUB DATE NOTE 13p. Education Commission of the States, 707 17th Street, Suite AVAILABLE FROM 2700, Denver, CO 80202-3427. Tel: 303-299-3669; Fax: 303-296-8332; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: <http://www.ecs.org>. Reports - Descriptive (141) PUB TYPE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE Academic Achievement; Alternative Teacher Certification; DESCRIPTORS Educational Change; Educational Improvement; *Educational Quality; Elementary Secondary Education; Higher Education; Preservice Teacher Education; Public Education; Teacher Effectiveness; Teacher Influence; *Teachers Education Commission of the States CO IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT This brochure gives a brief overview of Wyoming Governor Jim Geringer's focus as 1999-2000 Education Commission of the States (ECS) Chairman. Section 1 discusses a focus on quality, explaining that students learn more from well-prepared, quality teachers and that the challenge is how to equip every teacher with the necessary abilities and tools. Section 2 examines lessons learned from the past several decades about ways to increase teacher quality. Section 3 focuses on what must happen next in public education, noting the importance of such things as implementing performance-based assessment systems for students and teachers; emphasizing classroom performance in university-based teacher education programs; encouraging effective alternative teacher certification and preparation strategies; and restructuring schools to become learning organizations. Section 4 discusses the work that lies ahead for the ECS, including identifying key issues; clarifying and cataloguing new and promising policy options; and encouraging and helping state leaders in their quest to develop effective policy structures. Section 5 explains how states can participate. Section 6 presents a schedule of events during 1999-2000 for the ECS. Section 7 offers 16 World Wide Web resources. (SM) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** SP 11 ela A A I 0 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY F- ,c-,. I tc=e-c- C . . P TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy BEST COPY AVAILABLE Jim Geringer GOVERNOR OF WYOMING 1999-2000 ECS CHAIRMAN In the not-too-distant-future, the nation will experience a serious shortage of well-qualified teachers. There are two principal reasons. First, a significant number of teachers are nearing retire- ment age, necessitating their replacement. Second, with the robust growth in the national and many \t- regional economies, the demand for skilled profes- sionals is drawing many college graduates away from teaching as a pro- fession. The problem is most acute in states with high population growth, particularly in the subject areas of mathematics, science and spe- cial education. So how do we prepare our teachers, our students and our institutions for the future? How will we keep pace with the need for ongoing teacher development? Should we spend more money on teachers? Yes, definitely for the- good ones. But who determines what "good" is? And, we must remember that throwing more money at education too often is used as an easy solution to a complicated problem. I believe our success in education won't be measured by how much we spend per student, but in whether students achieve a desired result. Any remedy to financing education, whether at the K-12 or higher education levels, will depend upon our ability to define the results and then devel- op institutions and methods that can deliver education toward those results. The majority of our nation's schools still are structured on a model suited for a time that is past not one prepared to meet the challenges of the future. That means we need new structures, new technology, new fund- ing formulas and new professional development methods for our educa- tors. We must focus on student competency, not just seat time. Our chil- dren need education that is learned, not just taught. Teachers must be paid as valued professionals, but, in turn, the teaching profession must rid itself of those persons who don't measure up. As the 1999-2000 chairman of the Education Commission of the States, I will work to determine what defines a quality teacher, how those attribut- es and skills translate into a high level of student achievement, and what policies must be put in place to make high-quality teaching and learning happen. I look forward to working with you as we focus on increasing student learning through improved professional development. 3 EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES Assuring teacher quality QUALITY TEACHERS the next frontier for improving for the 21st Centu the nation's public schools Focus ON QUALITY professor and director of the All students learning at high lev- University of Tennessee Value- els. All classrooms staffed with Added Research and Assessment highly qualified teachers. This is Center says, "It's not grades, it's the hope. This is the vision. This is not poverty, it's not money that the goal of American education. counts. It's teaching." After two decades of struggling Sanders' research indicates that with K-12 education reform, the students with comparable achieve- education community and the ment levels have "vastly different nation's policymakers understand academic outcomes as a result of far better how to reach this goal. the sequence of teachers to which They understand what needs to they are assigned." Similar stud- happen to create an education sys- ies in Boston and Dallas confirm tem that helps all students learn. the Tennessee findings. They understand the components of that system: knowing what it is Additionally, these studies rein- students should learn; articulating force what traditionally has been those expectations in standards for common wisdom: student achievement; and develop- Students learn more from well- ing an assessment system that mea- rI prepared, quality teachers. sures individual student achieve- ment based on those standards. This statement is true regard- less of socioeconomic status, States and districts