ebook img

ERIC ED413709: Publications of the School-Linked Services Integration Research Project. PDF

270 Pages·1997·4.7 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED413709: Publications of the School-Linked Services Integration Research Project.

DOCUMENT RESUME EC 305 983 ED 413 709 Publications of the School-Linked Services Integration TITLE Research Project. Kansas Univ., Lawrence. INSTITUTION Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY 1997-00-00 PUB DATE 292p. NOTE H023D40020 CONTRACT Collected Works - General (020) -- Information Analyses PUB TYPE (070) -- Reports - Descriptive (141) MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *Agency Cooperation; Behavior Modification; Change DESCRIPTORS Strategies; Cooperative Programs; Demonstration Programs; *Disabilities; Educational Change; Educational Innovation; Elementary Secondary Education; *Family Involvement; Family Needs; Family School Relationship; *Inclusive Schools; *Integrated Services; Lawyers; Mainstreaming; Parent Empowerment; *School Community Programs ABSTRACT This compilation of publications from the School-Linked Service Integration Research Project focuses on integrated services and "New Community Schools: Issues for includes the following papers: (1) Families in Three Streams of Reform" (Wayne Sailor), describes issues in special education reform, general education reform, and school/health "Services Integration: Parent Empowerment through services reform; (2) School/Community Partnerships (Wayne Sailor), reviews barriers to services "American Education in the Postmodern Era" integration and solutions; (3) (Wayne Sailor), discusses the transformation from modern to postmodern "Family Participation in New Community rationality in our schools; (4) Schools" (Wayne Sailor and others), addresses the importance of family "New Structures and support within educational policy developments; (5) Systems Change for Comprehensive Positive Behavioral Support" (Wayne Sailor), describes positive behavioral support for students with severe behavior "Voice Collaboration and Inclusion: disorders in inclusive settings; (6) Democratic Themes in Educational and Social Reform Initiatives" (Thomas M. Skrtic and others), argues that, far more than a new special education service delivery model, inclusion is the emerging cultural logic of the 21st (7) "School-Linked Services Integration: Crisis and Opportunity in century; the Transition to Postmodern Society" (Thomas M. Skrtic and Wayne Sailor), considers the implications of the school-linked services integration reform and movement for professional practice and discourse in the fields of special remedial education, as well as for the broader political goal of democratic "Para Las Familias: An Example of An transformation in America; (8) Independent Policy Reform Model" (Martin H. Gerry and Henry M. Levin), in describes a model demonstration program for children and their families low-income neighborhoods; and (9) "Service Integration and Beyond: Implications for Lawyers and Their Training" (Martin H. Gerry). (Each chapter includes references.) (CR) The University of Kansas UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAM Publications of the School-Linked Services Integration Research Project #H023 D40020 U.S. DEPARTMENT OR EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATI NAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) his document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction Quality. o Points of view o' opinions stated in this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. rssir COPY AVAILAIELIF: iH Lawrence Campus Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies 1052 Dole Human Development Center 2 Lawrence, KS 66045 (913)864-4950 FAX (913)864-5338 Publications of the School-Linked Services Integration Research Project University Affiliated Program for Developmental Disabilities University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Table of Contents Sailor, W. (1994, Summer). New community schools: Issues for families in three streams of reform. Coalition Ouarterly, 11(3), 4-7. Sailor, W. (1994, Summer). Services integration: Parent empowerment through school/community partnerships. Coalition Quarterly, 11(3), 11-13. Sailor, W., & Skrtic, T. (1995). American education in the postmodern era. In J. L. Paul, H. Rosselli, & D. Evans (Eds.), Integrating school restructuring and special education reform (pp. 418-432). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace . Sailor, W., Kleinhammer-Tramill, J., Skrtic, T., & Oas, B. K. (1996). Family participation in New Community Schools. In G. H. S. Singer, L. E. Powers, & A. L. Olson (Eds.), Redefining family support: Innovations in public- private partnerships (pp. 313-332). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Sailor, W. (1996). New structures and systems change for comprehensive positive behavioral support. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 163-206). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Skrtic, T. M., Sailor, W., & Gee, K. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion: Democratic themes in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17(3), 142-157. Skrtic, T. M., & Sailor, W. (in press, 1996). School-linked services integration: Crisis and opportunity in the transition to postmodern society. To appear in Remedial and Special Education, 17(5). Gerry, M. H., & Levin, H. M. (in press). Para Las Familias: An example of an independent policy reform model. Submitted to Remedial and Special Education. Gerry, M. H. (in prepration). Service integration and beyond: Implications for lawyers and their training. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Community Policy Research Center, April 1996. oalitionA r uarterly1 Volume 11 Summer Number 3 1994 A PUBLICATION OF THE TAPP (TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PARENT PROGRAMS) PROJECT This issue was produced in collaboration with the Beach Center on Families and Disability, University of Kansas, Lawrence 4 COALITION QUARTERLY NEW COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ISSUES FOR FAMILIES IN THREE STREAMS OF REFORM By Wayne Sailor Director of the University Affiliated Program Lawrence Research Associate, Beach Center on Families and Disability University of Kansas, Lawrence Let's imagine for the moment that you are a single parent of three children. One of your children, Sarah, is an eight-year-old with severe intellectual disabilities. She also has other physical disabilities and has been referred to at times as "medically fragile." You have moved to a new community and things are difficult. You have a part-time housekeeping job on the other side of town and your income is below the community poverty standard. The bus route from home to job has been targeted for elimination for cost-saving reasons, further jeopardizing your circumstances. Is your situation unique? In fact it is played out in various scenarios all over America and in dramatically increasing numbers. Continuing to imagine, suppose today is the first day of contact with your local school; you prepare to enroll Sarah. Your previous experience, in another community with special education, was not satisfactory. You are prepared for the worst. To your surprise, the principal is welcoming. She asks about Sarah's previous history, her educational experiences, and seems to probe for information on Sarah's strengths, rather than her limitations. At the conclusion, she introduces you to Sarah's teacher, who is a regular third grade teacher, and also a member of the school counseling team whose job is described as "Services Coordinator." The teacher explains that Sarah will be supported as a fully included child through special education and other supports in the regular class curriculum. The Services Coordinator explains that her role will be to look after all of Sarah's and her parent's requirements for special supports, not only at school, but in the community as well. She explains that Sarah and her family qualify for a family support plan that will include an Individualized Educational Plan for Sarah. Sarah's parent will need only to contact the Service Coordinator to arrange for all educational, social welfare, and health-care assistance supports for which Sarah and her family are eligible by virtue of their combined circumstances. Is such imagining a total fantasy? In fact, such the millennium time landmark (AD 2000) is having schools exist in a number of communities across the effect of dramatically accelerating these reform several states, and their numbers are on the processes. increase. These circumstances represent the product For example, many aspects of all three reform of a fusion of three parallel human services policy processes are embedded in President Clinton's reform efforts at single school sites. The policy "Goals 2000" legislation. Only in the last few years streams are special education reform, called have these three parallel streams of reform come "inclusive education"; regular education reform together in a single, coherent school/coramunity called "school restructuring"; and health/social partnership program, and it is the outcome of such a services reform, called "integrated services." Each fusion that makes the scenario depicted for Sarah an of these streams of policy reform has been under increasing likelihood for many families. way in some form for two decades. The occasion of Special Education Reform To many concerned exclusively with special professionals and family members associated with education, inclusive education seems a radical children whose disabilities are relatively mild (i.e., departure from the norm and is quite controversial. learning disabilities) because of an historical reliance Its hallmark is the de-emphasis or complete on pull-out, resource room programs sometimes elimination of special education classrooms and a supported by partial mainstreaming. For these reconfiguration of resources to support students in students, research on the issue consistently favors neither approach over the other in terms of regular classroom placements. educational outcomes. When social outcomes are In general, resistance to inclusion comes from 4 COALITION QUARTERLY examined, research favors inclusion. comparison to special class placements. When viewed from the standpoint of other The community of families and professionals associated with students with deafness/hard-of- professions, not exclusively identified with special hearing disabilities is also divided on the issue of education, inclusive education seems to be just one aspect of a much broader-based set of reforms inclusion, but their concern is with a relative lack of social opportunities for these children to occurring across educational community special assistance programs. Some resistance to inclusion communicate with one another in sign language in has surfaced in recent months from the regular inclusive schools. education teacher unions, but these objections seem The strongest champions of inclusive education