Electrodeposition of Alloys PRINCIPLES and PRACTICE VOLUME I: General Survey, Principles, and Alloys of Copper and of Silver VOLUME II: Practical and Specific Information Electrodeposition of Alloys PRINCIPLES and PRACTICE Abner Brenner National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. Volume II 1963 ACADEMIC PRESS · New York and London COPYRIGHT © 1963, BY ACADEMIC PRESS INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS BOOK MAY BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM, BY PHOTOSTAT, MICROFILM, OR ANY OTHER MEANS, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHERS. ACADEMIC PRESS INC. Ill Fifth Avenue, New York 3, New York United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS INC. (LONDON) LTD. Berkeley Square House, London, W. 1 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 62-13044 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA To my dear wife, Sonia, who furnished incentive and encouragement and To my sons: David, Douglas, Michael, and Alan Preface In technical literature there is no book which comprehensively covers the subject of the electrodeposition of alloys. As a matter of fact, except for a small booklet entitled "Die elektrolytische Darstellung von Legierungen aus wässerigen Lösungen*' which was written by Robert Kremann almost 50 years ago, no book dealing exclusively with alloy plating has ever appeared. When Kremann's book was published in 1914, all the information available on alloy plating could be treated in 70 pages, but since then the subject has expanded greatly. The information lies widely scattered in many publications and has never been collected, organized, and evaluated. This situation makes it difficult for technical workers to appreciate and utilize the large amount of work that has been done in the field. Although several excellent reviews on alloy plating with extensive biblio- graphies have appeared in recent years, they neither adequately indicate the full scope of the field nor present a systematic, critical discussion of the theory of alloy plating. They are mainly of value for calling attention to some of the more important alloy plating processes. Textbooks on electrochemistry dismiss the subject of alloy plating with only a few pages of discussion and yet elaborate on some comparatively unimportant static phenomena of electrochemistry. Even books on electrodeposition do not adequately discuss the electrodeposition of alloys. After a brief treatment of principles, a few of the commonly plated alloys are discussed and the impression is left that the field has been rather un- cultivated. The presentation of the theory of alloy deposition in the various textbooks has not changed or improved appreciably since the work of Kremann. Some of the treatments are actually erroneous, because they deal with non- existent systems and are thus led toward false conclusions. The author has attempted to eliminate this hiatus in the field of electro- deposition. The objective was to produce a textbook, as well as a monograph, which would serve two purposes: (1) Supply the practical plater with sufficient information for preparing and operating alloy plating baths so that recourse to the original literature would not be necessary. (2) Provide the electrochemist, the researcher, and the student with a scientific presentation of the facts and theory of alloy plating. A minor objective was to discuss certain topics that are not adequately treated in existing textbooks. Because of this lack, these topics are treated at more length than might appear necessary for the subject of alloy deposition alone. When the author began the preparation of the treatise in 1947, he estimated that it would take about 18 months and the book would amount to about 150 pages. However, both of his estimates turned out to be off by a factor of 10. Because the treatise includes the general, theoretical, and practicable aspects of vii viii PREFACE alloy deposition, it would have been too bulky as a single volume. Therefore, the 42 chapters were equally divided between two volumes. The first one covers the general and theoretical topics and the detailed treatment of the electro- deposition of alloys containing silver and/or copper. The second volume contains the detailed treatment of the deposition of the remaining alloys. This treatise does not include a discussion of the electrodeposition of alloys from fused salt baths or the formation of alloy coatings by thermally diffusing separately deposited coatings. Neither