are in differing I 'Of 'I ethnicity, a student's level of stages of bringing these compo- preparedness or whether the nents to fruition. Even in states student's school is located in an and districts that have not made f urban or rural area. Research much progress, however, new has shown that well-trained studies have found that a quality teachers have a positive impact teaching force is critical to the on student achievement, while process of improving student poorly trained teachers have a achievement. After spending the negative impact. past 17 years trying to determine what inhibits and promotes ku- If a student has a good teacher dent learning, William Sanders, for consecutive years, the impact EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES 4 of the good teaching is com- If teachers are expected to tailor pounded every year a student is their instructional efforts to help exposed to such teaching. each student achieve at the highest level possible, they must be Unfortunately, the opposite equipped with the following: also is true. If a student has an exceptionally bad teacher for A thorough understanding of just one year, making up the state student achievement stan- deficit created in that time dards and the instructional takes several years. strategies that can be used to achieve them Schools with less effective teachers tend to produce Ability to reach students from lower-achieving students. diverse backgrounds and at vari- ous levels of initial preparedness Typically, these schools are located in low-income urban Ability to integrate technology and rural communities. into their everyday classroom practice Proving common wisdom to be true, however, does not go far Thorough understanding of enough. If teachers cannot use this emerging research about how wisdom in practical ways to focus students learn reading, writing on their students' needs, then this and mathematics insight will be for naught. Real-time individual student Teachers must Ilve access to indi- assessment data returned in a vidual student assessment data in way that allows teachers quickly a timely fashion so they can tailor to tailor individual instruction their instruction to meet each stu- to meet assessed student needs. dent's needs. This requires the quick collection and summariza- The challenge is how to equip tion of student results and the every teacher with these abilities sharing of these results with the and tools, and how to ensure that professionals interacting with stu- he or she uses them to be as effec- dents in the classroom. tive as possible. To meet this chal- lenge, some past mistakes must be recognized and not repeated. LESSONS LEARNED Over the past several decades, var- was considered to be the deter- ious strategies have been put for- mining factor in the quality of ward as ways to increase teacher teaching. "Teacher proofing " quality, some successfully, others the curriculum, however, did not. For example: not yield the desired results. In the late '50s and early '60s, In the early '80s, certification effective curriculum g,ontent requirements for new and con- COMMISSION OF EDUCATION THE STATES In the '90s, demand tinuing teachers were viewed CA has increased for as unrelated to the aspects of E. I I-7Ej =_:-.3= alternative routes into teaching that increased student ft in I( 1=1. the teaching profes- achievement. Steps were taken t 7E-377 sion and an emerging to bring these more into line role for the electronic with what research showed delivery of teacher helps to improve learning. preparation and on- In 1986, A Nation Prepared: going professional Teachers for the 21st Century, development services, published by the Carnegie such as the Western Forum on Education and the Governors University Economy, called for the creation and the British Open of the National Board for University. These Professional Teaching Stand- future developments promise a ards. The board worked to cre- for teacher preparation and ate performance-based assess- training that will be far different ments for teachers by subject than the past. area and level taught. It was a critical step forward. st WHAT MUST HAPPEN NEXT I 0S 1 mance regardless of the means or Public education is at a crossroads. accreditation of their preparation. Which path is right? The selection of a path may need to be "the one Teacher performance must be less traveled," in the words of the I evaluated on an ongoing basis 1 poet Robert Frost, if policymakers and based significantly on stu- and educators want to guide edu- dents' learning gains. S cation well. Teacher rewards and incentives We must develop and implement should be performance-based. performance-based assessment Teachers whose performance systems for students and teachers. repeatedly is ineffective must be retrained or dismissed. Even Student content standards in teachers who are tenured traditional subjects (e.g., math, should have their effectiveness reading, social studies) should INA reevaluated on an ongoing provide the fundamental basis, basis. but not the sole basis, for assess- ing student learning. Moral We must emphasize classroom leadership, civic responsibility performance in university-based and artistic creativity, for exam- teacher education programs at ple, also are important qualities least as much as intellectual to impart to students. understanding. Teachers should be certified based on demonstrated perfor- 6 OF THE STATES EDUCATION COMMISSION We must understand that new teachers, like any new profession- als, need to be nurtured and guid- ed if they are to be successful. We must coach and mentor new teachers intensively. We must not give new teachers initial assignments that exceed their abilities and extinguish their enthusiasm for teaching. We must ensure that ongoing teacher education aims, first and foremost, at enhancing teacher effectiveness and is grounded in accepted principles of effective We must increase partnerships professional development. between K-12 and postsec- ondary education so the real We must find ways to provide needs of today's classroom play teachers with continuous, real- a greater