ebook img

Empowered to Differ - VU-DARE Home - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam PDF

219 Pages·2004·1.38 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Empowered to Differ - VU-DARE Home - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

H a r r y F i n k Empowered to Differ e n f l ü g e l Since the advent of Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) in 1976, many developing countries have conducted CBR projects. CBR has been presented as a relevant and cost- E Stakeholders’ effective way to provide rehabilitation services to people with m disabilities. Twenty-five years later it was concluded that, Influences in despite the growing amount of literature on the topic, the p Graag nodig ik u uit evidence base for CBR is still fragmented and therefore its o Community-Based U w voor het bijwonen effectiveness cannot be sufficiently established. In this thesis, a van de openbare verdediging theoretical model based on the competency levels of the different e Rehabilitation stakeholders involved in CBR is presented. In addition, an r van mijn proefschrift: I e analysis of the stakeholders involved is carried out in order to Empowered d study the process of CBR. Finally, CBR projects in Southern T Africa (i.e. Zimbabwe) have been analysed to determine the t to Differ o influence of these stakeholders on the CBR process. D N The stakeholders involved in CBR projects are highly interdependent and rely on each other to achieve programme i and individual objectives. However, the interests of these ff Op woensdag 31 maart 2004 stakeholders conflict on several issues. One of these issues is the e om 13.45 uur precies O r need for a specialised competency level versus a broad in de aula van de Vrije Universiteit, competency level, and another is their orientation regarding De Boelelaan 1105 te Amsterdam. D the individual versus society. On the basis of these two issues, this thesis concludes by providing four scenarios for the further development of CBR. Harry Finkenflügel I Lodewijk Pincoffsweg 466, 3071 ASRotterdam Harry Finkenflügel was involved in the Zimbabwe CBR pilot telefoon 010-4863652 e-mail: [email protected] G projects and taught at the Rehabilitation Technicians Training School (1988-1991). In the Netherlands, he has worked as a physiotherapist, educational manager, and general manager I for organisations that serve people with severe learning PARANIMFEN: disabilities. He is currently working at the ‘Institute for Health Frans Finkenflügel N Care Policy and Planning’ of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Dahliastraat 6, 7081 ECGendringen, Rotterdam in the Netherlands. telefoon 0315-630827 e-mail: [email protected] G Rita Zijlstra ISBN 90-77595-11-2 Lodewijk Pincoffsweg 466, 3071 ASRotterdam Harry Finkenflügel telefoon 06-48351432 e-mail: [email protected] Empowered to Differ Stakeholders’ Influences in Community-Based Rehabilitation Harry Finkenflügel © Harry Finkenflügel, 2004, Rotterdam. [email protected] ISBN 90-77595-11-2 VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Empowered to Differ Stakeholders’ Influences in Community-Based Rehabilitation ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. T. Sminia in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de faculteit der Geneeskunde op woensdag 31 maart 2004 om 13.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit De Boelelaan 1105 door: Henricus Josephus Maria Finkenflügel geboren te Gendringen promotoren: prof.dr. I.N. Wolffers prof.dr. G.J. Lankhorst beoordelingscommissie: dr. D. Burck prof.dr. C. Vlaskamp prof.dr. W. van Mechelen M. Miles, Ph.D prof.dr. A. Vermeer VI Cover illustration: Giovanni Vetere Die Gesichter, die dem Betrachter wahrhaft “entgegenkommen”, nehmen direkten Blickcontact mit ihm auf. Dieser Blickcontakt ist zentraler Inhalt der Arbeiten einerseits, und macht es anderenseits fast unmöglich, sie einer distanzierten Analyse zu unterwerfen. Die Einbildung fuktioniert so unmittelbar, dass es oft recht schwierig oder auch befremdlicherscheint, mit diesen Blicken, “einfach” umzugehen. The faces that are coming towards the observer are taking up direct visual contact with him. This visual contact is - on one hand - the central content of his works and on the other hand makes it impossible to analyse them at a distance. The imagination is working immediately making it often very hard or disconcerting to handle these looks “easily”. (text in German: Christine Glenewinkel in: I Colori della vita. Die Farben des Lebens. Giovanni Vetere wird 60, English translation by Monika Hoffman) Editing contributions: K. Elmer, M. Miles This publication has been sponsored by: Maurits van Kattendijke Stichting Stichting Annafonds Leiden Graphic design / lay out: W.A.T.?! reclame, Rotterdam VII Preface Fifteen years ago, in September 1988, I arrived in Zimbabwe to take up a position as a teacher at the Rehabilitation Assistants Training School in Harare. In my first week Mrs. S. Chidyausiku, head of the Rehabilitation Unit in the Ministry of Health, asked me to represent the school in the committee set up to monitor the Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) pilot projects in Zimbabwe. CBR was a challenge in many ways. Zimbabwe had rapidly decentralised its health services and adopted the Primary Health Care approach. Supported by donor organisations, the Ministry of Health was determined to improve the care for people with disabilities along the same lines. One of the challenges was to train the cadres for CBR. From 1981 ‘Rehabilitation Assistants’ have been trained in Zimbabwe and in 1988 the University of Zimbabwe started a physiotherapy and occupational therapy training. At that time most therapists working for the Ministry of Health were expatriates. Both expatriates and the people trained in Zimbabwe were educated in the Western medical tradition and their skills and experience in counselling and training people with disabilities, their families, and volunteers in disadvantaged communities were limited. A second challenge was to beat the scepticism of many professional rehabilitation workers. Their fear of ‘watering down’ services and expertise and offering ‘second-rate’ services to people who were, in their view, entitled to ‘the best’ was difficult to address. Apart from the WHO manual and the book “Disabled Village Children” we had no documentation and evidence available to show that lay people and semi-skilled rehabilitation workers could provide adequate assistance. The few CBR projects already running in Zimbabwe had too many problems to convince the more reluctant rehabilitation workers. Most decisive in the process was that there were indeed enough rehabilitation workers to take up the challenge and to start projects. These projects were generally well prepared and problems were solved when they arose. Although I personally was in favour of this naïve approach I was also worried about the accountability of the efforts made and asked the Rehabilitation Technicians to collect specific data on the projects, the volunteers, and the people with disabilities involved in the projects. I also started reading on CBR as much as I could get my hands on. The early correspondence with M. Miles, Brian O’Toole and Marigold Thorburn motivated me to get even more involved in CBR. In 1991 the eight pilot projects were well underway and my contract ended. I returned to The Netherlands with a fascination for CBR. Dr. Adri Vermeer and prof. dr. Brian Hopkins of the Vrije Universiteit motivated me to set up a curriculum and to get students involved in rehabilitation in developing countries. Together with prof. dr. Ivan Wolffers I edited a book “The handicapped community” and this was published in 1993. Since then, the idea of writing a Ph.D. thesis stayed with me. In the ten years that it took me to write a consistent study on CBR many events have sidetracked me from this thesis but the simple fact that this book is now on your desk means that I’m really convinced that CBR is still an interesting approach. VIII IX Glossary CBR Community-Based Rehabilitation CRW Community Rehabilitation Worker CW Community Worker IBR Institution-Based Rehabilitation ILO International Labour Organisation ILS Intermediate Local Supervisor LS Local Supervisor NGO Non-Governmental Organisation PHC Primary Health Care RA Rehabilitation Assistant RCV Red Cross Volunteer RT Rehabilitation Technician SIDA Swedish International Development Authority UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund VCW Village Community Worker VHW Village Health Worker WHO World Health Organization About the use of he, she, his, her, ... Community-based rehabilitation has sometimes been referred to as Mother-Based Rehabilitation to illustrate that it is usually the mothers, grandmothers, aunts and sisters that care for people with disabilities. It is also observed that most of the volunteers are women. Men are better represented in the professional cadres while the rehabilitation workers at district and provincial level are mostly women. It is for these reasons that in this thesis ‘she’ and ‘her’ have been consequently used. As such the probably more correct but unattractive ‘he/she’ and ‘his/her’ is avoided.

Description:
The few CBR projects already running in Zimbabwe had too many problems to convince . Schematic representation of the intervention at stakeholder level in 123. 124. 124. 125. 126. 127. 127. 128. 129. 130. 130. 132. 147. 148. 149. 150
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.