EOR2.tpgsV1 11/10/04 10:04 AM Page 1 E N C Y C L O P E D I A O F R E L I G I O N SECOND EDITION EOR2.tpgsV1 11/10/04 10:04 AM Page 3 E N C Y C L O P E D I A O F R E L I G I O N 1 SECOND EDITION AARON LINDSAY JONES • EDITOR IN CHIEF ATTENTION eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page iv Encyclopedia of Religion, Second Edition Lindsay Jones, Editor in Chief © 2005 Thomson Gale, a part of The For permission to use material from this Since this page cannot legibly accommodate Thomson Corporation. product, submit your request via Web at all copyright notices, the acknowledgments http://www.gale-edit.com/permissions, or you constitute an extension of the copyright Thomson, Star Logo and Macmillan Reference may download our Permissions Request form notice. USA are trademarks and Gale is a registered and submit your request by fax or mail to: trademark used herein under license. While every effort has been made to Permissions ensure the reliability of the information pre- For more information, contact Thomson Gale sented in this publication, Thomson Gale Macmillan Reference USA 27500 Drake Rd. does not guarantee the accuracy of the data An imprint of Thomson Gale Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 contained herein. Thomson Gale accepts no 27500 Drake Rd. Permissions Hotline: payment for listing; and inclusion in the pub- Farmington, Hills, MI 48331-3535 248-699-8006 or 800-877-4253 ext. 8006 lication of any organization, agency, institu- Or you can visit our Internet site at Fax: 248-699-8074 or 800-762-4058 tion, publication, service, or individual does http://www.gale.com not imply endorsement of the editors or pub- lisher. Errors brought to the attention of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED publisher and verified to the satisfaction of No part of this work covered by the copyright the publisher will be corrected in future hereon may be reproduced or used in any editions. form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing, taping, Web distribution, or information storage retrieval systems—without the writ- ten permission of the publisher. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Encyclopedia of religion / Lindsay Jones, editor in chief.— 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-02-865733-0 (SET HARDCOVER : ALK. PAPER)— ISBN 0-02-865734-9 (V. 1)— ISBN 0-02-865735-7 (v. 2)— ISBN 0-02-865736-5 (v. 3) — ISBN 0-02-865737-3 (v. 4) — ISBN 0-02-865738-1 (v. 5) — ISBN 0-02-865739-X (v. 6) — ISBN 0-02-865740-3 (v. 7) — ISBN 0-02-865741-1 (v. 8) — ISBN 0-02-865742-X (v. 9) — ISBN 0-02-865743-8 (v. 10) — ISBN 0-02-865980-5 (v. 11) — ISBN 0-02-865981-3 (v. 12) — ISBN 0-02-865982-1 (v. 13) — ISBN 0-02-865983-X (v. 14) — ISBN 0-02-865984-8 (v. 15) 1. RELIGION—ENCYCLOPEDIAS. I. JONES, LINDSAY, 1954- BL31.E46 2005 200’.3—dc22 2004017052 This title is also available as an e-book. ISBN 0-02-865997-X Contact your Thomson Gale representative for ordering information. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page v E D I TO R S A N D C O N S U LTA N TS EDITOR INCHIEF Program in Religious Studies, SIGMAANKRAVA LINDSAYJONES University of Wisconsin—Madison Professor, Department of Literary and Associate Professor, Department of CHARLESH. LONG Cultural Studies, Faculty of Modern Comparative Studies, Ohio State Professor of History of Religions, Languages, University of Latvia Baltic Religion and Slavic Religion University Emeritus, and Former Director of Research Center for Black Studies, DIANEAPOSTOLOS-CAPPADONA BOARDMEMBERS University of California, Santa Barbara Center for Muslim–Christian DAVÍDCARRASCO MARYN. MACDONALD Understanding and Liberal Studies Neil Rudenstine Professor of Study of Program, Georgetown University Professor, History of Religions, Le Art and Religion Latin America, Divinity School and Moyne College (Syracuse, New York) Department of Anthropology, Harvard DIANEBELL University DALEB. MARTIN Professor of Anthropology and Women’s Professor of Religious Studies, and Studies, George Washington University GIOVANNICASADIO Chair, Department of Religious Australian Indigenous Religions Professor of History of Religions, Studies, Yale University Dipartimento di Scienze KEESW. BOLLE AZIMNANJI Professor Emeritus of History, dell’Antichità, Università degli Studi Professor and Director, The Institute University of California, Los Angeles, di Salerno of Ismaili Studies, London and Fellow, Netherlands Institute for WENDYDONIGER JACOBOLUPONA Advanced Studies in the Humanities Mircea Eliade Distinguished Service Professor, African American and and Social Sciences Professor of the History of Religions, African Studies Program, University History of Religions University of Chicago of California, Davis MARKCSIKSZENTMIHALYI GARYL. EBERSOLE MICHAELSWARTZ Associate Professor in the Department Professor of History and Religious Professor of Hebrew and Religious of East Asian Languages and Studies, and Director, UMKC Center Studies, Ohio State University Literature and the Program in Religious Studies, University of for Religious Studies, University of INÉSTALAMANTEZ Wisconsin—Madison Missouri—Kansas City Associate Professor, Religious Studies Chinese Religions JANETGYATSO Department, University of California, Santa Barbara RICHARDA. GARDNER Hershey Professor of Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Comparative Culture, The Divinity School, Harvard Sophia University CONSULTANTS University Humor and Religion GREGORYD. ALLES CHARLESHALLISEY Associate Professor of Religious Studies, JOHNA. GRIM Associate Professor, Department of McDaniel College Professor of Religion, Bucknell Languages and Cultures of Asia and Study of Religion University and Co-Coordinator, v eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page vi vi EDITORS AND CONSULTANTS Harvard Forum on Religion and TEDPETERS Religion, University of Chicago Ecology Professor of Systematic Theology, Law and Religion Ecology and Religion Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary TODSWANSON JOSEPHHARRIS and the Center for Theology and the Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Francis Lee Higginson Professor of Natural Sciences at the Graduate and Director, Center for Latin English Literature and Professor of Theological Union, Berkeley, American Studies, Arizona State Folklore, Harvard University California University Germanic Religions Science and Religion South American Religions URSULAKING FRANKE. REYNOLDS Professor Emerita, Senior Research Professor of the History of Religions MARYEVELYNTUCKER Professor of Religion, Bucknell Fellow and Associate Member of the and Buddhist Studies in the Divinity Institute for Advanced Studies, School and the Department of South University, Founder and Coordinator, University of Bristol, England, and Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard Forum on Religion and Professorial Research Associate, Centre Emeritus, University of Chicago Ecology, Research Fellow, Harvard History of Religions Yenching Institute, Research Associate, for Gender and Religions Research, School of Oriental and African GONZALORUBIO Harvard Reischauer Institute of Studies, University of London Assistant Professor, Department of Japanese Studies Gender and Religion Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Ecology and Religion DAVIDMORGAN Studies and Department of History HUGHB. URBAN Duesenberg Professor of Christianity and Religious Studies, Pennsylvania Associate Professor, Department of and the Arts, and State University Comparative Studies, Ohio State Ancient Near Eastern Religions Professor of Humanities and Art University History, Valparaiso University SUSANSERED Politics and Religion Color Inserts and Essays Director of Research, Religion, Health CATHERINEWESSINGER JOSEPHF. NAGY and Healing Initiative, Center for the Professor of the History of Religions Professor, Department of English, Study of World Religions, Harvard and Women’s Studies, Loyola University of California, Los Angeles University, and Senior Research University New Orleans Celtic Religion Associate, Center for Women’s Health New Religious Movements and Human Rights, Suffolk University MATTHEWOJO Healing, Medicine, and Religion ROBERTA. YELLE Obafemi Awolowo University Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, University African Religions LAWRENCEE. SULLIVAN Professor, Department of Theology, of Toronto JUHAPENTIKÄINEN University of Notre Dame Law and Religion Professor of Comparative Religion, The University of Helsinki, Member of History of Religions ERICZIOLKOWSKI Academia Scientiarum Fennica, WINNIFREDFALLERSSULLIVAN Charles A. Dana Professor of Religious Finland Dean of Students and Senior Lecturer Studies, Lafayette College Arctic Religions and Uralic Religions in the Anthropology and Sociology of Literature and Religion ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page vii E D I TO R I A L A N D P RO D U C T I O N S TA F F PUBLISHER Michael R. Fischbach, Rebecca J. INDEXER Frank Menchaca Frey, Paul R. Greenland, Ellen Coughlin Indexing Services, Inc. Hawley, Peter Jaskowiak, Jean Fortune PUBLISHINGDIRECTOR Kaplan, Eric B. Lagergren, Michael L. PRODUCTDESIGN Hélène Potter Levine, Steven M. Long, Eric Michelle DiMercurio, Tracey Rowens Lowenkron, Matthew May, Andrew H. Miller, Michael J. O’Neal, Janet PROJECT EDITORS Patterson, Kathleen A. Roy, Mary H. IMAGING Deirdre S. Blanchfield, Dawn Russell, Amy Loerch Strumolo, Karen Randy Bassett, Lezlie Light, Michael Cavalieri, Joann Cerrito, Stephen Akins Swartz, Alan Thwaits, Visual Cusack, Deirdre Graves, Alan Logusz, Dan Newell, Christine Education Group Hedblad, Anjanelle Klisz O’Bryan, Denay Wilding PROOFREADERS CONTRIBUTINGPROJECT EDITORS Dorothy Bauhoff, Judith Culligan, GRAPHIC ART Katy Balcer, Shawn Corridor, Mark Laurie DiMauro, Jennifer Gariepy, Mark A. Berger Drouillard, Melissa Hill, Jane Kevin S. Hile, Carol Holmes, Thomas Malonis, Kate Millson, Jenai Mynatt, F. McMahon, Melodie Monahan, RIGHTS ACQUISITION AND Jaime E. Noce, Carol Schwartz, Amy L. Unterburger, Thomas Wiloch Christine Slovey, Ken Wachsberger, MANAGEMENT Nicole Watkins Lori Hines, Mari Masalin-Cooper, BIBLIOGRAPHY RESEARCHERS Shalice Shah-Caldwell Warner Belanger, Erin Colihan, Brian EDITORIALTECHNICAL SUPPORT Collins, Mary V. Dearborn, Daniela Mark Springer Dumbrava, Dina Ripsman Eylon, TYPESETTER Anthony P. Johnson, Arthur Datapage Technologies International, ADMINISTRATIVESUPPORT McKeown, Laura Morelli, Chiara Inc. Cheryl Poloni Ombretta Tommasi COMPOSITION MANUSCRIPTEDITORS TRANSLATORS Evi Seoud, Mary Beth Trimper Kari Bethel, Carol Brennan, Sheryl A. Names of translators appear through- Ciccarelli, Judith A. Clinebell, Tony out the body of the encyclopedia, at Coulter, Judith Culligan, Andrew the end of each article that has been MANUFACTURING Cunningham, Anne C. Davidson, rendered into English. Wendy Blurton, Dorothy Maki vii eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page ix TA B L E O F C O N T E N TS Preface to the Second Edition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi Visual Essays: Rationale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvii Preface to the First Edition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xix Foreword to the First Edition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxiii Introduction to the First Edition . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvii List of Articles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxi List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lxxxvii Abbreviations and Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cxliii ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Volume 15 includes Appendix, Synoptic Outline of Contents, and Index ix eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page xi P R E FAC E TO T H E S E C O N D E D I T I O N To participate in a revision of Mircea Eliade’s Encyclopedia of sort. Careful reading reveals enormous diversity of perspec- Religion, first published in 1987, is an occasion of intense tive among first-edition contributors, far more than is often humility, but also a grand opportunity. Though not without assumed; and for the revision, even among the principal deci- its critics, the first edition was suitably heralded as the stan- sion makers, and positively among the contributors, there is dard reference work in the field, a truly landmark achieve- a very wide spectrum of opinions as to the most serviceable ment. The work of revision has, at nearly every turn, ampli- definitions of religion and the most worthy purview for the fied rather than diminished appreciation for the accomplish- field of religious studies. ment of those original volumes. Dealing firsthand with the On the one hand, encyclopedias seem by nature vehicles conceptual and organizational challenges, coupled with the of convention, destined to simplify, reify, essentialize, and logistical labors of coordinating the efforts of countless schol- provide falsely stabilized views of dynamic historical eras, ars and editors, redoubles a sense of admiration, respect, and gratitude for the makers of the original version of this ency- religious traditions, doctrines, and practices. Yet, on the other clopedia. hand, a large percentage of the contributors to this project understand their academic calling to be primarily one of dis- If the making of that original set posed innumerable ruption and destabilization; many have explicitly dedicated theoretical, organizational, and practical challenges, the revi- their careers to complicating and calling to question conven- sion of such a work evokes no fewer questions of balance and tional wisdoms about religion and things religious. Thus in compromise. On the one hand, the building and remodeling order to capitalize on their talents, contributors were provid- of a work of this wide scope is a preeminently collaborative ed explicit instructions, tidy scope descriptions, and specific enterprise. It is born of a vast community of scholars, togeth- word allotments, but they were also provided a fair measure er participating in an immensely collective project; the inter- of space for improvisation and flexibility. One member of the activity among editors, consultants, and contributors has editorial board framed the balance this way: indeed provided perhaps the most rewarding aspects of this project. Yet, on the other hand, such a large and multifaceted The letters to all contributors should include a general undertaking has a deeply impersonal, even anonymous, qual- statement that we wish to respect their judgment in ity. Face-to-face meetings among participants are few, sched- defining the general contours of each article, and the ules fast, authors and editors far-spaced. By engaging the tal- scope descriptions are meant only to be suggestive, ents of so many people from so many places, large encyclo- although of course we do hope that we will be taken pedias, and even more so their revisions, perpetuate the pre- seriously. Also that we are looking for entries that reflect tense of anonymous, objective, and interchangeable authors; the current state of the field and that we are hoping that each entry will not gloss over problems of evidence or numerous hands touch every piece, and the target of respon- conceptualization in the current state of the field but sibility either for credit or for blame is not always easy to will instead frankly acknowledge such problems and locate. make them key parts of the entry in a bid to make the Such an encyclopedia requires, in one respect, a large [second edition of the Encyclopedia of Religion] look to measure of consensus among contributors as to what religion the future and help to shape things to come. is and what academic students of religion ought to and ought not to circumscribe within their view. But, in another The intellectual challenges are likewise reflected in more respect, it is a scholarly consensus of a very broad and pliant practical tensions and balancing acts. Perhaps most onerous- xi eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page xii xii PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION ly, the recruitment of literally hundreds of qualified scholars, ASSESSMENTS, ADJUSTMENTS, ANDCONVENTIONS available and willing to deliver their work in a timely man- The initial step in the revision process was a comprehensive ner, is no mean task. For some, participation in an encyclo- evaluation of every one of the 2,750 first-edition entries. As pedia of this stature is a high calling, a fortuitous opportuni- though dealing out an enormous deck of cards, each of the ty to engage a uniquely wide readership; others, however, original articles was assigned to suitable members of the admit far less enthusiasm about undertaking assignments thirteen-person board of associate editors or the slate of some construed as diversions from their more technical research, two dozen consultants. Parity did not apply insofar as a stur- more public service than privilege. Once aboard, contribu- dy few were taxed with assessing hundreds of articles, others tors had to balance the standards of accuracy, sophistication, with only a handful. In the subsequent entry-by-entry and scholarly nuance that would satisfy themselves and their review, a relatively small number of articles were completely academic peers with the encyclopedia’s incentive to reach a jettisoned while the huge remainder was assigned to one of far more broad, less specialized audience. three categories. The balancing of word counts is likewise a constant con- A first category of entries is composed of those approved cern, and the space allotted to various topics is, to some real to be reprinted with few or no changes. Though roughly extent, a telling indicator as to the relative importance of 1,800 articles in this set were to remain largely or fully intact, those topics, at least in the eyes of the editorial board. Yet, attempts were made to reach the authors of those equations of article length and significance, a familiar first-edition entries both with an invitation to modify or assumption among reviewers, are invariably too simple, too update their contribution in ways that they saw fit and with little aware of the practical exigencies of accepted and a request that they augment the bibliography with relevant declined invitations, met and missed deadlines, obeyed and sources that had appeared in the interim. Of course, many of ignored editorial recommendations. The most well consid- those scholars were no longer active in the profession; others ered intentions and the clearest of visions are, not infre- did not reply; and others declined to make any alterations to quently, causalities in the stiff competition for the time of their original articles. Articles that were, therefore, reprinted twenty-first century academics. In fact, it is both noteworthy essentially unchanged have a designation of “(1987)” follow- and deeply disappointing that several dozen additional new ing the author’s name. In numerous instances, however, first- articles were conceived but never successfully assigned, and edition authors did take the occasion to adjust their own arti- also that at least three dozen promised articles had not cles in small or large ways. For these articles, the attribution arrived by the production deadline, and thus had to be omit- of authorship is followed by two dates, for example, Eleanor ted from the revision. Gaps and asymmetries in coverage Zelliot (1987 and 2005). Additionally, where original could, therefore, have innumerable explanations. authors of articles in this set were unavailable or nonrespon- Be that as it may, perhaps the most vexing acts of bal- sive, many of the respective bibliographies were nonetheless ance and compromise are built into the very notion of “revi- supplemented with relevant new sources; this accounts for sion” itself. Neither defense nor attack, revision demands those bylines that include the designation “Revised commingled attitudes of respect for and discontent with the Bibliography,” which signals that a “New Sources” section is original. To revise requires, on the one side, that a goodly appended to the bibliography. portion of the previous work will remain intact; this editori- A second category of entries comprises those judged to al board was not afforded a fully fresh point of departure. Yet, need significant revision or updating. These articles are per- on the other side, the initiative of revising does afford, even haps most properly worthy of the title “revised” insofar as necessitates, changes, reconceptualizations, and wholly new they both retain a substantial portion of the original work additions that respond both to recent events and to recent and introduce substantially new information and/or new trends in scholarship. Revision is, by nature and by design, a conceptual formulations. This sort of revision took one of balancing and a juxtaposition of old and new elements. three forms. In some cases, original authors were enlisted to This complex intermingling of first-edition and new rework and update their own articles; those articles (not components enriches but also greatly complicates the critical unlike those in which authors voluntarily revised their origi- use and assessment of these volumes. The synoptic outline of nal articles) are consequently attributed to a sole author but contents, the alphabetical list of entries, and the index pro- with two dates, for example, Davíd Carrasco (1987 and vide usefully comprehensive guides, but to discover all that is 2005). In many other cases, the revision was undertaken by new and different between the second edition and its prece- a different scholar, which accounts for those articles that are dent can, nonetheless, pose a difficult challenge. The remain- attributed to two authors, for example, Robertson Davies der of this preface works, therefore, to direct attention (1) to (1987) and Eric Ziolkowski (2005). Irrespective of whether some of the most prominent new elements of this revision; the modifications were completed by the original author or (2) to the decision-making processes that put those adjust- by someone else, the revisions are, in some instances, mod- ments in place; and (3) to the conventions in this edition that est, perhaps addressing recent events or attending to an can assist in ascertaining the precise status of individual important new publication on the topic; but, in other cases, entries. the adjustments and reconceptualizations are more thor- ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION eorel_fmv1 3/2/05 10:13 AM Page xiii PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION xiii oughgoing. All of the revisions and “updates” of these sorts NEWFEATURESANDCONFIGURATIONS do, however, eventuate in entries that are, at once, old and In addition to these various layers of revision and replace- new. ment, the second edition introduces entries on nearly six A third variation on this revision theme—and one of the hundred topics that did not appear in the first edition. New more distinctive features of the second edition of topics and titles are added to almost every portion of the revi- Encyclopedia of Religion—is a consequence of those situations sion, but especially noteworthy are those that appear in relat- in which the original article was assessed as a still-valuable ed sets of articles—or so-termed composite entries. Many of exposition of the topic, worthy of reprinting, but not a treat- these composite sets, which were also a very prominent fea- ment that could any longer be represented as state-of-the-art. ture of the first edition, provide a means of surveying the In many of these instances, the first-edition entry provided a geographical distribution of a large tradition: The “Buddhism” composite entry, for example, is composed of seminal statement on the subject, but was distinctive, or articles that treat, in succession, “Buddhism in India,” sometimes idiosyncratic, in ways that precluded revision or “Buddhism in Southeast Asia,” “Buddhism in Central Asia,” updating per se. Thus, instead of reworking the original, it and so on. In many other cases, however, these composite sets was more suitable to retain the integrity of that article by are trained on a broad topic or theme such as “Pilgrimage,” reprinting it unchanged and then augmenting it with a kind “Iconography,” “Music,” or “Soul,” which is then addressed of supplementary addendum. For instance, Mircea Eliade in a cross-culturally comparative fashion. In the main, these wrote the first-edition entry “Sexuality: An Overview,” which thematically configured composites open with a broad articulates a prominent, still-important exposition of the overview article, which is then followed by a series of articles topic, but not one that can be regarded as current in a field that explore that large theme either in different contexts of study where there has been enormous activity in the past and/or from different angles of view. And, although every two decades. The original entry is, therefore, allowed to stand sort of composite entry enjoys a measure of revision, it is with the parenthetical designation “[First Edition]” and then these thematically linked sets that are subject to the most is complemented by a completely new entry titled “Sexuality: venturesome innovation and growth. Several permutations An Overview [Further Considerations],” which focuses and outstanding examples deserve quick comment. attention on research and perspectives that have emerged since the first edition. This pairing of prominent but now In numerous instances, thematic composite entries that dated first-edition entries with new complementary pieces— appeared in the original edition were reworked and very sub- stantially expanded. For example, the first-edition “Afterlife” there are roughly fifty of these juxtapositions of old and composite entry included an overview and only two new—adds a special texture to the revision; it facilitates a area-specific articles, one on Jewish concepts of the afterlife kind of historical, even archaeological, appreciation of the and another on Chinese concepts. In the new edition, how- unfolding succession of ideas on a topic. But the same edito- ever, that pair is complemented by completely new entries on rial tactic also places a special burden on readers. African conceptions of the afterlife, as well as Australian, Accordingly, as a cautionary note, it would, in principle, Oceanic, Mesoamerican, Christian, Islamic, Greek and never be suitable to rely on one of these “First Edition” pieces Roman, and Germanic concepts. The first-edition without reading ahead also to its complimentary, sometimes “Cosmology” composite is similarly expanded with thor- quite critical, “Further Considerations” counterpart. oughly new entries on the cosmologies of Africa, indigenous In any case, the initial article-by-article assessment of the Australia, Oceania, indigenous North America and first edition eventuated also in a third category constituted of Mesoamerica, South America, Islam, and finally, so-termed those entries for which a topic and title were retained but the “Scientific Cosmologies.” Or, to cite just one more such actual article was completely replaced. There are well over example of the enhancement of a standing composite entry, three hundred of these new renditions of already-standing the original cluster of entries under the rubric of “Rites of topics. As a rule, authors of these replacement articles were Passage,” which had included entries solely on Hindu, invited to employ the original entry as a resource but not Jewish, and Muslim rites, is fleshed out to include new arti- necessarily a model, that is, to compose an essentially new cles on African, Oceanic, Mesoamerican, and Neopagan rites treatment of the existing topic. Not surprisingly, one can find of passage. instances in which there is considerable continuity between Other second-edition composite entries—article sets the original and present articles while, in other cases, the that provide some of the most notable new contributions to first-edition article and its new, second-edition iteration the revision—result from cases in which a topic that had share little beyond the title. That is to say, the great majority received fairly limited coverage in the first edition becomes of these so-termed replacement articles are, for all practical the subject of a much more extensive block of new articles. purposes, thoroughly new entries. Consequently, author For instance, where the original edition had modest-length attribution for these articles includes a parenthetical date pre- and broadly-framed articles devoted to “Healing,” cisely like other new articles, for example, Mary MacDonald “Medicine,” and “Diseases and Cures,” the revision explores (2005). those themes far more fully via a composite entry that opens ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION
Description: