ebook img

ERIC ED400038: The Effects of Preschool Attendance & Kindergarten Schedule: Kindergarten through Grade Four. A Longitudinal Research Study. PDF

81 Pages·1992·1.2 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED400038: The Effects of Preschool Attendance & Kindergarten Schedule: Kindergarten through Grade Four. A Longitudinal Research Study.

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 400 038 PS 024 411 TITLE The Effects of Preschool Attendance & Kindergarten Schedule: Kindergarten through Grade Four. A Longitudinal Research Study. INSTITUTION Ohio State Dept. of Education, Columbus. Div. of Early Childhood Education. PUB DATE 92 NOTE 80p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Statistical Data (110) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; Access to Education; *Alternate Day Schedules; Attendance; *Attendance Patterns; Early Childhood Education; Educational Change; Educational Policy; Educational Trends; Elementary Education; *Full Day Half Day Schedules; High Risk Students; *Kindergarten; Longitudinal Studies; *Outcomes of Education; Predictor Variables; School Entrance Age; School Readiness; Sex Differences; Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS *Preschool Effects ABSTRACT This longitudinal study examined the effects on children of three kindergarten schedules: half day, alternate day, and full day. A secondary purpose was to examine the relaticinchir between preschont attendance and subsequent school performance. Two additional variables thought to be related to school success were also explored: children's gender, and age at initial kindergarten entry. The study conducted and combined results of three different specific assessments. The first of those studies, initiated in May 1986, a statewide survey of beliefs and practices concerning kindergarten and preschool, obtained data from kindergarten teachers, school superintendents, school district records, and parents of kindergarten children. The second study, initiated in the summer of 1986, was a retrospective analysis of the cumulative records of 8,290 elementary school pupils. The third study, initiated in the fall of 1986, was a prospective longitudinal study of two groups of almost 6,000 elementary school students. The results indicate that children who attended preschool prior to kindergarten experience greater subsequent success in elementary school than those who do not attend. The child who is most likely to succeed in the elementary grades is a girl who attended preschool, turned five in January before kindei-garten entrance and attended a full-day kindergarten program. (Contains 24 references.) (AA) *******7' *****AAA***.A.A.***AA****-AAA******* c************* 7 Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. A************* A A ' ***:',**************** ' 'c***** " ' *******7'. A A*7'..i A' 1c). U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educahonal Research and improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) )1f<This document tuts been reproduced as ecerued from the person or organization originating it O Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction 'wilily Points of vow or opinions stated in this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OE RI positron or policy A Longitudinal Research Study of THE EFFECTS OF PRESCHOOL ATTENDANCE & KINDERGARTEN SCHEDULE Kindergarten Through Grade Four PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY T. So.kr.azzcs TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) DIVISION OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION OHIO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1992 BEST COPY AVAILABLE STATE BOARD Of EDUCATION Chester A. Roush, Kettering, President Sue Ann Norton, Westerville, Vice President Jean E. Bender, Akron J. James Bishop, Toledo Joseph A. Costanzo, Cleveland John P. Dougherty, Canton Mary Goodrich, Zanesville Keith D. Hamilton, Painesville Shirley Hawk,. Cleveland Jack C. Hunter, Youngstown Virginia E. Jacobs, Lima Mary R. Lindner, Cincinnati VVilliam E. Moore, Woodsfield Edwin C. Price, Jr., Cincinnati Constance Rice, South Charleston Anthony J. Russo, Mayfield Village. Wayne E. Shaffer, Bryan Patricia Smith, Worthington Sally R. Southard, Oxford Jo A. Thatcher, Portsmouth Martha W. Wise, Avon 01-110 DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Ted Sanders, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Public Instruction Irene G. Bandy-Hedden, Assistant Superintendent Childhood Education Jane M. Wiechel, Director, Division of Early Education Paula M. Mahaley, Consultant, Division of Early Childhood 3 TABLE Ci F CONTENTS TABLE OF Com Etas Executive Summary 1 9 Research Design 9 Statewide Survey Retrospective Analysis 10 Prospective Analysis 12 School Districts Participating in the Studies 13 Data Collected 15 Qualifications with Regard to the Studies 17 Research Findings 24 Statewide Survey 24 Kindergarten Schedule 27 School Achievement 27 Chapter 1 Placement and Grade Retention 32 Preschool Attendance 34 School Achievement 35 Chapter 1 Placement and Grade Retention 36 Gender 37 School Achievement 38 Chapter 1 Placement and Grade Retention 39 Age of Kindergarten Entrance 39 School Achievement 41 Chapter 1 Placement and Grade Retention 43 School Behavior 45 47 Kindergarten Schedule Preschool Attendance 48 Gender 50 Age of Kindergarten Entrance 52 Teaching Practices and Observed Learning Behaviors 55 Summary and Conclusions 62 Follow-up Study 63 Implications 64 Bibliography 67 Appendix: Description of Subset Comparisons 69 AacriowuDGmeas A study of this magnitude could not have been successfully conceived and launched without the able assistance and guidance of the Preschool/Kindergarten Research Study Advisory Committee, participation of the selected school districts, and the work of the four regional data coordinators and the more than fifty data collectors. The members of the Committee and the names of the school districts and regional data coordinators are listed below. COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mary Anderson, Columbus City Schools, Columbus David Beveridge, Bedford City Schools, Bedford James Brehm, Ohio Education Association, Columbus Wilbur J. Cline, Ohio Association of Elementary School Administrators, Bellbrook Svea Cooke, Evergreen Local Schools, Fulton County Tony DiBiasio, Fairview Park City Schools, Fairview Park George Erickson, Waterloo Local Schools, Portage County Barbara Falls, Xenia City Schools, Xenia Penelope Getz, Eastwood Local Schools, Wood County Jane Hayman, Brunswick City Schools, Brunswick Lucille Johnson, Columbus City Schools, Columbus Francie Kerpsack, Ohio Association for the Education of Young Children, Canfield Debbie Kohler, Ontario Local Schools, Richland County Martha C. Leyden, University of Akron, Akron Jacqueline Mann, West Carrollton City Schools, West Carrollton Joan Mapson, Ohio Education Association, Columbus Mary Ellen Martin, Northeastern Local Schools, Clark County Suzanne McFarland, Ohio Association for the Education of Young Children, Toledo Gregg Morris, Ontario Local Schools, Richland County J.R. Mustard, Celina City Schools, Celina Barbara Newman, The Ohio State University, Columbus Peggy Rang, Beavercreek Local Schools, Greene County Carolyn Reed, Akron City Schools, Akron Michelle Ritter, Buckeye Central Local Schools, Crawford County Dwight Rogers, Ohio University, Athens Susan Rudloph, Lima City Schools, Lima Chris Stafford, Proctor & Gamble Child Care Center, Cincinnati Carol Stivers, Ripley-Union Lewis Local Schools, Brown County Charles Thomas, Jr., East Liverpool City Schools, East Liverpool Judy Thomas,Cincinnati City Schools, Cincinnati J. Robert Warmbrod, The Ohio State University, Columbus Sharon Watkins, Erie County Office of Education, Erie County Wayne White, Dawson-Bryant Local Schools, Lawrence County Pheetta Wilkinson, Ohio Head Start, Cincinnati PARTICIPATING SCHOOL DISTRICTS Akron City Schools, Akron Beachwood City Schools, Beachwood Bright Local Schools, Highland County Cincinnati City Schools, Cincinnati Claymont City Schools, Dennison Cleveland Heights-University Heights City Schools, University Heights Coblentz Local Schools, Preble County College Corner Local Schools, Preble County Edon-Northwest Local Schools, Williams County Euclid City Schools, Euclid Fairbanks Llocal Schools, Union County Field Local Schools, Portage County Gallipolis City Schools, Gallipolis James A. Garfield Local Schools, Portage County Geneva Area City Schools, Geneva Liepsic Local Schools, Putnam County Lorain City Schools, Lorain Lynchburg-Clay Local Schools, Highland County Madison Local Schools, Lake County Miami East Local Schools, Miami County Mil 'creek-West Unity Local Schools, New Lexington New Riegel Local Schools, Seneca County North Union Local Schools, Union County Old Fort Local Schools, Seneca County Orange City Schools, Pepper Pike Perry Local Schools, Lake County Pickerington Local Schools, Fairfield County Piqua coy Schools, Piqua Ridgewood Local Schools, Portage County Rootstown local Schools, Portage County Shaker Heights City Schools, Shaker Heights South Euclid-Lyndhurst City Schools, Lyndhurst Southeast Local Schools, Portage County Waterloo City Schools, Waterloo Wyoming City Schools, Cincinnati REGIONAL DATA COORDINATORS Patrick Gallagher, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Martha Leyden, University of Akron, Akron Mary Lou Rush, Educational Support Services, Sylvania Ruth Roberts, University of Akron, Akron 6 iii Throughout the course of this study, John R. Cryan, professor at the University of Toledo, provided valuable input to the study. He also wrote and edited the several issues of Research Report: An Inside Look at the Preschool/Kindergarten Longitudinal Research Study and completed an extensive review of the literature. The framework for the study and data presented in this publication are the result of the many hours, frequent discussions, and extensive work done by Rob Sheehan, professor at Cleveland State University. A special thanks goes to Lisa Usselman, secretary, Division of Early Childhood Educa- tion, Ohio Department of Education, who provided many hours of assistance to ensure a successful study. BOARD lbsournota As one of its major initiatives in 1985, the State Board of Education issued the following resolution: WHEREAS The State Board of Education has studied early childhood programs; and WHEREAS the State Board empaneled a Commission on Early Childhood Education which made recommendations about preschool, early identification, early entrance, and latchkey programs; and WHEREAS the State Board utilized the commission report to formalize legislative recommendations regarding preschool and kindergarten programs; and WHEREAS several of the recommendations were not funded by the legislature; and WHEREAS additional information and data will be helpful to policy makers in the future; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the State Board of Education authorizes a relevant, longitudinal study of the effects of preschool and/or several options for kindergarten; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Superintendent of Public Instruction report the progress of the study and the relevant longitudinal data at the end of each school year throughout the study. iv INTRODUCTION PRESCHOOL/ KINDERGARTEN Child development research over the past iwenty years has led educators and LONGITUDINAL policy makers to the inescapable conclusion that the early years of schooling (preschool through grade 3) are formative years during which a tremendous RESEARCH STUDY amount of learning takes place. Most children do learn but many quickly fall behind, failing to learn the basic skills in reading, language, and mathematics. State and federal legislative initiatives have increasingly been designed to respond to this problem and that of ensuring success for all children. Additional service programs for failing children cost money and give no guarantee that the programs will work. Keeping children in school, progressing satisfactorily through the K-12 years saves money. In 1984, The Ohio Department of Education initiated a comprehensive effort to make possible the school success of all children. The Department requested research information that would have relevance to statewide policy making in the area of early childhood education. Specifically, it sought data on the effects of various kindergarten schedules and preschool attendance as preliminary to consideration of funding full-day kindergarten and public preschools. Existing studies focusing on the effects of different kindergarten schedules tended to be with small samples or unique populations. The studies generally failed to match the rigorous standards characteristically employed in Head Start preschool studies. Moreover, the results were mixed at best. The Department was interested in data that would be of relevance for large numbers of children in the state representing the entire range of socioeconomic circumstances. The Department also wanted to identify additional factors that might promote success in Ohio elementary schools. Accordingly, a series of statewide studies was conducted from 1985 to 1991. of This Preschool/Kindergarten Longitudinal Research Study combines the results three studies as they pertain to the predictive value of specific variables linked to three the success of children in kindergarten and the early elementary grades. The studies used are as follows: A statewide survey of belief and practices concerning kindergarten fall of A retrospective analysis of 8,290 children entering kindergarten in the 1982, 1983, or 1984 A prospective longitudinal study of two groups with a total of almost 6,000 children who entered kindergarten in the fall of 1986 (Cohort 1) or fall of1987 (Cohort 2) WHAT ARE THE PURPOSES OF THE ICINDERGAR1EN S 04EDULES RESEARCH STUDY? The overall focus of this entire research effort was to examine the effects on children attending one of three kindergarten schedules: Half day (typically 5 days per week, 2.5 hours per day) Alternate day (lypically 5 days in 2 weeks, 5 hours per day) Full day (typically 5 days per week, 5 hours per day) PRESCHOOL ATI-ENDA/4a A secondary purpose of the research effort was to examine the relationship between preschool attendance and subsequent school performance. During the exploring two additional variables that course of this study, interest developed in might be related to school success: children's gender and age at initial kindergar- ten entry. These results are included in the final report. WHEN DID THE ADVISORY CommrrrEE STUDY BEGIN? The study was guided by a 28-member advisory team appointed by the Superin- tendent of Public Instruction. Researchers and advisors involved in the research effort commenced planning activities in the fall of 1985. An intensive literature review was prepared during the winter of 1986. This literature review was used in considering possible research strategies and instruments that should be a part of the Ohio research effort. DATA COLLECDON By March 1986, three specific research studies had been recommended by the 4)4 advisory team to the State Board. In May 1986, the State Board initiated the first '14 of those studiesa statewide survey of beliefs and practices concerning kindergar- l,4-.4..-75-4-- '1 'Q'2.03.- :,, ten and preschool. This survey obtained data from kindergarten teachers, school A superintendents, school district records, and parents of kindergarten children. The second study, initiated in the summer of 1986, was a retrospective analysis of the ,...-." cumulative records of 8,290 elementary school pupils. The third study, initiated in the fall of 1986, was a prospective longitudinal study of two groups of almost 6,000 elementary school pupils. THE CHILDREN IN THE STUDIES WHAT IS THE DATA BASE FOR THE STUDIES? Children in the retrospective study entered kindergarten in the fall of 1982, 1983, or 1984. Children in the prospective study entered kindergarten in either the fall of 1986 (Cohort 1) or fall of 1987 (Cohort 2). 10

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.