primarily driven by issues associated with the tend to be associated with students who have collective bargaining process in general, rather than developmental disabilities. Research indicates that actual objections to including children with these students benefit significantly both socially and disabilities in regular classrooms. educationally from inclusive placements in KEY ELEMENTS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION All students attend local school Placement in regular, age-appropriate classroom Students fully included in all school activities No labels (Le., "LD") are used at school site No special classes exist at school Special education supports are fully integrated into regular program Students' supports are identified and provided through site team processes General Education Reform The current term for the rapid changes taking More importantly, perhaps, for families of students with special needs, restructured schools are chang- place in schools generally is "school restructuring." In general, Restructured schools differ from traditional schools ing their organization and governance. in two important ways. First, the processes of edu- restructured schools have more ability to experiment curriculum, instructional methods and cation with new methods, are governed by teams of teachers pupil progress evaluation are significantly and others at the school site (often including par- changing. Elements of the curriculum (i.e., math, ents), and most significantly, are fully integrating all special resource programs into a unified educational geography) are becoming more integrated with one another so that children learn in a more holistic program. Separate support programs for special Instruction occurs increasingly in small needs populations, such as special education, Chapter context. groups such as cooperative learning groups, with One, bilingual education, gifted, and soon, are fully integrated into the general education program and students more actively involved in the instruction of Evaluation is becoming more other students. coordinated in such a manner that all of the students at the school benefit from all of the available support outcomes-based, that is, looking at how students use what they learn, rather than how they fare on programs at the school. Viewed from the standpoint of school restructuring, inclusive education is simply standardized tests. part of the total school reorganization process. KEY ELEMENTS OF SCHOOL RESTRUCTURING Systemic Elements Process Elements Relative school autonomy Integrated curriculum Site-based management and team decision- Small grouping arrangements for making instruction Pooled and fully integrated school program Outcomes-based pupil progress evaluation resources 5 COALITION QUARTERLY Social/Health Services Reform Generally called "school-linked, integrated are created); what's left of the money is spent directly services," this set of reform processes serves to round on the problem. Each new program operates in out the full picture for families of students with isolation relative to other programs, even though the special needs. Under traditional systems, consumers others may be quite similar and even have common of agency programs must seek out each separate root causes. Consumers have no say in how programs agency, a process that may regularly involve many are operated, and often have little choice among In most cases there is no coordination contacts. programs. across programs, often including programs within By contrast, the key elements of integrated services the school. Consumer families are unaware of models are: numerous social, health and educational programs a) the formation of community service integration for which they qualify for assistance. councils that represent all human services provider School-linked, integrated services offer what agencies in the area including the schools, business would seem to be a simple solution to these difficult and industry representatives, and consumers of ser- This solution makes government circumstances. vices (i.e., parents of children who have special assistance programs "user friendly" by creating a assistance needs); single point of contact that offers a variety of choices b) services coordination (i.e., "case management") in assistance programs and makes all contact arrange- so that parents have a single point of contact for ments. The information provided to a parent on arrangement of all supports needed by the child in simply what is "out there" is often half the effort by school and by the child and family in the community; itself. and So why isn't such a simple, elegant idea in c) the coordination of all service within and across operation now? The answer lies in the traditional agencies so that barriers such as eligibility for spe- manner in which our country addresses social cific programs (but not others), confidentiality problems. To put it simply, a problem is identified requirements specific to individual agencies, agency- and described in a legislative context (federal or state specific budget limitations and restrictions, etc., can government); funds are appropriated to address the be set aside. problem (i.e., teen pregnancy; drug abuse); a special The result is a coherent "family services plan" that support program is created within an existing "wraps around" the consumer. bureaucracy (sometimes whole new bureaucracies KEY ELEMENTS OF SCHOOL-LINKED, INTEGRATED SERVICES Community councils with membership of consumers and the full spectrum of service agencies Services coordination with a single point of contact for families Services coordination within school and between school and community Comprehensive family services planning Pooled and shared resources across agencies and programs Flexible funding mechanisms to address problems not specifically covered by an agency New Community Schools To return briefly to our "fantasy" of Sarah and her single point-of-entry into service provision. She also mother, such a refreshing encounter with a school may be eager to develop various skills (if she does principal is becoming increasingly more likely. The not have them already), such as leadership skills, by role for family members in these reform processes participating on her school's inclusion team or represents nothing less than seeking to be appointed to the full-school site at several empowerment Empowerment begins with motivation, levels. management team. Within the community itself, Sarah's mother can seek membership on a depends on skills and resources, and flourishes in a community-services integration council or responsive context. Here, Sarah's mother may be motivated to work more closely with her daughter's participate on committees that facilitate council educators and other professionals because she has a operations. Finally, she finds a responsive context 7 6 COALITION QUARTERLY for her and Sarah's needs a policy and provider For further reading: system that is fully responsive to what she and Sarah Beach Center on Families and Disability (1993). Application want and what they choose. for federal funding. Lawrence, KS:The University of Kansas Sarah's school, by combining funds from a wide Integration of students Halvorsen, A.T., & Sallor,W. (1990). spectrum of programs through education, health with severe and profound disabilities: A review of research. and social services systems, is now open five days a In R. GaylordRoss (Ed.), Issues and Research In Special week from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. It offers three hot Education. New York: Teachers College Press. meals a day to students who need them and offers preschool as well as latch-key" programs. The Sailor, W., Gee, K., & Karasoff, P. (1993). Full Inclusion and facility is open at night for community meetings, and school restructuring. In M.E. Snell (Ed.), Instruction of child care is provided to encourage family Students with Severe Disabilities, 4th ed. New York: participation. For families of children with special Macmillan Publishing. needs, new community schools are certainly the wave of the immediate future. BEST COPY AVAILABLE SERVICES INTEGRATION PARENT EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SCHOOL/COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS By Wayne Sailor Director of University Affiliated Program Research Associate, Beach Center for Families and Disability University of Kansas, Lawrence Miguel Sylvia Sanchez (not her real name) is a single Freedom School bustles with teamwork. The parent and the mother of a child with severe disabili- school is governed by an interactive process that ties in the community of Watsonville in Santa Cruz, includes the principal and a site management team California. Her son Miguel (not his real name) used consistingof teachers, support personnel and parents. to be in a special school operated by the County The team allocates and distributes school resources Office of Education, called a 'Development Center on the basis of pupil needs rather than, as formerly, for the Handicapped." Mrs. Sanchez had relatively on the basis of categorical label (i.e., Special Education, little contact with the Center because she is Spanish- Chapter One, Gifted, etc.). Services Coordinators on speaking and the only interpreting provided at the the Site Team are fully familiar with the pattern of school was during IEP meetings. Her feeling about specialized in-school supports to individual students, the Development Center program is that it mainly and serve to coordinate those supports with other developed dependency on adults for support on the support systems available to the child and his family one hand and some behavioral problems on the outsideof the school. Asa result of this process, Mrs. otherno age - appropriate skills and no friendships. Sanchez has a Comprehensive Family Services Plan that effectively provides a "wrap-around" of all Miguel now attends Freedom School, a regular special assistance programs for which she and Miguel elementary school in Watsonville, as a fourth grader are eligible. in one of the regular classrooms. He has rapidly developed both skills and friendships. Mrs. Sanchez More importantly, as an active participant in her is a member of the Family Support Center team. family assistance planning process, she has chosen Freedom School is part of a community services from a number of options those services that meet integration partnership that coordinates all social, her needs. Most of Miguel's health care needs are health and specialized educational supports to looked after in the Freedom School Clinic, which has children and families associated with the school. a staff nurse and visiting physician assistants. In Mrs. Sanchez and Miguel attend meetings in the talking to Mrs. Sanchez abouther feelingsconcerning Family Services Center at the school on Wednesday Freedom School, it quickly becomes clear that she is evenings from 8 to 10 p.m. Child care is provided, so emotionally invested in a positive way. Her son's Miguel and his friends are looked after. school is a major community resource to the family. Maria In another school in the same community a traditional community, Maria might well havebeen different child, "Maria," is presenting a number of referred to the school psychologist for diagnostic problems in her classroom. The teacher is concerned testing. The process might have led to a categorical label being assigned to her, such as "learning because Maria, until recently, had made steady progress in her curriculum and presented no disabled" or "emotionally disturbed," and an IEP In a traditional school in a particular difficulties. written for special education. 