ebook img

Effects of corn and molasses supplements with and without feed additives on performance, voluntary intake, and digestive function in cattle fed bermudagrass hay PDF

324 Pages·1996·10.3 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Effects of corn and molasses supplements with and without feed additives on performance, voluntary intake, and digestive function in cattle fed bermudagrass hay

EFFECTS OF CORN AND MOLASSES SUPPLEMENTS WITH AND WITHOUT FEED ADDITIVES ON PERFORMANCE, VOLUNTARY INTAKE, AND DIGESTIVE FUNCTION IN CATTLE FED BERMUDAGRASS HAY By OSVALDO BALBUENA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA ,1 1 This dissertation is dedicated to my wife Elena for the years of love, help, and encouragement and to my children Gonzalo, Nicolas and Maria Daniela. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere gratitude to the supervisory committee consisting of Drs. W.E. Kunkle, D.B. Bates, J.E. Moore, A.C. Hammond, and L.E. Sollenberger. Special gratitude is extended to Drs. Kunkle and G. Hembry for financial support during the last six months of my project. I am very thankful to the Institute Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA) for financial support during my first thirty months at UP. Special thanks to the efforts of Jerry Wasdin, Dan Price, the Pine Acres and Santa Fe crew, and Dane Bernis (Feed Mill). Special thanks is extended to Jeanette Filer and Angelita Mariano for their help in the lab and during the experiments. I am in debt to John Funk, Pamela Miles, and Nancy Wilkinson from Nutrition Lab and to Sandra Armantrout and Christa Jenssen from Extension. I am also in debt to E. Bowers from STARS-Brooksville, Drs. R.C. Hill and K. Scott for allowing me to use their GC, and Dr. C.H. Courtney and Qiyun Jeng for helping me with parasitology analysis. I am very thankful to Kevin Downs, Diane Campbell, and Francisco Olbrich for their help during the experiments. I would also like to extend special thanks to Diego Rochinotti for his friendship and help, and thanks to Pedro Garces-Yepez for sharing his experience with me. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABSTRACT CHAPTERS 1 I INTRODUCTION 1 II LITEI^TURE REVIEW 3 AInnttirboidoutcitcionFeed Additives in Ruminants .... 35 Mechanisms of Action 6 Importance of Gut Metabolism 12 Nonionophore Antibiotics 14 BambentiYcins 15 Ruminant Performance 17 Digestive Function 26 Post-ruminal Effects 31 Summary of Effects of Bamberm^cins 35 lonophore Antibiotics 36 Effects on Performance 38 lonophore Modes of Action 44 Ruminal effects 45 Total tract digestibility 52 Metabolism of the host animal 53 Animal health 56 Interaction with Minerals 57 Frequency of Feeding 60 Summary of Effects of lonophores 62 Considerations in Feeding Molasses 63 Digestive Function 64 Intake and Performance 77 Summary of Feeding Molasses 79 III EFFECT OF BAMBERMYCINS AND MONENSIN IN CORN OR MOLASSES SUPPLEMENTS ON PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE 82 Introduction 82 Materials and Methods 83 Results and Discussion 91 Animal Performance 93 Volatile Fatty Acids 113 iv Plasma Urea Nitrogen 121 Parasites 123 IV EFFECTS OF BAMBERMYCINS FED IN CORN OR MOLASSES SUPPLEMENTS ON INTAKE, DIGESTIBILITY, AND DIGESTION KINETICS IN HEIFERS 125 Introduction 125 Materials and Methods 126 Results and Discussion 135 Pre-trial 136 LLaattiinn SSqquuaarree -- DIingteaksetioanndKDiniegteisctsibility . . 114398 V EFFECTS OF BAMBERMYCINS FED IN CORN OR MOLASSES SUPPLEMENTS ON RUMEN FUNCTION 162 Introduction 162 Materials and Methods 163 Digesta Kinetics 164 Characteristics of Ruminal Fluid 167 Ruminal and Total Tract Digestion 168 ResNuilttrsogeanndFDliowscuasnsdioMnicrobial Efficiency . . 117730 Digesta Kinetics 175 Characteristics of Ruminal Fluid 181 Ruminal and Total Tract Digestion 204 Nitrogen Flow and Microbial Efficiency . . 220 VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 233 EExxppeerriimmeenntt 21 -- AInnitmaakle aPnedrformance (Chapter III) . 233 Digestibility (Chapter IV) 237 Experiment 3 - Riomen Function and Digestibility (Chapter V) 238 Conclusions 244 APPENDICES A TABLES 247 B RAW DATA 256 LITERATURE CITED 286 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 315 V . Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy EFFECTS OF CORN AND MOLASSES SUPPLEMENTS WITH AND WITHOUT FEED ADDITIVES ON PERFORMANCE, VOLUNTARY INTAKE, AND DIGESTIVE FUNCTION IN CATTLE FED BERMUDAGRASS HAY By Osvaldo Balbuena December, 1996 Chairperson: W.E. Kunkle Major Department: Animal Science lonophores and bambermycins have improved gain of growing cattle fed forage based diets when mixed in grain or mineral supplements. In limited research monensin has not improved gain of growing cattle when fed in molasses based liquid feeds offered at 2 kg/d or more and the efficacy of bambermycins in this supplement has not been evaluated. Growing cattle fed bermudagrass hay were supplemented with 1.57 kg TDN from corn-urea (CU) or molasses-corn gluten meal (MCG) without and with monensin or bamberirrycins , Cattle fed supplements without antibiotics gained .62 kg/d. Monensin increased gain .035 kg/d in CU and decreased gain .029 kg/d in MCG. Bambermycins increased gain .106 kg/d in CU and .042 kg/d in MCG. Monensin decreased hay intake .14% of BW while bambermycins increased hay intake .14% of BW in vi vii Year 1 and had no effect in Year 2, Monensin increased the difference between observed and predicted gains (an estimator of feed efficiency) .102 and .026 kg/d in CU and MCG, while bambemrycins increased that difference .063 and .041 kg/d in CU and MCG, respectively. Effects of CU or MCG with and without bambermycins on feed intake and digestive function were evaluated in two 4 x 4 Latin squares with ad libitum and restricted intake. Bambennycins increased total DM intake .08% of BW but did not affect digestibility. Bambennycins increased ruminal pH (6.63 vs 6,52), decreased butyrate molar proportions (9.8 vs 10.6), and did not affect acetate:propionate ratio (C2:C3) and microbial N efficiency. Ruminal pH, total VFA, VFA molar proportions, and CjtCj exhibited a supplement by time postfeeding interaction (P < .07). Steers fed CU had higher (P < .033) apparent (3.59 vs 2.99 g N/100 g OM) and true (2.47 vs 2.19 g N/100 g OM) microbial N efficiency, and higher ruminal feed CP degradability (69.2 vs 58.9%) than those fed MCG. Monensin improved gain in cattle fed corn but did not improve gain in cattle fed molasses supplement. Bambermycins improved gain in cattle fed corn and molasses supplements but this effect was greater in corn than in molasses. Increased gain due to bambermycins was not explained by changes in digestive function. I CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION , Warm-season grasses are the main feed resource for cow- calf and backgrounding production systems. Animal production based on warm season forages is usually lower than on temperate forages because intake and nutritive value of C4 grasses is lower. Excess biomass production during the warm and humid season is conserved as hay, haylage or stockpiled forage to be used as the basal diet during the winter months. High animal performance is not possible with this feed resource alone because intake of digestible energy often is only enough to meet maintenance requirements or support low gains Supplemental feeds to meet animal . requirements for energy, protein, and minerals are recommended in Florida. Feed additives that enhance animal production and therefore improve the biological and economical response to supplemental feeding are desirable. Molasses is a locally available energy source competitively priced compared to traditional feeds. Researchers at University of Florida have evaluated high levels of molasses supplementation with the addition of dry ingredients containing natural protein sources (molasses slurries) An . effective feed additive to improve gain in cattle fed 1 . 2 molasses slurries at levels of 30 to 40% of the total diet is not available. Limited research has suggested that ionophores are not effective when fed in molasses slurries but more evidence is necessary. Objectives of this research are as follows: 1. Evaluate the efficacy of ionophore (monensin) and nonionophore (bambermycins antibiotics to improve gain in ) growing cattle fed high forage diets (bermudagrass hay) supplemented with a corn- or molasses-based feeds. 2. Evaluate the effects of feeding bambermycins on voluntary hay intake and digestive function of cattle fed high forage diets supplemented with corn- or molasses-based feeds. 3. Compare the digestive function in cattle fed high forage-based diets supplemented with corn- or molasses-based feeds CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Tntrodnrtion Animal performance (growth, reproduction) is often suboptimal when only warm-season forages are fed. Consequently, some type of protein and(or) energy supplementation is often needed. Molasses-based supplements are often fed to cattle consuming warm-season forage diets. Feed additives that enhance growth may improve biological and economical response to supplementation. Competitive feedstuffs are defined as those that can also be used as human food, while complementary feedstuffs are not used directly for human consumption. Rumsey (1984) and Hammond (1991) discussed the noncompetitive nature of ruminant production using the protein conversion ratio (Table 2-1). Relative input/output for ruminant protein is less efficient than protein produced by nonruminant animals. However, the use of competitive feedstuffs inputs is lower in ruminant production systems. The advantage of ruminants is the use of complementary feeds. The challenge is, therefore, to increase the animal output using noncompetitive feeds. 3

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.