Table Of Content

MNQUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY FINAL REVIEWED INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PERIOD 1 JULY 2014 TO 30 JUNE 2015 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENT PAGE NO. SECTION A 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Legislative Framework 4 1.3 Profile of Mnquma Local Municipality 5 1.4 Pre-planning 6 1.5 Municipal Demographics 14 SECTION B 1. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS 1.1 Introduction 24 2. Situational Analysis per cluster 24 2.1 Background to the Mnquma Cluster Arrangement 24 3. Situationalal Analysis: Basic Service Delivery and Infrastructure Development Cluster 25 4. Situational Analysis: Socio-Economic Development Cluster 38 5. Situational Analysis: Municipal Transformation, Institutional Development and Financial 49 Viability Cluster 6. Situational Analysis: Good Governance and Public Participation 122 7. Results of Ward Survey 133 8. Summary of Key Issues emanating from situational analysis 137 MUNICIPALITY’S VISION, MISSION, VALUES AND OVERARCHING STRATEGY 140 SECTION C PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1. Legislative Framework 146 2. Mechanisms for Public Participation 146 3. Ward Priority Issues 146 SECTION D 1. MUNICIPAL OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES (2014/2017) 1.1 KPA 1 – Municipal Transformation and Institutional Development 163 1.2 KPA 2 – Basic Service Delivery & Infrastrucure Development 166 1.3 KPA 3 – Local Economic Development (Socio-Economic Development) 169 1.4 KPA 4 – Financial Viability and Management 170 1.5 KPA 5 – Good Governance and Public Participation 171 SECTION E 1. PROJECTS FROM OTHER STAKEHOLDERS 1.1 Amathole District Municipality 175 - Environmental Affairs - Eskom - Social Developments Page 1 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 CONTENT PAGE NO. SECTION F 180 1. SECTOR PLANS 180 1.1 Financial Plan 225 1.2 Spatial Development Framework 1.3 Summary of other sector plans 238 1.3.1 Human Resources Strategy 1.3.2 Housing Sector Plan 1.3.3 Disaster Management Plan SECTION G 1. SCORECARDS 1.1 The Strategic Scorecard 2014/2017 241 1.2 Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (Annual Operational Plan) 288 2014/2015 SECTION H 1. THE MUNICIPALITY’S PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS) 348 Page 2 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 SECTION A Executive Summary & Demographics Page 3 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction Integrated Development Planning is a central planning tool for government that embodies local government development goals and a comprehensive service delivery programme. Integrated planning has been developed as a consolidated municipal wide planning process that provides a framework for planning of future development in a municipality. It ensures horizontal and vertical co-ordination and integration across the national, provincial and local spheres of government. In addition, the IDP requires community participation and stakeholder involvement. The integrated development planning process is therefore critical for the success of every South African municipality’s endeavours to bring about responsive, developmental and accountable local government. During the State of the Nation Address of, Government emphasized the importance of every South African Municipality to have a realistic IDP to meet the country’s developmental objectives, as well as the high aspirations of the South African people. Mnquma Local Municipality has already produced three full five year IDPs, that is, 2002 – 2007, 2007- 2012, and 2012 – 2017. The Municipality is now reviewing the 2012-2017 IDP for the second year in accordance with section 34 of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000. The focus of this IDP is within the context of a seamless integrated strategic planning process. The Municipality has developed a set of long term goals and five year objectives (reviewed annually) that will form the basis of the annual business planning and budgeting carried out on an ongoing basis. The IDP will also be further moulded by inputs from communities and civil society, as well as direction from the political leadership. A five year IDP supports a single, integrated planning process, with clear demarcation between long-term, medium term and short term planning. The five year IDP should therefore be understood as an interpretation of strategy and political priorities into a detailed Executive Mayoral Plan that is to become the basis for budget choices and actual outcomes for residents. Short term business plans, in this context, are seen as implementation tools. 1.2 Legislative Framework 1.2.1 The Local Government: Municipal System Act, 2000 (Act 32 of 2000) as amended compels municipalities to draw up the IDP’s as a singular inclusive and strategic development plan. In terms of this Act, a municipality produces an IDP every five years comprising of the following components: (i) A vision of the long-term development of the area. (ii) An assessment of the existing level of development which must include an identification of the need for basic municipal service. (iii) Municipality’s development priorities and objectives for its elected term. (iv) Municipality’s development strategies which must be aligned with any national, provincial sectoral plans and planning requirements. (v) Spatial development framework which must include the provision of basic guidelines for a land use management system. (vi) Municipality’s operational strategies. (vii) A Disaster Management Plan. (viii) Financial Plan. (ix) The key performance indicators and performing targets. Page 4 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 1.2.2 The Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations (2001) set out the following further requirements for the IDP: (i) An Institutional Framework for implementation of the IDP and to address the Municipality’s internal transformation. (ii) Investment initiatives that should be clarified. (iii) Development initiatives including infrastructure, physical, social and institutional development. (iv) All known projects, plans and programmes to be implemented within the Municipality by any organ of state. 