ebook img

ERIC ED343555: The Midlands Consortium Star Schools Project: Final Report, Final Evaluation Report, Final Evaluation Report Appendices. PDF

702 Pages·1991·18.1 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED343555: The Midlands Consortium Star Schools Project: Final Report, Final Evaluation Report, Final Evaluation Report Appendices.

DOCUMENT RESUME IR 015 422 ED 343 555 The Midlands Consortium Star Schools Project: Final TITLE Report, Final Evaluation Report, Firal Evaluation Report Appendices. Midlands Consortium. INSTITUTION Department of Education, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY PUB DATE 91 R203A80036 CONTRACT NOTE 827p. Vvorts - Research/Technical (143) -- PUB TYPE Tests/Evaluation Instruments (160) MF05/PC34 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE Advanced Courses; *Communications Satellites; DESCRIPTORS *Distance Education; Inservice Teacher Education; Intermediate Grades; Microcomputers; Postsecondary Education; Professional Development; *Program Evaluation; *Programing (Broadcast); Questionnaires; Secondary Education; *Staff Development; Tables (Data); Worksheets *Midlands Consortium; *Star Schools IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT The reports presented in this document describe the results of the first 2 years of the Midlands Consortium Star Schools Project (MCSSP) (October 1, 1988-December 31, 1990). The first report (1) the summarizes the major accomplishments of the MCSSP, including: Installation of communications satellites at schools in Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, and Oklahoma; (2) the production and delivery of four student credit courses (Basic English and Reading, Russian, and Spanish I and II) and four enrichment courses (genetics, (3) the "Moving Out and Moving On," PSAT/NMSQT, and Spanish I); production of eight courses by Oklahoma State University with indirect Star Schools support (Advanced Placement--AP--American Government, AP Calculus, AP Chemistry, AP Physics, Applied Economics, (4) provision German I and II, and Trigonometry/Analytic Geometry); of staff and professional development courses els well as training materials and conferences; and (5) the completion of research and evaluation activities. This report summarizes the projects by state, and provides 13 appendices with additional project information and materials. The second report, which focuses on the final evaluation of the project, contains the empirical findings of the Midlands Consortium Research and Evaluation Center based on the MCSSP results. This report discusses the chronology of research and evaluation, reviews the literature, and provides statistical data related to the educational effectiveness of communications satellites. This report also provides more than 200 references. The last of the three documents in this set contains the appendices to the final evaluation report. These include evaluation item banks, sample evaluation forms, researon agenda, sample requests for proposals, interim papers from selected participants reporting on aspects of communications satellite implementation, survey questionnaires, and needs assessment forms. References are included throughout this section. (DB) EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OP and Improvement Odrce o4 Educanonar Research INFORMATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES CENTER (ERICI reproduced as This document tat been organization received !torn the person or originating it been made to improve 1' Minor changes have reproduction quality staled in this docu Points ci view Of opinions represent official mant do not necessarily OERI position or policy CONSORTIUM THE MIDLANDS STAR SCHOOLS PROJECT FINAL REPORT Submitted to the United States Department of Education As required by Grant Award R203A80036, Star Schools Program 3 BEST COPY AMIABLE THE MIDLANDS CONSORTIUM STAR SCHOOLS PROJECT Final Report Csnicuts NARRATIVE 1 Project Personnel Executive Summary 4 Programming 4 Student Programming 7 Staff Development Programming 1 i Equipment 12 Alabama Project Summary 19 Kansas Project Summary 25 Mississippi Project Summary 30 Missouri Project Summary 34 Oklahoma Project Summary APPENDICES Summary Oklahoma State University's Staff Development Program Registration A. Inventory of Star Schools Equipment B . The Mississippi Star "Training Local Personnel for Distance Learning Programs: C. Schools Model" Sample Newspaper Articles on Mississippi Star Schools D. Programming Educational Satellite Network's (ESN) Staff Development E. Network Missouri School Boards Association (MSBA)/Educational Satellite F. Teleconferences Production Facilities of MSBA"s ESN G . ESN Missouri Member Sites H . Oklahoma Star Schools I. Sample Newspaper Articles on Oklahoma Star Schools J. Press Releases for Oklahoma Star Schools K . Other Articles on the Star Schools Project L. Letters of Endorsement M. University of Kansas' Research See Final Evaluation Report : Volumes I and II for findings of the and Evaluation Center. 3 1 MIDLANDS CONSORTIUM STAR SCHOOLS PROJECT Key Project Personnel: Dr. Kenneth H. McKinley, Dr. Malcom V. Phelps, Director Principal Investigator Oklahoma State University Oklahoma State University 408 Classroom Building 102 Gundersen Stillwater, OK 74078 Stillwater, OK 74078 (405) 744-6254 (405) 744-6508 Fax: (405) 744-7758 Lynn Geller, Mississippi State Director Nat Andrews, Alabama State Director University of Mississippi University of Alabama at Birmingham Yerby Center 1919 University Blvd. University, MS 38677 Birmingham, AL 35294 (601) 232-7644 (205) 934.7451 Dr. Constance M. Lawry, Hal Gardner, Missouri State Director (Year I) Oklahoma State Director Dr. Howard Jones, Director (Year II) 206 Life Sciences East Missouri School Boards Association Stillwater, OK 74078 21001-70 Drive, SW (405) 744-5647 Columbia, MO 65203 (314) 445-9920 Dr. John Poggio, REC Director Dr. Jerry Horn, Kansas State Director (Year I) University of Kansas Dr. Mel Chastain, Director (Year II) 115 Bailey Hall Kansas State University Lawrence, KS 66045 017 Bluemont Hall (913) 864-3726 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 (913) 532-7041 4 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY fulfilled all The Midlands Consortium Star Schools Project (MCSSP) is pleased to report that it objectives of the grant specified in the star schools grant proposal (as amended September 16, 1988) and in the Star Schools grant continuation proposal submitted May 15, 1989. The following is a report on the activities and accomplishments of the MCSSP during Year One (October 1, 1988 - September 30, 1989) familiar with and Year Two (October 1, 1989 - December 31, 1990). The report assumes that the reader is all quarterly the MCSSP grant proposal as amended September 16, 1988, the Year One Final Report, and progress reports. Following is a summary of the major accomplishments of the MCSSP: There have been 287 satellite receiving systems installed at participating schools in 1. Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. Each of these satellite receiving systems is unscrambled signal. Many additional systems have a dual band, steerable system using an been installed in Missouri by the Missouri School Boards Association in conjunction with the Midlands Consortium utilizing non-Star Schools funds. Virtually all of the schools which received the systems in the five partner states are participating in one or more of the student credit courses and many are also participating in educational professional development programming. Additionally, prudent utilization of federal funds has resulted in the ability of the consortium to install 36 additional satellite receiving systems in Kansas from the Year One budget. This was done by using federal funds to leverage local matching funds. These additional systems were ordered and were installed. Included were six demonstration sites strategically located across Kansas. All scheduled satellite programs have been produced by the Consortium and received by 2. participating schools, with one exception. The one exception, Improving Thinking Skills in the Classroom, was postponed until the Fall of 1990 due to low enrollment but was produced on the revised schedule beginning September 18, 1990. Of the courses for students produced with Star Schools grant support, the following enrollments were achieved: (a) Spanish I, 120 schools and 1,559 students in 10 states; (b) Spanish II, 30 5 3 schools and 120 students in 9 states; (c) Basic English and Reading, 64 schools and 955 students in 11 states; and (d) Russian, 28 schools and 170 students in 13 states. Additionally, the PSAT/NMSQT series was highly successful with 273 schools in 38 states enrolled. Production activities have continued according to schedule for all courses and staff 3. development programs to be produced, resulting in over 200 hours of professional development satellite programs during the project. Training materials mid conferences were held which prepared participating faculty and 4. administrators to benefit fully from satellite-based distance learning. A videotape which instructs teachers in the use of the satellite receiving equipment was disseminated. Research and evaluation activities were completed and new insights in the field of distance 5. education were obtained. The remainder of this report is organized as follows: programming carried out under a summary of the production and delivery of student 1. MCSSP sponsorship; for teachers and administrators produced a summary of the staff development programming 2. and delivered, wholly or in part, with MCSSP funds; MCSSP funds; and a compilation of the equipment purchased with 3. of the MCSSP conducted by a two volume report of the research and evaluation component 4. the University of Kansas Research and Evaluation Center. f; 4 PROGRAMMING Student Programming These courses The MCSSP produced four student credit courses with Star Schools grant funds. (2) Russian, (3) Spanish I, and (4) Spanish II. Four were: (1) Basic English and Reading [BEAR], & Moving On, enrichment courses for students were produced including: (1) Genetics, (2) Moving Out by Oklahoma State (3) PSAT/NMSQT, and (4) Spanish I. Eight additional courses were produced (1) AP American University with indirect Star Schools grant support. These eight courses were: Economics, (6) German I, Government, (2) AP Calculus, (3) AP Chemistry, (4) AP Physics, (5) Applied summarizes the (7) German II, and (8) Trigonometry/Analytic Geometry. The following table registrations for these classes. of the One indicator of the success of the MCSSP and the need for distance education programs enrollment. From 1989-90 to the 1990- type supported by the federal Star Schools funds is the increase in 91 school year, MCSSP enrollments inc,-..ased in 90.1% of the courses. 7 MIDLANDS CONSORTIUM STAR SCHOOLS PROJECT COURSE OFFERINGS atudgalsIgrams Foreign Language: COURSE PRODUCER OSU German I OSU German II OSU Russian Spanish I KSU Spanish II K SU Mathematics: MUM PRODUCER OSU AP Calculus Trigonometry/Analytic Geometry OSU Science: COURSE PRODUCER AP Chemistry OSU AP Physics OSU KSU Enrichment Programs Other: =QUM COURSE AP American Government OSU AP Applied Economics OSU Basic English & Reading OSU KSU Career Education College Application Process OSU Planning for Next Year KSU PSAT/NMSQT Preparation by Satellite OSU College Choices/College Costs OSU Early Awareness: Pathways to College OSU MIDLANDS CONSORTIUM STAR SCHOOLS PROJECT STUDENT PROGRAMMING REGISTRATION SUMMARY 1990-91 NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER OF OF OF COURSE STATES SCHOOLS STUDENTS 955 IggEr nglish & Reading 64 11 13 170 28 Russian 11 10 1,559 120 Spanish I 9 120 30 Spanish II 2,804 242 Subtotal 10 320 38 AP Amedcan Government * 19 360 63 AP Calculus * 14 185 29 AP Chemistry* 18 900 AP Physics* 126 630 11 42 Applied Economics * 19 1,800 217 German I* 13 320 79 German II* 2 50 6 Trigonometry/Analytic Geometry * 4 565 600 Subtotal 3iimiammi=aximmommiumseINEE 7,230 842 3 3 Total Schools * Course supported indirectly by the Star Schools Project; meets the Star objectives. 7 PROGRAMMING Slaff-DsarilumenLYsagramming MCSSP funding made quality staff development programming available to the numerous rural Schools, an schools served by the project. Cleveland Hammonds, Superintendent of Birmingham Public Alabama Star School, enthusiastically reports, "The opportunities available to the involved schools for on- site live staff development via satellite are innumerable." In Karsas. the 1990-91 school year saw the development and distribution of an ambitious Staff Development sf.cit.s, with six programs (seven hours) of live, interactive programming produced and uplinked prior to December 31, 1990. By May of 1991, the full series of 13 programs (19 hours) drew participation from more than 3, 000 teachers and administrators in 80 school districts across the country. The Missouri School Boards Association and their Educational Satellite Network developed educators on a variety of programs and teleconferences for school board members, administrators, and legislative workshops, and a w. training, topics. Leadership training, risk management, board cant/ monthly video-newsletter magazine were produced and uplinked to schools across the state. MSBA/ESN provided support to additional education organizations in developing and distributing video programs and teleconferences to a wide and varied audience, including the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, National School Boards Association, Missouri State Teacher Association, University of Missouri-Columbia, and Central Missouri State University. The University of Mississippi's Office of Distance Learning produced two live, interactive staff development programs. The first, "The Liability of Principals for School Accidents," was targeted for local school administrators and had 104 registrants. "Mississippi Distance Learning Update: A Teleconference for Administiators and Teachers" was the second of their productions.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.