ebook img

ERIC ED384166: Psychological and Social Adjustment of Visually Impaired Youth: 1936-1992. PDF

23 Pages·1992·0.31 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED384166: Psychological and Social Adjustment of Visually Impaired Youth: 1936-1992.

DOCUMENT RESUME EC 304 002 ED 384 166 Beaty, Lee A. AUTHOR Psychological and Social Adjustment of Visually TITLE Impaired Youth: 1936-1992. PUB DATE [92) 23p. NOTE Information Analyses (070) PUB TYPE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *Interpersonal Child Behavior; *Emotional Adjustment; DESCRIPTORS Competence; Personality Traits; Psychological Studies; *Self Concept; Self Esteem; *Social Adjustment; Social Behavior; *Visual Impairments ABSTRACT The empirical research on psychological and social impairments is adjustment of children and adolescents with visual functioning of reviewed. The dichotomy between deficit and nondeficit that some these youths is explored. Personality research suggests deficits in self-concept youth with visual impairments display minor of these and self-esteem. It is noted that although the results evidence in self-concept studies are contradictory, there ie more evidence in favor of favor of than opposed to such deficits. The negative social functioning and increased interpersonal less ineffectiveness among youth with visual impairments is somewhat of contradictory. Implications of the findings within the context (Contains 33 current cultural perspectives are discussed. references.) (SW) *********************************************************************** be made Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can from the original document. *****************************************i***************************** US. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) E4his document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it C Minor changes nave been made to mon.... reproduction Quality docu- a Points of view or opinions stated in this ment do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL ADIUSTMENT OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED YOUTH: 1936-1992 Lee A. Beaty, Ph.D. Northeastern Illinois University Counselor Education Program O O PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY 2 TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES ;NFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) BEST COPY AVAILABLE This paper reviews the existing empirical research on Abstract: adolescents psychological and social adjustment of children and The dichotomy between deficit and with visual impairments. Implications non-deficit functioning of these youth is explored. cultural of these findings within the context of current perspectives are discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION not youth The dilemma of attempting to determine whether or well with handicaps are psychologically and socially less For one. adjusted than their non-handicapped peers is a puzzlin who work counselors, teachers, and other helping professionals literature is with these youth, the psychological and educational inconsistent and contradictory relative to personal and This dilemma is certainly no less interpersonal adjustment. puzzling for youth who experience serious vision problems, What, then, is the whether totally blind or partially sighted. issues facing nature of some of these important psychosccial An examination of relevant empirical visually impaired youth? studies provides some answers, but there is really no consensus these about the effects of visual problems and vision loss on overview of It is the purpose of this paper to provide an youth. this issue. the historical and contemporary perspectives on has In the visual impairment field, personality research impaired focused on two primary hypotheses: (a) that visually psychological "problems" and (b) persons exhibit a variety of dysfunction that they display "common" patterns of social This perspective has (Ammerman, Van Hasselt, & Hersen, 1986). from many years of studies which have tended to support result It seems that many psychologists and such a zsfunctional view. deficits educators have tended to favor evidence in support of have been when visually impaired and non-impaired persons 4 2 literature is based It is true that much of the extant compared. which date from the 1930s); however, on older studies (some of understanding within the this only increases the need for better adjustment and context of current perspectives on psychosocial functioning. PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT AND FUNCTIONING the Let us begin with an examination of some of For deficit-oriented studies of general personality development. (CPI), example, using the California Psychological Inventory passivity in Joffe and Bast (1978) noted less aggression and more Burlingham (1979) blind youth than in partially sighted youth. balance suggested that visually impaired children must constantly independence with a realistic need for a need for increasing in feelings of dependence on their sighted peers, thus resulting inadequacy. Petrucci's (1953) study of blind residential school children Inventory and adolescents utilized the Bemreuter Personality for She found that 78% of he:: subjects had a greater need (BPI). sociability, 73% were less self-sufficient, 71% were less confident, 67% were more introverted, and 22% were more However, an older study submissive than sighted norm subjects. Psychological by Hastings (1947), also using the California impaired and Inventory, found no differences between visually sighted children and adolescents in grades one through 12. 3 isolated Hastings's study provides an interesting though exception to the deficiency orientation. and With the use of both the BPI and the CPI, Greenberg blind subjects were Jordon (1957) found only that their totally Hardy subjects. less authoritative than their partially sighted Blind (ASB), (1968), who developed the Anxiety Scale for the He found that examined blind adolescents and young adults. but that anxiety increased with age (not a surprising finding), and intelligence there was an inverse correlation between anxiety functioning, the lower that is, the higher one's intellectual The latter finding is one which is one's level of anxiety. in difficult to evaluate since there is little related research this area, at least with respect to vi3ually impaired youth. Within the context of these general personality studies, we Tuttle (1984), who has self. can include the concept of ego or studied the process of adjusting to blindness, defined the "The perceptions and feelings an concept of self as follows: individual has about the self, whether realistic or not, Thus, cumulatively mold and shape the self-concept (p. 63)." attributes self-concept could be described as the collection of which an individual uses to characterize himself/herself. Fitts (1965), author of the Tennessee Self Concept Scale imo five (TSCS), separated this collection of attributes self, categories: physical self, personal self, moral/ethical Fitts further suggested that both social self, and family self. in the cognitive and affective dimensions are represented 4 is dependent both on self-concept; that is, our sense of self about who we are. who we think we are and how we feel self-concept and Coopersmith (1967) has distinguished between is actually derived self-esteem by pointing out that self-esteem In other words, the degree to from the affective dimension. about themselves which people feel positively or negatively Coopersmith also determines the magnitude of their self-esteem. attitude of approval or felt that self-esteem represented an and by disapproval which individuals maintain about themselves capability, competence, and which they establish their sense of type Thus, one could correctly describe self-esteem as a worth. shaping individuals' of internal evaluation which assists in self-perceptions. examining There have been a considerable number of studies self-concept/self- the interaction between visual impairment and 1981). esteem during the past 30 years (Cook-Clampert, conclusions from the Unfortunately, it is difficult to draw firm in agreement results of these studies since they tend not to be Jervis In one of the earliest of these studies, with each other. sighted adolescents (1959) compared the self-concept of blind and Few between-group differences were noted by means of interviews. about their except that blind students seemed more concerned (In other positions. futures and tended to endorse more extreme low responses to words, these students chose artificially high or Zunich and Ledwith (1965), using an unidentified items.) Few children. self-concept scale, measured blind and sighted 7 5 they did differences between groups were observed, although to endorse replicate Jervis's finding that blind subjects tended more extreme positions. impaired college In the first empirical study of visually enrolled in students, Smith (1969) surveyed 55 college students A total of 27 of these students had attended a 33 institutions. pre-college orientation program sponsored by the. Arkansas had gone Enterprises for the Blind, while the other 28 students Using the Tennessee Self directly from high school to college. post-test Concept Scale, administered during a pretest and two in this sessions, Smith reported that, on 22 of the 29 subscales instrument, students who had attended the program exhibited In addition, he also higher self-concept than those who had not. reported that these same students exhibited lower levels of anxiety and higher persistence at the end of their freshman year. Meighan (1971) used the TSCS with visually impaired He reported negative adolescents from residential schools. results for all the dimensions of self-concept measured by Unfortunately, much of the potential strength this instrument. his of these results is negated by the fact that Meighan compared adolescent scores to norm group scores (which were based on a sample of heterogeneous persons ranging in age from 12 to 68 exclusively Thus, it may be questionable to compare an years). Head (1979), adolescent sample with these diverse norm subjects. using the same instrument, was not able to replicate Meighan's He found no significant differences in (1971) results. 6 various educational self-concept for students who were placed in social settings in terms of personal self, physical self, or self. Piers-Harris Self On the other hand, Coker (1979), using the impaired Concept Scale, found that his sample of visually In a sighted norms. children exhibited bstter self-concept than found that a sample of blind and more recent study, Beaty (1992) the low-vision urban students exhibited self-concept scores on In sighted students. TSCS lower than a comparison sample of particular, the family self subscale and moral/ethical self different. subscale scores of these groups were significantly these Therefore, it is important to realize that the findings of self-concept studies with visually impaired children and At the present time it is not adolescents are not in agreement. determination as to w-ether or not the easy to make a precise self-concept/self- esteem of visually impaired youth is lower sighted than, higher than, or roughly equivalent to that of This must therefore raise serious questions about the peers. validity of assuming that a deficit orientation is necessarily an appropriate conclusion. SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT AND FUNCTIONING Like personality research in the field of visual impairment, studies on social functioning of visually impaired inconsistencies. youth are replete with contradictions and 9 7 opinion that at least two However, there is some consensus of (a) that salient issues have emerged from these studies: social visually impaired persons have fewer and poorer visually experiences than their sighted peers and (b) that sometimes hostile impaired persons receive inadequate and Thus, these opinions suggest feedback from their sighted peers. for interpersonal that visually impaired youth may be at risk This perspective on social dysfunction (Ammerman, 1986). towards an adjustment is, like that on self-concept, oriented non-disabled essentially deficit vie-:;, of disabled versus persons. competence were carried Many of the older studies on social populations whose out utilizing instruments designed to assess social behavior were levels of intellectual ability and adaptive Little is gained by comparing developmentally subnormal. populations who are delayed populations with visually impaired It would not be overstating the not developmentally delayed. synthesis of the research on case to say that Ammerman's (1986) zulation of visual impairment and social adjustment is an acc which attempted to many years of research from numerous sources simply by suggest that visually impaired persons are "deviant" virtue of their specific handicap. of Much of the early research on the social functioning Social visually impaired youth was carried out using the Vineland This scale was a measure of Maturity Scale (VSMS) (Doll, 1947). checklist of general social competence consisting of a 10

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.