ebook img

EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER ... PDF

132 Pages·2016·11.25 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER ...

EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.) By HHAARRSSHHAADDSSIINNGGHH VVIIRREENNDDRRAASSIINNGGHH TTHHAAKKUURR B.Sc. (Ag.) THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE (AGRONOMY) CHAIRPERSON: Dr. K. BHANU REKHA DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE RAJENDRANAGAR, HYDERABAD-500 030 ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY 2013 DECLARATION I, HARSHADSINGH VIRENDRASINGH THAKUR, hereby declare that the thesis entitled “EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)” submitted to the Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture is the result of original research work done by me. I also declare that no material contained in the thesis has been published earlier in any manner. Place: Hyderabad (HARSHADSINGH VIRENDRASINGH THAKUR) I. D. No. RAM/10-09 Date: CERTIFICATE Mr. HARSHADSINGH VIRENDRASINGH THAKUR has satisfactorily prosecuted the course of research and that thesis entitled “EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)” submitted is the result of original research work and is of sufficiently high standard to warrant its presentation to the examination. I also certify that neither the thesis nor its part thereof has been previously submitted by him for a degree of any university. Date: (Dr. K. BHANU REKHA) Chairperson CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “EFFECT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)” submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE of the Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad is a record of the bonafide research work carried out by Mr. HARSHADSINGH VIRENDRASINGH THAKUR under our guidance and supervision. The subject of the thesis has been approved by the Student’s Advisory Committee. No part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma or has been published. The published part has been fully acknowledged. All the assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been duly acknowledged by the author of the thesis. (Dr. K.BHANU REKHA) CHAIRPERSON OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thesis approved by the Student’s Advisory Committee Chairman : (Dr. K.BHANU REKHA) Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, _________________ College of Agriculture, ANGRAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030 Member : (Dr. S. N. SUDHAKARA BABU) Principal Scientist, (Crop production) Directorate of Oilseeds Research (DOR), _________________ Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030 Member : (Dr. G. PADMAJA) Professor, Department of Soil Science & Agril. Chemistry, _________________ College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030 Date of final viva-voce: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With regardful memories …… I offer my salutations at the feet of GOD, who kindly provided the energy and enthusiasm through ramifying the paths of thick and thin of my efforts. I would like to take this opportunity to place my profound debt of gratitude on record to my major Advisor and Chairman of the Advisory Committee, Dr. K. Bhanu Rekha, Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad for her valuable suggestions, encouragement, affection, personal guidance, keen interest, immeasurable help and inspiration given to me throughout my work and who has made it possible to bring out this thesis. I am equally and deeply indebted to Dr. S. N. Sudhakara Babu, Principal Scientist (Crop Production), DOR, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, member of my Advisory Committee for his encouragement, technical suggestions and constructive criticism in perfect conduct of the experimental work and presentation of thesis. I owe my effusive thanks to Dr. G. Padmaja, Professor, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, member of my Advisory Committee for her timely help, co-operation and constant guidance and valuable suggestions throughout the investigation. I am especially grateful to, Dr. A. Srinivas, (Professor& Head) Department of Agronomy for his meticulous guidance. I wish to express my sincere thanks to Dr. G. E. Ch. Vidyasagar (PG Incharge), Dept. of Agronomy, Dr. G. Sreenivas Professor (Agronomy), Dr. K. B. Suneetha Devi Professor (Agronomy), Dr. M. Yakadri, Head and Principal Scientist (AICRP weed control), Dr. A. Pratap Kumar Reddy (Principal Scientist), Dr. K. P. Vani Associate Professor, Dr. P. Leela Rani, Assistant Professor, Dr. M. Shiva Shankar, Professor and Head of College Farm, Dr. Sayed Ahmad Hussain, Professor and Sri. B. Shamlal, A. O. (Retd.) Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad for their help rendered in all aspects for my thesis work. It is time to surface out genuflect love and affectionate gratitude to my dearest parents, Sri. Virendrasingh Thakur and Smt. Vaishali for their blessings, inspiration, encouragement and moral support throughout my educational career. I owe much to my loving brothers Shantanu Thakur, Vishal Thakur, Sumit Thakur and my sister Neha Thakur for their everlasting affection, co-operation and encouragement in my life. They have been a fountain of inspiration throughout my life without whose help in every walk of life, this work would not have been possible. It is pleasure to acknowledge the affection and inspiration rendered by my senior friends Rahul M Fuke, Manoj Jugseniya, Sachin Malwe, Pankaj Jadhao and Kishore Mote for their affection, special care and all time pragmatic help and operation which helped for my goal setting and spiritual upliftment during my studies and worries. Words fail to express my heartfelt thanks to my senior friends Sri Ranjitha, B. Sowmya, Rayala Srinivas, Sudhanshu Kasbe, Siddappa, Yogesh Mali and all my beloved U. G. FF series friends for their co-operation, moral support and transcendent suggestions during the course of my study. Alphabets are insufficient and words are not enough to express my heartfelt thanks to my best friends Anand, Ashwin, Ankit, Umesh, Pursha, Pravin Kharode, Dhananjay, Siddu, Vijay, Manoj, Nilesh, Jugal, Ajinkya, Ashish, Akash, Shipe, Amit, Om, Padam Kadam, Mukesh, Amol Munje, Pankaj, Ani, Nitin, Vasanta Kange, Dasharath Shinde and Santosh for their co- operation, moral support and transcendent suggestions during the course of my study. It is time to surface out my over whelming sense of affection to my friends Yogesh Giri, Arbind Gupta, Manish Jha, Divakar, Rajib Das, Saiprasad Jogdande and Shubham Divekar, for their whole hearted co-operation to materialize this work. I am extremely grateful to all my friends Mr. Raghavendra, Mr.Venkanna, Mr. Anil, Mr. Bharath, Mr. Shasikanth, Mr. Saikiran, Mr. Shankar, Mr. Gouse, Ms. Spandana, Ms. Swarna, Ms. Nandita, Ms. Nalini, Ms. Ashakumari, Ms. Johasana, and my junior friends Mr. Byomkesh, Mr. Partha, Mr. Meena, Mr. Naresh, Mr.Tirupathi, Mr. Kishore, Mr.Mahesh, Mr. Narendar, Mr. Nagendar, Ms. Pallavi, Ms. Divya, Ms. Swetha and Mr. Anil. I am grateful to Dr. Husain Prof. college farm, for helping me in successful completion of my field work. I personally thank Mr. Osman (AEO, College farm), Dr. khanerkar, and Prof. Sudhir Ghodchar for his support contributed and whole hearted encouragement during this work. My special thanks are due to one and all at the Dept. of Agronomy for their help provided to carry out my field trial in a successful manner. I also acknowledge the favours of numerous persons who, though not been individually mentioned here, have all directly or indirectly contributed during the course of the study. (Harshad V Thakur) LIST OF CONTENTS Chapter No. Title Page No. I INTRODUCTION II REVIEW OF LITERATURE III MATERIAL AND METHODS IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS LITERATURE CITED APPENDICES LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page No. No. 3.1 Soil physico-chemical properties of the experimental site 3.2 Cropping history of the experimental site 3.3 Chemical analysis of humic granules, humic acid and fulvic acid 4.1 Plant height (cm) of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.2 Number of leaves of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.3 Leaf area index of sunflower as influenced by different treatments Dry matter accumulation in leaf (g plant-1) of sunflower at 30, 45, 60 4.4 DAS and at harvest as influenced by different treatments Dry matter accumulation in stem (g plant-1) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at 4.4.1 harvest and dry matter accumulation in capitulum (g plant-1) at 60 DAS and at harvest of sunflower as influenced by different treatments Total dry matter accumulation (g plant-1) of sunflower at 30, 45, 60 4.4.2 DAS and at harvest as influenced by different treatments Leaf area duration (LAD) of sunflower at different stages as influenced 4.5 by different treatments Crop growth rate (CGR) g m-2 day-1 of sunflower at different stages as 4.5.1 influenced by different treatments Relative growth rate (RGR) g m-2 day-1 of sunflower at different stages 4.5.2 as influenced by different treatments Net assimilation rate (NAR) g g-1 day-1 of sunflower at different stages 4.5.3 as influenced by different treatments Stem girth (cm) of sunflower at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest as 4.6 influenced by different treatments SPAD chlorophyll meter readings of sunflower at different growth 4.7 stages as influenced by different treatments Days to 50 % flowering and physiological maturity of sunflower as 4.8 influenced by different treatments Head diameter (cm) and central unfilled diameter (cm) of capitulum of 4.9 sunflower as influenced by different treatments Test weight (g), number of filled and unfilled seeds head-1, seed filling 4.10 percentage (%) and seed yield plant-1 (g) as influenced by different treatments Seed yield (kg ha-1), stalk yield (kg ha-1) and harvest index (%) of 4.11 sunflower as influenced by different treatments Oil content (%), oil yield (kg ha-1) and protein yield (kg ha-1) of 4.12 sunflower as influenced by different treatments Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake (kg ha-1) of sunflower at 4.13 flowering stage as influenced by different treatments Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium uptake (kg ha-1) of sunflower at 4.13.1 harvest as influenced by different treatments Post harvest soil fertility properties as influenced by different 4.14 treatments Post harvest available soil nutrient status (kg ha-1) as influenced by 4.14.1 different treatments Post harvest bacterial, actinomycetes and fungal population (CFU gram 4.15 soil-1) as influenced by different treatments Cost of cultivation ( ha-1), gross returns ( ha-1), net returns ( ha-1) 4.16 and B: C ratio as influenced by different treatments LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Title Page No. No. 3.1 Weekly meteorological data during the crop growth period from July’ 12 to Oct’ 12 3.2 Layout of the experimental site 3.3 Chemical properties of humic substances 4.1 Plant height (cm) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.2 Leaf area index of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.3 Dry matter accumulation in leaf (g plant-1) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.3.1 Dry matter accumulation in stem (g plant-1) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.3.2 Dry matter accumulation in capitulum (g plant-1) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.3.3 Total dry matter accumulation (g plant-1) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.4 Stem girth (cm) of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.5 SPAD chlorophyll meter readings of sunflower at different crop growth stages as influenced by different treatments 4.6 Head diameter (cm) of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.7 Filled and unfilled seeds head-1 of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.8 Seed and stalk yield (kg ha-1) of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.8.1 Harvest index (%) of sunflower as influenced by different treatments 4.9 Oil content (%) of sunflower as influenced by different treatments Oil yield and Protein yield (kg ha-1) of sunflower as influenced by 4.9.1 different treatments

Description:
SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE of the Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,. Hyderabad is a record of the (Crop Production), DOR, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, member of my Advisory Committee for his .. cultivated area, contributes to 40 % of the country's food production, and supports 40% of.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.