Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal

333 Pages·2016·2.139 MB·English

by  Peter McLoughlin

“Easy Meat”
Multiculturalism,IslamandChildSexSlavery
Peter McLoughlin
○c PeterMcLoughlin2014
ThePDF(PostscriptDocumentFormat)version
ofthisdocumentmaybefreelydistributed.
Printedcopiesofthisdocumentmayonlybe
distributedbyLawAndFreedomFoundation.
Coverphoto
ByLinsenhejhej(Ownwork)[CC-BY-SA-3.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)],viaWikimedia
Commons
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Autistic_teenage_girl.jpg
publishing history
firstedition March2014
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2. TheGroomingGangPhenomenon . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.1 DefiningtheProblem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.2 TipoftheIceberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.3 InvisibleVictims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.4 NationalDimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.5 InternationalDimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.7 CountingtheVictims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.8 RealisingtheDamage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
3. SikhVictimsofGroomingGangs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
4. Chronology: Cover-uptoCollapse . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.1 1988Sikh/Muslimviolence . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.2 1989Sikhsconvicted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4.3 1991“Theearliestcase...” . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4.4 1995Bradford: StreetsandLanes . . . . . . . . 67
4.5 1996Rotherham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.6 1998SikhAwarenessSocietystarts . . . . . . . . 71
4.7 2001Derbyand“RealCaliphate” . . . . . . . . 73
4.8 2003Bradford/Keighley . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.9 2004EdgeoftheCity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4.10 2005Radio5programme . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
4.11 2005Lutonand“RealCaliphate” . . . . . . . . . 83
4.12 2007JulieBindel: alonevoice . . . . . . . . . . 85
4.13 2008MyDangerousLoverboy . . . . . . . . . . 87
4.14 2008BBCPanorama: TeenageSexForSale . . . 91
4.15 2009RiseofEnglishDefenceLeague . . . . . . 97
4.16 2011AndrewNorfolk’spivotalarticle . . . . . . 99
3
5. SystemicInstitutionalFailure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
5.1 Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
5.2 LocalCouncils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
5.3 Police . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
5.4 CriminalJusticeSystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
5.5 ChildExploitationandOnlineProtectionCentre . 136
5.6 SeriousOrganisedCrimeAgency. . . . . . . . . 151
5.7 Children’sCommissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
5.8 HomeAffairsSelectCommittee . . . . . . . . . 173
5.9 Barnardo’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
5.10 AcademicExperts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
6. AbuseoftheNarrativeofRacism . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
6.1 PoliticalCorrectness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
6.2 Muslims,not“Asians” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
6.3 “Racism”ProtectedtheRapists . . . . . . . . . . 206
6.4 RacistAspectsofGrooming . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
7. IslamicCulturalBackground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
7.1 “Asiangang”: racistduplicity . . . . . . . . . . . 223
7.2 IslamicMorality,MuslimCulture . . . . . . . . . 232
7.3 KoranicInstructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
7.4 StoriesfromtheHadith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
7.5 TheLifeofMohammed(Sira) . . . . . . . . . . . 248
7.6 ShariaLaw: ChildMarriage . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
7.7 ShariaLaw: LegalityofSlavery . . . . . . . . . . 255
8. TheScaleoftheProblem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
9. VictimsofMulticulturalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
10. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
11. Appendix1: GroomingGangConvictions . . . . . . . . 320
12. Appendix2: GroomingGangChronology . . . . . . . . 323
13. Appendix3: NameDistributionofConvicts . . . . . . . 324
14. Appendix4: LeedsSchoolWarning . . . . . . . . . . . 325
15. Appendix5: SheffieldSchoolWarning . . . . . . . . . 326
16. Appendix6: RealKhilafah-LettertoMoslemYouth . . 327
17. Appendix7: LutonArticleonRealKhilafah . . . . . . 328
18. Appendix 8: Children’sCommissionerCharts . . . . . 329
19. Appendix 9: VictimstoPerpetrators . . . . . . . . . . 330
17. Appendix10: PoliceReportonEDL . . . . . . . . . . 331
20. Appendix11: TranscriptionRealKhilafaLetter . . . . 332
Foreword
Thisisashockingreport. Itiswrittenwithcare,buttheevidence
ishardtobelieve. Readersshouldbeware,becausethereissomething
tofeelangryaboutonmostpages: theprevalenceofthecrime;the
lengthoftimethatithascontinued;itsblatancy;thelengthsour
authoritieshavegonetoinordertocoverupforit;butmostofall,the
vulnerabilityandsufferingofthevictims.
Thatangerisgoingtospreadasawarenessofthiscrimespreads.
Denialanddamagelimitationwon’tworkanymore.
Itishardtothinkofsomethingmorecalculatedtoincitepublic
violencethanthetargetingofnativegirlsforrapebyanimmigrant
population. Theuseofintercommunalrapeinthemostsavage
territorialconflictstestifiestoitsperceptionasaweapon,andthefear
ofitevokesthemostprimalinstincts.
Andthisisthebasisforourpleatoourcivilauthoritiestostamp
outthiscrimebyanylawfulmeans: ifthesufferingofthevictims
can’tmotivateyou,thenconsiderthethreattoyourgriponpower.
Vigilanteviolencedisablesitsownsociety,andisoneofthe
short-cutsfromQueen’speacetoall-against-all. Theself-appointed
doerofjusticetearsaholeintheentirefabricofthelaw. Heis
accountabletonoone,andifhisviolencecanbeinflictedonchild
rapiststhenthievesanddebtorswillbenext.
Thedangerofvigilantejustice.
Letmetellastory,somehypotheticaleventstoillustratehow
quicklypowercanspinoutoftheauthorities’hands.
Itmaybearguedthatthesituationistooviolent,butviolenceis
whathappenswhenethnichostilitymeetscivildisorder. Ihavetried
tounderplaythedescriptions,toassuagethesensitive. Ihopethe
passageoftimewon’treproachmeforfailingtopointoutthedangers
inclearenoughwords.
6
Supposeagroupofformersoldiers,withweaponsand
intelligencetraining,areboredwiththeirpost-servicejobsfor
securitycompaniesandprintshops,andtiredofthepubgoingwhich
keepsthemintouchwitheachotherandwithwhatbestowedasense
ofprideandpurpose. Theirpatriotismisfrustratedbytheirimpotence
inthefaceofpredatorycriminality. Theygainedanone-too-rosyview
ofIslamiccultureduringtheirtoursofIraqandAfghanistan,andits
presenceinBritainhasbecomeafrequenttopicofconversation.
Fuelledbybeerandboredom,theirconversationturnstooutrage
atthefailuretoeradicatechildrapegangs,andtoboastsabouthow
quicklytheycoulderadicatethem. Oneofthempointsoutthenumber
ofMuslimsamongthoseconvictedforgroomingcrimes,relativeto
theproportionofMuslimsinBritain: he’sbeenlookingthroughthe
convictionsandrealisedthatalmosteveryoneconvictedforthese
crimeshasaMuslimname,whenMuslimsareonly5%ofthe
population. Theydosomequickcalculations,andconcludethat
Muslimsare154timeslikeliertobeperpetratorsofthesecrimesthan
non-Muslims.1 Anotherpointsoutthatit’sworsethanthat: there’s
notbeenonecasewherethevictimwasaMuslimandthepaedophiles
1Someofthecalculationsgetlostinthebarroomhubbub,buttheywereasfollows:
muslimsmadeup89%ofoffendersfromthemostreliablelists,i.e.thelistsofconvic-
tionsascompiledbyAndrewNorfolk,whereguiltandinnocencehadbeentestedin
theglareofacourtroom,uninfluencedbytheprofessionalselfinterestofsocialwork-
ers’feedbackforms. Butmuslimsmadeup5%ofthepopulation. Theircalculations
were:
ThelikelihoodofindividualMuslimstocommitthisoffenceis:
89÷5%=1,780.00
Thelikelihoodofindividualnon-Muslimstocommitthisoffenceis:
11÷95%=11.58
SothelikelihoodofindividualMuslimstocommitthisoffence,comparedtoindivid-
ualnonMuslims,is:
1,780÷11.58=153.73
I.e. Muslims are roughly 154 times more likely than non-Muslims to commit this
crime. There is some squabbling, and much mathematical to-ing and fro-ing, as to
whetherthefigurecanreallybesosteep. But,aftermuchswearingatmobilephone
calculatorapps,thatisthefiguresettledon...
7
werenon-Muslims. “They’rerapingourkids,we’renotrapingtheir
kids. There’ssomethingwrongwithMuslims,”hesays.
Theysaytheycouldputanendtothisproblem. Theymeanifthey
weregiventhechance,like. Infuriatedbyeachnewcropofbearded
paedophilesgloweringfromthefrontpages,theirtalkbecomesmore
soberandlessboastful.
Promptedafewweekslaterbyreportsofaparticularly
incompetentpoliceinvestigation,idletalkturnstonot-so-idle
planning.
Tippedoffbyadisillusionedchildprotectionworkerorpolice
officerastothelocationofaBn’Bestablishmentusedforthiscrime,
theydecidetoputtheirplansintoaction.
Insteadofplanningareprisalraid–asoneortwoSikhgroups
appeartohavedoneinresponsetotheabuseofSikhgirls–they
decidethatpreventionisbetterthancure. Actingoninformation
received,theysurveilthepremises,notingwhenthe13yearoldgirlis
ledintothebuilding,andwhentheclientsfollow.
Oneeveningtheylayinwait,forcetheirwayinsidethebuilding,
andintotheroomwhereasemicomatosegirlisheld.
Aterriblemassacrefollows: theyshootdeadallthemeninthat
room,withoutwarning,atpointblankrange.
Theyarecaught,arrested,chargedwithmurder,andpleadnot
guilty.
Theappallingaftermathleavesnoroomtodenythekillings. So,
attrial,theyadmitthefactsbutclaimtheiractionswerejustified
becausetheyweredoneinthepreventionofacrime.
Theprosecutionareleftwiththeunenviabletaskofrebuttingthis
defencebeyondreasonabledoubt,andarguethattheDefendants’
actionswerenot“reasonableinallthecircumstances”becauselesser
forcewouldhavesufficed.
8
TheDefendantscitethefactthatAmericanstatesspecifically
sanctioncitizens’useof“deadlyforce”againsthomeinvasion,
whetherornotthelifeofthehouseholderisthreatened,andevenin
somecarchases. Similarlawshavebeenproposedforthiscountryin
thecaseofburglary,andwouldenjoysubstantialpublicsupport. They
arguethatmostpeopleagreethatthegangrapeofchildrenismore
seriousthanburglary. TheyrefertotheBBC’s“NochargeforTexas
dadwhokilleddaughter’srapist”story,andthecommentsbeneath.2
Theprosecutionalsosubmitthatthekillersfailedtoinformthe
authoritiesbeforetakingthelawintotheirownhands,towhichthe
killerspointoutthattheauthoritiesalreadyknew–sincetheygot
theirinformationfromadisaffectedmemberofonesuchauthority–
andthatnothinghadhappenedsofar.
ThejudgeismoreconsciousofthedangersofDIYjusticethan
manypeople,sosheisperturbedbythedefence. Butsheisunableto
preventitgoingtothejury. Shegivesthecorrectguidancetothe
twelvemenandwomenthatitishardtoseehowsuchextremeforce
canbeconsideredreasonablewhencivilauthoritiessuchaspoliceand
childprotectionunitsarepaidtopreventthesecrimes. Andthatwhilst
thecrimeofchildrapeisaterribleone,massacreisoutofall
proportiontoit.
Thejuryretireandareunabletoreachaverdict. Anonymous
reportsinsomenewspaperssuggestlaterthathalfofthejurors
refusedtoseeanythingwrongwithkillingmembersofachildrape
gang. Aretrialisheld,followed,unusually,byasecondretrial. But
noverdictiseverreached,andthejudgeatthesecondretrialinstructs
theforemantoacquitthedefendants. Picturetheenthusiastic
celebrationsoutsidethecourt–basedmoreonsoccerchantsthan
studyofthedovetailjointbetweenlawandcivilsociety.
Newsoftheacquittalspreadsfast. Othergroupsofwouldbe
vigilantes,takeonboardthatitisOKtokillchildrapists,especially
220June2013http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18522383.
9
themMuslimones. Themorebuccaneeringgangssoonbranchinto
otherareasofenforcementanddisputeresolution. Beforelongthey
becomethepeopletoreportcrimesandquarrelstoincertainareas.
Theyevenopentheirownbrothels,someofwhicharesometimes
somewhatcasualaboutagerestrictions–anironythattheliberal
pressarequicktospot,butwhichthepoliceareslowtoriskenforcing
againstforfearofupsettingthecalmstalemate.
Thissituationisnotsofar-fetchedasyoumighthope. The
fragilityofcivilisation,thebasichumanneedforsecurity,plusan
absenceoflaw(tosaynothingofbudgetconstraints)enablethe
violenttopullinthosearoundthemlikeafire-storm. Itis,therefore,
essentialthatourauthoritiesstampouttheseoffencesvisibly,
aggressively,andfast. Theyneedtobeseentobreakwiththeir
previousinertiaindoingso.
Itisnotrealisticmerelytocondemnthiscrime. Itmustbe
suppressed. Ifnot,thoseofuswhoarenowexecratedasfirebrands,
butwholatertrytopreachrestraint,willbebrushedasidewiththe
simplewords: “Theyrapeourchildren.”
GavinBoby
LawAndFreedomFoundation
10