ebook img

Effect of Feed-Borne Fusarium Mycotoxins on Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome PDF

131 Pages·2013·3.01 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Effect of Feed-Borne Fusarium Mycotoxins on Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome

Effect of Feed-Borne Fusarium Mycotoxins on Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome By Melissa Mortson A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal and Poultry Science and Toxicology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Melissa Mortson, December, 2012 ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF FEED-BORNE FUSARIUM MYCOTOXINS ON EQUINE GASTRIC ULCER SYNDROME Melissa Mortson Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Trevor K. Smith Consumption of feedstuffs contaminated by Fusarium mycotoxins and the development of equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) affect the overall health of horses. A study was conducted to determine if feed-borne mycotoxins have an effect on EGUS, and the efficacy of a glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent (GMA) was determined. Feed intake was decreased with the GMA diet compared to control horses. Body weight, ulcer score and gastrin concentration were unaffected by diet. Some significant changes in blood parameters potentially indicate liver damage and inhibition of protein synthesis. Histological evaluation showed an increase in mononuclear cells in the glandular region of the contaminated group likely indicating signs of gastritis. The incorporation of the GMA may reduce these negative effects on the horse based on our findings. It can be concluded that horses are susceptible to Fusarium mycotoxins with a possible effect on EGUS, as seen in the cells of the gastric glandular mucosa. In dedication to my papa, Mervyn Mortson   iii Acknowledgements I would like to begin by thanking my advisor Dr. Trevor Smith for his continued guidance and support throughout my studies. Thank you for believing in me and for giving me the opportunity to do this research. I would also like to thank my advisory committee, Dr. Laurent Viel and Dr. Niel Karrow, for their interest in this project and for supporting and guiding me throughout. I would like to thank the staff at the Arkell Equine Research Station as this research would not have been possible without their help. With special thanks to Heidi Naumann and Nancy Wedel for helping me with the horses during the busy sample collection days and to Dave Vandenberg and Brad Rogers for allowing me to use the facility and for getting me the horses for the project. I would also like to thank the veterinary technicians, veterinarians and agricultural assistants at the OVC Large Animal Clinic for their help organizing and coordinating this project. With special thanks to Michelle Morin and Ingrid Alexy-Ferrede for their assistance and support during the gastroscopies and sample collection periods. I would again like to thank Dr. Viel and his team, Aitor Gallastegui and Andres Diaz as well as Dr. Henri Staempfli for their help with the gastroscopies and sample collection. I could not have completed this project if it wasn't for all of you. I want to thank Rob Leighton and the agricultural assistants Rick and Mike for their help with coordinating and organizing the trailering of my research horses to and from the research station, your assistance was invaluable and I appreciate all that you did for me. I would also like to thank the staff at the Animal Health Laboratory for the blood sample analysis as well as for the preparation of the tissue biopsies. With special thanks to Josepha DeLay for her work on the histological evaluation of our biopsy samples. I would also like to thank the staff at the University of Guelph Laboratory Services division and the Agri-Food Laboratories for their analysis of our feed samples. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Dr. Mohammed Abo-Ismail for his continued guidance, support and expertise on our statistical analysis. I could not have done it without your help, thank you for your patience and for teaching me how to use the SAS program. To my friends and labmates, Maureen Crump, George Girgis, Brandon Walters and Si-Trung Tran, I could not have completed this project without all of your help. To Maureen, without your help I may not have pulled this project off, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for all you have helped me with during this project. As well as to George, thank you for guiding me through the process of sample collection and analysis. I could not have done it without your knowledge and support. I would like to thank my family and friends for supporting me throughout my degree. To my mom and dad, thank you for believing in me. Thank you to Ally for supporting me and taking care of Maxwell for me. To Dave, I could not have done it without your love and support. Thank you for always being there, it means the world to me. My research would not have been possible without the generous financial support of OMAFRA and Alltech Inc. Nicholasville, Kentucky, United States of America.       iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Review of Literature……………………………………………………………………1 1.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….1 1.2. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome…………………………………………………….3 1.2.1. Prevalence…………………………………………………………………4 1.2.2. Risk Factors……………………………………………………………….5 1.2.3. Signs………………………………………………………………………8 1.2.4. Diagnosis………………………………………………………………….9 1.2.5. Prevention/Treatment……………………………………………………..10 1.3. Fusarium Mycotoxins……………………………………………………………….11 1.3.1. Equine Fusarium Mycotoxicosis………………………………………….13 1.3.2. Fusarium Mycotoxins and GIT Damage………………………………….16 1.4. Mycotoxin Adsorbents………………………………………………………………18 CHAPTER 2 Experimental Rationale, Hypotheses and Objectives………………………………..21 2.1. Experimental Rationale……………………………………………………………..21 2.2. Experimental Hypotheses…………………………………………………………...22 2.3. Objectives…………………………………………………………………………...23 2.3.1. Pilot Trial………………………………………………………………….23 2.3.2. Main Trial…………………………………………………………………23 CHAPTER 3 The Effect of Feed-Borne Fusarium Mycotoxins On The Development of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: A Pilot Trial………………………………………………..25 3.1. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...25 3.2. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….26 3.3. Materials and Methods………………………………………………………………28 3.3.1. Experimental Animals and Diets………………………………………….28 3.3.2. Experimental Design and Housing………………………………………..29 3.3.2. Approval of Experimental Protocol……………………………………….30 3.3.3. Analysis of Dietary Mycotoxins…………………………………………..30 3.3.4. Experimental Parameters Studied…………………………………………31 3.3.4.1. Feed Intake and Body Weight…………………………………...31 3.3.4.2. Hematology and Serum Biochemistry…………………………..31 3.3.4.3. Gastroscopy and Ulcer Scoring of Gastric Mucosa……………..33 3.4. Results……………………………………………………………………………….34 3.4.1. Dietary Mycotoxin Concentrations………………………………………..34 3.4.2. Feed Intake and Body Weights……………………………………………34 3.4.3. Hematology and Serum Biochemistry…………………………………….35 3.4.4. Ulcer Scoring……………………………………………………………...35 3.5. Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...36   v 3.5.1. Dietary Mycotoxin Concentrations………………………………………..36 3.5.2. Feed Intake and Body Weight..……………………………………………37 3.5.3. Hematology and Serum Biochemistry…………………………………….38 3.5.4. Ulcer Scoring……………………………………………………………...39 CHAPTER 4 The Effect of Feed-Borne Fusarium Mycotoxins On Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome And The Efficacy Of A Glucomannan Mycotoxin Adsorbent……………………….51 4.1. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...51 4.2. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….52 4.3. Materials and Methods………………………………………………………………55 4.3.1. Experimental Animals and Diets………………………………………….55 4.3.2. Experimental Design and Housing………………………………………..56 4.3.3. Approval of Experimental Protocol……………………………………….57 4.3.4. Analysis of Dietary Mycotoxins…………………………………………..57 4.3.5. Experimental Parameters Studied…………………………………………58 4.3.5.1. Feed Intake and Body Weight…………………………………...58 4.3.5.2. Hematology and Serum Biochemistry…………………………..58 4.3.5.3. Gastrin Analysis…………………………………………………59 4.3.5.4. Gastroscopy and Ulcer Scoring of Gastric Mucosa……………..60 4.3.5.5. Histological Evaluation of Tissue Biopsies……………………..61 4.3.6. Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………...62 4.4. Results……………………………………………………………………………….63 4.4.1. Dietary Mycotoxin Analysis………………………………………………63 4.4.2. Feed Intake and Body Weight……………………………………………..63 4.4.3. Serum Hematological and Biochemical Parameters………………………64 4.4.4. Serum Gastrin Analysis…………………………………………………...66 4.4.5. Ulcer Scoring and Histological Evaluation of Tissue Biopsies…………...67 4.5. Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...68 4.5.1. Dietary Mycotoxin Analysis………………………………………………68 4.5.2. Feed Intake and Body Weight……………………………………………..70 4.5.3. Serum Hematological and Biochemical Parameters………………………72 4.5.4. Serum Gastrin Analysis and Ulcer Score………………………………….79 4.5.5. Histological Evaluation of Tissue Biopsies……………………………….81 4.5.6. Efficacy of a Glucomannan Mycotoxin Adsorbent……………………….83 CHAPTER 5 Overall Conclusions…………………………………………………………………...102 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………...105   vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 3.1. Composition of Dietary Equine Concentrates over the 28 Day Experimental Period, Dry Matter Basis……………………................................................................................41 3.2. Equine Gastric Mucosal Ulcer Scoring System……………………………………..41 3.3. Dietary Mycotoxin Content of Equine Concentrates, As Fed Basis..……………….42 3.4. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry I………………………………………..43 3.5. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry II……………………………………….44 3.6. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry III……………………………………...45 3.7. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry IV……………………………………...46 3.8. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology I…………………………………………46 3.9. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology II………………………………………..47 4.1. Composition of Dietary Concentrates, Dry Matter Basis…………………………...86 4.2. Dietary Mycotoxin Content of Equine Concentrates, As Fed Basis………………...86 4.3. The Effect of Diet on Feed Intake and Body Weight in the Horse over the 28 Day Experimental Period…………………………………….……………………………….87 4.4. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry I………………………………………..88 4.5. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry II……………………………………….89 4.6. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry III……………………………………...90 4.7. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry IV……………………………………...91 4.8. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry V………………………………………92 4.9. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry VI……………………………………...93 4.10. The Effect of Diet on Serum Biochemistry VII…………………………………...94 4.11. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology I………………………………………..95   vii 4.12. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology II……………………………………….96 4.13. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology III……………………………………...97 4.14. The Effect of Diet on Serum Hematology IV……………………………………...98 4.15. The Effect of Diet on Ulcer Score and Serum Gastrin Concentration in the Horse over the 28 Day Experimental Period…………………………………….……………...99                                       viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 3.1. Effect of Diet on Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Activity…………………………….48 3.2. Effect of Diet on Serum Calcium Concentrations…………………………………..48 3.3. Gastric Mucosal Changes…………………………………………………………...49 a) Day 5/6 Control Group………………………………………………………..49 b) Day 5/6 Contaminated Group…………………………………………………49 c) Day 12/13 Control Group……………………………………………………..49 d) Day 12/13 Contaminated Group………………………………………………49 e) Day 20/21 Control Group……………………………………………………..50 f) Day 20/21 Contaminated Group………………………………………………50 g) Day 27/28 Control Group……………………………………………………..50 h) Day 27/28 Contaminated Group………………………………………………50 4.1. The Effect of Dietary Treatment on Feed Intake…………………………………..100 4.2. The Effect of Dietary Treatment on Serum Total Protein…………………………100 4.3. The Effect of Dietary Treatment on Serum Total Bilirubin…………………….….101 4.4. The Effect of Dietary Treatment on Serum Free Bilirubin………………………...101   ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3-acetylDON 3-Acetyl-deoxynivalenol 15-acetylDON 15-Acetyl-deoxynivalenol AFLA Aflatoxin ANCOVA Analysis of Covariance ANOVA Analysis of Variance AST Aspartate Amino Transferase CHO Carbohydrates CK Creatine Kinase DON Deoxynivalenol, Vomitoxin EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EGUS Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome ELEM Equine Leukoencephalomalacia FUMON Fumonisin GGT Gamma Glutamyltransferase GIT Gastrointestinal Tract GLDH Glutamate Dehydrogenase GMA Glucomannan Mycotoxin Adsorbent Hb Hemoglobin HCl Hydrochloric Acid HCT Hematocrit HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography H. pylori Helicobacter Pylori   x

Description:
A decrease in overall health, behavior and athletic ability will likely be observed when the horse is afflicted with impaired digestion due to gastric ulceration. Mycotoxins are secondary products generated by fungi (molds) that can contaminate various types of soil and plants under certain environ
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.