EDITED BY ROBERT MCCLOY EDUCATION ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM 1944–2017 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PARTNERSHIPS Education Across the United Kingdom 1944–2017 Robert McCloy Editor Education Across the United Kingdom 1944–2017 Local Government, Accountability and Partnerships Editor Robert McCloy London, UK ISBN 978-3-319-89916-9 ISBN 978-3-319-89917-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89917-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018942011 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover image: © Helen Greenwood/Getty Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface Local Government Revisited The history of education in England is littered with the abolition of institutions before anything better has been put in their place. The replacement of grammar schools en masse by comprehensives is a case in point. The removal of local education authorities from any meaning- ful role in the national system, foreshadowed in the government’s White Paper ‘Educational Excellence Everywhere’, to become in the prime minister’s words ‘a thing of the past’, is another. Local education authorities were called into being and held their position for over a hundred years to prevent education from falling into what was then called ‘formlessness’—precisely the state of affairs which awaits the national system if the proposals in the White Paper, more a blueprint for incoherence, are ever implemented. No-one can say with any clarity where in practical terms the boundaries of responsibility, now being redrawn, between parents, faith groups, private interests, philanthropy, business, the schools themselves, let alone central and local government will finally come to rest, nor how and to what extent, the national system should be planned, if at all. v vi Preface Pragmatism ‘what works’ has replaced principle to a dangerous degree. At risk are the founding principles we still take for granted; that education is a birthright not a commodity to be bought and sold, that it should be available to all on an equal basis and that it is a public and not a private responsibility. Becoming clearer in the absence of a mediating layer of responsibility between those who provide and those who use and depend on the education service are the dangers of over- regulation, greater inequality, inefficiency, financial malpractice, lack of transparency, accountability and public involvement, not least, continu- ing low standards and under-performance. ‘Educational Excellence Everywhere’ claims that its proposals ‘sit squarely’ within the government’s agenda for greater devolution. They squarely do not. Why of all the public services is education, one of whose traditional strengths was precisely its diffused nature, held to be the only one not able to benefit from and contribute to devolved arrangements? Why are chain stores, banks and the like judged suitable to provide schools but not great cities belonging to the ‘northern power- house’? In this collection of essays, educationists review the contribution local government has made to the national system in the past and argue there is no inherent contradiction between the government’s policies towards school improvement and local government as a major part- ner. On the contrary, many would be advanced through local govern- ment’s involvement to the benefit of all concerned. The new pattern of devolved arrangements now emerging provides an invaluable opportu- nity (for a re-vitalised role for local councils) (for the re-vitalised role for local councils outlined here). It should be taken. London, UK Robert McCloy Editorial Commentary Of its nature, the study reflects differing perspectives. Experience of the education service has not been uniform. The voices vary in which accounts are rendered. What they have in common, however, is a per- spective of careers mainly spanning the 1960s to the 1990s, and reflec- tion upon subsequent developments. In this, they reflect concerns uppermost and especially characteristic of that period. Issues which later take on sharper relief are not necessarily less important albeit receiving less attention, such as the foundation and development of faith schools, the impact upon learning of digital technology, and the transformation of higher education by its exponential expansion. The study identifies seven emergent themes of concern. Education’s Purpose The first and overwhelmingly the most critical relates to the educa- tion’s purpose. In the beginning, it was broadly recognized as an essen- tial instrument in safeguarding and developing civilization. Herein was the justification for the state’s partnership with the churches in the vii viii Editorial Commentary superintendence of the service but also for the churches’ concentration of resources on its provision. This is evidenced, in particular, in Chapter 2 (treating with experience in the immediate post war years), Chapter 4 (describing the church/state dimension), and Chapters 5 and 7 (relating to Northern Ireland and Scotland). However, with the passage of time, this basis became increasingly obscure as society at large became more secular and the state, institutions, and practitioners turned to measurable outcomes and giving priority to aspects of education capable of improv- ing economic performance in a competitive world. This metamorpho- sis, never complete, is glaringly first witnessed in this narrative in the 1960s as consumerism assumes a stronger position in society and helps to shape education provision, as alluded to, for example, in Chapter 1 (giving an overview), and Chapter 2 (when referring to the Thatcher administration). It climaxes in the Great Education Reform Movement (GERM) and is a dominant theme, again, for example, in Chapter 3, treating with metropolitan England, and Chapters 6 and 7, in discussing developments following devolution in Wales and Scotland. The narrative, notwithstanding, records with approbation, a challenge to GERM and a partial reversion to a more comprehensive commitment to education’s purpose, again referred to especially, in Chapters 6 and 7, relating to Wales and Scotland, and taken up as a concluding theme in Chapter 10. The Changing Character of the Administration of Education A second major development, central to the focus of this study, was the fundamental change that occurred in the nature of local government’s education administration. Initially, the function was largely discrete dis- charged by a local education committee with high levels of autonomy with little direction from either central government or other local gov- ernment committees, described in Chapter 2. For the most part, too, the education committee was not in contention with a developed sys- tem of governing bodies. This status was buttressed by the Association of Education Committees and reinforced by its associated and authoritative professional journal ‘Education’, as considered, in particular, in Chapter 9. Editorial Commentary ix Duly this position was undermined: first, by a Labour government intent upon the reorganization of secondary education and then by a Conservative government resolved to take charge of the curriculum and much else (considered, in particular, in Chapters 2 and 3); second, suc- cessive re-organizations of local government, affecting both the scope of jurisdictions and internal working, themes in varying contexts of Chapters 2–7, showing how each country was affected; third, the general adoption of corporate management, manifested especially in England, as noted in Chapters 2 and 3; and fourth, the centralizing of authority and the scattering of various elements of the service to other agencies, phe- nomena noted especially subsequent to devolution and discussed, in vary- ing contexts, in Chapters 3, 5, 6, and 7. Intrusive Politics A third characteristic is the growth of politics in education’s adminis- tration. In the wake of the 1944 legislation there was so much to be done there was a limit to how far the political impulse could reach, as shown in the instances of England (Chapter 2) and Wales (Chapter 6). Initially, it was both commitment to the spirit of partnership enshrined in the legislation and necessity that shaped conduct. Nevertheless, as noted in the narrative, there were national and regional variations: South Wales and other urban areas often witnessed the active engage- ment of local government politicians in detailed administration. In contrast to later developments, however, professional officers exer- cised decisive influence. Progressively, party politics gained ascendancy and professional authority declined most notably from the 1970s, as cited in Chapters 2 and 3. Subsequent to devolution, the dominance of local political involvement was increasingly qualified by govern- ment ministers, both in Whitehall and in the devolved administrations. Throughout the period, the status of the education officer was progres- sively compromised by the removal of its statutory status and its more overt subordination to other disciplines. x Editorial Commentary The Weakening of Local Democracy Fourthly, the period has witnessed a progressive weakening of democratic accountability for the administration of the education service. In one process, the centralizing of decision-making in Whitehall or devolved administrations, democratic accountability was, in a sense, being empha- sized. However, the concomitant necessity to establish intermediate agencies, such as regional commissioners, made this an unreal concept. What was being lost was a tangible sense of democratic localism, as con- sidered, in particular in Chapter 9. The establishment in England of Free Schools constituted an extreme instance. In other instances, for example, in Wales (Chapter 6), the weakening of local government exacerbated by the need for operational economies, resulted in the necessity of authori- ties having to combine operations thereby obscuring, at a practical level, the identity of those democratically responsible. The Abandonment of Trust A fifth casualty of the period was the general abandonment of any real sense of trust. Initially, there was a high presumption that the teacher was a professional trusted as a doctor and lawyer to discharge duties in relative freedom. Supervision had a ‘light touch.’ Not only was the teacher accorded autonomy in the classroom but institutions were gen- erally given a wide measure of freedom to operate. The curriculum was broadly shaped by examination boards dominated by professional staff; and teachers, in the classroom, exercised wide discretion over method- ology and teaching content. Inspection, by the standards of a later age, was characterized by encouragement and gentle guidance: it was neither authoritarian nor inquisitorial. This aspect is discussed, for example, in Chapter 6 relating to Scotland. A critical consequence has been a seri- ous problem of staffing morale, recruitment, and retention.
Description: