EcclEsia in mEdio nationis Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 1 31/10/11 13:34 MEDIAEVALIA LOVANIENSIA Editorial Board Geert Claessens (Leuven) Hans Cools (Leuven) Pieter De Leemans (Leuven) Brian Patrick McGuire (Roskilde) Baudouin Van den Abeele (Louvain-la-Neuve) SERIES I / StUDIA XLII KAtHOLIEKE UNIVERSItEIt LEUVEN INStItUUt VOOR MIDDELEEUwSE EN RENAISSANCEStUDIES LEUVEN (BELGIUM) Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 2 31/10/11 13:34 EcclEsia in mEdio nationis Reflections on the study of monasticism in the centRal middle ages • Réflexions suR l’étude du monachisme au moyen Âge centRal edited by/edité par steven VandeRputten & Brigitte meijns leuVen uniVeRsity pRess Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 3 10/11/11 14:00 With support of: www.conventus.ugent.be © 2011 Leuven University Press / Presses Universitaires de Louvain / Universitaire Pers Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium). All rights reserved. Except in those cases expressly determined by law, no part of this publication may be multiplied, saved in an automated datafile or made public in any way whatsoever without the express prior written consent of the publishers. ISBN 978 90 5867 887 4 D/2011/1869/57 NUR: 684 Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 4 10/11/11 11:00 CONtENtS/CONtENU Steven Vanderputten (Gent) & Brigitte MeijnS (Leuven) Introduction 7 Isabelle roSé (Rennes) Les moines et leur vie communautaire du IXe au XIIe siècle. tour d’horizon historiographique 11 florian Mazel (Rennes) Monachisme et aristocratie aux Xe-XIe siècles. Un regard sur l’historiographie récente 47 Nicolas Ruffini & jean-françois NieuS (Namur) Société seigneuriale, réformes ecclésiales: les enjeux documentaires d’une révision historiographique 77 Alexis wilkin (Bruxelles) Communautés religieuses bénédictines et environnement économique, IXe-XIIe siècles. Réflexions sur les tendances historiographiques de l’analyse du temporel monastique 101 Harald Sellner (tübingen) L es communautés religieuses du Moyen Age central et la recherche des réformes monastiques en Allemagne 151 Gert MelVille (Dresden) Inside and Outside. Some Considerations about Cloistral Boundaries in the Central Middle Ages 167 Diane Reilly (Bloomington) the Monastic world View in the Artistic tradition 183 Arnoud- jan BijSterVeld (tilburg) Conclusions 211 Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 5 31/10/11 13:34 Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 6 31/10/11 13:34 Steven VANDERPUttEN & Brigitte MEIjNS IntroductIon the Benedictine hagiographer Gualbert of Marchiennes († c. 1130) did not shy away from expressive language to describe the plight of past genera- tions of monks. His account of the abbacy of Alberic (1033-1048) includes the following remark: “this abbey, which was situated in the midst of a perverted nation, was fighting a legitimate battle; it exceedingly pleased the divine onlooker because of its troubles and distress”1. Gualbert’s com- ment can be read in at least two different ways. One is historical, for it is embedded in a narrative that deals with the contemporaneous fragmenta- tion of political power and the ensuing conflicts over property and status. Gualbert’s judgment that the nation was ‘perverted’ derived from a real or supposed state of lawlessness and disorder that threatened the physical integrity of the monastery. His characterization of the monks’ battle as ‘legitimate’ stems from a discourse central to the various means (symbolic and legal) by which monks confronted their enemies. Gualbert’s comment can also be read ideologically, for it reflects a vision of the monastery as an island in the world, a symbolical space whose occupants were waging a systematic battle against the continuing impact of original sin on hu- man existence. thus, ‘perverted’ human society not only functioned as a perpetual backdrop to the monastic existence, but also gave it purpose. this paradox of the vita regularis (outwardly and inwardly focused, and outwardly and inwardly modeled) is now recognized by most schol- ars as a key paradigm with which investigations into the monastic phe- nomenon can be framed. In a number of fields – most notably that of the ordensforschung or study of the monastic orders of the twelfth to fifteenth centuries – it has now become common practice to refer systematically to this paradigm when situating one’s research in a broader context. How- ever, in the study of monasticism in the period between c. 900 and c. 1150, sometimes known as the ‘golden age’ of Benedictine monasticism, such references to an overarching paradigm are often missing. this is under- standable to a degree. Much of the explicit reflection is determined by 1. “Quod autem ecclesia, in medio nationis perversae sita, erat legitime decertans; per tribulationes et angustias magis divinis adspectibus complacebat”; acta sanctorum maii iii, Antwerp, 1688, col. 94. Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 7 31/10/11 13:34 8 S. VANDERPUttEN AND B. MEIjNS the problematic status of the primary evidence, and by the other debates (the mutation féodale being one example) that dominate the study of this period in western history. the comparative lack of an explicit common focus to studies of this period has engendered, over the last two decades, multiple attempts to establish a status quaestionis of research. In 1993, the Revue bénédictine devoted a special issue to the history of high medieval monasticism2, while in 1998, the more broadly conceived les tendances actuelles de l’histoire du moyen Âge en France et en allemagne addressed some of the central themes of monastic studies3. Articles by Dominique Iogna-Prat and Barbara Rosenwein in the 2001 volume dove va la storio grafia monastica in Europa updated several of the surveys featured in the two previous collections4, while Anne-Marie Helvétius briefly peered into the future of monastic studies in her 2003 contribution to mediävistik im 21. Jahrhundert. stand und Perspektiven5. the reading of these vari- ous publications not only makes for a fascinating panorama of monastic studies since the late nineteenth century, but has also allowed scholars to reach a consensus on the main research challenges for several decades to come. One of those challenges will be to examine the central narratives of the period in light of this model of ‘inside versus outside’ which is latent within them. this volume is, in part, a first contribution to that effort. Exactly a decade after the last major survey was published it is still too early to attempt a new, comprehensive evaluation of trends in monastic studies. But as twenty-first century scholarship has become accustomed to looking at historical research as a work-in-progress, and since so much is published every year that it is almost impossible to keep track of subtle changes in the debate, it has become useful, some might say necessary, to increase the rate of evaluative reports. when the International Research Network ‘Conventus. Problems of religious communal life in the cen- 2. le monachisme à Byzance et en occident du Viiie au Xe siècle. aspects internes et relations avec la société. actes du colloque international organisé par la section d’Histoire de l’UlB en collaboration avec l’abbaye de maredsous (1416 mai 1992), a. dierkenS, d. MiSonne and j. M. SanSterre eds., Maredsous, 1993 (= Revue bénédictine, 103/1-2). 3. les tendances actuelles de l’histoire du moyen Âge en France et en allemagne. actes des colloques de sèvres (1997) et Göttingen (1998) organisés par le cnRs et le max Planckinstitut für Geschichte, j.-C. SChMitt and o. G. oexle eds., Paris, 2002. 4. dove va la storiografia monastica in Europa? temi e metodi di ricerca per lo studio della vita monastica e regolare in età medievale alle soglie del terzo millennio. atti del convegno internazionale BresciaRodengo, 2325 marzo 2000, G. andenna ed., Milan, 2001. 5. A.-M. helVétiuS, Comment écrire une nouvelle histoire du monachisme?, in me diävistik im 21. Jahrhundert. stand und Perspektiven der internationalen und interdiszipli nären mittelalterforschung, H. w. Goetz and j. jarnut eds., Paderborn, 2003, p. 443-455. Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 8 31/10/11 13:34 INtRODUCtION 9 tral middle ages’ (http://www.conventus.ugent.be) was founded in 2009, the members made it one of their primary goals to provide scholarship with a more dynamic assessment of the current state of play in this field. thus, on 23 October 2009, they invited several experts to the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium to present their views on the current state of monastic studies. Each scholar responded in a different way to the organisers’ request. Some came with an evaluation of scholarship over the last two decades, combined with an outlook on future research; oth- ers opted to focus squarely on the task ahead; while still others explored the possibilities and limitations of scholarship’s current understanding of the aforementioned paradigm. Ranging from a debate on the evolution of monasticism itself in western francia and the Empire, to a discussion of links with the aristocracy, with economic realities, physical and ideologi- cal boundaries between the monastery and the outside world and, finally, representations of the outside world in monastic manuscripts, the papers presented a multifaceted and multi disciplinary outlook on a field of study that has become bewildering in its complexity. It is this complexity which the editors wanted to preserve in the current volume, which contains reworked versions of the papers presented at the Louvain conference. Its principal aim is to give some insight as to where scholarship is currently heading, and provide the materials for further re- flection and debate. the editors of this volume would like to thank the Onderzoekseenheid Geschiedenis van de Middeleeuwen of the K.U.Leuven for helping with the organisation of the symposium at Leuven, and the fwO-flanders for funding the International Research Network conventus. Ghent University Catholic University of Leuven Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 9 31/10/11 13:34 Mediaevalia Lovaniensia_opmaak.indd 10 31/10/11 13:34