ENGLAND: AN ELEGY ROGER SCRUTON ?:: Chatto & Windus LONDON - England: an elegy BY THE SAME AUTHOR Philosophy Art and Imagination The Aesthetics of Architecture A Dictionary of Political Thought Sexual Desire Modem Philosophy An Intelligent Person's Guide to Philosophy The Aesthetics of Music Essays The Meaning of Conservatism Untimely Tracts The Philosopher on Dover Beach On Hunting Fiction Fortnight's Anger Francesca A Dove Descending and other Stories Xanthippic Dialogues Perictione in Colophon ])A- l<t l .531- \ ~oo?> Published by Chatto & Windus 2000 2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 J Copyright © Roger Scruton 2000 Roger Scruton has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser First published in Great Britain in 2000 by Chatto & Windus Random House, 20 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London sw1v 2SA Random House Australia (Pty) Limited 20 Alfred Street, Milsons Point, Sydney, New South Wales 2061, Australia Random House New Zealand Limited 18 Poland Road, Glenfield, Auckland 10, New Zealand Random House (Pty) Limited Endulini, 5A Jubilee Road, Parktown 2193, South Africa The Random House Group Limited Reg. No. 954009 www.randomhouse.co.uk A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN I 85619 251 2 Papers used by Random House are natural, recyclable products made from wood grown in sustainable forests; the manufacturing processes conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin Typeset by Deltatype Ltd, Birkenhead, Wirral Printed and bound in Great Britain by Biddies Ltd, Guildford. C1RAti q l/0 2 373·7 G, 1 I t~ R I $' J }l l ;) I Contents .. Preface vu Chapter One: What on Earth was England? I Chapter Two: First Glimpses 23 Chapter Three: English Character 43 Chapter Four: Community as Person 68 Chapter Five: The English Religion 87 Chapter Six: The English Law 112 Chapter Seven: English Society 132 Chapter Eight: English Government 174 Chapter Nine: English Culture 199 Chapter Ten: English Countryside 234 Chapter Eleven: Epilogue: The Forbidding of England 244 Acknowledgements 258 Index 259 Preface 'The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the gathering of the dusk.' Hegel's words ring true of every form of human life: it is only at the end of things that we begin to understand them. And understanding them, we know that they are lost. Which comes first - the understanding or the losing? Often it seems that we kill things by examining them; and then again, that understanding is a way to keep what we value, when all other means have vanished. What follows is a memorial address: I speak of England as I knew it, not as the country might appear to the historian. My intention is not to add to the store of factual knowledge, but to pay a personal tribute to the civilisation that made me and which is now passing from the world. Since the Second World War the Owl of Minerva has hovered uninterruptedly above my subject: book upon book has appeared, describing, denouncing, analysing, and anatomising Eng land - whether or not under this, its true and proper description. I cannot add to, still less compete with, the work of diligent historians, and if the names of Sir Geoffrey Elton, Alan Macfarlane, Jonathan Clark, David Cannadine, Linda Colley, A.O. Harvey and the late Raphael Samuel appear rarely, if at all, I hope that I will be forgiven for making so little acknowledgement of their influence. My aim is that of all funeral orations: to praise the dead, and to cheer the . survivors. This is not the first such oration. Lamentations over England's passing have been a feature of English literature throughout the ... ENGLAND: AN ELEGY Vlll twentieth century - so much so that one can be forgiven for questioning their sincerity. From George Sturt's Change in the Village (1912) to Peter Laslett's collection devoted to The World We Have Lost (1984), writers have brooded on the destruction caused by social and material progress, to a country which a century earlier had made 'progress' its motto. But these lamentations, often dismissed as nostalgia, and criticised on all sides for their failure to compare the fate of England with the fate of everywhere else, have been superseded by a newer and more genuinely valedictory literature, in which the uniqueness of England is recognised, and its mortal nature shown. In a work packed with historical knowledge (In Memory Of England, London, 1998), Peter VanSittart has given an account of our disappearing country whose erudition I could not hope to rival. In more lyrical vein Linda Proud has evoked the spirit of England in a book - Consider England (London, 1994) - whose message is powerfully reinforced by the watercolours of Valerie Petts, and which makes an unanswerable case, both literary and visual, for the Old England of our dreams. Some, like Philippe Daudy in Les Anglais (Paris, 1991), have said their farewells from abroad. Some, like Jerellly Paxman in The English (London, 1998), have picked up the pieces (a few of them at least) while pieces remain. Others have documented, whether in anger, in sorrow or in secret or not so secret satisfaction, the passing of some aspect of our culture - of the countryside (Graham Harvey, The Killing of the Countryside, London, 1996), of the education system (George Walden, We Should Know Better, London, 1998), of our political institutions and political independence Oohn Redwood, The Death ofB ritain?, London, 1999), of the class system (David Cannadine, The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy, Yale, 1990, and Class in Britain, London, 1999), of the ritual and liturgy of the Anglican Church (Brian Morris, ed., Ritual Murder, Manchester, 1980), or of the entire English culture and settlement (Clive Aslett, Anyone for England?, London, 1997, and Peter Hitchens, The Abolition of Britain, London, 1999). Unique among the many obituaries is that of Julian Barnes, whose witty . Preface IX account of a represented and re-presented England (in England, England, London, 1998) contains a strangely moving evocation of the old tranquillity. My excuses for this book are two: first, that it is a personal tribute; second, that it is an attempt to understand, from a philosophical perspective, what we are now losing as our form of life decays. England furnished us with an ideal, and the English people acquired some of the gentleness, amiability and civilised manners which that ideal prescribed. What the English people have since become is, to my mind, a proof that ideals are important. Malmesbury, 2000 Chapter One What on Earth was England.I What was England: a nation? A territory? A language? A culture? An empire? An idea? All answers seem inadequate; in this chapter I attempt to say why. The English enjoyed the strange privilege of knowing exactly who they were, but not what they were. In moments of crisis they would reach for abstract ideas. Asserting his sovereignty against the Pope, Henry VIII described England as an 'empire, entire unto itself'. His subjects called it a kingdom, but were astonished to discover, when James VI of Scotland ascended the throne, that the kingdom stretched to the Outer Hebrides. Under Cromwell, England became a 'protectorate', though protected from what it was impossible to say. Following the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the English spoke first of empire, then of union and finally of a United Kingdom. Meanwhile, they accepted a foreign king, George I, who spoke no English, and they learned to revise the geographical description of their country. It was no longer England but Great Britain and Ireland - the latter dragged in protestingly and with a just grievance that has never been answered or atoned for. The English began to call themselves British and the most popular of their patriotic songs affirms that 'Britons never never never shall be slaves!'1 Their empire - having been acquired, as Sir John Seeley 1 Although 'Britain' was contained in the royal title after the Act of Union of 1707, the use of the word 'Briton' was subsequently an object of satire - especially from 2 ENGLAND: AN ELEGY famously put it, 'in a fit of absence of mind', in other words not by political planning but by private enterprise in which the Scots, the Welsh and the Irish played an equal part1 was not the English but - the British Empire. Even at the height of imperial splendour, however, England was the focus of their loyalty. Macaulay gave his countrymen the canonical image of their past in an unfinished work entitled History of England (184cr55). France had defined itself already as a nation; Germany and Italy were following suit, in each case with no small measure of violence, revolutionary upheaval and intoxicated speechifying.2 But still the English had no real equivalent of the national idea. Vague notions of 'kith and kin' animated the builders of empire; but who was included and why remained uncertain. When politicians appealed for support, they addressed not the nation or the kingdom but 'the country' - meaning all those people who were represented in the Parliament of Westminster. But what these people had in common, and what had brought them together under a single crown, remained wholly obscure. The Scots were still governed by their own laws, and possessed institutions, offices and ceremonies that made little sense to those brought up south of the Border. When politicians appealed to the country it was as though they were waving vaguely from the Palace of Westminster, towards territory that stretched without definition until falling, in some distant and unvisited region, into the sea. That territory was England - and it was an enchanted territory, which called to its children in every far-flung corner of the globe, furnishing them with the idea and the love of home. It was therefore as the home country that England was most easily Wilkes, in his The True Briton - and Scots and Irish soldiers were still referring to themselves as 'English' (being in service to the English crown) in the 1800s. See A.O. Harvey, Collision ofE mpires: Britain in the Three World Wars, 1793-1945, London, 1992, p. 6n. 1 Sir John Robert Seeley, The Expansion of· England in the Eighteenth Century, London, 188 3. 2 See Adam Zamoyski, Holy Madness: Romantics, Patriots and Revolutionaries, 1776-1871, London, 1999.