Engaging Adolescent Learners Brandy Yee • Anne Sliwka Matti Rautiainen Engaging Adolescent Learners International Perspectives on Curriculum, Pedagogy and Practice Brandy Yee Anne Sliwka Calgary Board of Education, Universität Heidelberg University of Calgary Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Calgary, AB, Canada Matti Rautiainen University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, Finland ISBN 978-3-319-52601-0 ISBN 978-3-319-52602-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018953169 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover illustration: © huePhotography / Getty This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland This book is dedicated to all those teachers, students and instructional leaders whose words and work have provided us with images of practice that will positively impact the ways in which we engage adolescents in their learning. This book is also dedicated to that person each of us has in our lives who will not only read our chapters, but who, more importantly, inspires us to be brave enough to share our words with the world…WGY, thank you for being my person…xo Contents 1 Why Comparative Research on the Middle Years? 1 2 S etting the Stage 21 3 Multicultural and Multifaceted Canada 71 4 G ermany: A System Undergoing Change 115 5 Finland: Towards the Future School 139 6 Ecologies of Practice 161 vii List of Figures Fig. 3.1 (a, b, c) Whys, hows and whats on rocks 89 Fig. 5.1 Big Picture of Teacher Education at the Department of Teacher Education at the University of Jyväskylä 152 ix 1 Why Comparative Research on the Middle Years? Is it okay if I tell you that most days I feel like I don’t even know who this person is who is staring back at me in the mirror. Sometimes I am happy, sometimes I am sad, and then mad and just bored, all in like the same hour. My body aches and all these things are happening to it that I feel embarrassed to ask my family and friends about. And then I have to be in class and try to hold all these emotions together and also get my mind focused on learning. Every day feels like a struggle. (Yee, Student Interview, December 2014) Anyone who has recently stepped into a middle years’ classroom knows all too well the truth of this portrait—the lived experience of learners in our schools today. Early adolescents are truly a unique group of learners, like none other a teacher might experience—a group that will at one moment test a teacher’s mettle and the very next bring so much elation and reward that a teacher might even question how they could ever think of working with another age group. This is the appeal and the true curios- ity behind the early adolescent learner and is the heart of what we will present to you in this book. While many arguments can be found to support either the early years (kindergarten through grade 4) or the high school years (grades 10 © The Author(s) 2018 1 B. Yee et al., Engaging Adolescent Learners, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7_1 2 B. Yee et al. through 12) as being of crucial importance in a child’s growth and devel- opment, it is the middle years that have often gone unnoticed. Much brain-based research has been devoted to understanding the tremendous changes early adolescents experience; yet, connecting that research to school-based practices for these learners has remained elusive. Decisions about middle level learning environments and programming for these learners are often based on budgets and capital plans as opposed to what will best support them through what can be a very tumultuous time. This is not a group of slightly more complex primary students. Nor is it a group of immature high schoolers. These [middle-years learners] are unique. Intellectually, the tools they need for figuring out academics and life are not all in the toolbox yet. This makes decision making, impulsivity control, moral/abstract reasoning, “reading” the situation, planning, understanding consequences of words and actions, and other executive functions intermittent at best. They are fiercely independent, yet paradoxi- cally, they crave social connection. They move from concrete to abstract thinking, sounding like adults when talking about some topics, and young children when discussing others. They crave competence, self-definition, creativity, vividness in learning, emotionally control/power over their lives, physical activity, positive social interactions with adults and peers, struc- ture and clear limits, and meaningful participation in school/community. Most of all, they want to belong. (Wormeli 2012, para. 9–14) Truly understanding the unique developmental needs of early adolescent learners and how the multifaceted developmental changes they undergo during this period impact their experience in school is often overlooked while educators with good intentions engage in “strategic guesswork” attempting to create effective and appropriate learning environments and opportunities for adolescent students. We cannot deny the very real stages of physical, emotional and social development and transition occurring for these learners; however, we need not perpetuate myths that associate early adolescence with distress, difficulty or suffering. If school systems attend to how these changes impact teaching and learning, middle level learning environments can achieve their potential in becoming remarkable places of learning, responsive to the unique learning needs of early adolescents. Why Comparative Research on the Middle Years? 3 With much attention worldwide currently focused on the early years of learning along with supporting students as they work towards high school completion, it is the early adolescent learner, age 10–14, and the middle years of learning that are often overlooked as large education sys- tems endeavour to bolster student achievement. An abundance of current research highlights a concerning decline of student engagement in and connectedness with their learning, beginning at age 10 (Association for Middle Level Education 2010; Balfanz 2009; Centre for Collaborative Education 2003; Manitoba Education 2008; McCreary Centre Society 2009; National Association of Secondary School Principals 2006; OISE 2008; Rumble and Aspland 2009; Steinberg 2014; Willms et al. 2009; Wormeli 2011). Still, a significant imbalance exists in the amount of time, money and human resources education systems have invested in the middle years of learning as compared to learners on either end of the developmental continuum. According to one study, Young People in Canada: Their Health and Well-Being, early adolescents’ behaviours and self-perceptions are closely related to their quality of life in school (Klinger et al. 2011). This study found that by Grade 8, only 21 per cent of girls and 16 per cent of boys reported “liking school a lot” (p. 52). Furthermore, 52 per cent of girls and 54 per cent of boys described their “teachers [as being] interested in them,” and only 72 per cent of girls and 70 per cent of boys believed that “most of their teachers were friendly” (p. 54). Similarly, a study sponsored by the McCreary Centre Society (2009) in British Columbia examined adolescents’ perceptions of school and feeling connected to school and their learning throughout the adolescent developmental period. This multifaceted study generated troubling findings that characterized early adolescent learners as lacking any meaningful connection to school across all grades. Results showed a sharp drop in student connectedness to their learning from 23 per cent in Grade 7 to 7 per cent in Grade 10, with a slight rise to 12 per cent in Grade 12. Longitudinal research studies from both New Zealand and Australia indicate that it “works” for schools to develop a middle years approach. Outcomes are better, student engage- ment with their learning is greater, teacher satisfaction is higher and resources within and across schools are better utilized (O’Sullivan 2005). Haigh (2004) writes, “Studies have overwhelmingly concluded that
Description: