rrc '^^^ s^j^i;/^ yW^g/^UU^ -.'/W-S'V »:•-:• IS&i .-.»:^#^^ ^^by:.:v t?'^ Sl^'^ ^^;^y:^^m^y^^ !^§^^^^0d^" ' ^Vf.-'il- WCBJgW^ .«S«?ySti«jHg' Philofophical Enquiry INTO THE Origin of our Ideas O F T H E SUBLIME AND BEAUTIFUL. LONDON: Printed for R, and J. Dodsley, in Pall-mall, M DCC LVII. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/enqphiljQSophicalOOburkrich THE PREFACE rHE author hopes it will not be thought impertinent to fay fomething of the motives which in^ duced him to enter into thefollowing enquiry. The matters which make the fubjedi of it hadformerly engaged a great deal of his attention. But he often found himfelf greatly at a lofs\ he found that he was far from hav^ ing any thing like an exa5l theory of our pafjions^ or a knowledge of their genuine fources ; he found that he could not reduce his notions to any A 3 fixed vi The PREFACE. fixed or conjijlent principles ; and he had remarked^ that others lay under the fame difficulties. He obferved that the ideas of the fublime and beautiful were frequently confounded ; and that both were in- difcriminately applied to things greatly differing^ and fometimes of natures diredily oppofite. Even LonginuSy in his incomparable difcourfe upon apart ofthisfubjeBy has comprehended things extremely repugnant to each othery un- der one common name of the Sublime. T^he abufe ofthe word Be2.ntyy has been ftill more generaly and attended with Jlill worfe confequences. Such a confufon of ideas muft cer^ tainly render all our reafonings upon fubjeBs of this kind extremely inaccu-' rate and inconclufive. Could this ad- mit