Equity and trusts

201 Pages·2013·76.424 MB·English

by  Anne Matthew, Tina Cockburn, Tracey Carver

LexisNexis
AUSTRALIA LexisNexis Butterworths
475-495 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood NSW 2067
On the internet at: www.lexisnexis.com.au
Contents
ARGENTINA LexisNexis Argentina, BUENOS AIRES
AUSTRIA LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA
BRAZIL LexisNexis Latin America, SAO PAULO
CANADA LexisNexis Canada, Markham, ONTARJO
CHILE LexisNexis Chile, SANTIAGO
CHINA LexisNexis China, BEIJING, SHANGHAI
CZECH REPUBLIC Nakladatelstvi Orac sro, PRAGUE
FRANCE LexisNexis SA, PARIS Preface Vll
GERMANY LexisNexis Germany, FRANKFURT
Table of Cases lX
HONGKONG LexisNexis Hong Kong, HONG KONG
HUNGARY HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST Table of Statutes xxv
INDIA LexisNexis, NEW DELHI
ITALY Dott A Giuffre Edi tore SpA, M1LAN
JAPAN LexisNexis Japan KK, TOKYO Chapter 1 The Nature and History of Equity 1
KOREA LexisNexis, SEOuL
MALAYSIA LexisNexis Malaysia Sdn Bhd, PETALING JAVA, SELANGOR Chapter 2 The Classification of Equitable Interests
NEW ZEALAND LexisNexis, WELLINGTON
POLAND Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, WARSAW and Priorities 9
SINGAPORE LexisNexis, SINGAPORE
Chapter 3 Equitable Assignments: The Requirements
SOUTH AFRICA LexisNexis Butterworths, DURBAN
SWITZERLAND Staempfli Verlag AG, BERNE of Writing 17
TAIWAN LexisNexis, TAIWAN
UNITED KINGDOM LexisNexis UK, LONDON, EDINBURGH Chapter 4 Equitable Assignments: The Requirements
USA LexisNexis Group, New York, NEW YoRK
of Form 29
LexisNexis, Miamisburg, OHIO
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: ~ Fiduciary Obligations 43
Author: Cockburn, Tina. Chapter 6 Third Party Liability for Breach of Fiduciary
Title: Equity and Trusts.
Edition: 4th edition. Obligation 55
ISBN: 97804093327 I I (pbk).
~ Confidential Information 65
9780409332759 (ebk).
Series: LexisNexis Questions and Answers. Chapter 8 Unconscionable Transactions: Undue influence
Notes: Includes index.
Subjects: Corporations law - Australia - Textbooks. and Unconscionable Bargains 93
Other Authors/Contributors: Carver, Tracey. Matthews, Anne.
Chapter 9 Penalties and Forfeiture 107
Dewey Number: 346.94004
Estoppel 121
© 2014 Reed International Books Australia Pty Limited trading as LexisNexis.
Second edition 2000. Reprinted 2003, 2004, 2007, Third edition 2009. Determining Ownership of Property in Equity:
This book is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act I 968 (Cth), no part of this Resulting and Q;;instructive Trusts 141
publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific WTitten
permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form Chapter 12 Equitable Remedies: Specific Performance 157
whatsoever without such permission.
I
Inquiries should be addressed to the publishers. Chapter 13 Injunctions and Declarations 175
Typeset in Bembo and GillSans. G~ter 14 onetary Remedies 197
Printed in China.
Visit LexisNexis Butterworths at www.lexisnexis.com.au Chapter 15 The Nature, Description and Classification
217
of Trusts
-v-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts
Chapter The Creation of Express Trusts: The Constitution
of Trusts 229
Chapter 17 The Creation of Express Trusts: The Three
Preface
/
Certainties 245
Chapter 18 Discretionary Trusts and Powers 259
The Legality of Trusts 277
Purpose Trusts 289
As with previous editions, we hope that this book will serve as a useful
Charitable Trusts 305
resource for students and others with an interest in equity and trusts.
The Office of Trustee: Capacity, Appointment This fourth edition incorporates and highlights recent developments and
trends. It contains a new range of problem and essay-style questions
and Removal of Trustees 325
across all the major areas. We have aimed to provide readers with a
( Chapter 23 The Office of Trustee: Powers, Duties concise analysis of legal principles, and an insight into how to apply
and Discretion 335 these principles to legal problems and structure answers so as to improve
~hapter exam performance.
24 The Office of Trustee: Rights, Liabilities
Writing this text has provided us with a valuable opportunity to share
and Defences 345
- both our substantive knowledge and our combined teaching experience
Chapter 251 The Beneficiary: Rights and Remedies 353 in a student-focused way. We also hope that, by making this area of law
more accessible, readers will be inspired to know more and, in particular,
to read the major cases and the writings of leading commentators so as
Index 363 to develop a deeper understanding of the principles in this conceptually
challenging area, thereby enhancing their learning experience, rather
than simply focusing on passing exams.
In this edition, Tina Cockburn and Tracey Carver are very pleased to
welcome our long-term colleague Anne Matthew as a co-author, in place
of Melinda Shirley, whose work on earlier editions (with Wendy Harris)
is gratefully acknowledged.
The authors would also like to acknowledge and drank our past and
present colleagues at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
Faculty of Law. As in earlier editions, we particularly thank Emeritus
Professor Malcolm Cope and Barbara Hamilton, for sharing their
legal acumen and for their collegiality and friendship over many years
of working together. We would also like to acknowledge the other
members of the present equity and trusts teaching team, including Kelly
Purser, Anne Overell, Damien Cooling and Stafford Shepherd, who
together with a dedicated team of sessional staff, including most recently
Ben McGlade, Andrew Fraser, Hugh Carter, Melanie Jackson, Simone
Fraser and John Lamont, have made valuable contributions to the
teaching of Equity and Trusts at QUT. We have been very fortunate to
have worked with such inspiring colleagues who have generously shared
their insights into this fascinating area of law in numerous discussions
over the years, and we are extremely grateful for their support.
-vi- -vii-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts
Finally, we thank the team at LexisNexis Butterworths, for working
with us and managing this project.
This book is dedicated to our families, who have provided encouragement
and tolerated our dedication to completing this task with good humour. Table of Cases
Tina Cockburn
Tracey Carver
Anne Matthew
All references are to paragraphs
Brisbane, October 2013
A Ansell Rubber Company Pty Ltd
Av B pie (2003) .... 7-28 v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd
Av Hayden (No 2) (1984) .... 7-4 (1967] .... 7-2, 7-5, 7-12, 7-13,
Abjornson v Urban Newspapers (1989] 7-25, 7-27, 7-36, 7-46
.... 3-8 Anton Pitier KG v Manufacturing
ACOA v The Commonwealth (1979) Processes Ltd [1976] .... 13-1
.... 13-4 ANZ Banking Group Ltd v National
Adamson v Hayes (1973) .... 3-8, 3-10, Mutual Life Nominees Ltd (1977)
3-15, 3-18, 3-24, 3-25 .... 2-25
Adderley v Dixon (1824) .... 12-13 Aquaculture Corporation
Aid/Watch Inc and Commissioner of v New Zealand Green Mussel
Taxation, Re (2008] .... 21-2 Company Ltd (1990] .... 1-8, 7-5,
Aid/Watch Inc v Commissioner of 7-28, 14-3, 14-27
Taxation [2010] .... 21-1, 21-2, Armstrong, Re (1960] .... 17-2
21-21, 21-25 Arthbuthnot v Norton (1846) .... 4-2
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice ASA Constructions Pty Ltd v Iwanov
Commission (1992] .... 13-9, 13-10 (1975] .... 14-35
Allen v Snyder (1977] .... 11-20 Ashton, In the Marriage of (1986)
Altson, Re (1955] .... 17-13 .... 18-6, 18-20
Ambridge Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) Ashton v Pratt (No 2) (2012] .... 10-3
v Baker [2010] .... 13-9, 13-10 Attorney-General v Chaundry (1971]
Ambrose (Trustee) in the matter of .... 13-5, 13-22
Poumako (Bankrupt) v Poumako Attorney-General v Guardian
(2012] .... 19-9 Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (1990]
American Cyanamid Company (Spycatcher case) .... 7-2, 7-35,
v Ethicon Ltd (1975] .... 13-36 7-44
AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin Attorney-General (Ex rel Meat
(1986) .... 9-4, 9-23, 9-24, 9-25 and Allied Trades Federation
Anderson v McPherson (No 2) (2012] of Australia) v Beck (1980]
.... 8-2 ..... 13-5, 13-18, 13-19, 13-22,
Andrews v Australia and New Zealand 13-23, 13-27
Banking Group Ltd (2012] .... 9-2, Attorney-General (NSW) v Fulham
9-21, 9-27 (2002] .... 21-8, 21-19
Annacott Pty Ltd v Konann Pty Ltd -v NSW Henry George Foundation
(2012] .... 13-10, 13-15 Ltd (2002] .... 21-21
Ansell v Roads Corporation (t/as - v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd
VicRoads) [2008] .... 13-7, 13-36 (1940) .... 21-1, 21-8, 21-19
-viii - -ix-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts Table of Cases
Attorney-General (UK) v Heinemann Australian Olympic Committee Inc Barlow Clowes International Ltd Blomley v Ryan (1956) .... 8-5, 8-15,
Publishers Australia Pry Ltd (1987) v Big Fights Inc (No 2) (2000) v Eurotrust International Limited 8-17, 8-19, 8-23
.... 7-3, 7-4, 7-35 .... 22-11, 22-21 [2005] .... 6-7, 6-17 Blyth, Re [1997] .... 18-2, 18-4, 18-5,
- v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] .... 7-4, Australian Postal Corporation v Lutak Barnes v Addy (1874) .... 6-2, 6-5, 6-6, 18-11, 18-12, 18-15, 18-25, 18-26,
7-35 (1991) .... 25-13 6-7, 6-10, 6-11, 6-12, 6-13, 6-14, 18-30, 21-4, 21-5, 21-14, 21-18,
Austin v Khaliffe [1966] .... 25-28 Australian Securities and Investments 6-16, 6-17, 6-18, 6-22, 7-49 21-22-21-24
Austotel Pry Ltd v Franklins Selfserve Commission v Mauer-Swisse Barnes v Alderton [2008] .... 10-2, Boardman v Phipps [1967] .... 5-15,
Pry Ltd (1989) .... 10-15 Securities Ltd [2002] .... 13-2 10-14, 10-26 14-6, 14-19
Australian and New Zealand - v Nelson (2003) .... 25-28 Basham, Re [1986] .... 10-2, 10-9, Bowen Central Coal Pry Ltd v Aquila
Banking Group Ltd v Widin (1990) Avanes v Marshall and Others (2007) 10-11, 10-18, 10-26 Coal Pry Ltd [2011] .... 13-7, 13-36
.... 12-27 .... 23-26 Bateman's Bay Local Aboriginal Land Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917]
Australian Boot Trade Employers' Avon Finance Company Ltd v Bridger Council v Aboriginal Community .... 21-21
Federation v The Commonwealth [1985] .... 8-4 Benefit Fund Pty Ltd [1998] Boyarsky v Taylor [2008] .... 12-18
(1954) .... 13-15 .... 13-5, 13-20 Boyce v Paddington Borough Council
Australian Broadcasting Corporation B Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) [1903] .... 13-5, 13-20
v Lenah Game Meats Pry Ltd Baburin v Baburin [1990] .... 8-22 .... 11-10, 11-11, 11-16, 11-18, Boyes, Re (1884) .... 16-7, 16-28, 16-30
[2001] .... 7-2, 7-4, 7-12, 7-13, Bacon v Pianta (1966) .... 20-3, 20-7, 11-21, 11-22, 11-24, 11-28, 11-37, Bradley v The Commonwealth (1973)
7-18, 7-28, 7-35, 7-36, 7-40, 13-2, 20-10, 20-12, 20-17, 20-18, 20-24, 11-38, 11-40, 11-41, 11-49, 11-50 .... 13-19
13-3, 13-7, 13-18, 13-33, 13-36 20-31 Beath v Kousal [2010] .... 23-25 Bradto Pty Ltd v State of Victoria;
- v O'Neill [2006] .... 7-21, 13-7, Baden v Sociere-Generale pour Beckbessinger, Re [1993] .... 17-7 Tymbook Pry Ltd v State of
13-36 Favoriser le Developpement du Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Victoria [2006] .... 13-7
Australian Competition and Consumer Commerce et de L'industrie en Laboratories Pry Ltd (1968) Brady v Stapleton (1952) .... 25-23
Commission v Francis [2004] France SA [1992] .... 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, .... 7-21, 13-7, 13-36 Brandon v Robinson (1811) .... 19-2
.... 13-15 6-6, 6-8, 6-11, 6-12, 6-13, 6-14, Beloff v Pressdram Ltd [1973] .... 7-19, Breadner v Granville-Grossman [2001]
Australian Conference Association Ltd 6-15, 6-16, 6-17, 6-19, 6-21, 6-22 7-41 .... 18-2, 18-11, 18-26
v Mainline Constructions Pry Ltd Baden's Deed Trusts, Re; McPhail Benbrika v R (2010) .... 20-3, 20-9, Break Fast Investments Pry Ltd v PCH
(1978) .... 15-30 v Doulton [1971] .... 15-23, 17-8, 20-23 Melbourne Pry Ltd [2007] .... 14-9,
Australian Conservation Foundation Inc 18-3, 18-4, 18-8, 18-9, 18-12, Bennett v Minister of Community 14-38
v The Commonwealth of Australia 18-14, 18-15, 18-16, 18-19, 18-20, Welfare (1992) .... 14-3 Breskvar v Wall (1971) .... 2-11, 2-13,
(1980) .... 13-5, 13-9, 13-20 18-28, 18-30, 18-31, 18-32, 21-35 Benzlaw and Associates Pty Ltd 2-22, 2-24
Australian Crime Commission v Gray Baden's Deed Trusts (No 2), Re [1972] v Medi-Aid Centre Foundation Ltd Brickenden v London Loan & Savings
[2003] .... 10-4, 10-14 .... 17-8, 18-4, 18-27 [2007] .... 5-20, 5-22, 5-24, 6-21 Co [1934] .... 14-3, 14-21, 14-27
Australian Elizabethan Theatre Trust, Baden's Deed Trusts (No 2), Re [1973] Bicycle Victoria Inc and Commissioner Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) .... 8-5,
Re (1991) .... 15-6, 15-34, 16-16, .... 17-8 of Taxation, Re (2011) .... 21-1, 8-28 ~
17-2, 17-16, 20-2, 20-15, 20-25 Bahr v Nicholay (No 2) (1988) 21-2 Bridgewater Care Group (Inc)
Australian Executor Trustees Ltd .... 16-16 Billington, Re [1949] .... 23-3 v Rossiter [2009] .... 13-10, 13-16
v Attorney-General (SA) [2010] Baker v Archer-Shee [1927] .... 15-14 Birtchnell v Equity Trustees Executors Bristol and West Building Society
.... 21-8, 21-16, 21-19 Baloglow v Konstandis (2001) .... 3-8 & Agency Co Ltd (1929) .... 14-14 v Mothew [1998] .... 14-20
Australian Executor Trustees Ltd Bank of New South Wales v Rogers Black v S Freedman & Co (1910) British Red Cross Balkan Fund, Re; Red
v Ceduna District Health (1941) .... 8-4 .... 25-22 Cross Society v Johnson [1914]
Services Inc [2006] .... 21-7, 21-8 Bank of New Zealand v New Zealand Black Uhlans Inc v New South Wales .... 25-28
Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd Guardian Trust Company Ltd Crime Commission (2002) .... 1-19, Brockbank, Re [1948] .... 23-3
v Mark Korda [2013] .... 17-4, [1999] .... 14-3, 14-20, 14-27 11-2 Brooks v Wyatt (1994) .... 14-8
17-24 Barbagallo v J & F Catelan Pry Ltd Blackburn v Yarra Vale Properties Pry Broomhead v Broomhead [1985] see
Australian Football League v The Age [1986] .... 14-8-14-10, 14-35 Ltd [1980] .... 19-4, 19-14, 19-18, JW Broomhead (Vic) Pry Ltd (in
Company Ltd [2006] .... 7-4, 7-5, Barclays Bank v Quistclose Investments 19-28, 19-29 liquidation) v JW Broomhead Pry
7-19, 7-27, 7-35, 7-41, 7-49 Ltd [1970] .... 15-6, 15-30, 15-31, Blackwell v Blackwell [1929] .... 16-7, Ltd [1985]
Australian Football League v The Age 17-2, 17-27 16-28, 16-29 Brown v Pourau (1995) .... 16-7, 16-28
Company Ltd (No 2) [2006] Barclays Bank pie v O'Brien [1994] Blausten v Inland Revenue Brownton v Edward Moore lnbucon
.... 7-5 .... 2-24 Commissioners [1972] .... 18-15, Ltd (1985] .... 4-2, 4-32, 16-22
18-30 Brusewitz v Brown [1923] .... 8-30
-x- -xi-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts Table of Cases
Bryson v Bryant (1992) .... 11-28 Central London Property Trust Ltd Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) Corin v Patton (1990) .... 1-12, 1-22,
Bulldogs Rugby League Club Ltd v High Trees House Ltd (1947] v Viewbank Properties Pry Ltd 1-25, 4-7, 4-17, 4-25, 4-27, 4-34,
v Williams (2008] .... 13-3, 13-8, .... 10-2, 10-27 (2004] .... 18-12 4-38, 16-5, 16-12
13-18, 13-33, 13-37, 13-39 Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Commissioner of Taxation v Bargwanna Cowan v Scargill (1985] .... 23-15
Burke v Frasers Lorne Pry Ltd (2008] Metals Limited (2012] .... 6-4, (2012] .... 21-1, 21-6 Crane v Gething (2000] .... 13-16
.... 13-7 6-18, 6-21 Commissioner of Taxation v Everett Crouch v The Commonwealth (1948)
Burnitt v Pacific Paradise Resort Pry Ltd Chan v Zachariah (1984) .... 5-14, (1980) .... 4-10, 4-11, 4-16, 4-18, .... 13-10, 13-16
(2005] .... 12-13 5-24 4-26 Crowle Foundation v NSW Trustee and
Burrough v Philcox (1840) .... 18-3, Chartered Secretaries Australia Ltd Commissioners for Special Purposes Guardian (2010] .... 22-11, 22-21
18-19 v Attorney General (NSW) (2011] of Income Tax v Pemsel (1891] Crowther v Brophy (1992] .... 20-11
Businessworld Computers Pry Ltd .... 21-8, 21-20 .... 21-2, 21-9, 21-11, 21-13 Cruise v Multiplex Ltd (2008]
v Australian Telecommunications Cheese v Thomas (1994] .... 1-18 Commonwealth Bank of Australia .... 13-15
Commission (1988) .... 13-6 Chirnside v Fay (2006] .... 14-6, 14-18, v Carotino (Australia) Pry Ltd Currie v Hamilton (1984] .... 11-4,
Byrnes v Kendle (2011) .... 17-4, 17-24, 14-19 (2011] .... 10-2, 10-3, 10-14, 11-34
23-15 Church of Scientology v Kaufman 10-15 Curro v Beyond Productions Pry Ltd
(1973] .... 7-19 v Smith (1991) .... 14-3 (1993) .... 13-37, 13-39
c Ciaglia v Ciaglia (2010] .... 12-20, Commonwealth of Australia v John Cypjayne Pry Ltd v Sverre Rodskog
C v Band W (2006] .... 18-6, 18-20 12-23, 12-24 Fairfax & Sons Limited (1980) (2009] .... 18-6, 18-20, 18-31
Calverley v Green (1984) .... 11-3, 11-4, CIBC Mortgages Pie v Pitt (1994] .... 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-17, 7-19,
11-6, 11-34, 11-44, 19-20, 19-28 .... 8-24 7-35, 7-38 D
Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited Citicorp Australia Ltd v Hendry (1985) - v Verwayen (1990) .... 10-2-10-6, Da Yun Xu v Fang Lin (2005]
v Surfers' Paradise Forests Limited .... 9-23, 9-24 10-10-10-12, 10-16-10-19, 10-21, .... 8-26, 8-29, 8-30
(1977] .... 7-44, 13-7, 13-36 Clay v Clay (2001) .... 17-1, 17-12 10-23, 10-25, 10-28-10-32, 10-34 Dalswinton Pastoral Company Pry Ltd
Cameron v Hogan (1934) .... 20-14 Clayton's case (1816) see Devaynes Compton, Re (1945] .... 21-5, 21-9, v Cole (2006] .... 12-19
Campbell v MGN Ltd (2004] .... 7-2, v Noble; Baring v Noble (1816) 21-11, 21-14, 21-23, 21-26, 21-27, Dalton v Ellis; Estate of Bristow (2005]
7-19, 7-28, 7-35, 7-41 (Clayton's case) 21-28, 21-29, 21-31, 21-32, 21-34, .... 16-14
Campbells Cash & Carry v Fostif CMA Recycling Victoria Pry Ltd 21-35 Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange (1986)
(2006] .... 4-2 v Doubt Free Investments Pry Ltd Comptroller of Stamps v Howard-Smith .... 2-4
Cannon v Hartley (1949] .... 16-6, [2011] .... 7-44, 13-7, 13-8, 13-36 (1936) .... 4-3, 4-12, 4-16, 4-25, Dart Industries Inc v The Decor
16-14, 16-25 Cochrane v Moore (1890) .... 4-5 15-6, 15-33, 15-34, 17-2, 17-25 Corporation Pry Ltd (1993)
Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd Congregation of the Religious Sisters .... 14-5, 14-17
Company [1991] .... 14-3, 14-27 (1969] .... 7-3, 7-11, 7-12, 7-15, of Charity of Australia Davenport v Bishopp (1843) .... 16-2,
Canterbury Orchestra Trust v Smitham 7-17, 7-34, 7-35, 7-38 v Attorney-General (Qld) (2011] 16-13, 16-24
(1978] .... 21-15 Cohen v Cohen (1929) .... 15-6, 15-32, .... 21-8, 21-18, 21-20 David Securities Ptf Ltd
Cardile v LED Builders Pry Ltd (1999] 15-34, 17-2, 17-17, 17-23, 17-27 Conroy v Lowndes (1958] .... 14-35 v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
.... 13-2, 13-3, 13-18, 13-33 Coles Supermarkets Australia Pry Ltd Consul Development Pry Ltd v DPC (1992) .... 7-42
Cassis v Kalfus (No 2) (2004] v Stateland Developments Pry Ltd Estates Pry Ltd (1975) .... 5-8, David Syme & Company Ltd v General
.... 14-21 (2008] .... 13-7, 13-8, 13-36 5-20, 6-6, 6-8, 6-11, 6-14, 6-15, Motors-Holden's Ltd (1984]
Castlemaine Tooheys Limited v The Collinge v Kyd (2005] .... 23-9 6-16, 6-18, 6-19, 6-21 .... 7-19
State of South Australia (1986) Combe, Re (1925] .... 18-2, 18-11, Cook's Settlement Trusts, Re (1965] Davies v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd
.... 13-7 18-26 .... 12-5, 16-6, 16-10, 16-11, (1959] .... 21-34
Castro! Australia Pry Ltd v Emtech Commercial & Accounting Services 16-14, 16-16, 16-18, 16-26 Dawson (deed), Re (1966] .... 14-2,
Associates Pry Ltd (1980) .... 7-4, (Camden) Pry Ltd v Cummins Cooney v Burns (1922) .... 12-24 14-3, 14-20, 14-22
7-15, 7-19, 7-27, 7-41 (2011] .... 7-14 - v The Council of the Muncipality Day v Couch (2000] .... 19-8
Caton v Caton (1866) .... 12-22 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd ofKu-ring-gai (1963) .... 13-5, Day v Mead (1987] .... 14-3, 14-27
CB Darvall and Darvall v Maloney v Amadio (1983) .... 8-1, 8-5, 8-14, 13-18-13-20, 13-22 Dean, Re (1889) .... 20-4, 20-28
(No 2) (2007] .... 24-2 8-15, 8-16, 8-17, 8-27, 8-28, 8-29, Cooper v Moloney (No 6) (2012] Dean v Cole (1921) .... 17-13
Central Bayside General Practice 8-30 .... 7-44, 13-7, 13-8, 13-36 Dearle v Hall (1828) .... 4-20, 16-29
Association Ltd v Commissioner Commissioner of Stamp Duties Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pry Ltd
of State Revenue (2006] .... 21-1, v Livingston (1960) .... 2-4, v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd (2007] .... 7-2, 7-10, 7-12, 7-14,
21-2, 21-21 15-16 (1998] .... 12-17, 12-36 7-27
-xii- -xiii-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts Table of Cases
Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010) Edmonds v Donovan; Disctronics Ltd Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Medicine Pry Ltd [2013] .... 10-2,
.... 10-4, 10-14, 10-16, 10-18, v Kingston Links Country Club Pry Film Sales Ltd [1987] .... 13-7 10-10, 10-25, 10-27
10-19, 10-20, 10-31, 10-34 Ltd [2005) .... 14-2, 14-5, 14-6, Filshie, Re; Raymond v Butcher [1939) Gibson v South American Stores Ltd
Denley's Trust Deed, Re [1969) .... 20-2, 14-18, 14-20, 14-24 .... 20-4, 20-30 [1950] .... 21-5, 21-14, 21-23,
20-3, 20-15, 20-25, 20-32 Eiszele v Hurburgh [2011] .... 14-3, Financial Integrity Group Pry Ltd 21-32
Devaynes v Noble; Baring v Noble 14-21 v Farmer [2009) .... 7-2, 7-10, 14-8 Giles & Company Ltd v Morris [1972)
(1816) (Clayton's case) .... 25-16, Eider's Trustee & Executor Co Fitzgerald v FJ Leonhardt Pry Ltd .... 12-35, 12-36
25-28 v Higgins (1963) .... 23-14 (1996) .... 19-23 Gilgandra Marketing Co-Operative
DFT v TFD [2010) .... 7-28 Ellaway v Lawson [2006) .... 19-2 - v Masters (1956) .... 12-20 Ltd v Australian Commodity
DHJPM Pry Ltd v Blackthorn Resources Elliott v Seymour (1993) .... 13-5, 13-22 Fletcher v Fletcher (1844) .... 16-6, & Merchandise Pry Ltd [2011)
Ltd (formerly called AIM Ellison v Ellison (1802) .... 16-2, 16-13 16-11, 16-14, 16-15, 16-16, 16-26 .... 12-13
Resources Ltd) [2011) .... 10-2, Emeco International Pry Ltd v O'Shea Flight v Bolland (1828) .... 12-37 Giller v Procopets [2008] .... 7-2, 7-5,
10-4, 10-17, 10-27, 10-32 [2012) .... 13-33, 13-36 Flinn v Flinn [1999) .... 10-14 7-23, 7-24, 7-27, 7-28, 7-35, 7-45,
Diagnostic X-Ray Services Pry Ltd v Endacott (deed), Re; Corpe v Endacott Fonu v Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co 7-49, 14-3, 14-7, 14-9, 14-10,
Jewel Food Stores Pry Ltd (2001) [1960] .... 20-30 (Cayman) Ltd [2011) .... 18-25 14-25, 14-35
.... 12-17 Engwirda v Engwirda [2000] .... 11-11, Foran v Wight (1989) .... 10-32 Gillett v Holt [2001) .... 10-14
Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) .... 10-2, 11-28 Force India Formula One Team Gilmour v Coats [1949) .... 20-11, 21-5,
10-11, 10-26 Equititrust Ltd v Franks [2009] Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team 21-14
Dingle v Turner [1972) .... 21-5, 21-14, .... 10-2 SDN BHD [2012) .... 7-5 Gissing v Gissing [1971) .... 11-14,
21-23, 21-27, 21-32, 21-33, 21-35 Equuscorp Pry Ltd v Jimenez [2002) Ford-Hunt v Raghbir Singh [1973) 11-20
Diplock, Re; Diplock v Wintle [1948) .... 16-5, 16-12 .... 14-9 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) .... 8-31,
(Diplock's case) .... 25-17, 25-22 Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd Forster v Hale (1798) .... 3-5, 3-15 10-3, 10-4, 10-6, 10-13, 10-15,
Dixon v Barton [2011) .... 12-33 v Plessnig (1988) .... 9-3, 9-21, - v Jododex Australia Pry Ltd (1972) 10-16, 10-18, 10-19, 10-30-10-32,
Docker v Somes (1834) .... 25-9 9-23, 9-25, 9-27 .... 13-10 10-34, 11-8, 11-9, 11-13, 11-26,
Doe v Australian Broadcasting Esquire Nominees Ltd v Federal Foster v Mountford & Rigby Ltd 11-42, 14-4
Corporation [2007) .... 7-28 Commissioner of Taxation (1972) (1976) .... 7-21 Glegg v Bromley [1912) .... 4-2, 4-9,
Doherty v Allman (1878) .... 13-4, .... 23-2 Franklin v Giddins [1978) .... 7-5, 7-13, 4-32, 16-22
13-37 ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd 7-25, 7-36, 7-46 Golay, Re [1965] .... 17-5, 17-15
Donis v Donis [2007) .... 10-4, 10-15, [2011) .... 7-28, 7-35, 7-49 Franklins Pry Ltd v Metcash Trading Gold & Copper Resources Pry Ltd
10-16, 10-18 European Bank Ltd v Robb Evans of Ltd [2009) .... 10-17 v Newcrest Operations Ltd [2013)
Dougan v Ley (1946) .... 12-13, 12-27, Robb Evans & Associates [2010) Fraser v Evans [1969) .... 7-4, 7-19, .... 7-1
12-28, 12-33, 14-41 .... 13-7 7-39, 7-41 Goodchild v James (1994) .... 20-28
Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3) [2003) Evans (deed), Re [1957] .... 21-34 Fraser Edmiston Pry Ltd v AGT (Qld) Goodson (deed), Re [1971) .... 20-14,
.... 7-2, 7-28, 14-27 Everist v McEvedy [1996] .... 14-21 Pty Ltd [1988) .... 14-4 20-25
Dowsett v Reid (1912) .... 12-18 French Caledonia Travel Service Pry Ltd Goodwin v NGN Ltd [2011) .... 7-28
Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll F (in liq), Re (2003) .... 25-16, 25-28 Gosling, Re (1900) .... 21-32
[1967) .... 7-2, 7-35, 7-39 Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Fung Ping Shan v Tong Shun [1918) Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
Duic v Duic [2013) .... 10-4, 10-15, .... 7-2, 7-14, 7-27 .... 2-25 [1978) .... 13-20
10-16 FAI Insurances Ltd v Pioneer Concrete Futuretronics.com.au Pry Ltd v Graphix Graham v KD Morris & Sons Pry Ltd
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Services Ltd (1987) .... 1-19 Labels Pry Ltd [2009) .... 7-14 [1974) .... 13-18
v New Garage & Motor Company Farah Constructions Pry Ltd v Say-Dee Grasso v Love [1980] .... 13-1
[1915) .... 9-3 Pry Ltd (2007) .... 5-8, 5-20, 6-4, G Green v Sommerville (1979) .... 12-19
Dunne v Turner [1996) .... 11-11, 6-5, 6-6, 6-8, 6-10, 6-11, 6-13, Garden Clubs of Australia Inc v Eyres Green and Clara Pry Ltd v Bestobell
11-23, 11-28, 11-38 6-14, 6-16, 6-17, 6-18, 6-19, 6-21, [2002) .... 20-18 Industries Pry Ltd [1982)
Dunworth v Mirvac Queensland Pry 11-24 Gardner (No 2), Re [1923) .... 16-7 .... 5-11
Ltd [2011] .... 12-7, 14-31 Fay v Moramba Services Pry Ltd [2009] Gartside v Inland Revenue Greenpeace New Zealand Inc, Re
Durham Bros v Robenson [1898] .... 4-16 .... 18-3, 18-6, 18-17, 18-18, Commissioners [1968) .... 15-24; [2011) .... 21-21
18-20, 18-28, 18-31, 18-32 18-3, 18-6, 18-20, 18-31 Gregory v Hudson (1997) .... 18-5,
E Federal Commissioner of Taxation Gascoigne v Gascoigne [1918) .... 19-19 18-25
Eastern Services Ltd v No 68 Ltd [2006) v Vegners (1989) .... 18-2, 18-25, GE Healthcare Australia Pry Ltd Grey v Australian Motorists & General
.... 12-20 18-26 v Medica Radiology & Nuclear Insurance [1976] .... 4-16, 4-27
-xiv- -xv-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts Table of Cases
- v Internal Revenue Commissioners Hill v Hill [2005] .... 11-10, 11-23, Inland Revenue Commissioners Khan v Khan (2004) .... 8-4
[1960] .... 3-8, 3-9, 3-24 11-37 v Broadway Cottages Trust [1955] Khoury v Khouri (2006) .... 3-8, 12-23,
Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL - v Rose [1990] .... 14-2, 14-3, .... 17-7, 18-12 12-25, 12-27
(No 2) [2012] .... 14-5, 14-6, 14-18 14-20 Integral Home Loans Pry Ltd v lnterstar Kibby v Registrar of Titles [1999]
Grundt v Greater Boulder Pry Gold Himmelhoch, Re (1928) .... 18-2, Wholesale Finance Pry Ltd [2007] .... 20-3
Mines Ltd (1937) .... 10-25 18-11, 18-26 .... 9-2, 9-21 Kinslea v Caldwell (1975) .... 17-7,
Gulbenkian's Settlement Trusts, Re Hirst Estate, Re [2010] .... 21-8, 21-19 lnterfirm Comparison (Aust) Pry Ltd 18-27
[1970] .... 18-2, 18-3, 18-4, 18-8, Hohol v Hohol [1981] .... 11-14, 11-20 v The Law Society of NSW (1975) Klemke v Lustig [2010] .... 18-5, 18-25
18-11, 18-12, 18-13, 18-17, 18-25, Holman v Johnson (1775) .... 19-4, .... 7-23, 7-45 Knight v Knight (1840) .... 15-23, 17-1,
18-26, 18-27, 18-28, 18-32 19-15 17-12
Holroyd v Marshall (1862) .... 4-9, J Kolb's Will Trusts, Re [1962]
H 4-21, 4-36, 12-13, 12-33, 16-16 J & H Just (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Bank of .... 17-18
Hagan v Waterhouse (1991) .... 3-5, Horan v James [1982] .... 18-2, 18-5, New South Wales (1971) .... 2-14 Kriezis v Kriezis [2004] .... 11-10,
3-8, 3-15, 3-24 18-8, 18-12, 18-15, 18-25, 18-30 Janson v Janson [2007] .... 8-2 11-23, 11-37
Haira v Burbery Mortgage Finance Hosking v Runting [2005] .... 7-28 Jarvis (dec'd), In re [1958] .... 14-6, 14-18 Kytherian Association of Queensland
& Savings Ltd (in rec) [1995] Hospital Products Ltd v United States JC Williamson Ltd v Lukey and v Sklavos (1958) .... 21-18
.... 14-21 Surgical Corporation (1984) Mulholland (1931) .... 12-4, 12-12,
Hallett's Estate, Re (1879) .... 1-24, .... 5-5, 5-11, 5-12, 5-22 12-15, 12-17, 12-32, 12-35, 12-36, L
25-15, 25-28 Huang v Australian Postal Corporation 12-37, 13-4, 13-8, 13-37 Labelmakers Group Pry Ltd v LL Force
Halloran v Minister Administering [2009] .... 13-7, 13-36 Jeffereys v Jeffereys (1841) .... 12-5 Pry Ltd [2012] .... 7-2, 7-3, 7-5,
National Parks and Wildlife Hungerfords v Walker (1988) .... 14-3, Jing v Yang [2008] .... 11-14, 11-20 7-14, 7-17, 7-25, 7-27, 7-38, 7-46
Act 1974 (2006) .... 3-8 14-26 ]NJ Investments Pry Ltd v Sunnyville Lamshed v Lamshed (1963) .... 12-20,
Hamdan v Widodo (No 2) [2010] Hunter v Moss [1994] .... 17-5, 17-14, [2006] .... 2-24 12-27, 12-28
.... 12-7, 14-31 17-15, 17-18 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White Lapin v Abigail (1930) .... 2-24
Hanchett-Stamford v Attorney-General Hussey v Palmer (1972) .... 11-20 City Tennis Club Ltd [2010] Lashmar, Re [1891] .... 3-10, 3-19
[2009] .... 20-14, 21-16, 21-21 Hyatt of Australia Ltd v Coolum Resort .... 10-4, 10-18 La tee Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal
Harcourt v White (1860) .... 1-20 Pry Ltd [2012] .... 13-7, 13-36 Johnson v Agnew [1980] .... 12-7, 14-9, Pry Ltd (1965) .... 2-4, 2-7, 2-13
Hardoon v Belilios [1901] .... 15-6, Hyde v Holland [2003] .... 18-12 14-10, 14-31, 14-32, 14-37, 14-38 Latimer v Commissioner of Inland
15-32, 22-20, 24-4, 24-16, 24-17 Hyhonie Holdings Pty Ltd v Leroy - v Ball (1851) .... 16-7, 16-29 Revenue [2002] .... 21-35
Harmer v Pearson (1993) .... 11-23 [2003] .... 17-2, 17-4, 17-24 - v Buttress (1936) .... 8-2, 8-3, 8-10, Laughton, Re [1962] .... 25-28
Harpur v Levy [2007] .... 17-2 HZD Pty Ltd v Mcinnes [2007] 8-11, 8-12, 8-26 Leading Synthetics Pty Ltd v Adroit
Harris v Digital Pulse Pry Ltd (2003) .... 13-7, 13-36 Jones v Badley (1868) .... 16-7, 16-28 Insurance Group Pry Ltd [2011]
.... 1-4, 1-5, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, Jones v Krawczyk [2011] .... 19-2 .... 10-17
5-13, 7-24, 14-3, 14-25-14-27 Jorden v Money (1854) .... 10-2, 10-24, Leahy v Attorney-General (NSW)
Hartigan v International Society for !merman v Tchenguiz [2010] .... 7-36 10-25 (1959) .... 20-1, 20-3, 20-4, 20-6,
Krishna Consciousness Inc [2002] Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney-General JW Broomhead (Vic) Pry Ltd (in 20-7, 20-8, 20-10, 20-11, 20-14,
.... 8-5 [1981] .... 13-10, 13-16 liquidation) v JW Broomhead Pry 20-15, 20-17, 20-18, 20-22, 20-24,
Hatfield v TCN Channel Nine Pry Ltd Inche Noriah v Shaik Allie Bin Omar Ltd [1985] .... 22-20, 24-16, 24-17 20-25, 20-28, 21-4, 21-12, 21-22
[2010] .... 13-7 [1929] .... 8-12 Ledgerwood v Perpetual Trustee (1997)
Hegarty, Re [2011] .... 20-1, 20-4, 20-8, Income Tax Acts (No 1), Re [1930] K .... 16-7, 16-29
20-22, 20-28, 21-12 .... 21-23 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited Leek (deed), Re [1967] .... 18-2, 18-11,
Heid v Reliance Finance Corporation Incorporated Council of Law Reporting [2013] .... 8-5, 8-16, 8-30 18-26
Pry Ltd (1983) .... 1-16, 2-7, 2-14, for England and Wales Karam v ANZ Banking Group [2001] Legione v Hateley (1983) .... 9-1, 9-7,
2-15 v Attorney-General [1972] .... 21-15 .... 8-31 9-10, 9-14, 9-15, 9-16, 9-20, 10-2,
Henderson v Miles [2005] .... 11-13, Incorporated Council of Law Reporting Kauter v Hilton (1953) .... 17-4, 17-24 10-11, 10-14, 10-15, 10-27
11-26, 11-42 of the State of Queensland v Federal Keen's Estate, Re [1937] .... 16-7, Letterstedt v Broers (1884) .... 22-11
- v - (No 2) [2005] .... 10-4, 10-19 Commissioner of Taxation ( 1971) 16-28, 16-29 Lighting by Design (Aust) Pry Ltd
Henry v Hammond [1913] .... 15-30 .... 21-2, 21-15 Kell v Harris (1915) .... 12-37 v Cannington Nominees Pry Ltd
Herdegen v Federal Commissioner of Independent Schools Council v Charity Kennon v Spry; Spry v Kennon (2008) [2008] .... 12-4, 12-22, 12-23,
Taxation (1988) .... 17-14, 18-12 Commission for England and Wales .... 18-3, 18-6, 18-17, 18-18, 12-24, 12-27
Hibberson v George (1989) .... 11-23 [2012] .... 21-5, 21-14, 21-28 18-20, 18-28, 18-31, 18-32, 19-3 Lind, Re [1915] .... 4-9, 4-10
-xvi- -xvii-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts Table of Cases
Links Golf Tasmania Pty Ltd v Sattler McLean v Burns Philp Trustee Meshakov-Korjakin (deed), Re Will of (1948) .... 21-5, 21-14, 21-18,
(No 3) (2012] .... 14-2, 14-22 Company Pty Ltd (1985) .... 24-14, [2011] .... 21-7, 21-15 21-21
Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans (1984] 24-16, 24-17, 24-19 Mettoy Pension Trustees Ltd v Evans National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth
.... 7-19, 7-41 McNally v Harris [2008) .... 6-21 (1990) .... 18-3, 18-17, 18-28, 18-32 (1965) .... 2-3
Lipinski's Will Trusts, Re (1976) - v -(No 3) (2008) .... 14-3, 14-22 Miller v Cameron (1936) .... 22-11 National Trustees Company of
.... 20-3, 20-15, 20-25, 20-32 McPhail v Doulton (1971) see Baden's Millett v Regent (1975) .... 12-24 Australasia Ltd v General Finance
Liquidity Financial Services Pty Ltd Deed Trusts, Re; McPhail Mills (dec'd), In re (1981) .... 21-34 Company of Australasia Ltd (1905)
v Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd v Doulton (1971) Mills v Ruthol Pty Ltd; Tricon (Aust) .... 24-22
(2012) .... 12-19, 12-33 Madden v Kevereski (1983] .... 14-10, Pry Ltd v Ruthol Pty Ltd (2004) Neace v Parfit (2006] .... 12-19
Lloyd's Bank Ltd v Bundy (1975) 14-38 .... 14-9, 14-10, 14-35, 14-38 Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips (1974)
.... 8-2, 8-11, 8-26 Maddison v Alderson (1883) .... 12-6, Milroy v Lord (1862) .... 3-3, 4-7, 4-17, .... 13-10
Locker's Settlement, Re; Meachem 12-22, 12-23, 12-27 4-25, 4-27, 4-34, 4-38, 16-4, 16-5, Nelson v Nelson (1995) .... 11-6, 11-46,
v Sachs (1978) .... 23-7 Maguire v Makaronis (1997) .... 14-3, 16-12, 16-22 19-5, 19-7, 19-14, 19-16, 19-22,
Logan, Re the Will of, [1993) .... 17-13 14-20, 14-21 Minister for Immigration and 19-23, 19-24, 19-28
Londonderry's Settlement, Re (1965) Maher v Attorney-General (Qld) (2011) Citizenship v Kumar (2009] .... 7-1, Neville Estates Ltd v Madden (1962)
.... 23-26 .... 21-7 7-4, 7-19, 7-41 .... 20-14, 20-25
Lord and Fullerton's Contract, Mahoney, Re [1918] .... 18-3, 18-17, Mizzi v Reliance Financial Services Pty Nicholls v Michael Wilson & Partners
Re (1896) .... 22-20 18-28 Ltd (2007) .... 16-14 Ltd [2010) .... 14-2, 14-3, 14-22,
Louth v Diprose (1992) .... 8-5, 8-28, Maiden v Maiden (1908) .... 12-16, MLW Technology Pty Ltd v May (2005) 14-25
8-30, 8-31 12-23, 12-35 .... 12-7 Nocton v Lord Ashburton (1914)
Lovell, Re [1985] .... 20-3, 20-16 Manglicmot v Commonwealth Moffett v Dillon (1999) .... 2-24 .... 14-2, 14-20
Lowe v Pascoe (No 4) [2012] .... 14-4 Bank Officers Superannuation Moorgate Tobacco Company Ltd Nolan v Collie (2003) .... 24-3
Lucas Stewart Pty Ltd v Hemmes Corporation (2010) .... 23-4 v Phillip Morris Ltd (No 2) (1984) - v Nolan (2004) .... 6-2, 6-12
Hermitage Pty Ltd (2010) .... 13-3, Manisty's Settlement, Re (1974) .... 7-1, 7-10, 7-33 Nonferral (NSW) Pty Ltd v Taufia
13-18, 13-33 .... 18-4, 18-15, 18-30 Morice v Bishop of Durham (1804) (1998) .... 19-23
Lumley v Wagner (1852) .... 13-33 Manns v Attorney-General (NSW) .... 15-21, 17-6, 18-3, 18-20, Norman v Federal Commissioner of
Lutheran Church of Australia South (2010] .... 21-4 18-31, 20-1, 20-8, 20-15, 20-22, Taxation (1963) .... 3-1, 4-1, 4-3,
Australia District Inc v Farmers' Manser, Re [1905) .... 21-17 21-12, 21-22 4-8, 4-10, 4-12, 4-16, 4-19, 4-22,
Co-operative Ex-ecutors and Mantonella Pty Ltd v Thompson (2009] Morris v Morris (1982) .... 11-13, 4-23, 4-36, 4-39
Trustees Limited (1970) .... 18-3, .... 14-3, 14-20, 14-21 11-26, 11-42 North Coast Environmental Council
18-5, 18-17, 18-25 Marchesi v Apostolou (2007) .... 4-7, Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd Inc v Minister for Resources (1994)
4-25 (2008] .... 7-2, 7-5, 7-19, 7-28, .... 13-5, 13-20
M Maritime Union of Australia v Patrick 7-41, 7-49, 14-3, 14-27 North Queensland Conservation
McBride v Sandland (1918) .... 12-23 Stevedores No 1 Pty Ltd (1998) Moss (deed), Re; Hobrough v Harvey Council Inc v f.xecutive Director,
McCracken v Attorney-General (1995] .... 12-36 (1949) .... 20-27, 21-16 Queensland Parks and Wildlife
.... 18-4, 18-12, 18-15, 18-30 Martin v Martin (1959) .... 19-4, 19-14, Moyes v J and L Developments Pty Ltd Service (2000) .... 13-20
McCrohon v Harith (2010) .... 14-3, 19-18, 19-28 (No 2) (2007) .... 24-2 NP Generations Pty Ltd v Feneley
14-20 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Palm Assets Murphy v Lush (1986) .... 7-21, 13-7, [2001) .... 7-14, 7-15, 7-17, 7-38
McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd Pty Ltd [2009) .... 12-22 13-36 NSW Masonic Youth Property Trust
(1933) .... 9-6, 9-13 Maxted v LC Smith & Company Pty Murray v Schreuder (2009] .... 23-26 v Attorney-General (NSW) (2009)
Macduff, Re (1896) .... 21-15 Ltd (2008] .... 10-14, 10-15 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) .... 1-15, .... 21-5, 21-14, 21-18, 21-32
McGovern v Attorney-General (1982] Mayfair Trading Company Pty Ltd 10-19, 11-9-11-12, 11-16-11-21, NSW Trustee and Guardian
.... 21-21 v Dreyer (1958) .... 13-10 11-24, 11-28, 11-37-11-39, 11-41, v Attorney-General in and for the
Mackay, Re; Griessemann v Carr (1911] Mehmet v Benson (1965) .... 12-19 11-45, 11-49, 11-50 State of New South Wales (2012)
.... 24-22 Melbourne Anglican Trust Corporation Mussoorie Bank Ltd v Raynor (1882) .... 21-6
McKenzie v McDonald (1927] .... 14-2, v Attorney-General (Vic) (2005] .... 15-23, 17-3, 17-5, 17-13
14-22 .... 21-8, 21-19 0
Mackintosh v Johnson (2013) .... 8-28, Mense and Ampere Electrical N Oatway, Re; Hertslet v Oatway (1903)
8-30 Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd National Anti-Vivisection Society .... 25-15, 25-28
McLean, Re (1930) .... 18-3, 18-17, v Milenkovic (1973) .... 7-15 v Inland Revenue Commissioners Octavo Investments Pty Ltd v Knight
18-28 (1979) .... 24-17
-XVIII- -xix-
LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Equity and Trusts
Table of Cases
O'Dea v Allstates Leasing System (WA) Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty
Public Trustee v Attorney-General of Corporation [2008] .... 7-44, 13-1,
Pry Ltd (1983) .... 9-3, 9-21, 9-22, Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia
New South Wales (1997) .... 21-21 13-7, 13-36
9-23, 9-25, 9-27 (No 3) [1998] .... 12-36
Public Trustee v Donoghue [1999] Riches v Hogben (1985] .... 10-2,
Ogilvie v Ryan [1976) .... 12-25, 12-27 Patros v Patros (2007) .... 23-22
.... 19-2 12-21, 12-23, 12-25
Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd Paul v Constance [1977] .... 3-9
Public Trustee of Queensland Riches v Hogben (1986] .... 10-4, 10-9,
(1976) .... 12-8 PC Developments Pty Ltd v Revell
v Rutledge [2010) .... 21-8, 21-16, 10-11, 10-15, 10-18, 10-19, 10-26
O'Halloran v RT Thomas & Family Pty (1991) .... 9-26
21-19 Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd, Re; ASIC
Ltd (1988) .... 14-3 Pearson v Inland Revenue
Public Trustee (Qld) as Litigation v Carey (No 6) (2006] .... 18-2,
O'Neill v Williams [2006) .... 10-4, Commissioners [1981]
Guardian for ADF v Ban (No 2) 18-3, 18-6, 18-18, 18-20, 18-32
10-18 .... 15-24
[2012] .... 4-7, 4-25 Rigg v Sheridan [2008] .... 14-3, 14-20
Onus v Alcoa of Australia Limited Pedulla v Nasti (1990) .... 20-4, 20-28,
Pullan v Koe [1913] .... 16-2, 16-13, Ringrow Pry Ltd v BP Australia Pry Ltd
(1981) .... 13-5, 13-20 20-30
16-24 (2005] .... 9-3, 9-21, 9-23, 9-27
Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Percival v Dunn (1885) .... 4-16
Robb v Green (1895] .... 7-10, 7-12,
Company Ltd (1951] .... 21-5, Permanent Building Society (in liq)
Q 7-14
21-14, 21-23, 21-26, 21-27, 21-30, v Wheeler (1994) .... 14-3
Queensland Industrial Steel Pry Ltd Robins v Robins (2006] .... 19-7, 19-14,
21-31, 21-33, 21-34, 21-35 Perpetual Executors and Trustees
v Jensen [1987] .... 7-21, 13-7, 19-22
Orleans Investments Pry Ltd Association of Australia Ltd
13-36, 13-39 Rochefoucauld v Boustead (1897]
v Mindshare Communications Ltd v Wright (1917) .... 19-4, 19-8,
Queensland State and Municipal .... 3-11, 16-5, 16-12
[2009] .... 13-1, 13-4, 13-23 19-14, 19-18
Orchestra Endowment Fund, Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pry
O'Sullivan v Management Agency and Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v John
Re [1999] .... 21-8, 21-19 Ltd (2003) .... 9-6, 9-13, 9-16
Music Ltd [1985] .... 8-13 Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1959)
Quinn v Bryant [2012] .... 10-4, 10-15 Ronowska v Kus (2012] .... 10-4, 10-18
Otway v Otway (1888) .... 1-19 .... 17-15
Rowe v Attorney-General (NSW)
Oughtred v Inland Revenue - v Tindal (1940) .... 18-2, 18-11,
R [2012] .... 21-7
Commissioners [1960] .... 3-8, 18-26
R v District Auditor; ex parte West Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan
3-11, 3-16, 3-19, 3-20 - v Wittscheibe (1940) .... 20-11
Yorkshire Metropolitan County (1995] .... 6-7, 6-17
Owners Strata Plan 22724 v Owners Perpetual Trustees Queensland Limited,
Council (1986) .... 18-30 Royal North Shore Hospital of Sydney
Strata Plan 30403 [2012] .... 10-4 Re (1999] .... 21-15
R & I Bank of Western Australia Ltd v Attorney-General (NSW) (1938)
Owners Strata Plan No 4085 v Mallone Peter Pan Manufacturing Corporation
v Anchorage Investments Pty Ltd .... 21-21
[2006] .... 13-1, 13-3, 13-6, 13-8, v Corsets Silhouette Ltd [1964]
(1993) .... 18-3, 18-19, 18-31 Ruthol Pry Ltd v Mills (2003) .... 2-7
13-18, 13-21, 13-33 .... 7-5, 7-23, 7-45, 14-5, 14-17
Raine (deed), Re; Walton
Pettingall v Pettingall (1842) .... 20-4, v Attorney-General [1956] .... 21-8, s
p 20-28
21-19 S & D International Pty Ltd (No 4 ),
P v D [2000] .... 7-28 Pianta v National Finance & Trustees
Ralli's Will Trusts, Re [1964] .... 16-5, Re (2010] .... 2-7, 2-14
Page One Records Ltd v Britton [1968] Ltd (1964) .... 12-13
.... 13-37 Pilmer v Duke Group Limited (in liq) 16-12 Saltman Engineerin~ Company Ltd
Ramsden v Dyson (1856) .... 10-2, v Campbell Engineering Company
Palette Shoes Pty Ltd v Krohn (1937) [2001] .... 14-3, 14-23
10-9, 10-11, 10-26 Ltd (1948) .... 7-1, 7-3, 7-4, 7-10,
.... 4-10 Pitt (deed), Re Estate of; Aston
Ready Constructions Pty Ltd v Jenno 7-12, 7-16, 7-33, 7-37
Palinkas v Palinkas [2009] .... 11-13, v Mt Gambier Presbyterian Charge
[1984] .... 12-18 Salvo v New Tel Ltd (2005] .... 15-6,
11-26, 11-42 (2002] .... 21-8, 21-20
Redgrave v Hurd (1881) .... 1-5, 1-8 15-30, 17-2, 17-16
Pardoe, Re [1906] .... 21-17 Platzer v Commonwealth Bank of
Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris (1969] Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc
Parij v Parij (1997) .... 11-11, 11-23, Australia (1977) .... 2-24, 2-25
.... 13-6 (2011] .... 13-2, 13-3, 13-7, 13-36
11-28 Pobjoy v Reynolds (2013] .... 10-4
Regent v Millett (1976) .... 12-23, Saul v Lin (No 1) (2004] .... 22-11,
Parry-Jones v Law Society [1969] Price v Strange [1978) .... 12-16, 12-37
12-24 22-21
.... 7-4 Princess Ann of Hesse v Field [1963]
Registered Securities Ltd, Re (1991] - v - (No 2) (2004) .... 22-11, 22-21
Pascoe v Boensch (2008) .... 3-5 .... 22-11
.... 25-28 Saunders v Vautier (1841) .... 17-14,
Patel v Ali [1984] .... 12-18 Prosper v Wojowicz [2005] .... 17-7,
Registrar of the Accident Compensation 22-22, 25-5
Pateman v Heyen (1993) .... 23-14, 18-27
Tribunal v Commissioner of Say-Dee Pry Ltd v Farah Constructions
23-24 Pryce, Re [1917] .... 1-5, 1-8, 16-6,
Taxation (1993) .... 18-12 Pty Ltd [2005] .... 14-6, 14-18,
Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty 16-14, 16-15, 16-16, 16-26
Resch's Will Trusts, Re [1969] .... 21-18 14-19
Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia PT Ltd v Maradona Pry Ltd (No 2)
RG Munro Futures Pty Ltd Scaffidi v Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd
(1998] .... 13-7, 13-23, 13-36 (1992) .... 3-10, 3-15, 3-25
(in liq) v Starport Future Trading [2011] .... 18-6, 18-20, 18-31
-xx-
-xxi-