Table Of Content

ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: 1 6 7 1 3 LESSONS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Cases and Materials VOLUME I Faculty of Law University of Toronto Spring Term 1996 Prepared by: Sandra Walker Blake, Cassels & Graydon DEC 2 0 1995 , OF J.AW ofeWEasiry of Toronto BORA LASK1N LAW LIBKAK i UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: LESSONS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Cases and Materials VOLUME I Faculty of Law University of Toronto Spring Term 1996 Prepared by: Sandra Walker , Blake Cassels & Graydon Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/economicintegrat01walk VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ARTICLES ON THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS INSTITUTIONS (a) Craig & de Burca, "The Development of 1 European Integration" (b) Weiler, "The Transformation of Europe" 21 (c) Wyatt and Dashwood, "Institutions of the 58 Communities and of the Union" (d) Wyatt and Dashwood, "The Court of Justice of 66 the European Communities" (e) Wyatt and Dashwood, "The Court of First 77 Instance" (f) The Economist, "The Laws of Canute" 83 Craig and de Burca, "Substantive and Procedural 84 (g) Conditions for the Legality of Community Action: Subsidiarity" COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER A. Articles (a) Wyatt and Dashwood, "The Community Legal 88 Order" (b) Steiner, "From direct effects to Francovich: 100 shifting means of enforcement of Community Law" (c) Scarborough, "Directives and the Doctrine of 111 Direct Effect: A Critique of Marshall v. Southampton Area Health Authority" (d) Craig and de Burca, "Enforcement Actions 121 Against Member States: Articles 169 and 170” 2 - - B. Case Law 1. Article 111 (a) H.P. Buhner Limited and Another v. J. Bollinger 125 &4 and Another (b) Pasquale Foglia v. Mariella Novello 132 (c) C.I.L.F.I.T. Sri and Others v. Ministro Della 134 Sanita (d) Firma Foto-Frost v. Hauptzollamt Lubeck-Ost 136 2. Relationship Between EC Law and National Law: Supremacy (i) ECJ Perspective (a) N.V. Algemere Transport - en Expeditie 137 Ondememing Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Tariefcommissie (b) Costa v. Erne Nazionale Per L’Energia Elettrica 138 (ENEL) (c) Amministrazione Delle Finanze Dello Stato v. 145 Simmenthal SpA (d) Regina v. Secretary of State for Transport ex 149 parte Factortame Limited and Others (ii) Member State Perspective (a) Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbh v. Einfuhr- 151 und Vorratsstellefur Getreide und Futtermittel (b) Re the Application of Wunsche 162 Handelsgesellschaft (Case 2) (c) Manfred Brunner and Others v. the European 173 Union Treaty - 3 - (d) Society for the Protection of Unborn Children 180 (Ireland) Limited v. Stephen Grogan and Others 3. Direct Effect of EC Law in Member State’s Legal Order (i) Treaty Provisions (a) Van Duyn v. Home Office 186 (b) Gabrielle Defrenne v. Societe Anonyme Beige de 193 Navigation Aerienne (Sabena) (if) Decisions and Directives (a) Franz Grad v. Finanzamt Traunstein 198 (b) Pubblico Ministero v. Ratti 201 (c) Ursula Becker v. Finanzamt Munster - Innenstadt 205 (d) Marshall v. Southampton and South West 210 Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (e) Andrea Francovich v. Republic (Italy) 216 INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITY AND JURISDICTION OF THE COMMUNITY A. Case Law (a) Re the European Road Transport Agreement: E. C. 239 Commission v. E.C. Council (b) International Fruit Company N. V. and Others v. 242 Produktschap Voor Groenten en Fruit (No. 3) (c) Hauptzollamt (Chief Tax Office) Mainz v. C.A. 253 Kupferberg & Cie KG a.A. -4- IV. FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS A. General 1. Articles (a) Oliver. "Introduction" to Free Movement of 255 Goods in the EEC (b) Craig and de Burca, "Completion of the Single 258 Market" (c) Craig and de Burca, "Free Movement of Goods: 278 Duties, Charges and Taxes" Case Law (a) Procureur du Roi v. Dassonville 281 (b) Sociaal Fonds Voor de Diamantarbeiders, 283 Antwerp v. S.A. Ch. Brachfeld & Sons, Antwerp (c) Re Imports of Cyprus Potatoes: E. C. Commission 285 v. Ireland B. Balancing Free Movement Against Other Public Policy Objectives: Exceptions to Free Movement of Goods 1. Articles (a) Craig and de Burca, "The Advantages and 290 Disadvantages of Cassis and the Interrelationship Between Judicial and Legislative Initiatives" (b) Gormley, "Reasoning Renounced? The 295 Remarkable Judgment in Keck & Mithouard" (c) Walker, "Level of Intervention" 300 (d) Kramer, "Environmental Protection and Article 305 30 EEC Treaty" -5 - (e) Gardner, "EC Court Refuses to Block Toxic 322 Waste" 2. Case Law (a) Rewe-Zentral v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung 323 Branntwein ("Cassis de Dijon”) (b) Cinetheque SA and Others v. Federation nationale 327 des cinemas frangais (c) CCH Comment re Commission v. Federal 333 Republic of Germany ("German Beer Standards") (d) Torfaen Borough Council v. B&Q pic 336 (e) Sergius Oebel 353 (f) Keck and Mithouard 362 (g) Mars GmbH 368 (h) Commission of the European Communities v. 375 Kingdom of Denmark ("Danish Bottles") (i) Re Imports of Waste: E.C. Commission v. 385 Belgium