part in shaping the time feedback on their students' content of teacher education. learning so that they can respond 00 promptly to student needs and We must rethink the role and their own shortcomings. responsibilities of college of 0 0 education faculty so that they Requirements for continuing can devote more attention to the teacher education should practical side of the curriculum. enhance teacher performance, of f not merely support the accu- 0 0 We must encourage effective alter- mulation of teacher credentials. native certification and teacher preparation strategies, including We must restructure schools to for-profit and virtual programs. become "learning organizations" in which valuable informal We must not bury our heads m opportunities for learning by both the sand and pretend these teachers and students are promot- alternatives will go away They ed and directed at key goals. are growing in mfluence and promise to reshape the way Teachers' classroom isolation teachers are prepared. must be overcome so teachers can participate with colleagues We must take advantage of the in frequent exchanges that potential these alternatives offer address specific student and to increase the efficiency of the job-related problems. teacher preparation process and widen access into the teaching The weekly school schedule profession. must be reorganized to allow 7 more opportunity for teachers COMMISSION OF THE STATES EDUCATION to respond to their students' Collectively, prindpals and immediate learning needs. their teachers must be held accountable for student learn- We must evaluate the success of ing in their schools. teacher preparation and continu- ing education strategies on the Principals and teachers must basis of their impact on student learn how better to access and performance. manage information about stu- dent achievement, and about We must seek the broader dis- financial and human resources semination of those models that prove to be effective. Stated simply, we must develop and implement national, state We must evaluate the "return on and local education policies that investment" of successful strate- promote proven strategies for the gies and models so their true cost- recruitment, preparation, certifi- effectiveness can be measured. cation and continuing education We must provide incentives and of highly effective teachers. education opportunities for These tasks, however, will not be school administrators so the accomplished easily. focus of their work becomes the instructional leadership. Focus ON THE WORK AHEAD Under the leadership of Wyoming Clarify, develop and catalogue Governor Jim Geringer, ECS chair- new and promising policy options man for 1999-2000, ECS will in several areas, including: engage political, education and Teacher recruitment and business leaders, as well as the alternative certification education community (state agen- Teacher preparation cies, universities, schools of educa- Ongoing teacher training tion and state associations), in a and education thorough review of practices and policy strategies that lead to the Encourage and assist state lead- vision of a quality teacher in every ers in their qUest to develop classroom in the 21st century and effective policy structures to the ultimate goal of increased around issues related to teacher quality. This work will include: achievement for all students. To that end, over the next two Comprehensive teacher quality policy reviews in years, ECS will do the following: several pilot states Identify the key issues around In-state workshops that which public support for teacher bring together key state quality reform can be mar- policymakers and education shalled leaders to address impor- EDUCATION COMMISSLON OF THE STATES tant policy issues related to teacher quality Technical assistance to states in support of specif- ic initiatives in the area of teacher quality. How CAN YOU PARTICIPATE? Encourage your state leaders to take a thorough look at the state's teacher quality policies Take part in the upcoming ECS survey on teacher quality Attend and participate in meetings scheduled during the year (see schedule below) Attend the 2000 ECS National Forum and Annual Meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota Sign up your state to host an ECS teacher quality workshop. Workshops will be offered, with the support of the DeWitt Wallace- Reader's Digest Fund, beginning in the summer of 2000. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS JULY 1999 Commencement of intensive, three-year ECS project on the recruitment and preparation of high-quality teachers (supported by the DeWitt Wallace-Reader's Digest Fund) AUGUST 1999 Chairman's meeting on public and policymaker engage- ment in teacher quality initiatives (supported by the Rockefeller Foundation) 9 EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES SEPTEMBER 1999 Chairman's meeting in Denver, Colorado, on teacher recruitment and preparation (supported by the DeWitt Wallace-Reader's Digest Fund) Chairman's meeting on improving teacher education (supported by the MacArthur Foundation) OCTOBER 2, 1999 SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Joint ECS/National Conference of State Legislatures/Consortium on Policy Research in Education/Institute for Educational Leadership conference at Stanford University on the alignment of K-12 and postsecondary policies on teacher education (supported by the U.S. Department of Education) . NOVEMBER. 14-16, 1999 ECS Fall Steering Committee Meeting in Williamsburg, Virginia. The Chairman's Initiative Advisory Group will review the summer meetings. MARCH 2000 ECS Spring Steering Committee Meeting in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The Chairman's Initiative Advisory Group will discuss the pilot state policy reviews and the impending in-state teacher quality workshops. JULY 9-12, 2000 ECS National Forum and Annual Meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota SUMMER 2000 AND BEYOND In-state teacher quality policy workshops and intensive technical assistance 10 EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES