ebook img

ERIC ED399688: Adoption: A Lifelong Journey for Children & Families. PDF

38 Pages·1996·1 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED399688: Adoption: A Lifelong Journey for Children & Families.

DOCUMENT RESUME EC 305 019 ED 399 688 McManus, Marilyn, C., Ed. AUTHOR Adoption: A Lifelong Journey for Children & TITLE Families. Portland State Univ., OR. Research and Training INSTITUTION Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health. National Inst. on Disability and Rehabilitation SPONS AGENCY Research (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 96 NOTE 37p. Serials (022) Collected Works PUB TYPE Focal Point; v10 nl Spr 1996 JOURNAL CIT MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *Adopted Children; *Adoption; Adoptive Parents; DESCRIPTORS *Attachment Behavior; Child Welfare; Confidentiality; Disabilities; *Emotional Disturbances; Family Relationship; Federal Legislation; Incidence; *Intercultural Programs; Parent Attitudes; Parent Child Relationship; Parent Role; Personal Narratives; Placement; Transracial Adoption Improving Americas Schools Act 1994 Section 551 IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT in Several issues surrounding adoption are addressed others, this journal. "Openness in Adoption," by Ruth G. McRoy and adoption. explores the movement away from confidentiality in "An Adoption "Mid-Life Reflections on Adoption" by Carol Yttri and Journey" by Shannon Latimer detail the experiences of adults who were Children and adopted as children. In "Emotional Disorders in Adopted review Youth" (Ruth G. McRoy and Harold D. Grotevant), a research finds that adopted children are referred for psychological treatment study of two to five times as frequently as their nonadopted peers. A 50 adopted and 50 non-adopted adolescents in residential treatment influenced by a variety centers indicated that adoption outcomes are and of child and parental factors, including the parent's reasons motivation for adoption and their attitudes toward adoptive Ramos), "The Case parenthood. "Intercultural Adoption" (Joan D. Against Transracial Adoption" (Leora Neal), and "The Birth of impact of Intercountry Adoptions" (Susan Soon Keum Cox) discuss the adoptions between members of racial, ethnic, national origin, and religious groups on the children and families involved. "The Multiethnic Placement Act" by Carol Williams reviews this 1994 law. "Parent and Child Attachment" (Margaret Redfern) examines the bonding for between parents and their children. "Adoption Subsides: A Boon "My Children" (Ann Sullivan) discusses the federal adoption subsidy. Family: Formed by Adoption" (Stephanie Ward) is a personal narrative Selected by a woman who adopted a child with mental disorders. adoption resources are also listed. (CR) **A;,A**AAA,%,%**************** ***********************************Ak**, Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ." ************************* *******************;:**A.A..r... U S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Eauca erm AseAreft IMPOAMMIN CENTER /ENIn 00 rocp'itloINT A NATIONAL BULLETIN ON. FAMILY.SUPPORT& CHILOREN'SJIENTALHEALTH ADOPTION: A LIFELONG JOURNEY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES MID-LIFE REFLECTIONS OPENNESS IN ADOPTION weeping changes in adop- ON ADOPTION ....)tion practices are taking Tt was a recurrent dream. A large, place in the United States and told Victorian house with at least other western countries. The three stories and a cavernous base- movement is generally away ment in an unknown city. Its wood is from confidentiality and se- rich, but dark, the hallways are nar- crecy toward more "open- row and poorly lit. Where there were ness" in adoption, in which windows, they were a bit smudged so either mediated or direct con- that what light came through was dif- tact occurs between the fuse and pale. The doors to the out- child's families by birth and side were loose or sometimes nonex- by adoption. istent so that a chill wind blew Why such changes? First, through them. Yet, it wasn't a fright- of the availability of abortion and the the practice of confidentiality in adop- ening placeno ghosts inhabited it, decreased stigma associated with tion was based on several assump- no creatures menaced from its shad- single parenting. Thus, adoption tions: that birthmothers, once tainted owy cornersit was simply empty. agencies have had fewer babies to by the stigma of illegitimacy, would There was no furniture in it anywhere. willingly "relinquish" their children place. Night after night for as long as I can Third, growing numbers of in order to "get on with their lives:" remember, I walked its floors, from adopted persons are returning to the that adoptive parents who were infer- basement to attic, sometimes stop- agencies that placed them years be- tile would be able to build a family ping to rest or sleep fitfully usually fore to seek information about their through adoption just as if they had on a seat in a bay window. Sometimes "their own children;" and that birthfamilies. Birthparents have been through the window I could see more keenly aware of the possibility adopted children would be integrated blurry faces going by as if I were on a of having at least some knowledge of into the new families with minimal train moving through a crowded sta- their children's well-being as they are difficulty and live happily ever after tion. Throughout the years two things growing up, and they are sometimes as if they were biological children of have never changed: I was always cold forming search groups in order to es- these parents. But these assumptions and I was always alone. tablish links with the children they are not accurate. Birthmothers don't For years I made no attempt to placed through confidential proce- forget that they gave birth. In fact, create meaning from this repetitive dures. Adoptive families are contact- many of them spend the rest of their image. Then one night, I had a radi- ing agencies to get information about lives wondering how their children cally different dream that gave mean- birthfamilies because they cannot are doing. Adoptive parents can't pre- ing to the first and banished it for- adequately answer their children's tend that a child is their own by birth, dreamed of a modern ever. I especially if they look different or questions. ranch-style house with pocket doors Consequently, agencies have have different interests or talents. And between the living room and a patio found that options that include open- adopted children cannot pretend they enclosed by clear glass walls. I was ness are attractive to birthparents who had no history before the adoption. showing a friend through the house might place with them, and many Where are their roots? What piece of and had dramatically pushed open the their identity puzzle is missing? adoption professionals feel that open- sturdy doors revealing a striking im- the ness is in the best interests of Whom do they look like or talk like? age that imprinted itself as I awak- child. This change has been very con- And why shouldn't they know their ened. The patio was filled with famil- troversial. Some adoption specialists biological roots? iar furniture, knickknacks, people should argue that fully open adoption Second, the pool of babies avail- and bright sunlight! be standard practice for everyone and able for adoption has shrunk because Continued on page 6 Continued on page 3 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE SPRIG 1998 FO C0 INT Center Associates Increasing Multicultural Paul Adams, D.S.W., Laura Brennan, RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTER Parent Involvement Regional Research Institute for Human .'"" B. A., Leah Carouthers, Iris Garvilles, James L. Mason; A.13.1X, Services Rae Anne Lafrenz, A. Myrth Oglvie, Principal Investigator Graduate School of Social Work M.S.W., Linda Pfohll, B.A., Razif Razak, Tracy Williams-Murphy, M.S.; Portland State University Nina Shapiro, BA., E. Darey SheU,B.S., . - Project Manager P.O. Box :751, Julie Siepmann, B.S, Dana Sieverin- Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 Evaluation of a KanWork Contract -Held; BA. (503) 725-4040 Barbara J. Friesen, Ph.D., Co-Principal Investigator FOCAL POINT NATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE s. Nancy M. Koroloff, Marilyn McManus, J.D., M.S.W., Editor . (800) 628-1696 TDD (503) 725-4165 Circulation: 25;000- . Co-Principal Investigator Copyright m 1996 by Regional Research Family Caregiver Panel Study GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK Institute for Human Services. All rights Thomas P. McDonald, Ph.D., James H. Ward, Ph.D., Dean reserved. Permission to reproduce Principal Investigator articles may be obtained by contacting REGIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE the editor. Support for Working Caregivers FOR HUMAN SERVICES . Eileen Brennan, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Nancy M. Koroloff, Ph.D., The Research and Training Center on Julie Rosenzweig, Ph.D., Senior Researcher Interim Director.: Family Support and Children's Mental' , . Health was established in 1984 with fund- William H. Feyerherm, Ph.D., Co-Director Family Participation in Residential ing from the National Institute on Disabil- Treatment Programs - NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ity and Rehabilitation Research, U. S. De- Barbara J. Friesen, Ph.D., Richard Angell, M.D., Director of partment of Education, in collaboration Co-Principal Investigator Training of Child Psychiatry, Department with the Center for Mental. Health Ser- Jean-M. Kruzich, . of Psychiatry, Oregon Health Sciences vices, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Co-Principal Investigator. -- University Services Administration, U. S. Department Tracy Williams - Murphy, M.S., William Arroyo, M.D., Assistant of Health and Human Services. The content . Project Manager, Director, Child/Adolescent Psychiatry, of this publication does not necessarily re- Los Angeles County USC Medical Families and Therapeutic flect the views or policies of the funding Center Foster Parents as Partners agencies. Marva Benjamin; M.S.W., CASSP Pauline Jivanjee, Ph.D., Assistance Center, Georgetown . Technical Principal Investigator RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTER , University . . Barbara.): Friesen, Ph.D., Center Direitor Engagement A SeCondary Analysis of Legal Director, Ira A. Bumim, Nancy M. Koroloff, Ph.D., Director of Research and Placement in Families Served by Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, James L Mason, A.B.D., Director of Training Multiple Systems - Washington, D.C. Paul E. Koren, PhD , Research Methodologist Kristine Nelson, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Cleopatra Caldwell, Ph.D., African- M.S.W.; Center Manager . Kaye J. Exo, American Mental Health Research National Evaluation of Statewide. Shad E. Jessen, Administrative Assistant. - Center, University of Michigan, Institute Family Support Networks of Social Research Effects of Family Participation in Harold Briggs, Ph.D., Beth Dague, M.A., Stark County Mental Services: A Panel Study Principal Investigator Health Board, Canton, Ohio Barbara J. Friesen, Ph.D., Solla Carrock, M.S., Project Manager Glenda Fine, Parents Involved Principal Investigator .. Network, Mental Health Association of Denise Stuntzner-Gibson, M.S.W., Southeast Pennsylvania Family Participation in Professional Project Manager Paula Goldberg, PACER Center, Inc., Education: An Intervention Minneapolis, Minnesota Multicultural Perspectives of . Barbara J. Friesen, Ph.D., Mary Hoyt, M.S.W., Special Assistant to Empowerment Principal Investigator the Administrator, Oregon Children's Barbara A. Minton, Ph.D., Development of a Teacher Education Services Division Principal Investigator Jody Lubrecht, Ph.D., Mental Health Curriculum Promoting Family An Evaluation of Responsive Project Manager, Idaho Department of Partnerships for Inclusive Classrooms Academic Assessment for Students Health and Welfare Amy Driscoll, Ed.D., Principal Investigator with Severe Emotional Disabilities Brenda Lyles, Ph.D:, Deputy Assistant A Model of Family Participation in Administrator, Mental Health and Mental Mary Henning-Stout, Ph.D., Therapeutic Preschools for Children Retardation Authority of Harris County, Principal Investigator Who Have Emotional Disorders Houston, Texas Family-Centered Policy: Diane Pancoast, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Phyllis Magrab; Ph.D., Director, Child A Study of Family Member -Development Center, Georgetown Resource Service and National Representation at the Policy Level University Clearinghouse on Family Support and Nancy M. Koroloff, Ph.D., Larry Platt, M.D., Public Health Children's Mental Health Principal Investigator Consultant, Berkeley, California Beverly A. Stephens, B.S., B.A., Marilyn C. McManus, J.D., M.SW., Betsey Poore, Student, Richmond, VA Information Resource Coordinator Project Manager Deify Pena Roach, Program Coordinator, Denise Schmit, Publications Coordinator Parents for Behaviorally Different Children, Albuquerque, New Mexico VONIII 10, 10.1 tat FOCATIOINT OPENNESS IN ADOPTION CONTINUED PERSPECTIVES OF THE families. As much as we wanted to that the secrecy of confidential adop- ADOPTIVE PARENTS. interview birthfathers as well, this was tion is harmful to all parties. Other Virtually all the parents in our typically impossible due to their un- adoption professionals argue that study adopted because of infertility. availability or unknown whereabouts. openness is experimental and poten- Their average age was around 40, Included in this study are 720 in- tially harmful. The latter view holds their average educational level was dividuals: 190 adoptive families (in- that confidential adoption worked three to four years of college, and cluding 190 mothers, 190 fathers, and well, so why change it? Yet others take their average family income exceeded at least one child in 171 of the fami- a more middle ground and advocate $50,000 per year. Many adoptive par- lies) and 169 birthmothers. Families for communication, as long as it is ents were initially reluctant to con- were sampled across the full range of mediated by a neutral third party. sider an open relationship with the openness in adoption. Sixty-two fami- Adoption professionals, advo- birthmother of the child they hoped lies had confidential adoptions, in cates, and members of support groups would join them through adoption. and which no information was shared be- individuals adopted of Two major issues involve the adop- tween birth- and adoptive parents af- birthparents hold passionately strong tive parents' concerns that they will ter the adoptive placement. Sixty-nine feelings about openness; however, al- be unable to control the birthmother's had mediated adoptions in which in- most no research on this topic has (or birthfamily's) involvement in their formation was exchanged between been available to guide adoption family's life and the fear that the birth- and adoptive families through policy in this important area that birthmother will try to reclaim the an adoption agency staff member act- touches the lives of many families. child as her own. ing as go-between. In 52 of the fami- We found that the overwhelming lies, this contact was continuing, and OUR STUDY majority of adoptive parents across all in 17 families it had stopped by the Wanting to contribute research levels of openness indicated satisfac- data on which recommendations time we interviewed them. Finally, 59 tion with their ability to control the of our families had fully disclosed could be made, we developed a study birthmother's involvement in their adoptions, in which information was to examine openness in adoption family's life. There were a number of shared directly between birthparents from the points of view of adoptive parents who were dissatisfied in this and adoptive parents, typically in- parents, adopted children, birth par- regard, however andin almost ev- cluding face-to-face meetings and ents, and adoption agencies. We were ery instancethe problem was that telephone calls. able to carry out the study with the the adoptive parent wanted more con- Almost two-thirds of the fully dis- assistance of funding from the Hogg tact with the birthparent rather than closed adoptions did not start that Foundation for Mental Health, the less contact. In these instances, the way Although they began as mediated federal Office of Population Affairs, adoptive mother or father typically or confidential adoptions, trust and the National Institute of Child Health felt that the lack of contact was ei- mutual respect were gradually estab- and Human Development, the Min- ther a unilateral decision by the lished between adoptive parents and nesota Agricultural Experiment Sta- birthparent or sometimes an agency the birthmothers until mutual deci- tion, and the University Research In- decision or policy sions were made to share full identi- stitute of The University of Texas at There were a number of reasons fying information. Austin. Adoptive families and birth moth- ers were recruited for our study ',EDITOR'S NOTE through 35 adoption agencies located across the United States. We sought 'There are an estimated five million adoptees in the United States. Ap- families in which: (1) there was at 1 proximately forty million individuals in this country have been touched by adoptioneither as adoptees, adoptive parents, or birthparents whose least one adopted child between ages 4 and 12 at the time of the interview children have been placed in adoptive homes. The institution of adoption who was adopted through an agency is as old as humankind. Adoptive placements into loving homes are the best possible permanency planning outcome for children who cannot, for prior to age one; (2) the adoption was death, poor not transracial, international, or "spe- a variety of reasons (such as unplanned pregnancy, poverty, cial needs"; and (3) the adoptive par- parenting skills), be raised by their birthparents. Adoption is an ever-present ents were married to the partner they overlay to family life. It has lifelong effects upon all members of the "adop- had at the time of the adoption. tion triad" (child, adoptive parents, birthparents) as well as upon siblings We simultaneously sought and extended family members. In this issue of Focal Point, we explore the birthmothers who made adoption impact of adoption upon adoptees and their adoptive families. plans for children placed with these 0 SP111116 1996 Foct4toiu sic information, such as the age of the why adoptive parents wanted more birthmother at the time of the birth. contact and felt unable to bring it This finding is not surprising in light about. Sometimes parents adopted a of the fact that some of the children child through the confidential pro- were unaware of the contact and shar- cess, but later adopted another child ing, and some were too young to un- with more openness and then wanted derstand the situation clearly. How- to open up the earlier adoption so that ever, virtually all of the children, no the older child would have contact . matter what type of adoption they with his or her own birthparent(s), had, wanted to know more about their as well. In other cases, the adoptive birthparents. The following quotes parents wanted more contact at a time I illustrate their desire for information: in life when the birthmother felt the "1 felt fine about asking. I just need to have less. Perhaps she was asked and my dad told me. I guess I were based on the actual birthparents' marrying someone who did not favor got curious about it 'cause I'm here, life circumstances. ongoing contact with the family that who did it and who was I? And my The reasons for not having fear adopted her child, or perhaps she dad says like I kept on asking my were also very different across levels moved away because of a career op- neighbors and teachers like 'was it of openness. Families with confiden- portunity or a new relationship. you?' but it was none of them. And I tial and mediated adoptions cited the The general picture that emerged, asked questions like 'what is the color degree of openness selected and their however, was one in which adoptive of her hair?" (10-year-old girl, fully control over information shared as parents expressed satisfaction with disclosed adoption). their primary reasons for having no the way that the degree of openness "Sometimes I make my tummy so fear. The legal and social barriers in- was working in their family. For fami- upset that I throw up. I'm worried herent in their types of adoption pro- lies with more open adoptions. the [that] my birthmom might not have tected them from the realities of re- concern that openness would lead to a husband." (6-year-old girl, mediated claiming. However, parents in fully unwanted intrusion seems ground- adoption). disclosed adoptions cited impressions less. "If they're dead or if they're about their children's birthparents, Adoptive parents did discuss an- alive." (6-year-old boy, confidential the actual birthparents' life circum- other type of fear, however; the fear adoption). stances, and statements made by the that the birthmother might try to re- I Children with less information children's birthparents most fre- claim the child born to her. In con- about birthparents tended to wonder quently as reasons for not having fear trast to the predictions by opponents most about their health, well-being, of reclaiming. They often spoke of of openness, the lowest degrees of fear and what they looked like. Children birthparents who specifically stated of reclaiming were in the ongoing with more information or contact that they would never try to take a fully disclosed adoptions. In fact. tended to wonder most about when child from his or her adoptive parents. 77.2% of adoptive mothers and 82.5% they would see the birthparents again, of adoptive fathers in fully disclosed about birthsiblings they had not met, PERSPECTIVES OF THE CHILDREN. adoptions indicated "no fear" of re- and what the birthparents have been How do the children themselves claiming. from doing since they last heard from them. information about feel The reasons for having fear of re- I Most of the children currently their knowing birthparents, claiming differ strikingly as a func- desired some information about their birthparents, or not having any con- tion of whether the adoptive parents birthparents. However, some of the nection with them? In order to un- have a personal relationship with the adoptive parents had not yet shared derstand the child's point of view, the birthmother. In confidential and me- information received from the 90 male and 81 female children from diated adoptions, the most frequently birthmothers. In these situations, the adoptive families were asked to cited reason for fear of reclaiming was adoptive parents must consider a participate in the study as well. Fifty- parents' about stereotypes gradual revelation of the information families seven of the children were in birthparents developed from general- in stages determined by the age, de- that had confidential adoptions, 59 ized experiences and knowledge. The velopmental level, and receptiveness were in families with mediated adop- second most frequent reason for fear of the child. tions, and 55 were in families with in confidential adoption was other Young children seem to derive fully disclosed adoptions. people's experiences with adoption benefit from contact with their In their interviews, 22 of the chil- including "horror stories," media por- the birthparents, reaffirming dren in mediated adoptions and 3 in trayals, and widely publicized court birthparents' love and providing op- fully disclosed adoptions indicated cases. In the very few ongoing fully portunities to explain the circum- that they either had no information disclosed adoptions showing dny evi- stances that led to the adoption plan. about their birthparents or only ba- dence of fear, however, these concerns 6 101111A10.1111.1 For example, as one eight-year-old is impossible to predict the needs of the parties (e.g., flexibility, tolerance if my child stated: asked "I any one child regarding openness, it for ambiguity), knowledge of agency birthmother still loved me and my is likely that most children desire in- practices, availability of options, and mom goes, 'Of course she does.' My formation about their birthparents, agency pre-adoption counseling. mom says she does and I believe her, possible birthsiblings, and their ge- Third, since many of the fully dis- 'cause every time my birthmother netic heritage. It is important to take closed adoptions evolved gradually comes up to see us, she's always hug- cues from the childare questions over time, our findings may not be ging me and stuff." begin asked? If not, discussions applicable to adoptions that begin Also, birthparents may gradually should be initiated and information completely openly without a period reduce contact as they begin to marry offeredproviding an opportunity of relationship building or without and parent children or as they become for the child to give feedback about adoption agency personnel to assist assured that the aaopted children are readiness to hear information or meet in the preparation process. Finally, safe and well. Some of the children in birthparents. It is important to be sen- our sample only included two-parent this study spoke about this kind of sitive to the children and let them families who adopted same-race in- decrease in contact or their perceived fants through private adoption provide their input when adoptive lack of contact: agencies. Any generalizations be- parents are making decisions for what "Couldn't we just stop talking is age-appropriate inclusion in the yond a similar group must be made about my birthmother? It's making openness. with caution. me sad. Because she used to live real Our many discussions with near us and now she doesn't, and I'd birthmothers, adoptive parents, SELECTED ADOPTION RESOURCES like to see her....The only things that adopted children, and agency profes- bother me about Sara [birthmother[ sionals have shown us that openness Adoptive FamilieS of AMeriCa is I never get to see her." (7-year- in adoption is an ongoing process 3333 Highway 100 North old girl, ongoing fully disclosed rather than a final state. Relationships Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 adoption). that work the best seem to be those (612) 535-4829 (voice) Clearly, if contact has begun be- that can evolve mutually over time. (612) 535 -7808 (fax) tween an adopted child and a Initially, the)., appear to fall well birthparent and circumstances arise National Adoption Center within the participants' limits of ac- that necessitate reducing the contact, 1500 Walnut Street; Suite 701 ceptability, and the relationship pro- Philadelphia, Perinsilvania 19102 it becomes important for birth and cess toward greater openness is inter- (800) TO-ADOPT (voice) adoptive parents to consider implica- actively determined by all those (215) 7354410 (fax) tions for the child and to develop al- involved. ternatives that help maintain the con- Perfect harmony in the evolving National AdoptiOn Information tact over time. Clearinghouse relationship might only be seen in the 5640:Nicholson Lane, Suite 300 ideal world, however. Our data sug- GENERAL DISCUSSION AND Rockville, Maryland 20852 gest that what may be "best" for one (301) .2316512:(voice) CONCLUSIONS. party in the adoption triad at a given (301) 984.852 (fax) The face of adoption in the United time may not be "best" for other par-. States has changed dramatically in the ties. Furthermore, parties' needs for North American Council last decade and will likely continue greater or lesser openness may change on Adoptable Children to do so. Changes in societal attitudes over time and not always in syn- 970 Raymond Avenue, Suite 106 about sexuality and parenting, the chrony with other triad members. St.: Paul; Minnesota 55114-1149 supply and demand for babies, and (612) 644-3036 jvciice) Readers should be aware that this experience with "new" forms of adop- (612) 644-9848 (fax) study, just as all research studies in tion suggest that American adoptions the social sciences, has limitations. National CoUncil for Adoption, Inc. will continue to become more open Participants were all volunteers, so 1930 17th Street; N.WH in the future. This means that parents, they may not be representative of all Washington, D. C: 20009- educators, adoption workers, mental families who have adopted children (202) 328-1200 (voice) health professionals, and the public nor of all women who have made (202) 332=0935 (fax) at large will need to be better in- adoption plans for their infants. Sec- , - National Resource tenter for formed about such family arrange- ond, it is impossible to make causal Special Needs Adoption ments in order to be responsive to the statements about the "effects" of dif- Spaulding for children needs of all triad members and re- ferent levels of openness, because 16250 Northlandpriire; SUite 120 spectful of their experiences. there were many factors that contrib- Sonthville, Michigan 48075 Every adopted child will have a uted to birthmothers' and adoptive (810) 443- 7080:-Svoice) unique set of feelings and reactions families" decisions about openness .(810) 44377099, (fax) to his or her own adoption. While it levels. These included personalities of VCR 1016 FRAM MID-LIFE REFLECTIONS ON ADOPTION LOOKING TO THE FUTURE. The participants in our study were CONTINUED FROM PAGE ONE interviewed between 1987 and 1992, of nurture over nature and concretely How did my first house come to when the children were between the by placing infants in foster homes for be so empty? By what process did the ages of four and twelve. We plan to at least six months so that develop- second one become filled? The image re-contact all our participants in or- ment could be carefully observed and of emptiness or a void is common to der to check in on their lives and ex- measured. In the words of my adop- adult adoptees, even those who are periences once again as the children tion records I "would need to be six considered well-adjusted and success- reach adolescence. What changes will months of age so that the agency ful. One would think that this image have occurred in the level of open- was] an appro- could determine if would be least likely to occur in those ness in the family's adoption, if any? priate child for adoption." They adoptees who, like me, were born in How does a personal relationship needed to "determine that [I was] free the year the Good War (Terkel, 1984) with one's family of birth influence of any mental or physical problems ended or soon after (the Baby the adopted child's struggle with the that would prevent placement with an Boomers) for we are the legacy of a identity questions that face all ado- adoptive family...since [they] only unique era in the history of adop- lescents? What kinds of social sup- had half of [my] medical and genetic tionan era that combined the pre- ports have been most helpful to our history." And that was not promising. cepts of the pre-war eugenics move- participants over the years? What ser- Not only had my birthmother of ment with societal acceptance vices do they wish they could have been unable or unwilling to name my stranger adoptions as a desirable way had? The rapid change in attitudes birthfather, but she was labeled by the to create a family. toward adoption and social policy in intake social worker as "promiscuous, If the Depression era promise of our country makes it critically impor- not too bright, with a speech and at- prosperity was "a chicken in every pot tant for us to continue learning from titude suggesting little culture and and a car in every garage," the post- the experiences of the parties in- advantage in life." It was only after a World War II equivalent was "a wife volved in these forms of adoption. psychologist had seen me at the age in every house and a child in every of six months and pronounced me family." Rosie the Riveter had been Center for Social Work RUTH G. McROY, PH.D.. developing "at a somewhat advanced forced out of the factory and back into Research, University of Texas at Austin, rate" and "very attractive with large her domestic role, the nuclear family 1925 San Jacinto, Austin, Texas 78712- blue eyes" that the agency began to had become the accepted standard, 1703, (512) 471-9832, (512)471-9514 actively seek termination of my and children were the electrons (if I (fax); birthmothees parental rights. Notice bound may use a dated image) that D. HAROLD I did not say, seek an adoptive family. the unit into a cohesive, functioning GROTEVANT, PH.D.. My adoptive parents knew about me system. It was into this post-war so- Family Social Sci- from the time I was born. Finally, the cial milieu that healthy infants like me ence, College of day before my first birthday, my were brokered by the agents of public Human Ecology, birthmother succumbed to relentless morality who decreed that every mari- University of Min- agency pressure and consigned me to tal dyad should have a child of its own. nesota, 290 As one author, Reid, put it, the void. McNeal Hall, 1985 Harold Grotevant I have often thought of her in the "Agencies...attempted to convince the Buford Avenue, St. years since I bought the non-identi- public that they could guarantee them Paul, Minnesota 55108, (612) 624- fying social information to which I a perfect child; that by coming to an 3756 (voice), (612) 625-4227 (fax), e- was now as an adult reluctantlybut agency, adoptive parents could be sure mail:[email protected]. umn.edu; legallyentitled. What must it have that the child was without physical, Center for SUSAN AYERS-LOPEZ, M.ED.. been like to never be able to see me, emotional or mental defect...and Social Work Research, University of or hold me, to have to deal with so- adopting a child was a far less risky Texas at Austin, (512) 471-0550 cial workers who labeled her, to suf- procedure than having one normally" (voice), (512) 471-9514 (fax). Ex- fer the shame as well as the pain of What a strange paradox, given that cerpted with permission from Chang- my birth all so that the post-war de- most of us came from birthmothers ing Practices in Adoption, Hogg Foun- mand for children could be assuaged. who were considered immoral tramps dation for Mental Health 1994, The But I feel no less for my adoptive par- and birthfathers who were deemed so University of Texas, Austin, Texas ents who not only were caught in the irrelevant that until 1972 they had no 78713-7998. social mores of the time but, who legal rights to their children. Stanley Note: Space limitations do not allow Editor's were also, as I later came to know, v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). inclusion of birthparents' and agencies' perspec- excellent parents who suffered also in Agencies dealt with the dilemma tives on the topic of open adoption. These per- the hands of the all-powerful givers inherent in this position by embrac- spectives are included in the Hogg Foundation monograph which is available through the above of babies, more powerful than God in ing an exaggerated belief in the power address. 0 7 YOLIMI Ill. 80.1 FOCIAINT In what I their ability to give or withhold chil- adults (adoptees) to freely associate dren. My parents often talked about have come to with whomever they choose their increasing anxiety as my view as one of (birthparents)? Certainly American birthmother dragged her feet with the the cruelest slavery laws had such an intent and acts of emo- relinquishment while they grew older effect. Adoption and slavery laws (almost fortythe cut-off point in tional depriva- share a remarkable feature: both those days), and their outright fear tion that could adoptees and slaves are or were bound that the agency would renege on its have ever been by contracts to which they were not commitment to them and give me to committed by parties. someone else. "well-mean- A few weeks ago I realized in a But that didn't happen and, at the ing" authori- graphic way just how successful the age of thirteen ftionths, I went home ties against an lie had been. I was with a group of to a set of earnest parents, a flock of infant, the blue teddy bear given to friends who were going around the doting aunts and uncles, and a blank me by my birthmother on my first circle telling three-year-old Olivia (an slate. In keeping with the norm of the Christmas was not with me on the day adopted child) whose "tummy" each time, my parents were told virtually of ,my adoption. In fact, I came into person had come out of. Olivia had nothing about my background. As my adoptive family with nothing at started the game by saying she had Ann Hartman, in her chapter "Secrecy allno teddy bear, no clothes (the come out of her birthmother Maria's in Adoption" in the book Secrets in ones I was wearing had to be returned tummy. When my turn came, I was Families and Family Therapy, writes to the agency), and no history. And speechless. I literally could not think " (Al nything that makes adoption dif- so began the building of the empty of what to say even though I know ferent must be denied or minimized." house. my birthmother's name. The game This "rejection of difference" was per- I wonder, what was it like for went on and then came back to me. I vasive in the adoption industry of adoptive parents to have a thirteen- managed to blurt out, "I came out of thirty to fifty years ago. The most ef- month-old child thrust into their 's [my birthmother] tummy." fective way to accomplish this was to arms with nothing but a name and to But the wordswhen I heard them break completely and irrevocably the now have to play out the fiction that sounded like the lines of a play writ- bond between birth family and adop- they instantly had a baby exactly like ten in a language that I didn't under- tive family (done legally) and to tell a biological family? It says so right on stand. They had no meaning, no the adoptive parents as little as pos- my birth certificate. In the words of emotion, no sense of attachment. sible about the adopted child's bio- the State Registrar of the Bureau of And, unfortunately, no piece of logical history or past life. I would Vital Statistics: "We are now required paper can dictate attachment. Judith guess that at the point that I was fi- to file an entirely new record of birth Modell in Kinship with Strangers de- nally handed. over to my parents all for your daughter...indicating you...as scribes the intricate system and pre- they wanted to do was "get out of the natural parents. We shall be cedents that have. evolved over the Dodge"get out of that agency and pleased to do this." years in American adoption law with out of that town as quickly as pos- For $1.50 the state was happy to every case up until the 1970's focus- sibleno questions asked. provide a certified lie. I remember the ing on reproducing a family system We all wept the night I read my first time I saw my birth certificate. I parents the three-page summary of wondered what else on it was false. I 141 social information I had bought from wondered what else about my life was the adoption agency in 1989. My a lie. Perhaps that was the origin for ANNUAL BUILDING ON: FAMILY mother kept shaking her head as I the pervasive feeling I had through- -STRENGTHS CONFERENCE read and saying over and over again, out my growing up years that my ev- 11A y:8-110; 1997 "We were told none of this. We had -Hitiori eryday life was a dream from which I no idea what your first year of life was would one day awaken and find -FI3OirnA.Nai OREGON my- like." They were not given the poi- self to be someone else. -For Additional Information: gnant letter found in those records, What could I really believe if even Kaye Exo,.M.S.W., written to them by my last foster the most basic legal document every- Conference:COordinatcir mother, whom the record describes . 'Ipteaearc1i and Training Center one possesses was a lie? And now 1 . as very attached to me. She describes on F,amily,Suppor & Children's wonder whether there . are other pre- Menial1.14W my favorite foods, my words and ges- cedents in American law for certify- . tures, my love of music, my daily rou- ing a document as the truth that is tines and closes with: "My only plea known to be false. Are there other sets please let her retire with her blue :-"TPD: (503) 725 -4165 of laws (like adoption statutes) that Fax: (503) 725-4180 teddy bear for the time being. Thank allow states to forever abridge and E- Mail:[email protected] you and God bless you." abrogate the rights of one group of 0 8 1/111161991 FOCIAINT dicting successful adoption. did not want a reunion and I am hon- that looked like a blood relationship. My adoptive parents began the oring her choice to remain hidden Numerous books on adoption empha- process of helping build a furnished sized the social worker's role in from me. But I know that she is alive house when they first shared what and well and that my brother and I matching the birthmother's hair and little they knew (including my have four half-brothers and sisters, eye color, education, national origin birthmother's name), when they ac- and that was enough to start the pro- and religion to the adoptive parents knowledged that their Scandinavian particularly to the adoptive mother. cess of filling a house. fascination with their ancestors had I believe that there was a particu- Somehow, if those differences were no meaning for me, when they re- lar defining moment when the pro- minimized, then environment and fused to get defensive throughout my cess of filling a house began. The nurture would take over to produce teenage identity-crisis years, when woman doing my search called one a child whose temperament fit the they cried with the happiness of day to say, "I think I've found her." family, who was indistinguishable knowing something of my first year We had had one false start despite the from the natural-born children of the of life and when the more different I fact that my birthmother's name was extended family, and who felt right at became as an adult the more they con- quite unusual. "Shall 1 go the next home. In my case, this primitive at- tinued to love and accept me. step? Are you ready?" I said, "Yes," tempt at quasi-genetic matching was Two of my closest friends (one, my hung up the phone and waited. at least partially botched. I ended up former partner) helped me continue About a half hour later she called with a fiery temper and sharp tongue the process by finding the search back and said, "I had the most un- in a family of Lake Wobegon Norwe- worker for me, by listening patiently gians, dark hair in a pack of blond canny experience after I talked to you. and endlessly to my inner struggles cousins, and an all-encompassing I called the number and this woman as my adult self continued to be answered and I almost hung up be- feeling of being different that goes shaped by new information and cause I though I had accidentally back so far in my memory as to be thenin a joyous act of lovegave said, "She called you again." preverbal. I me a new blue teddy bear just as I Was sounded like me, didn't she?" "Yes," Soon after receiving the non-iden- about to embark on a year-long soli- tifying social information six years the searcher replied, "exactly." "That tary sabbatical away from everything doesn't surprise me," I said, "I have ago, I hired an adoption social worker and everyone I knew. always believed that 1 would know my gone bad to .find my birthmother. I And, finally, I think the acceptance was 45 years old. I believed my mother by her voice." At that instant of difference took a curious twist and an overwhelming sense of connection birthmother was about 62 years old. came back to the face of my daughter washed over me, and I knew that I Not old yet, but entering that age whereon my first glimpse of her when something could carry her off had a family and a history. I embraced a likeness to myself, to my I'm over 50 years old now, healthy, before I found her. Like most adoptees birthparents and to my history. Thus, with good parental relationships, I well-educated, and modestly success- it is now, in mid-life, that the strange, had thought I would wait until my ful at what I do. I have a daughter to empty house has been transcended by whom I am fiercely attached, a adoptive parents died before embark- the everyday familiarity of my life and brother with whom I share not only ing on my pilgrimage of genetic dis- I am at peace. genetic endowment but an almost covery. But three things had changed uncanny psychic affinity, friends to CAROL YTTRI my mind. First, my parents had al- whom I am close, a collection of ways been honest with me and my REFERENCES foundling animals whom I adore, and adopted brother (who is genetically Hartman, A. (1993). Secrecy in adoption.. a calm acceptance of who I am. my half-brother) and some years be- In E. Imber-Black (Ed.) Secrets in So who gets the credit? My fore had told us our birthmother's Families and Family Therapy (pp. 86- 105). New York: Norton. birthparents whoin spite of society's name which they had surreptitiously Kirk, D. (1964). Shared fate: A theory of censuregave me a stalwart genetic noticed on adoption paperwork. Sec- adoption and mental health. New York: start? The adoption agency workers ond, they were healthy 80-somethings Free Press. likely to be around for many more who selected so skillfully? (Like Dave Modell, J.S. (1994). Kinship with strangers: Thomas of the Wendy's restaurant years. And, third, I had been fortu- Adoption and interpretations of kinship chain. I probably could be another nate to have them in my life long Berkeley: culture. American in poster child for the industry.) My University of California Press. enough to have made peace with our Reid, J. (1963). Principles, values and adoptive parents who reared me and differences. Thus, I no longer feared assumptions underlying adoption their reaction if I told them what I had loved me? practice. In E. Smith (Ed.) Readings in In the end I think it comes down done; nor did I feel the need to pro- adoption (pp. 24-30). New York: Child to what David Kirk said thirty years tect them any longer from whomever Welfare League. I of Adop- 1 might turn out to be. ago in Shared Fate: A Theory Terkel, S. (1984). The "Good War": An oral As it stands now, I have no great history of World War II. New York: tion and Mental Health: acceptance of Pantheon Books. difference is the major variable in pre- reunion story to tell. My birthmother 0 9 VOLUME 10.40.1 fOCOOINT EMOTIONAL DISORDERS IN ADOPTED CHILDREN AND YOUTH choice to place. They may fear that sychological risks associated with P their adoptive parents will reject them adoption have been the subject of and feel depression, anger and guilt numerous studies over the past sev- associated with the loss of their eral decades. Although it is estimated birthparents (Berman and Bufferd, that about 2% of the child population 1986). As adopted children reach ado- under 18 in the United States have lescence, they seek an integrated iden- been adopted by non-relatives, about tity and may find that their lack of 10-15% of children in residential treatment facilities are adopted information about their birthparents, their heritage and reasons for relin- (Brodzinsky, 1993). According to the quishment leads them to grieve for research literature, adopted children these lost relationships and loss of are referred for psychological treat- important information which may ment two to five times as frequently help them to develop a stable ego as their nonadopted peers. This find- identity (McRoy et al., 1988). Studies ing has been replicated in countries of the etiology of emotional disorders as widely dispersed as Great Britain, in adopted adolescents have typically Israel, Poland, Sweden and the United focused on clinical populations of States (Grotevant & Mc Roy, 1990; ing behaviors, such as aggressive, pro- children in traditional confidential Mc Roy, Grotevant, and Zurcher, vocative, and anti-social behaviors adoptions in which very littleif (Eiduson 6z Livermore, 1953; 1988). These studies have typically anyinformation was available to Schechter, Carolson, Simmons & included populations of children who adoptive parents or to adopted chil- were adopted as infants and placed Work, 1964; Menlove, 1965; Simon dren about their birthparents. This and Senturia, 1966; Goodman and with childless couples. article presents a brief synopsis of the Magno-Nora, 1975; Jackson, 1968; Wilson (1985) and Warren (1992) findings and implications of the au- Offord, Aponte, & Cross, 1969; have suggested that the higher inci- thors' research on familial and con- Brinich, 1980). Some studies have dence of referrals for adopted children textual factors associated with the to mental health settings, may result shown higher instances of borderline placement of adopted children in resi- personality (Schechter et al.; Simon from several factors including: (1) the dential treatment settings. greater likelihood that adoptive par- and Senturia, 1962), eating disorders Research Design. In the mid-80's, ents will attribute even somewhat (Holden, 1991), substance abuse the authors' initiated a comparative (Bowman and von Knorring, 1979; minor problems to the child's adop- study of a population of adopted and tion or to unknown hereditary fac- and Hoden, 1991), learning disabili- non-adopted adolescents in residen- ties (Silver, 1970 &1989) and atten- tors; (2) the adoptive family may feel tial treatment settings in order to iden- tion deficit hyperactivity disorder unduly vulnerable to rejection by the tify familial and other contextual fac- (Dickson, Heffron, and Parker, 1990; adopted child which may lead to mal- tors associated with the placement of Deutsch, Swanson, Bruehll, et al., adaptive reactive defenses by parents adopted children in residential treat- and child; (3) the social stigma asso- 1982), than non-adopted children in ment for emotional disorders. Fifty ciated with adoption may influence clinical settings. adopted adolescents in residential some families to seek help if family Research literature suggests that treatment and their families as well the greatest psychological risk for integrity is threatened due to prob- as fifty non-adopted adolescents and adopted children occurs during the lems of their adopted child; (4) adop- their families participated in the study. middle childhood and adolescent tive parents may be more accustomed All participants were associated with to seeking help from social service years. It is at this stage that the child 14 residential treatment centers lo- agencies and may be more likely to is cognitively capable of fully consid- cated in Texas and Minnesota and had ering the meaning of adoption and seek help than non-adoptive parents; been adopted before the age of two and (5) adoptive parents tend to be reasons for their birthparents' deci- and were between the ages of 11 and more economically advantaged than sion to relinquish them (Brodzinsky, 18 at the time of the study. Interviews Singer and Braff, 1984; Brodzinsky, the general population and may there- were conducted with adoptive fathers, fore be more likely to seek mental 1990; McRoy, Grotevant, Ayers- adoptive mothers, adopted adoles- health services for their children. Lopez, and Furuta, 1990; Brodzinsky, cents and the caseworker or therapist Regardless of the reasons for the 1993). Between the ages of eight and for each child and family. The adop- eleven, adopted children are able to high incidence of referrals, studies of tive sample consisted of twenty-six adopted children in clinical settings reflect on the alternatives to relin- males and twenty-four females rang- quishment and may express anger have reported that adopted chirdren ing in age from 11-17 (mean age = that their birthparents made the are more likely to exhibit extenializ- n SPRIIG 1998

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.