1.2.3 In addition, the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act 56 of 2003) provides for closer alignment between the annual budget and the compilation of the IDP. This can be understood as a response to the critique that IDP’s took place in isolation from financial planning and were rarely implemented in full as a result. Specifically, section 21 (1) of the Act requires that a municipality co-ordinates the process of preparing the Annual Budget and the IDP to ensure that both the budget and IDP are mutually consistent. Key to ensuring the co-ordination of the IDP and Annual Budget is the development of the Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) also refered to in this IDP as the Annual Operational Plan. The SDBIP is a detailed plan approved by the Executive Mayor of a municipality for implementation of service delivery and Annual Budget. The SDBIP should include monthly revenue and expenditure projections, quarterly service delivery targets and performance indicators. 1.3 Profile of Mnquma Local Municipality According to the 2011 Census results, Mnquma Municipality has a total population of approximately 252 390 people, 99% of which are Xhosa speaking. The remaining 1% of the population includes English, Afrikaans, Zulu, and Sesotho speaking people. This female dominated municipal area comprises of 53. 4% female and 46.7% male of the total population and consists of approximately 69732 households. A study of the age distribution revealed that the bulk of the population, approximately 39%, is children (0-19 years). About 5% falls within the pension group (over 56 years), whilst 55% are economically active (20-64 years). This means that 45% of the total population is depended on the 55% that is economically active. As part of the Eastern Cape Province, Mnquma is one of the municipalities with the highest levels of poverty, illiteracy and unemployment. An estimated 11% is unemployed, only 25% is employed while 64% of the municipal population is considered economically inactive. The area has limited employment opportunities and this has huge implications on the increased need for welfare and indigent support in the municipal area. The municipality therefore needs to put priority into service provision, skills and social development. Further to this, the municipal area also lacks a skills base. Statistics depict low levels of education in this municipal area. 7% of Mnqumas’ population has no schooling and the municipality has moved improved from 8% to 31% of its population that has completed primary school. In the 10 year period it has been discovered tha the municipality has also improved from 10% to 52% that has completed grade 12 while no more than 9% of the population have a higher education. Page 5 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 1.4 Pre-Planning 1.4.1 Legislative Framework 1) Section 25 (1) (a) to (e) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act 32 of 2000) as amended provides that: (1) Each municipal council must, within a prescribed period after the start of its elected term, adopt a single, inclusive and strategic plan for the development of the municipality which – (a) Links, integrates and co-ordinates plans and takes into account proposals for the development of the municipality; (b) Aligns the resources and capacity of the municipality with the implementation of the plan; (c) Forms the policy framework and general basis on which budgets must be based; (d) Complies with the provisions of this Chapter; and (e) Is compatible with national and provincial development plans and planning requirements binding on the municipality in terms of legislation. 2) Section 21 (1) (a) of the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act 56 of 2003) provides that the Executive Mayor of the Municipality must: a) Co-ordinate the processes for preparing the annual budget and for reviewing the Municipality’s Integrated Development Plan and budget related policies to ensure that the tabled budget and any revisions of the Integrated Development Plan and budget related policies are mutually consistent and credible. b) At least ten months before the start of the budget year, table in the municipal Council a time schedule outlining key deadlines for :- (ii) (aa) the annual review of the Integrated Development Plan in terms of section 34 of the Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000. 3) Section 34 of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 prescribes that: A municipal Council: - (a) Must review its integrated development plan – (i) Annually in accordance with an assessment of its performance mearsurements in terms of section 41; and (ii) To the extent that changing circumstances so demant; and (b) May amend its integrated development plan in accordance with a prescribed process 1.4.2 Objectives (a) To draw up a process plan that would engender inclusivity and transparency. (b) To encourage participation by all stakeholders and communities. (c) To solicit and determine priorities of the Municipality. (d) To enhance service delivery and development. 1.4.3 Organisational Arrangements Role players and their Roles and Responsibilities No Role Player Roles and Responsibilities and Terms of Reference 1 Council The Council will consider and adopt the process plan and the IDP on Page 6 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 No Role Player Roles and Responsibilities and Terms of Reference recommendation of the Executive Mayor 2 Executive Mayor o The Executive Mayor must ensure that the IDP is developed and reviewed annually. o Chairs the IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum Chairs the IDP Steering Committee. o Recommends the developed and reviewed IDP and any amendments thereof to the Council 3 Mayoral Committee The Council of Mnquma Municipality through the Executive Mayor and his/her Mayoral Committee is legally responsible for managing and formulating the Municipality’s IDP. In terms of section 30(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act 32 of 2000) this responsibility can be delegated to the Municipal Manager. 4 Municipal Manager The Municipal Manager has delegated the function of the IDP development, review and implementation to the Director Corporate Services; therefore the Corporate Services directorate will co-ordinate the IDP development and review process. Terms of Reference o Preparing the process plan o Undertaking the overall management and co-ordination of the planning process ensuring: • Participation and involvement of all different role players. • That timeframes are adhered to. • That the planning process is aligned to the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy. • Conditions for community participation provided. • That the results of the planning and IDP development and review processes are documented. • Responding to comments on the draft IDP from the public and other spheres of Government to the satisfaction of the Municipal Council. • Accommodate and consider IDP comments and proposals from the office of the MEC for Local Government and Traditional Affairs. 5 IDP/PMS and Budget The IDP, PMS and Budget Technical Steering Committee will do the ground Technical Steering work and feed the information into the IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee Committee. It will involve: o Municipal Manager. o Directors. o Cluster Champs. o Divisional Managers Terms of Reference The Terms of reference for this committee shall be as follows: o Collect and collate information for IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee. o Conduct research. o Advises the IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee. 6 IDP, PMS and Budget The IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee assist the Executive Mayor Steering Committee in guiding the development process. It comprised of the following members: o Executive Mayor. o Council Speaker. Page 7 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 No Role Player Roles and Responsibilities and Terms of Reference o Members of the Mayoral Committee. o Chief Whips of political parties. o Municipal Manager. o All Directors. o IDP and PMS Manager o Research and Policy Development Manager o Chief Accountant: Budget Planning and Financial Reporting Terms of reference The terms of reference for the IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee shall be as follows: o To draw terms of reference for the various planning activities. o Establish sub-committees. o Commission research studies. o Consider and comment on: o Inputs from sub-committees, study teams and consultants. o Inputs from provincial sector departments and support providers. o Summarize and document inputs. o Make content recommendations. o Define the terms of reference for the IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum. o Inform the public about the establishment of the IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum. o Identify stakeholders to be part of the Forum in such a way that the public is well represented. o Providing relevant technical, sector and financial information for analysis and for determining priority issues. o Contributing technical expertise in the consideration of financial strategies and identification of projects. o Providing operational and capital budget information. o The IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee is chaired by the Executive Mayor or his delegate. The secretariat for this committee will be Corporate Services Directorate. o The IDP, PMS and Budget Steering Committee may delegate some or all its responsibility to the IDP, PMS and Budget Technical Steering Committee. 7 IDP, PMS and Budget The IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum of Mnquma Municipality Representative Forum is the organizational mechanism for discussions, negotiations and decision- making between stakeholders within our municipal area. The following organizations and/or stakeholders will be involved: o All Councilors. o Ward Committees. o Community Development Workers. o Members of the Inter Governmental Forum. o Amathole District Municipality o Traditional Leaders. o Ministers Fraternal. o Stakeholder Representatives of Organized Groups. o Advocates of Unorganized Groups. o Community Representatives. o Resource Persons. Page 8 of 386 Mnquma Local Municipality - Final Reviewed Integrated Development Plan for the period 2014-215 No Role Player Roles and Responsibilities and Terms of Reference Terms of Reference The terms of reference for the IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum are as follows: o Represent the interests of their constituents in the IDP processes. o Provide an organizational mechanism for discussion, negotiation and decision-making between stakeholders including municipal government. o Ensure communication between all stakeholders including municipal government. o Provide a platform for engagement, input and feedback to stakeholders on the IDP and PMS. o The IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum is chaired by the Executive Mayor or duly delegated Councilor. o The Secretariat for the IDP, PMS and Budget Representative Forum shall be an official from the Corporate Services Directorate of the Municipality duly appointed or delegated such function by the Director Corporate Services. 8 IDP, PMS and Budget Clusters 8.1 Basic Service Delivery The Basic Service Deliverty and Infrastructure Development Cluster deals and Infrastructure with all issues of service delivery including: Development (cid:252) Roads (cid:252) Land Administration and Housing Development (cid:252) Public Transport (cid:252) Community Facilities (cid:252) Building Control (cid:252) Water and Sanitation (cid:252) Electricity (cid:252) Telecommunication 8.2 Socio-economic The Socio-Economic Development Cluster (LED) deals with issues of local development economic development, waste and environmental management including: (cid:252) Agriculture (cid:252) Manufacturing (cid:252) Tourism (cid:252) SMME Development (cid:252) Forestry (cid:252) Municipal/Environmental Health (cid:252) Primary Health Care and HIV/ AIDS (cid:252) Disaster Management and Fire Fighting (cid:252) Environmental Services (cid:252) Waste Management Law Enforcement and Community Safety 8.3 Municipal The Municipal Transformation, Institutional Development and Financial transformation, Viability Cluster deasls with issues of transformation and administration and Institutional as well as financial management. The following are some of the Priority Development and Issues: Financial Viability. (cid:252) Special Programmes (cid:252) Municipal Administration (cid:252) Human Resources Management (cid:252) Information and Communication Technology Services (cid:252) Legal Advisorty Services Page 9 of 386