9 11 COALITION QUARTERLY In this case,however, a different process occurred. Victoria, the coordinator was able to develop a short- The teacher asked for assistance from the student term Family Assistance Plan that helped Jose find study team at the school. The team felt that Maria's work and helped the family to not only get back on problems may be linked to family difficulties, and its feet, but also get much-needed assistance in a variety of support areas that the family members her situation became known to a Services Coordinator at the school, who elected to make a home visit. He were unaware even existed. Maria's problems abated with no long-term special support program needing found a situational crisis: Maria's father had just lost With cooperation from Maria's mother, his job. to be invoked. From Agency Centered to Family Centered The unique circumstances that make these point of contact. Families may select from a wide illustrations commonplace in Watsonville and array of service options to meet their needs in a increasingly in other communities is a piece of coordinated and periodically evaluated fashion. significant special assistance policy reform called Instead of being interviewed by a host of strangers school-linked, integrated services. At the heart of representing a variety of agencies; instead of filling this reform is the idea that services to people who out volumes of forms, one set for each program or need special assistance in order to enjoy a reasonable agency encountered; instead of appearing in person quality of life need to be transformed from agency at a variety of agency offices located all over town centered to family centered. A second principle is and, in some cases, outside of town instead of all involved: service support systems need to be geared these traditional headaches, family members can be to prevention rather than adult interventions. In other interviewed by a single person, with a single set of words, invest in children rather than waiting to cope forms who meets with them in a single and familiar with major, expensive adult problems that emerge place, often the school attended by one of the family later on. members. The person interviewing the family is the same person at the school who looks after the various Instead of consumer family members having to special support programs that the school provides to seek out a variety of provider agencies in order to the child with special assistance needs. have their needs met, these agencies are represented through a knowledgeable and "user friendly" single Barriers Various programs do not co- of access, etc. This process of transformation in school-linked, integrated services is not a new idea. ordinate, cooperate and in some cases are not It has been actively discussed and attempted in different forms even aware of each other. by government agencies at the federal and state Eligibility. Bureaucracies that administer levels since the early 1970s. It has only very recently various programs (for example, the Agriculture begun to gather steam as a major program of reform Department, for food stamps) set standards for in American public policy. The reason is that the eligibility for assistance use. Often, programs process of transformation is difficult. There are very that theoretically fit nicely together to provide a significant barriers to services integration that have "safety net" of assistance for families in need, in to be addressed in each community and in each state reality cancel each other out. If you make use of where these efforts are under way, before Program A, you lose entitlement option for demonstrations like the one in Watsonville become Program B, even though the two together might possible. help a family to become self-sustaining much more rapidly than can either program alone. Some of the more formidable barriers are as follows: Confidentiality. Each agency that administers programs for client assistance maintains its own Discrete services programs. Congress addresses database on its consumers and rarely shares social problems by creating an "authorization" (creating a program) and "appropriation" information with other agencies. The result is a near impossibility for coordinated services use (funding the program) that is specifically aimed Each agency has "case across agencies. at solving a single problem (and no other managers" who will treat you as a "case" but problem). Take AIDS, for example. Special who rarely correspond with or contact each assistance programs to address the ravages of other. Worst of all, none of the case managers AIDS are now available in communities through will inform you concerning programs for which a variety of discrete agency programs. Each has you may be eligible in other agencies. its separate eligibility requirements, forms, places BEST COPY AVAILABLE 12

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.