DOCUMENT RESUME EA 023 314 ED 336 839 Restructuring the Education System: A Consumer's TITLE Guide, Volume 1. Education Commission of the States, Denver, Colo. INSTITUTION John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, SPONS AGENCY Chicago, IL. SI-91-4 REPORT NO PUB DATE 91 32p. NOTE ECS Distribution Center, 707 17th Street, Suite 2700, AVAILABLE FROM Denver, CO 80202 ($8.00). Reports - Descriptive (141) PUB TYPE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE *Euucational Change; *Educational Improvement; DESCRIPTORS Educational Objectives; *Educational Philosophy; Elementary Secondary Education; Experimental Schools; *Nontraditional Education; School Effectiveness; School Restructuring ABSTRACT Overviews of 10 major restructuring initiatives in publication. The programs the United States are provided in this goals, a focus on hands-on share a questioning attitude, vision-based potential, new learning, an assumption of all children's learning and new participant approaches to thinking and problem-solving, its history, beliefs roles. Each program is described according to and practices, and goals, implementation, teaching content per-pupil cost. A contact participant roles, assessment, funding, and include Coalition of address is also provided. The 10 programs Learning Consortium; Essential Schools; Foxfire; The Mastery in Press; Re: Learning; Montessori in the Public Schools; The Paideia Accelerated Schools Project; School Development Program; The Stanford of terms is included. Success for All; and Whole Language. A glossary (LMI) *********************************************************************** best that can be made Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the from the original document. *********************************************************************** Restructuring the Education System GUIDE A CONSUMER'S VOLUME I "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OP EDUCATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY (*Ice of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) As document has been reProduced 88 received from the person or organization onginatirig It (I Minor cnenges have been made to improve reproduction Quality TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES Inisdocu- e Points of view or opinions stated in INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." official mint do not necessarily represent OEM position or policy Education Commission of the States r NM PIM min Am RESTRUCTURING THE EDUCATION SYSTEM CONSUMER'S GUIDE A VOLUME I 1 Introduction 5 Coalition of Essential Schools 7 Foxfire 9 Consortium The Mastery in Learning 11 Montessori in the Public Schools 13 The Paideia Program 15 Re: Learning 17 School Development Program 19 Schools Project The Stanford Accelerated 21 Success For All 23 Whole Language 25 Glossary INTRODUCTION education system? Why A Consumer's Guide to initiatives to restructure the talk about "school restructuring" and "system change," so much local, state and national With time, many people are interest in school improvement is at an all-time high. At the same variety of programs and propcsals for confused by the number and have questions about the What are they trying to accomplish? What are reform. What kinds of initiatives are under way? adopt or adapt an existing effort or start our their track records? Should my community or state own? What kinds of help are available? of those questions by providing brief This guide represents an initial effort to answer some about them. The 10 programs included overviews of major initia*ives and ways to find out more plan to involve, many schools and education systems were selected because they involve, or their ambitious scope, these approaches have received enough across the country. Because of business leaders, educators or citizens begin recognition to be mentioned when policy makers, They are not, by far, the only conversations about how to inprove their education systems. worthwhile efforts under way. system? changing our education system? Why not just tune uo the present Why is there so much interest in fundamentally comprehensive redesign of the states' school There are four main reasons why fundamental, systems is needed: diverse population than New types of students. Today's schools are serving a more their current design effectively allows. has changed rapidly. A New social and economic demands. The American economy knowledge, skills and attitudes and rapidly changing job market calls for new Unds of Complex social problems call for new much higher levels of literacy than ever before. national affairs. Much of what forms of citizen participation in community, state and schools teach is unrelated to the world students must enter. researchers have learned much New knowledge about learning. In the last 30 years, question a number of current about the nature of human learning that throws into that learning should be an active, educational practices. Research shows, for instance, make learning a passive, engaging, collaborative process. Many schools, however, all children can learn whatever they unengaging, isolated experience. Evidence shows that of given the right opportunities to learn. But much are motivated to learn and are assumption that only a few students have the contemporary schooling rests on the outdated intelligence to do high-level work. Evidence not producing satisfactory results. is The current education system students do not know what they need to abounds that unacceptably large proportions of what they learn in school, cannot apply succeed in the future, do not understand much of learning and have not learned how to that knowledge in their daily lives, do not respect numbers of poor and minority young iearn. There is also evidence that disproportionate society. people receive educations of little benefit to them or 4 be out of touch with its When an important organization or system appears to things, uninformed by research, producing customers, focusing on the wrong fundamental design will come under unsatisfactory results and chaaging very slowly, its education. scrutiny. This is what is happening to American change" really mean? What do the terms "restructuring" and "system change the fundamental structure of the In this guide, restri.cturing applies to any effort to which all students can achieve at higher levels. education system in order to create conditions in curriculum, teaching, testing, management, budget, The structure includes such elements as incentives and other practices, policies and schedules, roles and responsibilities, relationships, working environments. procedures that define school and district in many ways, but in general Advocates of restructuring define the desired results the results wanted are: students learn, how well they understand Far greater student learning in terms of what apply their knowledge in, outside of and beyond what they learn and how well they can school conditions for teachers to bring about greater Vastly different roles and working learning for students community relations to bring about Major shifts 4n leadership, admiuistration and those changes in teaching and learning and coalitions to create and sustain New forms of education policy, politics improvement and a focus on quality are environments in which innovation, continuous the rules, not the exceptions. school restructuring will not succeed unless all parts System change emphasizes the idea that Changing the system are redesigned simultaneously. school, district, state of the system board members, those on the state board and involves redesigning, for example, roles of school staff in the state education department. this guide share? do the restructuring initiatives in What principles, ideas and features They question, questions about conventional practices. People in and around the schools ask hard separation of students by age and so-called "ability," the for instance, the practice of grouping how schools mathematics from the rest of the curriculum, subjects such as reading, writing and how they define and measure progress. involve parents, how they use time and help of the learning environments needed to The initiatives are based on visions of how and what is changed in a school system students reach new goals. The specifics is derived from those visions. especially active, hands-on learning. Adults are seen The initiatives focus or, learning, Comer's School Development whether they are parents, as in James as learners, too, Mastery in National Education Association's (NEA) Program (SDP); teachers, as in the inside for more in Re:Learning (see descriptions Learning Project; or community leaders, as information on these efforts). learn whatever they are Initiatives in this guide assume that all children can time and opportunities to learn. motivated to learn and are given appropriate problems in new ways. In SDP schools, for All aim to get students thinking and solving differences between their home values and the example, students learn to think about the and those in the Coalition of Essential Schools values that prevail in school. In Paideia schools discussions about funchmental human concerns. network, students learn to think in Socratic of what teachers are and do. Teachers are seen All the initiatives require new concepts making any significant changes, and their latitude for ma',ing as the central actors in things is greatly expanded. Such decisions, collaborating with parents and trying new administrators and more school autonomy than changes bring about new roles for usually exists in current systems. What are the major differences between these initiatives? For instance, Stanford's Accelerated schools Initiatives vary by level of schooling they address. elementary-school level. On the other hand, most and the Montessori public schools focus on the Schools and Re:Learning are high schools. schools in the Coalition of Essential schools, target special "at-risk" populations; Some initiatives, including SDP and Accelerated others do not. teacher preparation and training required. Montessori Approaches differ in the degree and kind of training obtainable only from specialized trainers schools, for instance, ree,u;,e highly specialized offers extensive workshops for teachers, and NEA's Mastery in and institutes. The Foxfire network they can broaden their knowledge of best practice. Learning connects its teachers by computer so community involvement they invite. SDP and Initiatives vary in the amount and kind of involvement; other approaches welcome it in Accelerated schools require intensive parental various degrees, but do not focus on it. focus. Montessori public schools have a very specific Initiatives vary with respect to curriculum Accelerated schools, Success for All curriculum built upon theories of child development. research-based language, literacy and story- schools and Whole Language schools focus on the curriculum away from an emphasis on telling ideas. Essential schools aim to move questions." Foxfire schools tend to use the memorizing facts toward an emphasis on "essential curriculum. traditions of the local community as a focus for and assessment. Essential and Re:Learning schools Differences also exist with respect to testing instead "exhibitions," "performances" and downplay standardized examinations, requiring and understand content. Other initiatives gauge portfolios for proof that students have learned school faculties. leave assessment choices up to participating progress with standardized tests or direct attention to policy and politics. Finally, considerable differences exist with respect to changes in district and state policy that will lead to a Re:Learning schools and districts work for reform. Teachers in the NEA network examine policies political climate supportive of long-term environments. Other approaches pay less attention to that affect working c mditions and learning schools policy and politics will evolve along supportive lines as system influences, trusting that are restructured. 6 3 that for the most part, it is important to point out Although the above getTeralizations hold true participants to All the initiatives, however, invite greatly. schools within each initiative can vary Foxfire, Essential or needs, conditions and resources. No two tailor their approaches to local with the values and that is perfectly compatible Accelerated schools are exactly alike, capitalize on diversity. idea is to free up innovation and undergirding the initiatives. The whole by the president, be desired at "the top" School and system redesign in America may reality if the people at "the bottom" leaders -- but it can only become governors and corporate creative, community happen as they, in their continuing, take responsibility for making it conversations, see fit. restructuring in this guide to better understand what We invite you to read the descriptions Words in boldface are explaine i in the look different from place to place. means and how it may glossary to aid your understanding. about the materials noted and address further questions Then, we invite you to read the learn more about We hope this guide will be of use as you initiatives to the contact people listed. approach-by-approach, it Though the information is presented restructuring the education system. job as a leader of the of a particular approach(es). Your is not meant to suggest adoption work in which the best ideas and approaches education system is to develop a reform strategy needs of your state or district. together, tailored to the individual Rexford Brown Change Initiatives executive director, State System Bob Palaich director of policy studies Martha Lederer Higher Literacies Project research assistant, Policy and the Andna Paolino Initiative research assistant, System Change 4 COALITION OF ESSENTIAL SCHOOLS (CES) Theodore R. Sizer, Chairperson Brown University Providence, Rhode Island WINI Brown University in by 1984 The Coalition of Essential Schools (CES) was established at What is the history of this program? Theodore R. Sizer with 12 schools as members. work of Essential schools. The principles were developed 4 Nine Common Principles guide the reported in Horace's Compromise: the out of Sizer's "A Study of High Schools" (1979-1983), Dilemma of the American High School and two other volumes. level. CES focuses primarily on improving education at the secondary-school minds well. Nine common principles The function of every school is to help students use their What beliefs guide this program? activities in schools. Those principles are: were developed from this belief to guide Schools should have an intellectual focus. limited number of Schools should have simple goals; each student should master a essential skills and areas of knowledge. Schools should have universal goals that apply to all students. possible. Schools should strive to personalize teaching and learning as much as "student-as-worker." The governing metaphor of the school should be demonstration or exhibition of mastery. Diplomas should be awarded upon a successful self-consciously stress values of The tone of the school (attitude) should explicitly and unanxious expectation, trust and decency. themselves as generalists first The principal and teachers (staff) should perceive discipline). and specialists second (experts in one particular in addition to total student Ultimate administrative and budget targets should include, for collective planning by loads per teacher of 80 or fewer pupils, substantial time per-pupi.t cost not to exceed that teachers, competitive salaries for staff and an ultimate at traditionpl schools by 10%. them to question and mason by the time they What are the goals of this program? Help students acquire the habits of mind that allow leave high school. in which students are encouraged to Create an intellectual atmosphere of personalized instruction assume responsibility for their own learning. Commission of the States (ECS) in CES has been in partnership with the Education Since How is this program implemented? 1988, Re:Learning summary). Schools wanting to join CES an effort called Re:Learning. (Please see must be in participating states. CES: Schools go through three phases in order to join of reading and study to understand the nine Faculties of "exploring schools" enter into a period school change and to determine if they want to Common Principles and their implications for proceed with developing an Essential school plan. proceed with developing a plan to adapt "Networking schools" have determined that they wish to the nine Common Principles. faculties are putting into practice programs "Essential schools" have officially joined CES. Their based on the nine Common Principles. networking and Essential schools: publications, an annual CES provides a variety of support to faculties. development institutes and on-site work with school meeting, workshops, professional curriculum, taking into encouraged to design or restructure its own Each participating school is cultural make-up and other factors. account the community's regarding specific practices. It does, however, make suggestions CES does not recommend any What is taught? How is it taught? of teacher approaches. in Essential schools and the general nature the number of subjects taught completely and are not bound to a given textbook. Teachers teach fewer topics more content." skills and knowledge, rather than merely "cover Students work to master essential presentations, using a variety of assessments, including oral Teachers evaluate student progress and portfolios of collected works. tests, written reports, essay exams instead of deliverers of knowledge. Teachers are facilitators of learning What new role(s) do teachers, teaching, administrative and counseling duties. Teachers and administrators share administrators and parents play? graduation rates, research-based initiative suggest improvement in Preliminary data on this How is program effectiveness referrals in conventional tests and a decline in discipline attendance and achievement on measured'? Essential schools. project is being implemented. A long-range assessment and report their progress. Schools are expected to monitor the country participate in CES. More than 180 schools across Where is the program operating? Carnegie Corporation, Citibank, funds from Aetna Foundation, The coalition has received How is the program funded? General Foods, John D. and Education Foundation, IBM, Kraft Danforth Foundation, Exxon Fund, Pew Charitable Trusts, Rockefeller Brothers Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, donor and many other contributors. Southwestern Bell Foundation, Xerox, an anonymous of existing budgets school. CES emphasizes the reallocation Per-pupil costs vary from school to What does the program to implement its program. cost per pupil? of the program. time account for most additional costs Professional development and planning School, Theodore R. Sizer. Dilemma of the American High Horace's Compromise: The For more information, read: Company, 1985. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Marketplace, Arthur G. Winners and Losers in the Educational The Shopping Mall High School. 1985. Cohen. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, Powell, Eleanor Farrar and David K. Robert Hampel. Boston: Houghton American High Schools Since 1940, The Last Little Citadel: Mifflin Company, 1986. Information Center Lisa Lasky, Manager, For more information, contact: Brown University Coalition of Essential Schools, One Davol Square 02903 Providence, Rhode Island 401-863-3384 P IIMINIIIMM, 6 FOXFIRE The Foxfire Center Rabun Gap, Georgia Foxfire began in 1966 with the efforts of high school teacher Eliot Wigginton to stimulate his What is the history of this program? students' interest in language and learning. One of Wigginton's English classes decided to produo a quarterly magazine, Foxfire, for and about their community, Rabun Gap, Georgia. In 1972, Doubleday published a selection of articles from the magazine in book form. Approximately 200 student magazines, modeled on Foxfire, sprang up in communities throughout the country over the next several years. Foxfire established five Teacte.r Outreach Centers to train teachers in the Foxfixe approach. Eleven Foxfire-affiliated teacher networks operate across the country. (1991) People learn best when education builds on previous experience. What beliefs gtiide this program? The work teachers and students do together must flow from student desires and concerns. School work must be connected to the surrounding community and to the real world. Student work muse have an audience beyond the teacher. What are the goals of this program? For students: Help students become willing and able participants in their own education. Develop students' understanding of community and culture. Support teamwork and democratic process in the classroom. Facilitate analytical and reflective thought. Enable students to take "measured risks" toward personal growth and intellectual development. of imagination, reflection and aesthetic experience. i kdvance the appreciation For teachers in the Teacher Outreach Program: Encourage and equip teachers to use the Foxfire approach in classroom instruction. be Foxfire does not portray itself as a "reform movement." but rather as an approach that can How iS this program implemented? implemented in almost any school structure. :nostly col!eges and The Teacher Outreach Program works through "host institutions," bases universities, that sponsor Foxfire courses and workshops and serve as home for the teacher networks. In Foxfire classrooms: What is taught? How is it taught? Students develop and work on projects and activities they consider relevant and important. Programs often include students of mixed ages and ability levels. Specific content and method Foxfire teachers use state and local curricula as guidelines. for each class varies according to student projects and needs. sessions Students examine and discuss what they are learning in "debriefing" throughout activities and experiences. determine Teachers assess student performance and needs continually to what each student has mastered and what areas need more attention.