are the subjects of black nickel plating or electroless plating covered. To have included all these topics would have expanded the text which was already too voluminous. The literature of alloy plating has been covered through 1959 and most of 1960. The author has attempted to make this treatise more than a compilation or a compendium of all published work on the electrodeposition of alloys. He has attempted to establish a philosophy of alloy plating and to this end has in- corporated the following treatments. The alloy plating systems have been grouped into five types, and these have been individually discussed with respect to the plating variables. The fundamental bases of alloy deposition have been summed up in six principles. The role of diffusion in alloy deposition, which previously had been only qualitatively treated, has been thoroughly explored. The role of the current density versus potential relations in alloy deposition has been examined objectively, and certain misconceptions regarding their value in alloy deposition have been pointed out. The writing of this treatise has been less rewarding to the author than if the time had been spent on technical reading in more widely diversified fields. However, the author has obtained one satisfaction. This comes from presenting to reviewers and critics a document too massive to undergo the customary dotting of I's and crossing of T's. December, 1962 A. BRENNER Acknowledgments The author, not wishing to burden any one person with the onerous task of reviewing the manuscript, submitted one or two chapters to each of a number of scientists who were familiar with the subjects discussed. The names of these reviewers are listed below, and the author wishes to thank them for their cooperation. In particular, the author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of his secretary, Mrs. Anna Chapman, for her neat and accurate typing of the bulky manuscript with its many tables and legends. JOHN G. BEACH, Battelle Memorial Institute, VERNON A. LAMB, National Bureau of Columbus, Ohio. Standards, Washington, D.C. JOHN A. BENNETT, National Bureau of FREDERICK A. LOWENHEIM, Metal and Standards, Washington, D.C. Thermit Corp., Rahway, N.J. LEE O. CASE, University of Michigan, Ann FRANK C. MATHERS, Indiana University, Arbor, Mich. Bloomington, Ind. MYRON CERESA, Westinghouse Electric ABRAHAM M. MAX, RCA, Record Div., Corp., E. Pittsburgh, Pa. Indianapolis, Ind. ΒÅÍÍÉÅ COHEN, Wright Air Development FIELDING OGBURN, National Bureau of Div., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Standards, Washington, D.C. Ohio. EDWARD A. PARKER, Technic, Inc., Pro- DWIGHT E. COUCH, National Bureau of vidence, R.I. Standards, Washington, D.C. DAVID SCHLAIN, U.S. Bureau of Mines, A. H, DUROSE, Harshaw Chemical Co., College Park, Md. Cleveland, Ohio. SEYMOUR SENDEROFF, Union Carbide Corp., CHARLES L. FAUST, Battelle Memorial Inst., Perma Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Columbus, Ohio. JOSEPH M. SHERFEY, National Bureau of D. GARDINER FOULKE, Sel-Rex Corp., Standards, Washington, D.C. Nutley, N. J. JOHN L. SLIGH, Jr., National Bureau of A. KENNETH GRAHAM, Graham, Savage Standards, Washington, D.C. and Associates, Jenkinstown, Pa. JOHN K. TAYLOR, National Bureau of SAMUEL HEIMAN, Philadelphia Rust-Proof Standards, Washington, D.C. Co., Philadelphia, Pa. DENNIS R. TURNER, Bell Telephone Labs., LESLIE M. HOLT, University of Wisconsin, Murray Hill, N.J. Madison, Wis. HERBERT C VACHER, National Bureau of NELSON W. HOVEY, University of Toledo, Standards, Washington, D.C. Toledo, Ohio. CHRISTIAN J. WERNLUND, formerly with GARBIS H. KEULEGAN, National Bureau of Ε. I. duPont de Nemour & Co., now Standards, Washington, D.C. retired. ALBERTINE KROHN, University of Toledo, IRVING W. WOLF, General Electric Co., Toledo, Ohio. Syracuse, N.Y. JOSEPH B. KUSHNER, Evansville College, GWENDOLYN B. WOOD, National Bureau of Evansville, Ind. Standards, Washington, D.C. ROGER J. LABRIE, National Bureau of VICTOR ZENTNER, Hughes Aircraft Co., Standards, Washington, D.C. Los Angeles, Calif. ix Contents of Volume I Part I GENERAL AND PRACTICAL 1. Survey of Alloy Plating 2. History and Literature of the Electrodeposition of Alloys 3. Conductors, Current Flow, Electrode Potentials, and Definitions 4. Practical Considerations Involved in the Electrodeposition of Alloys 5. Variation in the Composition of Electrodeposited Alloys with the Composi- tion of the Bath 6. Effect of Operating Variables on the Composition of Electrodeposited Alloys 7. Structure of Electrodeposited Alloys 8. Properties of Electrodeposited Alloys Part II THEORY 9. Theory of Electrodeposition of Alloys. General Considerations and Literature 10. The Cathode Diffusion Layer and Its Role in the Electrodeposition of a Single Metal 11. The Role of the Cathode Diffusion Layer in the Electrodeposition of Alloys 12. Role of Cathode Potentials in the Electrodeposition of Alloys 13. Some Theoretical Aspects of Complexing Agents and Addition Agents in Alloy Plating Part III PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON THE ELECTRODEPOSITION OF ALLOYS ALLOY GROUP A. SOME IMPORTANT ALLOYS OF COPPER AND SILVER 14. Electrodeposition of Brass 15. Electrodeposition of Copper-Tin Alloys 16. Electrodeposition of Cadmium-Copper Alloys 17. Electrodeposition of Alloys Containing Copper and the Metals of the Iron Group 18. Electrodeposition of Brass- or Bronzelike Ternary Alloys 19. Electrodeposition of Copper-Silver Alloys and Some Miscellaneous Alloys of Silver 20. Electrodeposition of Copper-Lead and Silver-Lead Alloys 21. Electrodeposition of Silver-Cadmium and Silver-Zinc Alloys AUTHOR INDEX SUBJECT INDEX xix Part III (CONTINUED) PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS and SPECIFIC INFORMATION on the ELECTRODEPOSITION of ALLOYS THE REMAINDER OF this treatise deals with the practical aspects of the electrode- position of alloys. However, frequent reference is made to the theoretical concepts treated in Parts I and II. This treatise covers only the electrodeposition of alloys from aqueous solutions. The electrodeposition of alloys from fused salt baths and from organic solutions is not included, nor is the production of alloys by the thermal interdiifusion of two separately deposited metallic coatings. Some borderline subjects, such as the deposition of black nickel and the deposi- tion of electroless nickel, are not included. The grouping of the alloys into chapters for the purpose of discussion and the order of treatment has been governed more by expediency and convenience rather than by a set rule. For example, lead-tin and tin-zinc plating are treated first and in separate chapters, since they are among the most important alloy plating processes. The various alloys could not be conveniently grouped into the five different classes of alloy plating systems, since a given alloy might be depositable from more than one type of plating system; for example, tin-zinc can be deposited from both regular and irregular alloy plating systems. Most alloys are grouped together under the heading of that parent metal which was the most difficult to deposit, since the difficulties associated with the deposition of this parent metal usually was the overriding consideration in the deposition of the alloys; for example, all manganese alloys are discussed in one chapter. Little information is given on the analyses of baths or alloys, and the chemistry of the complex ions in the plating baths has not been treated at any length, because this information is available in textbooks on electrodeposition. Short literature surveys are given for those alloys which are of special importance and for which the literature is so large that the most important contributions are difficult to discern. ALLOY GROUP Β. Mutual Alloys of Cadmium, Lead, Tin, and Zinc This group of metals possesses the common characteristic of being depositable from acid solution with high cathode current efficiency, in some instances 100% efficiency, although they are less noble than hydrogen. This is because they have in common a high hydrogen overvoltage. In acid solution the electrode potentials of cadmium, lead, and tin are close enough together to permit the deposition of mutual binary alloys. Alloys of zinc with these three metals can also be deposited from acid solution, but less satisfactorily. Their standard electrode potentials in volts are: Lead, — 0.126; tin (stannous), — 0.136; cadmium, — 0.403; and zinc, — 0.763. In alkaline solutions the static potentials of the metals are closer together. The four metals also have the common characteristic that they serve as good protective coatings for steel. Of these, cadmium and zinc protect by their sacrificial galvanic action. In corrosive environments lead and tin may sometimes be anodic (less noble) sometimes cathodic (more noble) with respect to steel. Because of the similarities in the methods of deposition and in the uses of the binary alloys of these four metals, it is convenient to treat their mutual alloys as a group.